New topic
PrintableCyra said: PanicAttack said: Cyra said:
GreenLeaves, watch your LANUGAGE. You can get your point across without the swearing. NOTICE, if you will, how I can get my point across CLEARLY without doing so. Now, GreenLeaves & Cyre...There are approximately 3 MAJOR REASONS that nothing I say can get through to you: FIRST  Your EMOTIONAL INVESTMENT in MJ is too DEEP to WARRANT a FAIR consideration of OPPOSING VIEW POINTS. Regardless of how strong an OPPOSING ARGUEMNT is--YOU WILL NOT GET!
SECOND You DON"T WANT TO GET IT! You hear and see only that which you want. I have no EMOTIONAL INVESTMENT into MJ which is why I can see him more OBJECTIVELY than either one of you.
THIRD That JURY that let MJ off ARE NOT EXEMPT FROM THE SAME FLAWS (BECOMING STAR-STRUCK & ALLOWING THIS TO INFLUENCE THE VERDICT) THAT ARE NOW AFFECTING YOUR POOR SENSE OF JUDGEMENT IN THIS AREA. MANY OF THE JURY ARE DEVOUT FANS WHO HAVE HIS RECORDS TOO!!!!
Because all of you have WILLINGLY put on BLINDERS in regards to Mr. Jackson's questionable virtue, whby go any further? YOU'RE NOT SENSIBLE! Besides, anybody in Law enforcement--especially in the FBI's CRIMINAL PROFILING UNIT-- could tell you that MJ EXHIBITS all of the BEHAVIORAL CHARACTERISTS of a PEDOPHILE. That type of HONESTY is more than you can take. 
CURIOUS: Not that I'm interested in stiffling anyone's freedom of speech, but why are you guys on here anyway downgrading Prince fans when this site is aSTOMPING GROUNDS FOR HIS FANS? You guys are obviously hardcore MJ fans...Why are you here arguing with us anyway? Thats a bit pretentious, to assume I have an emotional investment in MJ, much less one that "affects my poor sense of judgment". And that alone is rich, coming from someone who makes no sense, and can't back up their nonsensical claims with any real evidence. Even if you did posses a logical thought process, it's all baseless conjecture. The way I see it, you're the one with "something affecting their poor sense of judgement". I choose to believe MJ is innocent due to the indisputable fact that A) He was acquitted of all 10 charges B) There is NO solid evidence to suggest he is guilty D) People have falsely attacked his child-like tendencies to get money out of him before (see the trial from the 90s. There is proof, audio of the prosecuting family itself, that it was a scam) C) My judge of his character is that he just is not a child predator. Period. He is eccentric and has child-like tendencies; a delayed maturity, like peter pan syndrome. Not to mention a genuine love for children. I don't think he has it in him to harm a child. That is my take on his character, and my belief. Thats my opinion, the facts support it, and I am sticking with it. Regardless of my beliefs or "emotional investment", there is no hard evidence to suggest he is a child molester. There just isn't, and I still have yet to see you prove otherwise. (PROTIP: Putting WORDS IN BOLD makes your arguements VALID and SUPERIOR) 
Thank You. | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
PanicAttack said: SunsetDriver said: Michael writes nearly all his songs and he is a brilliant song writer, when he didnt work with Quincy Jones he released his Dangerous Album which was a huge If I'm not mistaken, QUINCY JONES no longer wants ANYTHING to do with MJ. He brushes him off every chance he gets.  Not true! while we keep our eyes, not on the things seen, but on the things unseen. For the things seen are temporary, but the things unseen are everlasting. - 2 Corinthians 4:28
| |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
for all you haters out there read the book Michael Jackson Conspiracy then make your decision about Michael while we keep our eyes, not on the things seen, but on the things unseen. For the things seen are temporary, but the things unseen are everlasting. - 2 Corinthians 4:28
| |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
PFU pay attention..
If U really wanna Pee Prince off, just keep talking about Jacko on here!! "There are no Kings on this Earth, only Princes" "Had to get off the boat so I could walk on water..." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SunsetDriver said: for all you haters out there read the book Michael Jackson Conspiracy then make your decision about Michael
I'm familiar with the author. From her conversations, the book should be DEAD on. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wish it were Prince himself who wanted to do it all over again...  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PanicAttack said: DANGEROUSx said: LMAO. What do you have to support that? MJ was ACQUITTED on ten charges. If he was guilty he would of been found out on one. :] This is painful, and dangerous. --WE"RE TALKING ABOUT KIDS!!! KIDS!!! So at least allow me this:
AN-ALL-TOO-TYPICAL-EVERYDAY SENARIO: A little girl goes to her mother and confesses that her live-in boyfriend has been playing HOUSE with her. The little girl is already afraid but tells her mother that he has been TOUCHING her and doing things...The mother REFUSES to believe her...WHY? She needs her MAN! And she's not willing to sacrafice the relationship for the WELL-BEING of her own child... Conclusion In trying to PROVE to you MJ's GUILT I am up against a MENTALITY that is almost the same as that of a mother who doesn't want the painful TRUTH about her BOYFRIEND. It's too inconvenient...People would rather SACRAFICE JUSTICE for these kids than to give up being ENTERTAINMED by MJ. That's more important than JUSTICE.
If people feel that the TRUTH costs too much onto themselves then nothing is SACRED and the INNOCENT INCLUDING KIDS will be THROWN TO THE WOLVES! Your posts make me laugh. You don't make any sense, speak english? 
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GreenLeaves said: Cyra said: Thats a bit pretentious, to assume I have an emotional investment in MJ, much less one that "affects my poor sense of judgment". And that alone is rich, coming from someone who makes no sense, and can't back up their nonsensical claims with any real evidence. Even if you did posses a logical thought process, it's all baseless conjecture. The way I see it, you're the one with "something affecting their poor sense of judgement". I choose to believe MJ is innocent due to the indisputable fact that A) He was acquitted of all 10 charges B) There is NO solid evidence to suggest he is guilty D) People have falsely attacked his child-like tendencies to get money out of him before (see the trial from the 90s. There is proof, audio of the prosecuting family itself, that it was a scam) C) My judge of his character is that he just is not a child predator. Period. He is eccentric and has child-like tendencies; a delayed maturity, like peter pan syndrome. Not to mention a genuine love for children. I don't think he has it in him to harm a child. That is my take on his character, and my belief. Thats my opinion, the facts support it, and I am sticking with it. Regardless of my beliefs or "emotional investment", there is no hard evidence to suggest he is a child molester. There just isn't, and I still have yet to see you prove otherwise. (PROTIP: Putting WORDS IN BOLD makes your arguements VALID and SUPERIOR)
Thank You. co- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
people need to stop hating michael jackson is still the best and as much as i love prince mj is still going to out sell P in record selling | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lele18 said: people need to stop hating michael jackson is still the best and as much as i love prince mj is still going to out sell P in record selling
..and thats a fact! The hating is definitely getting old. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nevermind his rep - MJ has made some beautiful music.
I'm not even a FAN, never have been... but let's acknowledge. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midnightmover said: PanicAttack said: You know, I should have guessed by now, after all that's been done people are still WILLFULLY praising this DEMONIC guy! THIS MAN IS A CHILD MOLESTER!!!!! Doesn't that mean anything to people anymore? And anyone supporting a person who would willingly prey off the innocence of a child for their own sexual gratification is MORALLY BANKRUBT!
No amount of talent on Earth should ever excempt ANYONE from such HARROWING acts. 
I understand what you're saying. I believe Michael is sexually attracted to little boys, (although whether he's actually fondled any of them I don't know). Now, despite that, I still love his voice and enjoy his music. Does that make me morally bankrupt? If you found out the guy who designed The Statue Of Liberty was a criminal, would you tear down the statue? If it turned out Shakespeare was a mass murderer would you burn all his plays? Personally I'm able to enjoy the work without worrying about the character of the artist. Obviously, as a Prince fan, I've been doing that for a long time. I agree with Midnightmover.With artists like Prince and Michael Jackson,you really have to separate the artist from the music.That's why I'm still able to enjoy their music,despite their obvious character flaws. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Goodness will guide us if Love is inside us" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fantasticjoy said: Cyra said: I never understood why MJ and Prince constantly get compared. The ONLY thing they have in common is that they are major entertainment icons, and eccentric ones. Other than that, they are COMPLETELY different. One has not copied the other, they both do completely different things, and are both equally talented at their respective efforts.
Stop comparing them, and stop trashing on MJ just because he's not your god, Prince. Heaven forbid the man decides to put on a show/tour (which you damn well know would sell out), especially in Europe where his biggest fanbase resides. Grow up. Equally talented?HA!!!  not equally, lolLove is whatever u want it 2 b | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kenlacam said: It's really sad and disheartening that all of you MJ haters diss on him so hard. It's funny because you can go to ANY of MJ fansites, and you won't see the disrespect and dissing on Prince that you see here.That just goes to show who has the more mature fan base (and it aint Prince).
Take that to the bank! and to all you MJ fans here, I apologize if any of this is offensive, but it has to be said. Somebody here is sticking up for you, Mike! Oh, really. Even MJNO? Not true. Shit, I'd even link you to the actual threads there, but they banned me.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
vinx98 said: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/itn/20071214/ten-jackson-to-thrill-london-ea4616c_1.html
it seems when this guy cant think of anything to do, he tries to copy Prince, a tactic he's been using most of his career. [Edited 12/14/07 9:07am] Copy Prince ? When ? |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Both of you are tripping. Neither Prince or Mike or going to sell a lot of records because of their ages but, at least P is working and not sitting on his ass.
----- DANGEROUSx said: lele18 said: people need to stop hating michael jackson is still the best and as much as i love prince mj is still going to out sell P in record selling
..and thats a fact! The hating is definitely getting old. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lottielooloo1968 said:
he'll b as well recieved as gary glitter Aye, if he's lucky!  Coming soon to a town near you...Sounds like a real man to me...mind if I turn on the radio? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anotherloverholeinyohead said: lottielooloo1968 said:
he'll b as well recieved as gary glitter Aye, if he's lucky! Coming soon to a town near you...Lock up your sons... “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kenlacam said: It's really sad and disheartening that all of you MJ haters diss on him so hard. It's funny because you can go to ANY of MJ fansites, and you won't see the disrespect and dissing on Prince that you see here.That just goes to show who has the more mature fan base (and it aint Prince).
Take that to the bank! and to all you MJ fans here, I apologize if any of this is offensive, but it has to be said. Somebody here is sticking up for you, Mike! No dissing on Prince on MJ fansites. Which ones have you checked out, because they are worse. More mature fanbase, just bring up the name Prince and they are ready to rip him to shreds. Always declaring MJ is better because he sold more records. If that's the case Britney Spears is selling more. I guess she's better than both of them. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fantasticjoy said: kenlacam said: It's really sad and disheartening that all of you MJ haters diss on him so hard. It's funny because you can go to ANY of MJ fansites, and you won't see the disrespect and dissing on Prince that you see here.That just goes to show who has the more mature fan base (and it aint Prince).
Take that to the bank! and to all you MJ fans here, I apologize if any of this is offensive, but it has to be said. Somebody here is sticking up for you, Mike! No dissing on Prince on MJ fansites. Which ones have you checked out, because they are worse. More mature fanbase, just bring up the name Prince and they are ready to rip him to shreds. Always declaring MJ is better because he sold more records. If that's the case Britney Spears is selling more. I guess she's better than both of them. And this right here is every reason why I think MJ's fans are Rats. They ALWAYS bring up totals in sales and are much more slanderous of Prince and well anyone else who isn't like Mike which is everybody. Michael Jackson has the worst fans in music. I call them Wacko Jacko and his Wackos cause that fits them all.   I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: fantasticjoy said: No dissing on Prince on MJ fansites. Which ones have you checked out, because they are worse. More mature fanbase, just bring up the name Prince and they are ready to rip him to shreds. Always declaring MJ is better because he sold more records. If that's the case Britney Spears is selling more. I guess she's better than both of them. And this right here is every reason why I think MJ's fans are Rats. They ALWAYS bring up totals in sales and are much more slanderous of Prince and well anyone else who isn't like Mike which is everybody. Michael Jackson has the worst fans in music. I call them Wacko Jacko and his Wackos cause that fits them all. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GreenLeaves said: purplecam said: And this right here is every reason why I think MJ's fans are Rats. They ALWAYS bring up totals in sales and are much more slanderous of Prince and well anyone else who isn't like Mike which is everybody. Michael Jackson has the worst fans in music. I call them Wacko Jacko and his Wackos cause that fits them all. silly stuff said edit [Edited 12/19/07 10:52am] I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: GreenLeaves said: You clap now but that doesn't stop how wacked out y'all are. That's real. Okay, what the fuck are you talking about. I basically agreed with you and the other poster. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GreenLeaves said: purplecam said: You clap now but that doesn't stop how wacked out y'all are. That's real. Okay, what the fuck are you talking about. I basically agreed with you and the other poster. Oh damn. I was on some stupid shit at work in front of me and the computer. Please forgive me. [Edited 12/19/07 10:54am] I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: GreenLeaves said: Okay, what the fuck are you talking about. I basically agreed with you and the other poster. Oh damn. I was on some stupid shit at work in front of me and the computer. Please forgive me. [Edited 12/19/07 10:54am] Don't worry about it it's cool. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GreenLeaves said: purplecam said: Oh damn. I was on some stupid shit at work in front of me and the computer. Please forgive me. [Edited 12/19/07 10:54am] Don't worry about it it's cool. You know what, I blame Wacko Jacko and the Wackos for that and everything wrong in the world today. They give me the creeps. They should give us all the creeps. They need to go back to their sewers and never come out again. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: GreenLeaves said: Don't worry about it it's cool. You know what, I blame Wacko Jacko and the Wackos for that and everything wrong in the world today. They give me the creeps. They should give us all the creeps. They need to go back to their sewers and never come out again. Okay, apparently something did get lost along the way, because I agreed with what you said about MJ fans insulting other artists, and that's it. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vinx98 said: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/itn/20071214/ten-jackson-to-thrill-london-ea4616c_1.html
it seems when this guy cant think of anything to do, he tries to copy Prince, a tactic he's been using most of his career. [Edited 12/14/07 9:07am] Wow, and another cheap shot at Michael! Your comment would have a least some validity if the O2 wouldn't have opened just last July! But then again... even then it would have no validity... Michael has been doing concerts already at a time when Prince still was going to school.... so who's following who?? And about the comment on whether it's a gamble whether he can sell out those dates... well, if you look at how much MJ has sold in the UK since '03 compared to Prince, then there is no question about it, that he easily can (if there aren't outlandish ticket prices)! It was great to see Prince this year, now it would be great to see Michael next year! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GreenLeaves said: purplecam said: You know what, I blame Wacko Jacko and the Wackos for that and everything wrong in the world today. They give me the creeps. They should give us all the creeps. They need to go back to their sewers and never come out again. Okay, apparently something did get lost along the way, because I agreed with what you said about MJ fans insulting other artists, and that's it. I guess something did get lost. Well based on what we agree on, I don't know why the MJ folks feel like it makes them superior to use sales figures to prove that MJ is the man. I don't knock his success, hell I helped it, but Britney Spears has NO talent and she still sells well. I think it's lame when they do that. That's just one of many reasons wny I despise them. I hope I'm on track with you now.  I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |