independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > isnt pfunk the intellectual property of george clinton?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 11/10/07 5:45am

syble

isnt pfunk the intellectual property of george clinton?

afterall he has the pfunk allstars!

who is copying whom?

when does emulation become plagerism?

who owns the intellectual rights to words and music who owns the right to a refrain or a changed word in a sentence

who own ' to paint a perfect picture'? prince?

or could it be geoffrey gardner 'i'm going to paint a perfect picture...' the first line of the choraus in that hymn.

how far should copyright extend? am i allowed to share my music with my family? or should they buy their own and i listen solely on headphones?

should i be worried that if i invite a friend over and show them a cd cover to admire the artwork, that the thought police will be knocking on my door as the cd was sold for my personal use. the showing and sharing of album covers etc on the internet is the same situation. no-one is making money from it the fan sites are free and we enjoy freedom of speech in each of our democratic countries.

should we buy music by entering a store listen in a booth buy a black wrapped cd and take it home not to be opened until alone and non listening range of another individual.

are w to ban children from copying art from comics because it is the artistic or intellectual property of the publisher or graphic artist.

should the graphic artist/illustartor be sueing prince for allowing the misuse of their art or indeed for not allowing it to be viewed when it was most likely sold to prince with lisence to be used as a cover and by that very inference viewable by the public?

prince needs to make a public statement because this has now left cyberspace and the whole world is now aware of the goings on here on the fan sites

should we collectively be suing npg for not providing a means for us to play music that was sold to use via their fan site?

should we be banning comedians from mimicking celebrities/public figures, should they be scared to speak out or poke fum at these people for our entertainment less they be sued?

prince has made a very fine living out of his collaborations with various artists and by his own choice decides to be responsible for that music

for me the purist prince music is that he has made 9apparently0 mostly on his own it is uniquely different to that of npg

'npg' is remarkably like 'pfunk allstars' where an artist can create a sound using many talented people and claim it for his own

will prince in turn start to see artists like rosie gaines come out of the woodwork claiming their piece of the pie? how much of those npg songs are princes and how much are theirs.

all artists collaborate that is how we evolve and prince evolved but he appears to be evolving into the very beast he claims to despise.

that beast although now very old originally financed young acts/artists/writers and gave them a leg-up in the world. yes the 25yr rule is now antiquated and it is time for copyright reform but how far should we go?

(EDIT: I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT I AM REFERING TO WARNER BROTHER AND OTHER PUBLISHERS I AM NOT REFERRING HERE IN THIS CASE TO RPINCE BEING OLD, I JUST REREAD THIS AND THOUGHT IT COULD BE MISCONSTRUED)


i am a law abiding citizen

i do not own bootlegs

i do not download stuff

i do promote princes many talents to my friends and npg have actively encouraged us to do this with the provision of banners

npg need to come out of their cyberspace world and stop being so cryptic its time to stand up and be counted in the real world, now the press know what has been going on for years.

the cover of planet earth is now worrying and i wonder prince 'which ones will you choose and which ones will you loose' well if you are choosing to loose your fans then you are on the right road

if you are not in control anylonger then its time for 'a new position' and get rid of those 'scallywags who pretend to be friends'


or has the beast that calls itself npg or paisley park become so in control that the man who is prince is being led along a dangerous path - only he can tell us

but as we all know he doesnt talk to us


this prince seems to be completely alien to the guy i saw at the o2 or the guy fans reported on here as taking time to talk to them, touch their hands etc

which leads me to think he is not in control of his enterprises
prince is in danger of becoming the very thing he hates -

most of recent music makes references to having no friend or being alone - maybe this is the case

as for PFUnk

i still cant see where the supposed 'diss' is in this somg yes there are a few references to to fans but the main lyrics are about some woman

i dont know its all too cryptic for anyone to decifer - prince you need to talk clearer cos the world dont get it - anyhoo what the heck does 3121 really mean - just TELL US!



phew got that off my chest - now im gonna cry

who is this new guy?

COME BACK PRINCE COME BACK!!!!! sad
[Edited 11/10/07 5:50am]
walk with crooked shoes www.myspace/syblepurplelishous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > isnt pfunk the intellectual property of george clinton?