Author | Message |
iTunes - F.U.N.K. So, on iTunes, the new song has 927 reviews, 2 1/2 stars average rating.
I think the thermometer has popped, and Prince is done. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cf. Betty Davis "F.U.N.K."
maybe she'll send little man who must not be named a c&d, eh? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
On UK itunes there are 26 reviews posted. 20 of them give 5 stars (nothing under 4) and all rave about the song. I'm not sure how many people have downloaded it, not sure how to get that info yet.
Maybe Prince should come and live in the UK, where he's appreciated!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Jeffiner said: On UK itunes there are 26 reviews posted. 20 of them give 5 stars (nothing under 4) and all rave about the song. I'm not sure how many people have downloaded it, not sure how to get that info yet.
Maybe Prince should come and live in the UK, where he's appreciated!! i agree! he'd get spoilt rotten. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lottielooloo1968 said: Jeffiner said: On UK itunes there are 26 reviews posted. 20 of them give 5 stars (nothing under 4) and all rave about the song. I'm not sure how many people have downloaded it, not sure how to get that info yet.
Maybe Prince should come and live in the UK, where he's appreciated!! i agree! he'd get spoilt rotten. Funky London Prince... you know it's where you want to be..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thats the most accurate rating on iTunes yet. [Edited 11/23/07 11:26am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
on an unrelated note.. Prince is possibly one of the most popular artist on iTunes, and his new single is getting promoted very heavily on the front of iTunes page... and it still can't make the top songs list. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I would say that at least 25% of those reviews were made by non-fans (or pissed off ex-fans) and just listened to the short sample.
I believe the more accurate average would be 3 1/2 to 4 stars which is fairly good. Prince can certainly whip up a frenzy. It will be interesting to find out if it charts! Australia !!!! Nice to see some good reviews Any one from Alice Springs? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Jeffiner said: On UK itunes there are 26 reviews posted. 20 of them give 5 stars (nothing under 4) and all rave about the song. I'm not sure how many people have downloaded it, not sure how to get that info yet.
Maybe Prince should come and live in the UK, where he's appreciated!! Yep I noticed that too... seems a better response here due to the tour, the US fans that are complaining(only those ones NOT all US fans before you start accusing me of hating all Americans) aren't just bitter solely because of the C&D letters etc... to fan sites. If he'd done a tour in the US first those reviews would be much different, you know it. Come to the UK prince, we love the music [Edited 11/23/07 11:45am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
nice to hear the Aussies aren't a bitter lot, good on you guys | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm a huge fan of Prince, and I downloaded/bought the single, but it's still garbage. Prince could do better, and make a song with a more positive message. "Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart." - Khalil Gibran | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ProgRocker said: I'm a huge fan of Prince, and I downloaded/bought the single, but it's still garbage. Prince could do better, and make a song with a more positive message.
I'm curious. You heard the song on princefansunited, and you thought it was garbage. It's freely available on the torrent sites. Why did you buy garbage? Very strange. It's good to know your still a Prince fan. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince fans - The song is garbage get it from a torrent site!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Pirate Bay !!!! Where the funk is F.U.N.K. Are you losing your bottle? http://thepiratebay.org/s...00,400,600 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
darrenj said: I believe the more accurate average would be 3 1/2 to 4 stars which is fairly good. Um....you would be wrong then. The more accurate average is the one that uses the actual ratings, as opposed to the ones you've dreamed up in your head. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
truefunksoldier said: darrenj said: I believe the more accurate average would be 3 1/2 to 4 stars which is fairly good. Um....you would be wrong then. The more accurate average is the one that uses the actual ratings, as opposed to the ones you've dreamed up in your head. Do you agree that it may be possible that some people may have left negative reviews without listening to the whole song? Do you agree that it may be possible that some people left negative reviews because they are not happy with how he is behaving towards the fan sites? If it is possible, then it is possible that the reviews do not reflect the track accuratley. I really hope the track charts. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
truefunksoldier said: darrenj said: I believe the more accurate average would be 3 1/2 to 4 stars which is fairly good. Um....you would be wrong then. The more accurate average is the one that uses the actual ratings, as opposed to the ones you've dreamed up in your head. Umm....who give's a fuck what some 13 year old kid whose all time favorite song is Crank Dat Soulja Boy thinks about a Prince song. If you don't like the song, just say you don't like it, instead of finding opinions on the internet to somehow try and embolden your own. Some people are so goddamned ignorant! He is exactly who we thought he was | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Accujack said: truefunksoldier said: Um....you would be wrong then. The more accurate average is the one that uses the actual ratings, as opposed to the ones you've dreamed up in your head. Umm....who give's a fuck what some 13 year old kid whose all time favorite song is Crank Dat Soulja Boy thinks about a Prince song. If you don't like the song, just say you don't like it, instead of finding opinions on the internet to somehow try and embolden your own. Some people are so goddamned ignorant! Actually, ignorant is replying to a post that states a fact, then saying that the more accurate fact is something that you make up in your head. But thanks for playing. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Co-Sign. I have seen some of the most ignorant shit on this board in the last few weeks. It is very sad that some of you care about what 13 years old who really think that crunk is funk/rnb music think about Prince.
Who the fuck cares? Those of you that think the song is garbage but, bothered to buy it anyway or even more disturbed that the 13 year-olds but you got to give it to Prince he has an incredible fanbase. ----- Accujack said: truefunksoldier said: Um....you would be wrong then. The more accurate average is the one that uses the actual ratings, as opposed to the ones you've dreamed up in your head. Umm....who give's a fuck what some 13 year old kid whose all time favorite song is Crank Dat Soulja Boy thinks about a Prince song. If you don't like the song, just say you don't like it, instead of finding opinions on the internet to somehow try and embolden your own. Some people are so goddamned ignorant! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No, I believe ignorant is someone who takes the rating system off of itunes, and quote it as if actually has any merits at all to a song or artist's worth.
One doesn't even have to listen to the song to post a rating. If that is how you determine whether or not you like a song or artist, then enjoy listening to T-pain and Akon. He is exactly who we thought he was | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Considering that "F.U.n.k." is an insult filled brat attack, put to music, I'm surprised that any reviews are good. I haven't been to iTunes, but I would guess that many would post negativity without hearing, just because of the Prince climate. Why do you like playing around with my narrow scope of reality? - Stupify | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What up, bitches.
Anyone who thinks those reviews actually reflect the quality of the tune is simply, retarded. 900+ reviews, God knows how many references to "alvin", "chipmunk", or "helium", etc., it's easy to see that the vast majority of 1-2 star reviews are likely from people simply trying to drive down the average via pure, unadulterated hateration. Some of the reviews aren't even reviews of the song itself, just attacks on Prince and the website tomfoolery. Some simply ask why the high voice. I mean, it's kinda dishearting seeing how childish people can get when they think someone's not doing things the way they think they should be done. In contrast, Beyonce's single was released, and only has 32 reviews. How backward is that. It's painfully apparent that Prince's reviews are the result of simple immaturity and hateration. It makes one wince to read what some apparently consider reviews. Peace, bitches. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BlackandRising said: What up, bitches.
Anyone who thinks those reviews actually reflect the quality of the tune is simply, retarded. 900+ reviews, God knows how many references to "alvin", "chipmunk", or "helium", etc., it's easy to see that the vast majority of 1-2 star reviews are likely from people simply trying to drive down the average via pure, unadulterated hateration. Some of the reviews aren't even reviews of the song itself, just attacks on Prince and the website tomfoolery. Some simply ask why the high voice. I mean, it's kinda dishearting seeing how childish people can get when they think someone's not doing things the way they think they should be done. In contrast, Beyonce's single was released, and only has 32 reviews. How backward is that. It's painfully apparent that Prince's reviews are the result of simple immaturity and hateration. It makes one wince to read what some apparently consider reviews. Peace, bitches. Great post. Glad to see that not everyone on this website has lost their fuckin' mind. He is exactly who we thought he was | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Accujack said: BlackandRising said: What up, bitches.
Anyone who thinks those reviews actually reflect the quality of the tune is simply, retarded. 900+ reviews, God knows how many references to "alvin", "chipmunk", or "helium", etc., it's easy to see that the vast majority of 1-2 star reviews are likely from people simply trying to drive down the average via pure, unadulterated hateration. Some of the reviews aren't even reviews of the song itself, just attacks on Prince and the website tomfoolery. Some simply ask why the high voice. I mean, it's kinda dishearting seeing how childish people can get when they think someone's not doing things the way they think they should be done. In contrast, Beyonce's single was released, and only has 32 reviews. How backward is that. It's painfully apparent that Prince's reviews are the result of simple immaturity and hateration. It makes one wince to read what some apparently consider reviews. Peace, bitches. Great post. Glad to see that not everyone on this website has lost their fuckin' mind. Co-Sign Some of us have it together. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i guess he learned his lesson, that song was strictly for/aimed/makes sense to fan/ms. it's really not a bad track at all, most of the lousy ratings were due to itunes making the worst preview ever in the history of itunes. that plus people who aren't really a fan were confused by the Camille voice (but fans seem to adore it) hopefully his next itunes attempt will be more broad (hint hint if a certain s.o.m.e.o.n.e. is reading this ) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |