independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The unostentatious deterioration of Prince’s sound! Why the blandness?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 07/12/07 2:33pm

babooshleeky

avatar

mirrorbestfriend said:

As I listen to prince’s music since 1996 there are some striking things that have made him seem to be playing it safe or bored?

When you listened to prince in the 80’s you were guaranteed to hear 1 arrangement or sound that u NEVER HEARD BEFORE! think back to doves cry or even 1999…….
You didn’t have people saying oh that sounds like boogie wonderland or sly stone etc……IT DIDN’T SOUND LIKE ANYBODY BUT PRINCE!
In my opinion it seems to me prince has not kept up with all the great technology available by way of synthesizers and sound creation.

When I go into Guitar Center and hear all these great new sounds I can only wish that prince would sit down and learn to use these sounds….Imagine the technology in the hands of a master musician?

Why do you think he doesn’t embrace and learn new technology like he did early in his career?

Is he bored?

Not hungry?

Satisfied with his own greatness?

Just too spoiled to work hard anymore?


neutral do you do anything at all in ur life besides putting Prince's music under a microscope?!?!?!?!?!?



wink
tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 07/12/07 3:07pm

Mars23

Moderator

avatar

moderator

Get your thesaurus back out and try again. I know you're trying hard, but your title and statement say 2 different things.

I even think you're almost touching on something valid, but I know better.

If Prince's sound has bored you for 21 years now, why have you just come here in June of '07?
Studies have shown the ass crack of the average Prince fan to be abnormally large. This explains the ease and frequency of their panties bunching up in it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 07/12/07 3:21pm

roanmairin

avatar

Riverpoet31 said:

Some people here are naming Van Morrison as an example as artist still going strong after several decades.

I myself are a big fan of "Van the Man", but i just partly agree with that statement.

Van is, like Prince, also not creating really groundbreaking music anymore. The years of him delivering original, improvised 'jazz-folk' (Astral Weeks, No Guru) or hypnotisizing soul/R&B jams (Into the Music) are far behind us.
Like so many other artists with a long career (Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan, Lou Reed) Van is in a period in his career that he is indeed delivering good albums and still going strong live, but the real 'brilliance' of the past he doesnt reach anymore.
Next to that: Van has also has had a quite week period in his career, in the first halve of the eighties he fell into the trap of using synths in his music, writing so-so material, and flirting with the scientology church.

To be short: the potential is there with Prince, the question: will he able to bring it too real fruition again on his recorded music in the future?


I see what you are saying but I don't think you need to be "ground breaking" to be producing great music. Van in general still makes fantastic albums. "Magic Time", for example stands up very well against just about anything he did in his early career. Astral Weeks and Guru were definitely more groundbreaking and experimental. But Tupelo Honey, Moodance, St. Dominics fit perfectly with what he still does which is to bring great musicians together to make great albums. And he is every bit as prolific as Prince maybe even more so.

I do not expect Prince to be ground breaking just good. And he isn't good anymore. Live he can't be touched. On album he makes disposable pop that wouldn't be excusable on some teeny bopper, bubble gum, American Idol twits first album. There are a few exceptions of course but as a rule he is recording crap.

I say stick to the live torrents if you want to hear what the man is capable of and avoid the disposable albums. He obviously doesn't even care about them.


confused
"What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 07/12/07 3:23pm

roanmairin

avatar

Riverpoet31 said:

Adding sometimes that just comes to mind... lol

The following artists went to a period of not really sounding as 'themselves' and releasing weaker material while they were trying to confirm themselves to a certain form of organised religion.
- Bob Dylan: Christianity
- Van Morrison: Scientology
- Prince: JW

Maybe its the fault of dogmatic religion. And we will get Prince back when he leaves the Jehovah's biggrin


Except Rainbow Children is Prince's finest work in twenty years. wink
"What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 07/12/07 3:38pm

skywalker

avatar



I do not expect Prince to be ground breaking just good. And he isn't good anymore. Live he can't be touched. On album he makes disposable pop that wouldn't be excusable on some teeny bopper, bubble gum, American Idol twits first album.


Couldn't it be said that Prince has ALWAYS made pop music. You call it disposable, but I call it everything from "Soft and Wet" to "Lolita". Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems like you really don't like Prince making "pop" music.

And calling Prince "recording crap" is a HUGELY biased overstatement.
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 07/12/07 3:39pm

NDRU

avatar

roanmairin said:

Riverpoet31 said:

Adding sometimes that just comes to mind... lol

The following artists went to a period of not really sounding as 'themselves' and releasing weaker material while they were trying to confirm themselves to a certain form of organised religion.
- Bob Dylan: Christianity
- Van Morrison: Scientology
- Prince: JW

Maybe its the fault of dogmatic religion. And we will get Prince back when he leaves the Jehovah's biggrin


Except Rainbow Children is Prince's finest work in twenty years. wink


since 1982?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 07/12/07 3:43pm

KoolEaze

avatar

skywalker said:



I do not expect Prince to be ground breaking just good. And he isn't good anymore. Live he can't be touched. On album he makes disposable pop that wouldn't be excusable on some teeny bopper, bubble gum, American Idol twits first album.


Couldn't it be said that Prince has ALWAYS made pop music. You call it disposable, but I call it everything from "Soft and Wet" to "[b]Lolita". Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems like you really don't like Prince making "pop" music.

And calling Prince "recording crap" is a HUGELY biased overstatement.[/b]


Ehhh....most of the time I really dig what you write here but do you really, honestly, seriously LIKE Lolita ? confused
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 07/12/07 3:49pm

skywalker

avatar


Ehhh....most of the time I really dig what you write here but do you really, honestly, seriously LIKE Lolita ? confused


I wasn't saying that I necessarily like Lolita--I certainly don't hate it. I was making the point that Prince has ALWAYS had his share of silly little pop songs. Lolita can be enjoyed as such. Furthermore, Lolita is a throwback type of Prince song and more fun than anything on The Rainbow Children. Read what I said-not "better" just more fun. It is what it is meant to be. Certainly better than Jughead or Call the Law.
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 07/12/07 3:53pm

maxwell

avatar

for me the prince sound is like washing your teeth - raspberry beret, i could never take the place...and the 1 u wanna c fits right in

stay enjoying, stop moaning

oh, and stop hanging around music shops
Moo said the cow
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 07/12/07 3:59pm

KoolEaze

avatar

skywalker said:


Ehhh....most of the time I really dig what you write here but do you really, honestly, seriously LIKE Lolita ? confused


I wasn't saying that I necessarily like Lolita--I certainly don't hate it. I was making the point that Prince has ALWAYS had his share of silly little pop songs. Lolita can be enjoyed as such. Furthermore, Lolita is a throwback type of Prince song and more fun than anything on The Rainbow Children. Read what I said-not "better" just more fun. It is what it is meant to be. Certainly better than Jughead or Call the Law.


Ah, okay then....but I really like Call The Law....seriously, I´d prefer Call The Law over that horrible song named Lolita any day, even Tony M´s rapping on it is not as bad as those horrible lyrics in Lolita and that cheesy music. Sure, it does bring back memories of The Time ( with that "Fellas!" "Yeah!" , and the synthlines and so on, which makes it even worse ) but I find it sooo horrible that I have made a copy of 3121 without that song so I don´t have to skip it or program my cd player any more, that´s how much I despise that song. Call The Law on the other hand is a nice, laid back tune that I pop in from time to time .
lol

But hey, it´s all good..we all have different tastes. lol
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 07/12/07 4:46pm

Brendan

avatar

And this debate will fortunately go on indefinitely.

As someone asked on another thread, “What defines a good song”?

Why of course a good person with good taste. wink

"TRC" has received more hate than I can calculate. Do I care? Not beyond what it represents.

If most were excited, I'm afraid it would often turn out to be a wildly acceptable piece of entertainment that just so happens to fit within the current mainstream parameters. That’s hardly what I’m looking for (although sometimes these world’s do adjoin- - just look at “Purple Rain”.)

Not that anyone should care in the least, but I’m moved by emotional, logical or intellectual truth, not by hate.

I would truly welcome the hate, as hate rarely did anything but counter the passion. And if there is little passion, there will be little hate. They work like a hand to a glove.

Fortunately there is still passion, therefore there is still plenty of hate.

Just try and start months of passionate discourse about the greatness of “For You” or “Xpecation”. I just don't think you'll find enough people who are passionate about those albums to produce lasting hatred; at least not beyond their initial release dates.

And the strangest thing of all about art appreciation in my opinion? What doesn't move you, will likely never stir you. And what does move you, will likely be responded to accordingly.

I'm still being moved. Not nearly as often as by the 80s, but certainly by some extraordinary music.

If others don't hear it, I can't much do anything about it. They can't listen to music through my ears anymore than I can listen through theirs.

Again, I ask you, who do you make music for?

The people with the good taste, right? Somehow I think were back to everybody again! wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 07/12/07 4:56pm

skywalker

avatar

KoolEaze said:

skywalker said:



I wasn't saying that I necessarily like Lolita--I certainly don't hate it. I was making the point that Prince has ALWAYS had his share of silly little pop songs. Lolita can be enjoyed as such. Furthermore, Lolita is a throwback type of Prince song and more fun than anything on The Rainbow Children. Read what I said-not "better" just more fun. It is what it is meant to be. Certainly better than Jughead or Call the Law.


Ah, okay then....but I really like Call The Law....seriously, I´d prefer Call The Law over that horrible song named Lolita any day, even Tony M´s rapping on it is not as bad as those horrible lyrics in Lolita and that cheesy music. Sure, it does bring back memories of The Time ( with that "Fellas!" "Yeah!" , and the synthlines and so on, which makes it even worse ) but I find it sooo horrible that I have made a copy of 3121 without that song so I don´t have to skip it or program my cd player any more, that´s how much I despise that song. Call The Law on the other hand is a nice, laid back tune that I pop in from time to time .
lol

But hey, it´s all good..we all have different tastes. lol



Exactly--one person's "Call the Law" is another's "Lolita"...
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 07/12/07 4:58pm

skywalker

avatar

Brendan said:

And this debate will fortunately go on indefinitely.

As someone asked on another thread, “What defines a good song”?

Why of course a good person with good taste. wink

"TRC" has received more hate than I can calculate. Do I care? Not beyond what it represents.

If most were excited, I'm afraid it would often turn out to be a wildly acceptable piece of entertainment that just so happens to fit within the current mainstream parameters. That’s hardly what I’m looking for (although sometimes these world’s do adjoin- - just look at “Purple Rain”.)

Not that anyone should care in the least, but I’m moved by emotional, logical or intellectual truth, not by hate.

I would truly welcome the hate, as hate rarely did anything but counter the passion. And if there is little passion, there will be little hate. They work like a hand to a glove.

Fortunately there is still passion, therefore there is still plenty of hate.

Just try and start months of passionate discourse about the greatness of “For You” or “Xpecation”. I just don't think you'll find enough people who are passionate about those albums to produce lasting hatred; at least not beyond their initial release dates.

And the strangest thing of all about art appreciation in my opinion? What doesn't move you, will likely never stir you. And what does move you, will likely be responded to accordingly.

I'm still being moved. Not nearly as often as by the 80s, but certainly by some extraordinary music.

If others don't hear it, I can't much do anything about it. They can't listen to music through my ears anymore than I can listen through theirs.

Again, I ask you, who do you make music for?

The people with the good taste, right? Somehow I think were back to everybody again! wink



Well said. Well said.
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 07/12/07 5:01pm

KoolEaze

avatar

skywalker said:

KoolEaze said:



Ah, okay then....but I really like Call The Law....seriously, I´d prefer Call The Law over that horrible song named Lolita any day, even Tony M´s rapping on it is not as bad as those horrible lyrics in Lolita and that cheesy music. Sure, it does bring back memories of The Time ( with that "Fellas!" "Yeah!" , and the synthlines and so on, which makes it even worse ) but I find it sooo horrible that I have made a copy of 3121 without that song so I don´t have to skip it or program my cd player any more, that´s how much I despise that song. Call The Law on the other hand is a nice, laid back tune that I pop in from time to time .
lol

But hey, it´s all good..we all have different tastes. lol



Exactly--one person's "Call the Law" is another's "Lolita"...


Yes ! I´m out, good night, it´s late over here. Always enjoy your posts.

Banana Daiquiri recipe
printable version
Scale ingredients to servings
1 1/2 oz light rum
1 tbsp triple sec
1 banana
1 1/2 oz lime juice
1 tsp sugar
1 cherry

Combine all ingredients (except for the cherry) with 1 cup crushed ice in an electric blender. Blend at a low speed for five seconds, then blend at a high speed until firm. Pour contents into a champagne flute, top with the cherry, and serve.
" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 07/13/07 12:18am

mirrorbestfrie
nd

Mars23 said:

Get your thesaurus back out and try again. I know you're trying hard, but your title and statement say 2 different things.

I even think you're almost touching on something valid, but I know better.

If Prince's sound has bored you for 21 years now, why have you just come here in June of '07?

didnt say it bored...bland
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 07/13/07 12:28am

PapaSmurf

wlcm2thdwn said:

Why are people attacking Prince when the CD is not even out yet? Aren't there any REAL fans left around here? confused

What makes a "real" fan and when did you become the great and magnificent arbiter of Prince fans? lol

The CD is shite. As a "real" fan, I feel qualified to make such an assessment. Anyone who says Planet Earth is as good as Lovesexy or SOTT makes me question how familiar they are with Prince's music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 07/13/07 1:25am

Flowerz

wlcm2thdwn said:

There are more peopleon the org slamming Prince than there has ever been before and coming from the outside looking in I'm telling you it's fucked up!Lookk at these people's history and past threads where did they even come from?! mad
[Edited 7/12/07 9:45am]

I dunno .. confused .. granted I dont like all of what Prince does either, but the constant negative energy.. yuk .. im glad im not here everyday..

babooshleeky said:


neutral do you do anything at all in ur life besides putting Prince's music under a microscope?!?!?!?!?!? wink


thumbs up! i dig that .. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 07/13/07 10:46am

mirrorbestfrie
nd

PapaSmurf said:

wlcm2thdwn said:

Why are people attacking Prince when the CD is not even out yet? Aren't there any REAL fans left around here? confused

What makes a "real" fan and when did you become the great and magnificent arbiter of Prince fans? lol

The CD is shite. As a "real" fan, I feel qualified to make such an assessment. Anyone who says Planet Earth is as good as Lovesexy or SOTT makes me question how familiar they are with Prince's music.

good point
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 07/13/07 11:40am

Love2tha9s

avatar

roanmairin said:

Riverpoet31 said:

Some people here are naming Van Morrison as an example as artist still going strong after several decades.

I myself are a big fan of "Van the Man", but i just partly agree with that statement.

Van is, like Prince, also not creating really groundbreaking music anymore. The years of him delivering original, improvised 'jazz-folk' (Astral Weeks, No Guru) or hypnotisizing soul/R&B jams (Into the Music) are far behind us.
Like so many other artists with a long career (Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan, Lou Reed) Van is in a period in his career that he is indeed delivering good albums and still going strong live, but the real 'brilliance' of the past he doesnt reach anymore.
Next to that: Van has also has had a quite week period in his career, in the first halve of the eighties he fell into the trap of using synths in his music, writing so-so material, and flirting with the scientology church.

To be short: the potential is there with Prince, the question: will he able to bring it too real fruition again on his recorded music in the future?


I see what you are saying but I don't think you need to be "ground breaking" to be producing great music. Van in general still makes fantastic albums. "Magic Time", for example stands up very well against just about anything he did in his early career. Astral Weeks and Guru were definitely more groundbreaking and experimental. But Tupelo Honey, Moodance, St. Dominics fit perfectly with what he still does which is to bring great musicians together to make great albums. And he is every bit as prolific as Prince maybe even more so.

I do not expect Prince to be ground breaking just good. And he isn't good anymore. Live he can't be touched. On album he makes disposable pop that wouldn't be excusable on some teeny bopper, bubble gum, American Idol twits first album. There are a few exceptions of course but as a rule he is recording crap.

I say stick to the live torrents if you want to hear what the man is capable of and avoid the disposable albums. He obviously doesn't even care about them.


confused


I 100% totally disagree.
"Why'd I waste my kisses on you baby?" R.I.P. Prince You've finally found your way back home. Well Done.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 07/13/07 1:37pm

ThirdStrike

avatar

mirrorbestfriend said:

PapaSmurf said:


What makes a "real" fan and when did you become the great and magnificent arbiter of Prince fans? lol

The CD is shite. As a "real" fan, I feel qualified to make such an assessment. Anyone who says Planet Earth is as good as Lovesexy or SOTT makes me question how familiar they are with Prince's music.

good point


At the same time, I think those who like to compare the quality of music on "PE" to other albums made some 20 odd years ago need to move on with their lives, and allow it to mature and grow based on it's own individual merits...

Also, to call the CD "shite" is rather disrectful of others opinions, isn't it? I don't think most civilized fans would take offense to a intelligently presented critique. But, when you're as blunt and ignorant as what's shown here, it's inappropriate IMHO...

Just my 2 cents.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 07/16/07 7:08am

roanmairin

avatar

NDRU said:

roanmairin said:



Except Rainbow Children is Prince's finest work in twenty years. wink


since 1982?



How was math in school for you? Tricky I bet. smile
"What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 07/16/07 9:41am

Kacey725

As I get older, I am finding more joy in introducing Prince's back catalogue to friends of mine who never understood my love for him and are getting hooked on some of his new and accessible (though in some of our eyes, inferior) music. I am not one of those fams who expects or even wants 1987 to happen again...it already happened and man, it was glorious! I would MUCH rather get my hands and ears on the unreleased stuff made THEN then hear Prince try to recapture it. Some of you, if you'll pardon a snobby literary reference, are "waiting for Godot." In my opinion, when you do that, life is miserable and being a fan is not fun anymore. I keep my focus on the fact that there's only one letter's difference between "fan" and "fun," and that's "u." (Okay...that was bad!)

At any rate, one discussion that comes up here frequently and might deserve some mentioning again (and it might have been covered here a bit already) is the notion of Prince allowing himself to COLLABORATE on some level. Already on this thread, one of you mentioned the career resurgence of Johnny Cash, which worked because he allowed himself to be produced by someone who adored him as a fan (Rick Rubin). Rubin's adoration of Cash (as well as other artists he's produced) allowed Cash the security to trust someone with only the best interest of the music at heart...someone who could hear the old stuff clear as day and see a future that held hands with the past. Cash had firm control over the song choices on the American recordings, but allowed his "greatest fan" to have imput in terms of the sound. And those are amazing albums.

Perhaps an even BETTER example to compare to Prince is Paul McCartney. Who else besides Prince and McCartney has been so criticized for having genius tracks next to shlock on one cd? Fans always said that McCartney's problem was that he never allowed anyone to get close to him and his music enough to tell him that songs like "No More Lonely Nights" and "Silly Love Songs" were schmaltzy garbage, cheezy pop-lite. There was no outside quality control...just Macca's whim on a disc. The same has been true with Prince since he cut the cord with Wendy & Lisa, or anyone else who was strong enough to get an idea through to Prince and his unique, strong vision.

The good news? McCartney gave in to working with good producers on his last two albums and has seen a resurgence in the overall quality of his work. When "Chaos and Creation in the Backyard" came out, there was much publicity about his head-butting with Nigel Godrich. Paul almost ripped his head off! And it's a great cd by Paul's recent standards. Then he finds another produced for "Memory Almost Full" and captures music that is uniquely his but finds an ear who pulls the Beatles back out of him. Also a good cd!

I can only imagine Prince doing the same thing if he ever took to a collaboration with someone...perhaps a better-quality album overall but then a burnt bridge for the relationship because the collaboration is not Prince's typical work style.

I am looking forward to getting into Planet Earth as much as I look forward to every new Prince creation. Like everyone else, I have my favorites and least favorites, but I have yet to hear a Prince album with NOTHING on it that excites me. So if I get two or three "almost classics" from PE, then it was worth it! After all, even though we love Sign O the Times, we can still prioritize, based on personal tastes, those tracks from best to worst. And so it goes with everything!

Peace on Planet Earth!
Keith/Kacey
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 07/16/07 10:23am

bsk3601

Prince is 50 years old. Why would you expect anything else but middle of the road music from a middle-aged man? Prince, like Stevie, like the Rolling Stones, like Bruce, etc has established his legend... therefore he CAN afford to release albums that sound like he's on auto-pilot. Would you expect a 20 year old thoroughbred to still win horse races? Instead of raising your expectations of Prince you should probably raise your expectations of the current generation of artists out there. He's paid his dues so there's really nothing left for him to prove. Even though it's expected, I still find it remarkable that with each album people will complain for YEARS about the "blandness" Ironically, these people seem like the old and bitter has-beens.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 07/16/07 10:27am

internationall
over2004

Zah.
[Edited 7/16/07 11:06am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 07/16/07 10:43am

bsk3601

wlcm2thdwn said:

There are more peopleon the org slamming Prince than there has ever been before and coming from the outside looking in I'm telling you it's fucked up!Lookk at these people's history and past threads where did they even come from?! mad


There really aren't more people slamming Prince. This is just one of the repercussions of Prince being so diverse. There are some who appreciate his funk, There are some who appreciate his pop. There are some who appreciate his rock. There are some who appreciate his music overall. Then with every album (each year), there are some asshol-- people who are going scrutinize every single thing he does just for the sake of being argumentative on a message board yet will show up to every concert and purchase every download, album, etc... these folks are called fronters.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 07/17/07 10:27am

mirrorbestfrie
nd

bsk3601 said:

Prince is 50 years old. Why would you expect anything else but middle of the road music from a middle-aged man? Prince, like Stevie, like the Rolling Stones, like Bruce, etc has established his legend... therefore he CAN afford to release albums that sound like he's on auto-pilot. Would you expect a 20 year old thoroughbred to still win horse races? Instead of raising your expectations of Prince you should probably raise your expectations of the current generation of artists out there. He's paid his dues so there's really nothing left for him to prove. Even though it's expected, I still find it remarkable that with each album people will complain for YEARS about the "blandness" Ironically, these people seem like the old and bitter has-beens.

he 49
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 07/17/07 10:54am

tricky99

avatar

skywalker said:

Brendan said:

And this debate will fortunately go on indefinitely.

As someone asked on another thread, “What defines a good song”?

Why of course a good person with good taste. wink

"TRC" has received more hate than I can calculate. Do I care? Not beyond what it represents.

If most were excited, I'm afraid it would often turn out to be a wildly acceptable piece of entertainment that just so happens to fit within the current mainstream parameters. That’s hardly what I’m looking for (although sometimes these world’s do adjoin- - just look at “Purple Rain”.)

Not that anyone should care in the least, but I’m moved by emotional, logical or intellectual truth, not by hate.

I would truly welcome the hate, as hate rarely did anything but counter the passion. And if there is little passion, there will be little hate. They work like a hand to a glove.

Fortunately there is still passion, therefore there is still plenty of hate.

Just try and start months of passionate discourse about the greatness of “For You” or “Xpecation”. I just don't think you'll find enough people who are passionate about those albums to produce lasting hatred; at least not beyond their initial release dates.

And the strangest thing of all about art appreciation in my opinion? What doesn't move you, will likely never stir you. And what does move you, will likely be responded to accordingly.

I'm still being moved. Not nearly as often as by the 80s, but certainly by some extraordinary music.

If others don't hear it, I can't much do anything about it. They can't listen to music through my ears anymore than I can listen through theirs.

Again, I ask you, who do you make music for?

The people with the good taste, right? Somehow I think were back to everybody again! wink



Well said. Well said.


Shoutout to skywalker and Brendan! U are among my favorite posters. Always levelheaded and real. I don't alway agree but I always respect what u guys have to say.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 07/17/07 11:11am

tricky99

avatar

Kacey725 said:

As I get older, I am finding more joy in introducing Prince's back catalogue to friends of mine who never understood my love for him and are getting hooked on some of his new and accessible (though in some of our eyes, inferior) music. I am not one of those fams who expects or even wants 1987 to happen again...it already happened and man, it was glorious! I would MUCH rather get my hands and ears on the unreleased stuff made THEN then hear Prince try to recapture it. Some of you, if you'll pardon a snobby literary reference, are "waiting for Godot." In my opinion, when you do that, life is miserable and being a fan is not fun anymore. I keep my focus on the fact that there's only one letter's difference between "fan" and "fun," and that's "u." (Okay...that was bad!)

At any rate, one discussion that comes up here frequently and might deserve some mentioning again (and it might have been covered here a bit already) is the notion of Prince allowing himself to COLLABORATE on some level. Already on this thread, one of you mentioned the career resurgence of Johnny Cash, which worked because he allowed himself to be produced by someone who adored him as a fan (Rick Rubin). Rubin's adoration of Cash (as well as other artists he's produced) allowed Cash the security to trust someone with only the best interest of the music at heart...someone who could hear the old stuff clear as day and see a future that held hands with the past. Cash had firm control over the song choices on the American recordings, but allowed his "greatest fan" to have imput in terms of the sound. And those are amazing albums.

Perhaps an even BETTER example to compare to Prince is Paul McCartney. Who else besides Prince and McCartney has been so criticized for having genius tracks next to shlock on one cd? Fans always said that McCartney's problem was that he never allowed anyone to get close to him and his music enough to tell him that songs like "No More Lonely Nights" and "Silly Love Songs" were schmaltzy garbage, cheezy pop-lite. There was no outside quality control...just Macca's whim on a disc. The same has been true with Prince since he cut the cord with Wendy & Lisa, or anyone else who was strong enough to get an idea through to Prince and his unique, strong vision.

The good news? McCartney gave in to working with good producers on his last two albums and has seen a resurgence in the overall quality of his work. When "Chaos and Creation in the Backyard" came out, there was much publicity about his head-butting with Nigel Godrich. Paul almost ripped his head off! And it's a great cd by Paul's recent standards. Then he finds another produced for "Memory Almost Full" and captures music that is uniquely his but finds an ear who pulls the Beatles back out of him. Also a good cd!

I can only imagine Prince doing the same thing if he ever took to a collaboration with someone...perhaps a better-quality album overall but then a burnt bridge for the relationship because the collaboration is not Prince's typical work style.

I am looking forward to getting into Planet Earth as much as I look forward to every new Prince creation. Like everyone else, I have my favorites and least favorites, but I have yet to hear a Prince album with NOTHING on it that excites me. So if I get two or three "almost classics" from PE, then it was worth it! After all, even though we love Sign O the Times, we can still prioritize, based on personal tastes, those tracks from best to worst. And so it goes with everything!

Peace on Planet Earth!
Keith/Kacey


Good Post! Hey I like "silly love songs". I don't think we would be "better off" if Prince were produced by someone. The same arguments would exist except with a new one focused on Prince "selling out" his sound. Alot of the complaint comes from people who aren't that diverse in what they want from Prince. People tend to forget that the genius lies within Prince and not within themselves. Knowing Prince is the musical genuis and not I allows me to give a "pass" to songs I don't necessarily like on first listen. This is good because countless times I will revisit songs and get something entirely different from them. Any of these people who say I listened to such and such once or twice and deleted or gave it away aren't really fans. There is always a level of detail inherent in his work that takes time to understand.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 07/17/07 11:46am

Dewrede

avatar

lockdance
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 07/17/07 12:53pm

ufoclub

avatar

mirrorbestfriend said:

PapaSmurf said:


What makes a "real" fan and when did you become the great and magnificent arbiter of Prince fans? lol

The CD is shite. As a "real" fan, I feel qualified to make such an assessment. Anyone who says Planet Earth is as good as Lovesexy or SOTT makes me question how familiar they are with Prince's music.

good point


mmmm... what??? when Lovesexy came out, many fans and producer type friends of mine said it was all CRAP and groaned that he had strayed from the path set forth in SOTT and Black Album. I remember clearly the disappointment in the silly rushed cheesy sounds and melodies of most of Lovesexy. Now it's looked at as a masterpiece.

I remember the same being said about the production and compositions of most of Parade (outside of two-three solid tracks).

I think Prince loves to completely axe his previous directions and even his previous fans from time to time, and if you really listen very closely, it all seems very calculated and masterful in hindsight, this new album certainly fits the same bill of destroying his previous expectations . Some of you seem completely unaware the confusion and general disappointment prince fans even had with SOTT when it came out, shitty charting, shitty silly songs (U Got The Look? HOt Thing?) compared to what they wanted (when Doves Cry)

I think that right now Prince has made a seductive album for all the housewives in the world... like it or not (I'm not kidding!). And for the first time since Let's Go Crazy, he is letting the mix sound noisy and busy even obscuring the vocals in a cloud of noise. All the lyrics are carefully aimed at a certain mentality as is the vibe and melody structures. It might not be aimed at you, and it might not be aimed at who you hang with, but he is definitely aiming with a target in mind, and he is still working on his own terms. He will ALWAYS strive to piss you off and surprise you in a negative way.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > The unostentatious deterioration of Prince’s sound! Why the blandness?