independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > 'America': Rampant Jingoism Or Something Else?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 07/29/07 4:03pm

dseann

I think Prince was just being sarcastic. The cold war was still raging in 85 and the American government was doing it's best to demonize the USSR and communism on the whole. What Prince did was illustrate the similarities of the aforementioned and capitalism. Being poor in America was the same as being poor in communist Russia. Being rich in communist Russia was the same as being rich in America and being unpatriotic in any country leads to a bullshit existence. I think Jimmy's mushroom cloud was drug induced, him being strung out with no belief or value system as a foundation in his life and not as a result of some nuclear experiment.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 07/29/07 4:05pm

Raze

avatar

America is one of his more patriotic songs. He's written it in such a way that it sounds like he's being ironic, but he's actually not.
"Half of what I say is meaningless; but I say it so that the other half may reach you." - Kahlil Gibran
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 07/29/07 4:44pm

KidaDynamite

avatar

Justin1972UK said:

studal said:



Depends. Will it last as long as it took you to write it? lol lol


mad

.
[Edited 7/29/07 7:51am]

falloff
surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 07/29/07 4:49pm

KidaDynamite

avatar

FarrahMoan said:

Justin1972UK said:



Oh yeah! lol

Vive la France!

Man, I have seen "The Beautiful Experience", "A Video Recording of The 1999 Tour in France", "Some One Nite Alone....Live Clips", and other things that I may have never, ever gotten the chance of seeing any other way. Life is grand, ain't it? Well....sometimes, anyway. razz


bawl I wanna know! nutty boxed
surviving on the thought of loving you, it's just like the water
I ain't felt this way in years...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 07/30/07 6:04am

tricky99

avatar

dseann said:

I think Prince was just being sarcastic. The cold war was still raging in 85 and the American government was doing it's best to demonize the USSR and communism on the whole. What Prince did was illustrate the similarities of the aforementioned and capitalism. Being poor in America was the same as being poor in communist Russia. Being rich in communist Russia was the same as being rich in America and being unpatriotic in any country leads to a bullshit existence. I think Jimmy's mushroom cloud was drug induced, him being strung out with no belief or value system as a foundation in his life and not as a result of some nuclear experiment.


I never read that lyric as being drugs, but it sure makes sense. I think Prince values "freedom" above all things. A look at his career seems to point to his desire to always have a free hand and choose his own path. I think he is/was very ambiguous about the US but finds it perferable to a regime that controls the people as part of its doctrine.


This is really a cool thread. This is what the org should be all about instead of moaning about the music or latest business move.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 07/30/07 6:45am

Genesia

avatar

Justin1972UK said:

Genesia said:

That is absolutely false. In 1985, the United States was in the early stages of the longest peacetime economic expansion in our history. rolleyes


Well, if Reaganomics was anything like Thatcherism, all it meant to the average man on the street is that the rich got richer, whilst the poor did increase their wealth - but were given more options to spend it on things which they previously never needed.

Microwave ovens; Game consoles; VCRs; CD players - those items cost hundreds of pounds when first sold to the average blue collar worker.


Nonsense. A rising tide lifts all boats. The average "poor" person in the United States has it all over the truly poor in any other part of the world. Yes, there is an entrenched underclass in "first world" countries -- but it has as much to do with poor life choices as anything.

And, of course, microwaves, etc. cost more when first sold -- new technology is always at its most expensive when first offered. (Fewer competitors, developers recouping their R&D costs, etc.) It isn't like anyone was trying to gouge blue collar workers -- the items were the same price for everybody.

If people feel the need for the latest and greatest (regardless of what percent of their income it sucks up), that is a personal choice -- not some nefarious government scheme. rolleyes
We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 07/30/07 7:05am

Justin1972UK

Genesia said:

If people feel the need for the latest and greatest (regardless of what percent of their income it sucks up), that is a personal choice -- not some nefarious government scheme. rolleyes


I just gave consumer goods as one example.

There were other factors for the poor remaining poor (despite an increase in earnings) such as Reagan and Thatcher's rampant privatisation of former state-owned (or state-subsidised) services. The Reagan administration's sale of Conrail being a prime example of this.

As soon as public services fall into the hands of private business, you remove the state-owned monopoly - but replace it with an investor-based totopoly which is even less unaccountable to its customers.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 07/30/07 8:01am

datdude

good post. more of these needed for sure. America is a FAR CRY from rampant jingoism. Because its a PRINCE song. we know enough to know that he's as astute as he is contradictory at times and too critical to be a "blind patriot." so the song, like the country, is wrought with complexities and contradictions.

i like your piece about communism being just a word. i think ppl have always been afraid of that word and the gov't used that fear against us in the worst way (vietnam). Russia's version of that system wasn't it's best possible manifestation, just like our version of capitalism isn't the BEST version of what it could be. for what its worth, i always understood the "mushroom cloud" reference to be an allusion to Jimmy becoming drug addicted instead of any sort of reference to "nuclear testing".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 07/30/07 11:54am

ufoclub

avatar

datdude said:

good post. more of these needed for sure. America is a FAR CRY from rampant jingoism. Because its a PRINCE song. we know enough to know that he's as astute as he is contradictory at times and too critical to be a "blind patriot." so the song, like the country, is wrought with complexities and contradictions.

i like your piece about communism being just a word. i think ppl have always been afraid of that word and the gov't used that fear against us in the worst way (vietnam). Russia's version of that system wasn't it's best possible manifestation, just like our version of capitalism isn't the BEST version of what it could be. for what its worth, i always understood the "mushroom cloud" reference to be an allusion to Jimmy becoming drug addicted instead of any sort of reference to "nuclear testing".


Listen to "Free". Prince was not politically/socially astute back then! He was a blind patriot. Maybe not now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 07/30/07 12:48pm

SpecialEd

avatar

ufoclub said:

Listen to "Free". Prince was not politically/socially astute back then! He was a blind patriot. Maybe not now.


Yeah America and Free stay in the same naive patriotism folder IMO. Can't blame greedy ol' Prince for enjoying 80s America though, no better time to be part of a rich elite.
Glug, glug like a mug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 07/30/07 12:50pm

SpecialEd

avatar

KoolEaze said:

Later , on TRC, he mentioned changing the colors of the flag in the song "Everlasting Now", though I didn´t really get a 100 % what he was trying to say. Maybe he felt scapegoated or blacklisted for speaking up against certain things in the music industry and society in general.


Those lines were referring to Sly Stone who famously altered the US flag for the cover "Theres a Riot Going On".
Glug, glug like a mug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 07/30/07 5:45pm

KoolEaze

avatar

SpecialEd said:

KoolEaze said:

Later , on TRC, he mentioned changing the colors of the flag in the song "Everlasting Now", though I didn´t really get a 100 % what he was trying to say. Maybe he felt scapegoated or blacklisted for speaking up against certain things in the music industry and society in general.


Those lines were referring to Sly Stone who famously altered the US flag for the cover "Theres a Riot Going On".



Yes, that possibility or interpretation has been discussed before and I´m familiar with that album but I think this line is about Prince, not Sly.
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 07/30/07 7:54pm

datdude

SpecialEd said:

ufoclub said:

Listen to "Free". Prince was not politically/socially astute back then! He was a blind patriot. Maybe not now.


Yeah America and Free stay in the same naive patriotism folder IMO. Can't blame greedy ol' Prince for enjoying 80s America though, no better time to be part of a rich elite.


i think u missed the gist of that song (America) if u think its a song about blind patriotism. btw, one can enjoy the freedoms OF America and still be critical of it. ppl have made criticism and patriotism mutually exclusive concept and they are NOT.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 07/30/07 8:47pm

ufoclub

avatar

datdude said:

SpecialEd said:



Yeah America and Free stay in the same naive patriotism folder IMO. Can't blame greedy ol' Prince for enjoying 80s America though, no better time to be part of a rich elite.


i think u missed the gist of that song (America) if u think its a song about blind patriotism. btw, one can enjoy the freedoms OF America and still be critical of it. ppl have made criticism and patriotism mutually exclusive concept and they are NOT.


trust me, I have not missed the point, the song clearly has Prince saying that despite bad stuff like poverty, America is the best place to be especially compared to a communist country. Read the lyrics, they are as clear as his drum beat.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 07/30/07 8:49pm

ufoclub

avatar

and mushroom cloud refers to a nuclear war. And also Prince is saying stay in school. And you also better be "proud".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 07/31/07 12:29pm

dseann

ufoclub said:

and mushroom cloud refers to a nuclear war. And also Prince is saying stay in school. And you also better be "proud".



Nothing made Jimmy proud. Now Jimmy lives in a nuclear war? eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 07/31/07 1:23pm

KoolEaze

avatar

dseann said:

ufoclub said:

and mushroom cloud refers to a nuclear war. And also Prince is saying stay in school. And you also better be "proud".



Nothing made Jimmy proud. Now Jimmy lives in a nuclear war? eek



Of course. I always understood it as a reference to atomic bombs and never even thought about psychodelic mushrooms ( mushroom cloud = cloud you see when the a-bom explodes) . Drug mushrooms don´t make clouds.

Nothing made Jimmy proud ( to be an American ) and now he´s dead because "the enemies" have dropped the bomb on the USA.
That´s how I understand that line. What else would it be about ? What is your take on it ?
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 08/01/07 4:19pm

marxisreal

Genesia said:

Justin1972UK said:



Well, if Reaganomics was anything like Thatcherism, all it meant to the average man on the street is that the rich got richer, whilst the poor did increase their wealth - but were given more options to spend it on things which they previously never needed.

Microwave ovens; Game consoles; VCRs; CD players - those items cost hundreds of pounds when first sold to the average blue collar worker.


Nonsense. A rising tide lifts all boats. The average "poor" person in the United States has it all over the truly poor in any other part of the world. Yes, there is an entrenched underclass in "first world" countries -- but it has as much to do with poor life choices as anything.

And, of course, microwaves, etc. cost more when first sold -- new technology is always at its most expensive when first offered. (Fewer competitors, developers recouping their R&D costs, etc.) It isn't like anyone was trying to gouge blue collar workers -- the items were the same price for everybody.

If people feel the need for the latest and greatest (regardless of what percent of their income it sucks up), that is a personal choice -- not some nefarious government scheme. rolleyes



Economic growth doesn't necessarily mean that everyone becomes "richer" - the "trickle down" fantasy of neoliberal Reaganites. This was the case in the 1960's, an extraordinary period of sustained growth under capitalism, but certainly not during the most recent upswing in the US.

Since 2001 real wages of most American workers have stagnated or dropped. Says the Financial Times, not an advanced post of socialism. Only the credit bubble has kept consumption afloat (but this bubble is bursting at this very moment).

So, not all boats are rising. The boats of a super rich elite have become much bigger and ordinary workers have been doing the rowing for them. I don't think poverty, or having to combine 2 or 3 jobs, is the result of "poor life choices" - a smug conservative statement to shift the blame on the victims of free market anarchy. It's the consequence of not producing rationally for the needs in society, but for profit.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 08/02/07 3:23pm

dseann

KoolEaze said:

dseann said:




Nothing made Jimmy proud. Now Jimmy lives in a nuclear war? eek



Of course. I always understood it as a reference to atomic bombs and never even thought about psychodelic mushrooms ( mushroom cloud = cloud you see when the a-bom explodes) . Drug mushrooms don´t make clouds.

Nothing made Jimmy proud ( to be an American ) and now he´s dead because "the enemies" have dropped the bomb on the USA.
That´s how I understand that line. What else would it be about ? What is your take on it ?


Well looking at it from that perspective I can understand your reasoning. If nobody cared about America, it would create an opportunity for the enemies to get in and get us good.


lol

But what do you think of my reasoning?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 08/03/07 2:30am

DaveDare79

avatar

I don't know about all this politics stuff, but damn if that 20-minute extended version of 'America' isn't the funkiest thing Prince ever laid down in the studio. biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > 'America': Rampant Jingoism Or Something Else?