Author | Message |
HOW ACCURATE WOULD YOU SAY THIS WIKIPEDIA ENTRY ON PRINCE IS? http://en.wikipedia.org/w...(musician)
i know a Lot about Prince, but not everything some of you guys know. what grade would you give this information on Prince? A--covers everything about Prince B--covers the high and low lights, above average C--lazy work, couple of useful tidbits D--hack job, nothing new F--waste of reading [Edited 8/29/07 5:04am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Its okay for a wikipedia entry, which have tendencies to be full of crap. I wouln't use that entry to write an article or anything because there is blatant crap there. For instance, last week or two ago it use to say his mama was white, which is a bold face lie. That has been corrected, but still it was there. I cant grade it because the falsehoods taint what may be a majority good article. I wouldnt trust a wiki article even if my mama wrote it, anyway. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |