New topic
Printablemplsmike said: Seems to me Prince has a problem with HQ..and not the org..
I think the difference is that "they" (WebSheriff or whomever) asked HQ to remove the Prince avatars that HQ offers to its users as avatar options. The Org does not have an "avatar gallery," everyone here has to provide their own avatar pic. THus, I think it is okay (or at least Websheriff isn't bothering) if individual users upload pics of Prince as their avatars; there are still Prince avatars at HQ, just not any that HQ 'provided.' Of course who know how long it will last.... They also made HQ remove the album covers in their discography section, which is fucking ridiculous considering they seem to have no problem with Amazon posting the very same covers... Double fucking standard much? | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Maybe he's feeling self-conscious about his looks...and he doesn't want people to see them(the pics) online...maybe he's scared worried or paranoid...maybe his woman doesn't want other women drooling over his pics so she told him to make everyone take them down along with his videos...heh.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DevotedPuppy said: ...They also made HQ remove the album covers in their discography section...
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator
|
mplsmike said: luv4u said: Or Mariah Carey or Britney Spears  Please say Mariah  againMariah  
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
moderatorHey I really could care less, it ain't no skin off my nose! 
I'm more upset about why you didn't call me last night prince?!?!?!  surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
 Prince.
Seriously, I'm considering not even wanting to see you on tour any more. Douche. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DJ506 said: DevotedPuppy said: ...They also made HQ remove the album covers in their discography section...
Yes, it's true. Technically they* asked Photobucket to remove the pics, but they knew exactly what they were doing. And again I ask, why is it okay for Amazon and All Music to use these very same images, but not Housequake? *Websheriff, I suppose.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DevotedPuppy said: DJ506 said: Yes, it's true. Technically they* asked Photobucket to remove the pics, but they knew exactly what they were doing. And again I ask, why is it okay for Amazon and All Music to use these very same images, but not Housequake? *Websheriff, I suppose. cha know, i wonder if there is a fair use issue at play by allowing some entities to use the images versus others... Space for sale... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: DevotedPuppy said: Yes, it's true. Technically they* asked Photobucket to remove the pics, but they knew exactly what they were doing. And again I ask, why is it okay for Amazon and All Music to use these very same images, but not Housequake? *Websheriff, I suppose. cha know, i wonder if there is a fair use issue at play by allowing some entities to use the images versus others...  But how is it fair use for Amazon (which one could argue is making money from the image, as it's used to sell albums) or All Music (which is using the images in pretty much exactly the same way as the HQ discography) and not fair use for Housequake, a not-for-profit website? I call bullshit. If Websheriff is gonna be a dick about it, then they need to be a dick to all the websites using those images, not just HQ. Of course, maybe they tried the same thing with Amazon & All Music, but since those are huge corporate websites with a lot of money for fancy attorneys they laughed in Websheriff's face. Like I said elsewhere, I get the Youtube thing (even if I think it's a lost cause), but this stuff over photos of album covers and avatars is beyond petty. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DevotedPuppy said: sosgemini said: cha know, i wonder if there is a fair use issue at play by allowing some entities to use the images versus others... But how is it fair use for Amazon (which one could argue is making money from the image, as it's used to sell albums) or All Music (which is using the images in pretty much exactly the same way as the HQ discography) and not fair use for Housequake, a not-for-profit website? I call bullshit. If Websheriff is gonna be a dick about it, then they need to be a dick to all the websites using those images, not just HQ. Of course, maybe they tried the same thing with Amazon & All Music, but since those are huge corporate websites with a lot of money for fancy attorneys they laughed in Websheriff's face. Like I said elsewhere, I get the Youtube thing (even if I think it's a lost cause), but this stuff over photos of album covers and avatars is beyond petty.that was my point.  Space for sale... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: DevotedPuppy said: But how is it fair use for Amazon (which one could argue is making money from the image, as it's used to sell albums) or All Music (which is using the images in pretty much exactly the same way as the HQ discography) and not fair use for Housequake, a not-for-profit website? I call bullshit. If Websheriff is gonna be a dick about it, then they need to be a dick to all the websites using those images, not just HQ. Of course, maybe they tried the same thing with Amazon & All Music, but since those are huge corporate websites with a lot of money for fancy attorneys they laughed in Websheriff's face. Like I said elsewhere, I get the Youtube thing (even if I think it's a lost cause), but this stuff over photos of album covers and avatars is beyond petty.that was my point.  The way you worded it made it seem like you thought it was fair use for amazon & all music but not HQ and that was logical... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
While the lawsuit is getting going it make sense that all pics on the fans sites would have to come down too. When it comes to legal nitpicking it does get very petty!
I'm still not convinced it's permanent...when all of this legal business is settled maybe... He gets it! That's why the ladies love him...  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
luv4u said: mplsmike said: Please say Mariah againMariah  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Mariah!!! "I would say that Prince's top thirty percent is great. Of that thirty percent, I'll bet the public has heard twenty percent of it." - Susan Rogers, "Hunting for Prince's Vault", BBC, 2015 |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mplsmike said: luv4u said: Mariah 
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
christos7 said: mplsmike said:
By the look on her face that book is giving her much more entertainment then she intended!  surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: okay...if we get this request i say we change them all to mj images.
NOOOOO  seems that i was busy doing something close to nothing, but different than the day before   | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Maybe Amazon got permission to use the images?... just a thought... I'm not stopping. I haven't even taken my coat off
C'mon and dance while you, while you still have your cherry babe, cherry babe.. www.KerrysCakes.org.uk | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
KidaDynamite said: christos7 said:
By the look on her face that book is giving her much more entertainment then she intended! Nah, the airbrushing on her waist made her all tingly! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplesweat said: KidaDynamite said: By the look on her face that book is giving her much more entertainment then she intended! Nah, the airbrushing on her waist made her all tingly! surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
KidaDynamite said: purplesweat said: Nah, the airbrushing on her waist made her all tingly! I so wish I was that airbrushing...  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
christos7 said: KidaDynamite said: I so wish I was that airbrushing... surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
U got that right.
But then HQ think they represent the fans of Prince when in fact they represent the fans of HQ. Easy enough mistake to make when you've shoved that many bootlegs up your ass. mplsmike said: Seems to me Prince has a problem with HQ..and not the org.. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am so angry at Prince that it frightens me! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrsGoodnight said: Maybe Amazon got permission to use the images?... just a thought... ding, ding, ding!!!! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lothan said: MrsGoodnight said: Maybe Amazon got permission to use the images?... just a thought... ding, ding, ding!!!! What's this "permission" concept of which you speak? j/k
But seriously, I bet even if HQ asked permission, at this point they'd get a big fat "NO." 
. [Edited 9/17/07 7:52am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DevotedPuppy said: Lothan said: ding, ding, ding!!!!
What's this "permission" concept of which you speak? j/k
But seriously, I bet even if HQ asked permission, at this point they'd get a big fat "NO."
. [Edited 9/17/07 7:52am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CandaceS said: gemini13 said: ... The only reason I come back here is not because of him, but because of the people and community.
 And I like to annoy the haters by talking incessantly about Madonna in the non-Prince forum!  And I've found a new hobby here, bashing Prince. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rinluv said: mplsmike said: Seems to me Prince has a problem with HQ..and not the org..
I noticted that too. I also noticted that PrinceFams.com has tons of pics of Prince, but really doesn't get messed with by the Web Sheriff as far as I know, cuz I haven't been there in a while. HQ always gets attacked. I think it has everything to do with the fact that HQ basically thumbed their noses at P over and over again a couple years back when they refused to take down the "Homecoming" boot performance when his people sent them the cease and desist letters. If I recall HQ's position was that because they were in the Netherlands (or where ever they are) and the boot was being sold in stores there that it was not in fact a boot but a legitimate release. P challanged them and the stores in the Netherlands and the courts sided with Prince. . [Edited 9/17/07 8:14am] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later. -Miles Davis- | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lothan said: MrsGoodnight said: Maybe Amazon got permission to use the images?... just a thought... ding, ding, ding!!!!Oooh I've never been 'dinged' by a Swedish man before.... it was rather nice!  I'm not stopping. I haven't even taken my coat off
C'mon and dance while you, while you still have your cherry babe, cherry babe.. www.KerrysCakes.org.uk | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |