Author | Message |
Moderator moderator |
Is Prince The Next Amadeus? I watched Amadeus last weekend with my boys. I haven't seen it since the 80's; tremendous movie with Tom Hulce and F. Murray Abraham, among others.
Anyway, he was a prodigy... a spectacular musician who wrote his first symphony before the age of 8, among other things! The character F. Murray Abraham played was in an insane asylum, and told a priest that he was responsible for Mozart's death. He played a little ditty of his work, and the priest did not recognize it... he played another one of his dittys, again, the priest did not recognize it... he said, well, how about this one... played a bit, and the priest says, Oh, that's great! Yes that's wonderful, I recognize that! He stopped playing and said, that was Mozart. My point... in a hundred years, I believe Prince's music, his scores, his arrangements, will be looked back on and still be recognized. His work has already been played by symphonies and performed by the ballet. His music will stand the test of time. In that sense - I think, like Mozart, his music will live forever... can you name another artist of the day that will have that staying power? |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Amadeus could NOT carry prince's FUNK rag. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Uh huh I know the whole dialogue to this because it was my father's favorite movie. I always thought Prince's fashion during lovesexy was very Mozart inspired. As for the music, they are both musical geniuses but different styles and different times but I don't think it is far fetched to compare them to one another. My God, can you imagine learning to play 20 instruments BY YOURSELF there is no other way to explain that except a gift that you were given to be able to do that. Just like Mozart started writing full blown symphonies, operas and other pieces of music at such a young age. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Years ago, some female friend of his said that Amadeus was Prince's favorite movie and he watched it over and over again. The Edwardian clothes and look was from that era, Prince was a pop star with hints of classical greatness in his music and looks. He has always came across as a genius, serious, dark, moody, mysterious, distant,frighteningly intense, like beethoven even more than mozart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
one of my favorite movies -- top 5 easily
mozart was a masterful songwriter and arranger one of the most prolific composers ever he could obviously write down exactly what he heard in his head not just a melody, but an entire score at once prince can't write music by hand this limits his creation he's gotta jam and record to preserve what he hears half of his "songs" are grooves, tunes, and studio effects he's never arranged for full orchestra and those 20+ instruments he learned it's not quite the feat we all make it out to be once you learn brass, you can play them all learn woodwind, you understand the rest learn percussion, guitar, and keys then everything else comes easily prince played by ear and made up his own songs he didn't read from a score or play for the philharmonic he got his technique from watching and hearing others play not to mention all those moody hours he spent alone anytime you want -- compare notes, literally place mozart next to prince, sheet to sheet arrangements, harmonies, and melodies yeah, prince is a musical genius probably in more ways than mozart but when it truly comes to the art and craft of songwriting wolfy takes the lead and even today there are others just as inspiring take a peek into Berklee and see what you can see but i gotta admit as a whole for what Prince is and for what Prince does i can't think of anyone dead or alive who's been or done any better btw, for conspiracy theorists there are some other interesting similarities between the two [Edited 5/10/07 1:04am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Snap said: one of my favorite movies -- top 5 easily
mozart was a masterful songwriter and arranger one of the most prolific composers ever he could obviously write down exactly what he heard in his head not just a melody, but an entire score at once prince can't write music by hand this limits his creation he's gotta jam and record to preserve what he hears half of his "songs" are grooves, tunes, and studio effects he's never arranged for full orchestra and those 20+ instruments he learned it's not quite the feat we all make it out to be once you learn brass, you can play them all learn woodwind, you understand the rest learn percussion, guitar, and keys then everything else comes easily prince played by ear and made up his own songs he didn't read from a score or play for the philharmonic he got his technique from watching and hearing others play not to mention all those moody hours he spent alone anytime you want -- compare notes, literally place mozart next to prince, sheet to sheet arrangements, harmonies, and melodies yeah, prince is a musical genius probably in more ways than mozart but when it truly comes to the art and craft of songwriting wolfy takes the lead and even today there are others just as inspiring take a peek into Berklee and see what you can see but i gotta admit for what Prince is and for what Prince does i can't think of anyone dead or alive who's been or done any better [Edited 5/10/07 0:41am] so.. u're saying that when he writes ballads straight from the piano.. that's not original? to this day.. when i see the beginning of UTCM.. (piano scene) .. that is one of the most kick ass pieces he's written to me.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i do it myself
and so do hundreds others but that's merely one voice and ten fingers i agree, prince does beautiful stuff amazingly beautiful and performs it well but still he's not the only one when it comes to writing a song others excel just as well and better | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Snap said: prince can't write music by hand
this limits his creation I was referring to your statement.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Flowerz said: Snap said: prince can't write music by hand
this limits his creation I was referring to your statement.. Well, there is certainly a difference in the products of composers and songwriters, I don't think that is fully being taken into account. The aims of both are a bit different and similar in many ways too. They both are judged mainly on their abilities to inspire. However, the common man is much more easily moved today by simple music. The layperson may not be able to appreciate many things about classical music. It's a very difficult comparison. I would put it this way, The Beatles wrote songs that were much simpler than lots of classical music that wouldn't be able to move anyone. Classical is technical, complex, european and very rulebound. I doubt if Prince can make that kind of music, nor should he, it would be a total waste of time for him. There is no doubt that the Mozarts and Beethovens were specialists at the study and creation of symphonic music and that all the techniques and methodology in that vein of music, would not have much in common with what Prince has done. I think the comparison holds however in that there has always been a general aura around prince that he was a pop version of mozart or a great classical composer, something i believe he has always been very conscious of. It would make an endless arguement, the world has changed so much, and basic craft would be useless to many modern musicians, who has time to learn all that fossilized crap? I never did so I quit and did my own thing, that is what American art is. I've seen classical musicians play some exquisite, incredibly complex stuff that just doesn't move me, every musician makes that kind of music, but I don't believe that superficial things like that are of much artistic or creative merit at all. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
One need only listen to the song "Condition of the Heart" to hear a glimpse of Prince's orchestral potential.
It's probably his most symphonic take on a song... the strings, the piano, the arrangement, the choir of vocals, his lead... mmm. brilliant. Add to the fact that he is playing every note of music and singing every part, it's, dare I say... genius. Keeping this in mind - it is my opinion that if Prince ever truly wanted to write for a symphony, or create an opera, he could. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
June7 said: One need only listen to the song "Condition of the Heart" to hear a glimpse of Prince's orchestral potential.
It's probably his most symphonic take on a song... the strings, the piano, the arrangement, the choir of vocals, his lead... mmm. brilliant. Add to the fact that he is playing every note of music and singing every part, it's, dare I say... genius. Keeping this in mind - it is my opinion that if Prince ever truly wanted to write for a symphony, or create an opera, he could. Oh, he had better write one! I've been waiting for that to happen for a long time. Come on Prince, channel you inner Mozart. I know you can do it! I'll be your mezzo soloist if you need one. [Edited 5/10/07 9:42am] Wanna hear me sing? www.ChampagneHoneybee.com | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mozfonky said: Years ago, some female friend of his said that Amadeus was Prince's favorite movie and he watched it over and over again. The Edwardian clothes and look was from that era, Prince was a pop star with hints of classical greatness in his music and looks. He has always came across as a genius, serious, dark, moody, mysterious, distant,frighteningly intense, like beethoven even more than mozart.
Ummmm...Amadeus didn't live during the Edwardian period. He died in 1791. Edward VII of England (for whom the Edwardian period is named) wasn't crowned until 1901. But, yes -- there were some Lovesexy outfits inspired by the clothing of Mozart's time. We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Snap said: prince can't write music by hand this limits his creation [Edited 5/10/07 1:04am] U guys are funny. If the technology that is available 2 today was around back in Amadeus time.....they would NOT have been writing by hand. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: Snap said: prince can't write music by hand this limits his creation [Edited 5/10/07 1:04am] U guys are funny. If the technology that is available 2 today was around back in Amadeus time.....they would NOT have been writing by hand. To your point, I believe Irving Berlin couldn't read or write music, either. He employed the same transcriber for most of his career, and had a piano with a keyboard he could shift to compose in different keys. (He played in C major only.) We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mozart died at, what, 35? I'm glad Prince is not the next Amadeus. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
Genesia said: mozfonky said: Years ago, some female friend of his said that Amadeus was Prince's favorite movie and he watched it over and over again. The Edwardian clothes and look was from that era, Prince was a pop star with hints of classical greatness in his music and looks. He has always came across as a genius, serious, dark, moody, mysterious, distant,frighteningly intense, like beethoven even more than mozart.
Ummmm...Amadeus didn't live during the Edwardian period. He died in 1791. Edward VII of England (for whom the Edwardian period is named) wasn't crowned until 1901. But, yes -- there were some Lovesexy outfits inspired by the clothing of Mozart's time. 1901??? |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
June7 said: Genesia said: Ummmm...Amadeus didn't live during the Edwardian period. He died in 1791. Edward VII of England (for whom the Edwardian period is named) wasn't crowned until 1901. But, yes -- there were some Lovesexy outfits inspired by the clothing of Mozart's time. 1901??? Ummm...yes? Edward VII succeeded his mother, Queen Victoria. He was king from 1901 to 1910. We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Genesia said: June7 said: 1901??? Ummm...yes? Edward VII succeeded his mother, Queen Victoria. He was king from 1901 to 1910. yeah, i just looked it up, all I knew was that Prince's ruffles and lace were always called "edwardian" and I always thought that it was the same as what the classical guys wore. You are correct my four eyed friend. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mozfonky said: Genesia said: Ummm...yes? Edward VII succeeded his mother, Queen Victoria. He was king from 1901 to 1910. yeah, i just looked it up, all I knew was that Prince's ruffles and lace were always called "edwardian" and I always thought that it was the same as what the classical guys wore. You are correct my four eyed friend. Yeah, I know they called it Edwardian. But ruffles and lace were long gone by then. Reporters are lazy. I know -- I was one. We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Genesia said: Graycap23 said: U guys are funny. If the technology that is available 2 today was around back in Amadeus time.....they would NOT have been writing by hand. To your point, I believe Irving Berlin couldn't read or write music, either. He employed the same transcriber for most of his career, and had a piano with a keyboard he could shift to compose in different keys. (He played in C major only.) Irving Berlin could only play in F sharp My author page: https://www.amazon.com/au...eretttruth | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JesseDezz said: Genesia said: To your point, I believe Irving Berlin couldn't read or write music, either. He employed the same transcriber for most of his career, and had a piano with a keyboard he could shift to compose in different keys. (He played in C major only.) Irving Berlin could only play in F sharp So he liked the black keys then. Wanna hear me sing? www.ChampagneHoneybee.com | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
When I first learned who Prince really was (not that Purple Rain was a good source), this was going back a year or two...
I did think of him as a musical genius like Mozart. They were alike in the fact that their lives were dedicated to the music. And I had a fear Prince would be the type who'd die for his art the way Mozart did... but after learning about how he grounded himself during his years as , that fear went away. Needless to say, Prince is a musical genius and is just plain awesome. had 2 run away... pride was 2 strong. It started raining, baby, the birds were gone | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
Genesia said: June7 said: 1901??? Ummm...yes? Edward VII succeeded his mother, Queen Victoria. He was king from 1901 to 1910. My bad... I was thinking of the Victorian period... |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
UCantHavaDaMango said: JesseDezz said: Irving Berlin could only play in F sharp So he liked the black keys then. I read a biography on Irving Berlin years ago - many thanks to the local neighborhood library! My author page: https://www.amazon.com/au...eretttruth | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My point... in a hundred years, I believe Prince's music, his scores, his arrangements, will be looked back on and still be recognized. His work has already been played by symphonies and performed by the ballet. His music will stand the test of time.
In that sense - I think, like Mozart, his music will live forever... can you name another artist of the day that will have that staying power? I/f all you know of mozart and the classics that time you are music challenged mozart and many others will touch your soul and you feel as if angels are calling to you you may even break into tears no prince will fade like a rose compared to them | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
misslilly said: My point... in a hundred years, I believe Prince's music, his scores, his arrangements, will be looked back on and still be recognized. His work has already been played by symphonies and performed by the ballet. His music will stand the test of time.
In that sense - I think, like Mozart, his music will live forever... can you name another artist of the day that will have that staying power? I/f all you know of mozart and the classics that time you are music challenged mozart and many others will touch your soul and you feel as if angels are calling to you you may even break into tears no prince will fade like a rose compared to them Don't assume about what I know or don't know musically. You don't know me enough to be making that type of statement about me, however poorly written... |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OMG no fucking way is he anywhere near ANY of master classical composers. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
SlamGlam said: OMG no fucking way is he anywhere near ANY of master classical composers.
You see? That's better. That's just a straight disagreement. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
SlamGlam said: OMG no fucking way is he anywhere near ANY of master classical composers.
But, in a hundred years from now, who knows what they're going to be listening to, and what they will consider as noteworthy. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |