independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Was everyone happy with the remastering on 'Ultimate'?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 02/07/07 3:58am

loveisnotgod

Was everyone happy with the remastering on 'Ultimate'?

I know these were done from copies and not the original master tapes.
Basically the songs were compressed ALOT for higher volume and i think they sound pretty bad especially the extended versions which sound very squashed.

Don;t get me wrong they're not awful at all and on a car stereo or something like that they probably sound o.k but they don;t do the recordings justice.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/07/07 4:04am

JoeTyler

I haven't listened Ultimate (because I think it's a waste of money), but nevertheless I think that the remastering of TVBOP was just EXCELLENT.

By the way, do you know if Warner is planning to release a Remaster Series of Prince or something like that?
tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 02/07/07 4:10am

loveisnotgod

JoeTyler said:

I haven't listened Ultimate (because I think it's a waste of money), but nevertheless I think that the remastering of TVBOP was just EXCELLENT.

By the way, do you know if Warner is planning to release a Remaster Series of Prince or something like that?


Is TVBOP remastered? I didn;t know that.

I'm afraid i have no knowledge about future remasters although i heard someone say Purple rain was gonna be remastered soon.

Imagine a remastered SOTT the celebrate the 20 years it's been out? Of course it depends who would do it but i think the fuckadelic remasters are great, clear and dynamic; Prince has a catalogue which deserves that treatment; don;t ya think?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 02/07/07 5:55am

Anx

i thought it sounded nice, though i wasn't blown away. it was nice to hear some of those b-side/12" tracks cleaned up for CD, though. nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 02/07/07 5:59am

loveisnotgod

Anx said:

i thought it sounded nice, though i wasn't blown away. it was nice to hear some of those b-side/12" tracks cleaned up for CD, though. nod


The original let's work extended sounded better.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 02/07/07 6:03am

Anx

loveisnotgod said:

Anx said:

i thought it sounded nice, though i wasn't blown away. it was nice to hear some of those b-side/12" tracks cleaned up for CD, though. nod


The original let's work extended sounded better.


you mean the album version? there are several album versions i prefer to the 12" versions - "hot thing", for example - but it's nice to have those previously vinyl/cassingle-only mixes on a professionally remastered CD, just to have. shrug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 02/07/07 6:08am

datdude

i guess my ears are rubbish or something. i'd have to listen compartively to pick up on certain differences you all are pointing out.

Best thing to me about Ultimate though is the Hot Thing extended remix, I'm feelin' it. Didn't know it was even out there. Worst thing is that Cream debacle
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 02/07/07 6:10am

Anx

datdude said:

i guess my ears are rubbish or something. i'd have to listen compartively to pick up on certain differences you all are pointing out.

Best thing to me about Ultimate though is the Hot Thing extended remix, I'm feelin' it. Didn't know it was even out there. Worst thing is that Cream debacle


they TRULY could have kept the cream remix off there! lol

heck, put on 'call the law' instead, at least it has camp value.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 02/07/07 11:12am

superspaceboy

avatar

Anx said:

loveisnotgod said:



The original let's work extended sounded better.


you mean the album version? there are several album versions i prefer to the 12" versions - "hot thing", for example - but it's nice to have those previously vinyl/cassingle-only mixes on a professionally remastered CD, just to have. shrug


I agree. Having Kiss 12" on CD was nice. The 1st CD I dunno is ok, but the second CD was where it was at for me.

Christian Zombie Vampires

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 02/07/07 11:22am

superspaceboy

avatar

Anx said:

datdude said:

i guess my ears are rubbish or something. i'd have to listen compartively to pick up on certain differences you all are pointing out.

Best thing to me about Ultimate though is the Hot Thing extended remix, I'm feelin' it. Didn't know it was even out there. Worst thing is that Cream debacle


they TRULY could have kept the cream remix off there! lol

heck, put on 'call the law' instead, at least it has camp value.


There were several songs that could have been left off...just for the sake of having something DIFFERENT out there for the fans.

Easily left off

I would Die 4 U
Money don't Matter 2nite rolleyes
Nothing Compares 2 U confused
Little Red COrvette Mix
Hot Thing Remix
Cream Remix

And replace them with

Take Me with U
Mountains
I wish U heaven
Sexy Dancer 12"
Anotherlover 12"
HouseQuake 12"

Christian Zombie Vampires

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 02/07/07 11:53am

Abrazo

what does the booklet say about remastering?
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 02/07/07 1:35pm

ufoclub

avatar

the waveform's don't look squashed, it doesn't sound squashed... confuse
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 02/07/07 1:44pm

paisley16

avatar

Anx said:

it was nice to hear some of those b-side/12" tracks cleaned up for CD, though. nod


nod definitely. since the only place I've generally ever heard those B-sides/extended versions is my old vinyl or cassette taped from my old vinyl- I thought it sounded great! I got that CD for Christmas, and actually had goosebumps hearing some of that stuff. Many of those long versions I hadn't listened to in way too long....
Ask where they're going, they'll tell U – "Nowhere"
They've taken a lifetime lease on Paisley Park ...music
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 02/08/07 5:25am

Abrazo

Doesnt this forum have any people left who are willing to answer a simple question?

WHAT DOES THE BOOKLET SAY ABOUT REMASTERING?
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 02/08/07 6:41am

floralelephant
s

The booklet doesn't say anything about remastering...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 02/08/07 7:39am

ufoclub

avatar

floralelephants said:

The booklet doesn't say anything about remastering...


it isn't even claimed it's remastered on the booklet, does it? There might be one credit... I can't find it in my house! mad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 02/08/07 8:03am

Abrazo

floralelephants said:

The booklet doesn't say anything about remastering...

If thats true, then peeps are talking out of their aholes with this "remaster" shit.

--
[Edited 2/8/07 8:05am]
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 02/08/07 8:06am

paisley16

avatar

ufoclub said:

floralelephants said:

The booklet doesn't say anything about remastering...


it isn't even claimed it's remastered on the booklet, does it? There might be one credit... I can't find it in my house! mad


nope
Ask where they're going, they'll tell U – "Nowhere"
They've taken a lifetime lease on Paisley Park ...music
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 02/08/07 8:15am

ufoclub

avatar

Abrazo said:

floralelephants said:

The booklet doesn't say anything about remastering...

If thats true, then peeps are talking out of their aholes with this "remaster" shit.

--
[Edited 2/8/07 8:05am]


I believe it was remastered, but very conservatively. I made sure by checking the waveform to see if it was different and it was (on at least Gett Off). A simply volume change wouldn't affect the proportional shape of the wavefrom, but any kind of tampering with the EQ or compression will make a different shape.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 02/08/07 8:16am

ufoclub

avatar

and someone who posted on here (or was it housequake.com?) actually helped with the production of this compilation, and confirmed that it was remastered.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 02/08/07 8:34am

Abrazo

ufoclub said:

and someone who posted on here (or was it housequake.com?) actually helped with the production of this compilation, and confirmed that it was remastered.

and you believe all that?

when it it's TRULY remastered the booklet will SURELY say so.
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 02/08/07 9:01am

ufoclub

avatar

Abrazo said:

ufoclub said:

and someone who posted on here (or was it housequake.com?) actually helped with the production of this compilation, and confirmed that it was remastered.

and you believe all that?

when it it's TRULY remastered the booklet will SURELY say so.


I made sure by checking the waveform to see if it was different and it was (on at least Gett Off). A simply volume change wouldn't affect the proportional shape of the wavefrom, but any kind of tampering with the EQ or compression will make a different shape.

And yes, the person or people do work professionally and were part of the team that created the compilation. In fact they were interviewed in an article about it, and that link was posted. It was one of their personal record collections that the photography of prince stuff depicts.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 02/08/07 9:08am

Abrazo

ufoclub said:

Abrazo said:


and you believe all that?

when it it's TRULY remastered the booklet will SURELY say so.


I made sure by checking the waveform to see if it was different and it was (on at least Gett Off). A simply volume change wouldn't affect the proportional shape of the wavefrom, but any kind of tampering with the EQ or compression will make a different shape.

And yes, the person or people do work professionally and were part of the team that created the compilation. In fact they were interviewed in an article about it, and that link was posted. It was one of their personal record collections that the photography of prince stuff depicts.

"on at least Gett off"?

ok.

LOL.

Really, when a new CD is TRULY remastered they always put it on there.
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 02/08/07 9:30am

ufoclub

avatar

Abrazo said:

ufoclub said:



I made sure by checking the waveform to see if it was different and it was (on at least Gett Off). A simply volume change wouldn't affect the proportional shape of the wavefrom, but any kind of tampering with the EQ or compression will make a different shape.

And yes, the person or people do work professionally and were part of the team that created the compilation. In fact they were interviewed in an article about it, and that link was posted. It was one of their personal record collections that the photography of prince stuff depicts.

"on at least Gett off"?

ok.

LOL.

Really, when a new CD is TRULY remastered they always put it on there.



meaning I doubted it was really remastered, so I opened the wave form of Gett Off from the album and from the new compilation, and they were different. So it was remastered (apparently from the two track mixdown)

It is odd that they didn't say anything in the booklet, and that is why I did that test, but if you look at the tech specs on amazon.com it will be listed as a remastered product. So it was promoted that way.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 02/08/07 11:42am

livewire

avatar

This PopMatters feature from Feb. 2 addresses the remastering issue specifically.

http://www.popmatters.com...te-prince/

Here's the relevant bit:

Yes, fans new and old can enjoy the fruits of their labor: two CDs with 28 classic Prince tracks, 11 which are remixes, which sound better than ever despite not being remastered. (Rhino declined to comment on the issue of remastering for this story, citing contractual confidentiality.)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 02/08/07 12:54pm

Abrazo

livewire said:


Yes, fans new and old can enjoy the fruits of their labor: two CDs with 28 classic Prince tracks, 11 which are remixes, which sound better than ever despite not being remastered. (Rhino declined to comment on the issue of remastering for this story, citing contractual confidentiality.)

Well I guess that settles that.
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 02/08/07 2:41pm

ufoclub

avatar

Abrazo said:

livewire said:


Yes, fans new and old can enjoy the fruits of their labor: two CDs with 28 classic Prince tracks, 11 which are remixes, which sound better than ever despite not being remastered. (Rhino declined to comment on the issue of remastering for this story, citing contractual confidentiality.)

Well I guess that settles that.


"pop matters" is more credible than analyzing the wave file? No.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 02/08/07 2:44pm

Abrazo

ufoclub said:

Abrazo said:


Well I guess that settles that.


"pop matters" is more credible than analyzing the wave file? No.

why would they be silent about it?

putting "DIGITALLY REMASTERED" on it sells.
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 02/08/07 3:30pm

ufoclub

avatar

Abrazo said:

ufoclub said:



"pop matters" is more credible than analyzing the wave file? No.

why would they be silent about it?

putting "DIGITALLY REMASTERED" on it sells.


I completely agree with you. something weird is going on. Why did the people interviewed in the article you quoted (who are the ones I mentioned that have posted) originally flat out said it was remastered at the time the collection was originally being scheduled for release? why is it then not printed in the booklet? The only thing I can guess is that they remastered them then ran into a problem with some contractual prince glitch and were not allowed to say such. I can actually post the wave files in a second for everyone (interested) to see...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 02/09/07 12:58am

Abrazo

ufoclub said:

Abrazo said:


why would they be silent about it?

putting "DIGITALLY REMASTERED" on it sells.


I completely agree with you. something weird is going on. Why did the people interviewed in the article you quoted (who are the ones I mentioned that have posted) originally flat out said it was remastered at the time the collection was originally being scheduled for release? why is it then not printed in the booklet? The only thing I can guess is that they remastered them then ran into a problem with some contractual prince glitch and were not allowed to say such. I can actually post the wave files in a second for everyone (interested) to see...

If there is a contractual glitch, which is possible, I am sure Prince would have tried to block the release and we would have heard something about that.
You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Was everyone happy with the remastering on 'Ultimate'?