independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > 3121 is totally unlistenable!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 4 <1234
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 11/18/06 3:24am

mikek1

metalorange said:

AsylumUtopia said:


I mean you could create your own versions using a wave editor. I'm not sure of the technical jargon so I'll just say it as best I can - you need to lower the wave volume enough to make sure the peaks no longer hit the top or bottom of the wav (i.e. make sure that nothing is going into the very high and low registers). It won't get rid of the clipping, but it'll make it less noticeable when you crank the volume up.

OK, I know that technically isn't remastering, but it should make it sound better.


I don't think that would work. If you have music in a wave editor where the original sound already goes beyond the top or bottom limit, it's like a curve with a flat line. If you reduce that down, the peaks are not suddenly going to occur, they're long gone, all you would do is bring the flat line down to a lower decibel, the clipping would still be in the same place.

I don't know, I heard somewhere that Prince still prefers analogue to digital recording, it may be that the engineers of today can't handle the subtleties of analogue and when they convert it to digital you get the peaks going beyond the digital level, thinking that's the way the artist wants it they just leave it.

Or they're being ordered to crank it to the highest level they can get and be consistent through the CD, somethings got to give in the process for the more subtle songs to be at a decent volume. Te Amo being okay on 3121 can be explained by the fact it never really hits loud decibels, it's a relatively quiet song.

Imagine a quiet guitar with a really loud drum beat that goes off the graph - you'd have to reduce the drum down and the guitar would also reduce to the point you couldn't hear it - so they have to leave some clipping/flat lining in for a decent CD volume. Or an album with a few quiet songs next to some really loud drum and bass songs, it must be hard to keep the levels consistent. Perhaps one of the problems is simply that Prince's albums have such a variety of sound and instruments it becomes almost impossible to equalise them all at a similar level thoughout an album.


That is happening!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 11/18/06 11:14am

NDRU

avatar

bonedaddy said:

But how do you know it was recorded fine?

I aint trying to be funny, but we are talking about Prince.No musician with ears would record like that, I would say he has a good ear for music.There is no way he would do that, I don't doubt he pushes his equipment, but someone's fucking it up further down the line by trying to get more from it. It aint about being louder, its about the sound quality/clarity becoming fucked up (not the technical term) I believe he's recording digitally, and he's recording on the edge (perfection, possibly) then as soon as someone touches anything, it's fucked ever so slightly, and becomes more apparent on certain tracks. didn't seem to happen on the old stuff, where analogue was transfered to cd.
Just shows that he probably doesnt ever listen to an off-the-shelf cd of his own work.


yes, he exercises the most meticulous control of his music of any artist. This is why I don't see him relinquishing control for the mastering without having any input or at least the final say as to whether it's okay sounding--especially now that he's so "free."

We haven't addressed this yet, but who says Prince's ears are tha same as they were at 25? I'd be surprised if they were, honestly. He's not deaf, obviously he sings on pitch, but does he hear the subtle things he used to?
[Edited 11/18/06 11:15am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 11/18/06 11:17am

laurarichardso
n

minneapolisgenius said:

IdeaLady said:

lol You people R something else....I have listened 2 many songs over the

years that have bothered my ears...Hurt ?? give me a BREAK..

NOTHING that Prince

has EVER recorded has Hurt or offended,or disturbed me like the "Rap Crap"


that some folks R cranking up 2 listern 2 these days...Besides you can always

turn it down or off completely....

Not even "Gangsta Glam"? razz


-----
Good Lord. Get a life. Your still living in 90 with the Gangster Glam comments.
Nothing is wrong with 3121. We got a lot of people on this board who are RnB phobic.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 11/18/06 12:50pm

2freaky4church
1

avatar

It is listenable, just barely. But I try to avoid telling people I am a fan.
All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 11/18/06 12:53pm

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Audiophiles have messed up ears, that is my contention.
All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 11/18/06 4:12pm

bonedaddy

yes, he exercises the most meticulous control of his music of any artist. This is why I don't see him relinquishing control for the mastering without having any input or at least the final say as to whether it's okay sounding--especially now that he's so "free."

what would the excuse be for all those other albums, non-prince out there? It aint just a few of Princes later albums, theres hundreds of other albums out there.
Once he's handed over his recordings, I don't see him having any more involvement in getting the album pressed and out the door. As far as he's concerned, his job is done.
Just a thought, His on-line releases seem to sound fine, yes, I know they are quieter because of the bit-rate, or what-ever. It would be interesting to know what the differences are, on a technical level. Surely they are closer sounding to the source material?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 11/19/06 4:04am

mikek1

bonedaddy said:

yes, he exercises the most meticulous control of his music of any artist. This is why I don't see him relinquishing control for the mastering without having any input or at least the final say as to whether it's okay sounding--especially now that he's so "free."

what would the excuse be for all those other albums, non-prince out there? It aint just a few of Princes later albums, theres hundreds of other albums out there.
Once he's handed over his recordings, I don't see him having any more involvement in getting the album pressed and out the door. As far as he's concerned, his job is done.
Just a thought, His on-line releases seem to sound fine, yes, I know they are quieter because of the bit-rate, or what-ever. It would be interesting to know what the differences are, on a technical level. Surely they are closer sounding to the source material?


Bonedaddy you are a man of great observation and interlect!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 11/19/06 4:06am

mikek1

bonedaddy said:

But how do you know it was recorded fine?

I aint trying to be funny, but we are talking about Prince.No musician with ears would record like that, I would say he has a good ear for music.There is no way he would do that, I don't doubt he pushes his equipment, but someone's fucking it up further down the line by trying to get more from it. It aint about being louder, its about the sound quality/clarity becoming fucked up (not the technical term) I believe he's recording digitally, and he's recording on the edge (perfection, possibly) then as soon as someone touches anything, it's fucked ever so slightly, and becomes more apparent on certain tracks. didn't seem to happen on the old stuff, where analogue was transfered to cd.
Just shows that he probably doesnt ever listen to an off-the-shelf cd of his own work.


YES PRAISE THE LORD; there;s smart people on here who say things i thought myself! You are so fucking correct man!!
[Edited 11/19/06 4:07am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 11/19/06 6:27am

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

laurarichardson said:

minneapolisgenius said:


Not even "Gangsta Glam"? razz


-----
Good Lord. Get a life. Your still living in 90 with the Gangster Glam comments.
Nothing is wrong with 3121. We got a lot of people on this board who are RnB phobic.

I'm "living in 90"? lol But hey, Gangsta Glam is CLASSIC Prince trying too hard. lol Are we not allowed to discuss things he's done in the past here?

And that's your opinion that there's nothing wrong with 3121. Others might not like it so much. Maybe because it's too slick and generic sounding IMO. How's that for a start? It has nothing to do with being "r&b phobic". wtf. lol I love r&b, but a lot of it that's out these days sounds the same and is just zzz boring.

I consider myself a dedicated Prince fan, but that doesn't mean I have to love every damn thing the man does. Jesus Christ people are blind here sometimes. wacky

Like I said before, the only track I like on it is the title track, and maybe Lolita a little bit. shrug But that's not what this thread is about anyway, is it? It's about how loud it is. neutral
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 11/19/06 12:19pm

NDRU

avatar

bonedaddy said:

ndru said

yes, he exercises the most meticulous control of his music of any artist. This is why I don't see him relinquishing control for the mastering without having any input or at least the final say as to whether it's okay sounding--especially now that he's so "free."

what would the excuse be for all those other albums, non-prince out there? It aint just a few of Princes later albums, theres hundreds of other albums out there.


like I said, I agree that mastering fucks up a lot of music today, but it's just one part of the process. It also improves some shitty recordings. But my question is, why does Musicology sound fine to me, but A Million Days sound fucked up to me. Those are on the same album, probably mastered together. But not recorded together.

Once he's handed over his recordings, I don't see him having any more involvement in getting the album pressed and out the door. As far as he's concerned, his job is done.


I can't believe this would be true of the same guy who pulled the Black Album at the last minute. Who fought and fought to gain control of his masters. I just don't buy that.

Just a thought, His on-line releases seem to sound fine, yes, I know they are quieter because of the bit-rate, or what-ever. It would be interesting to know what the differences are, on a technical level. Surely they are closer sounding to the source material?


Not sure. I don't claim to have the answers (and none of us has watched him record), but I'm only saying if there's a problem with Prince's albums, it's silly to assume Prince played no part in that.
[Edited 11/19/06 12:20pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 11/19/06 1:15pm

mikek1

NDRU said:[quote]

bonedaddy said:

ndru said

I can't believe this would be true of the same guy who pulled the Black Album at the last minute. Who fought and fought to gain control of his masters. I just don't buy that.

Just a thought, His on-line releases seem to sound fine, yes, I know they are quieter because of the bit-rate, or what-ever. It would be interesting to know what the differences are, on a technical level. Surely they are closer sounding to the source material?


Not sure. I don't claim to have the answers (and none of us has watched him record), but I'm only saying if there's a problem with Prince's albums, it's silly to assume Prince played no part in that.
[Edited 11/19/06 12:20pm]


no it's not! Hardly any artists have any input in the mastering and Prince hasn't either.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 11/19/06 1:35pm

MrHappyRave4

mikek1 said:

This album sound horrible.It's compressed and distorted; far too loud.
It literally gives me an headache.

For you is better sounding than this and that is the truth.

It's either universal's fault or the actual guy who mastered it but someone needs to be accountable.

If i ever interviewed Prince i would bring this up first.


Is this a Michael Jackson fan writing this, and just wanting to hate on Prince? What expertise do you base your claims of "horrible compression and distortion"?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 11/19/06 1:35pm

MrHappyRave4

mikek1 said:

luv4u said:

Sounds fine to me smile


It's far from fine.

I have cds at level 34(volume) on my system. This cd is too loud at 40(the higher is actually lower volume).

It's been mastered FAR too loud.
I wish record labels and engineers wouldn't do this; there is simply no need for it at all.

you can't turn it up and enjoy it because of the distortion and clipping.


I have never had any problem with volume. Maybe you need new equipment.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 11/19/06 2:38pm

bonedaddy

Is this a Michael Jackson fan writing this, and just wanting to hate on Prince? What expertise do you base your claims of "horrible compression and distortion"?

I would love for this topic to die, but, are you serious? I can't speak on behalf of others, but I for one am no 'wacko kiddy fiddler' fan, Prince is the fucking man, I wouldn't be here otherwise. just for the record, Ive been into the music for 20 years. Nobody has said a bad word about the man, as far as I can tell, this is not about 'hating' our man or his music, that's the whole point, we want it to sound amazing when we buy a cd. I can understand people saying they can't hear anything wrong, or it's just louder than the old stuff, but this is a genuine issue, I wouldn't be so brave as to suggest the whole of 3121 is unlistenable, but it has it's problems, just not problems for everyone.

It certainly aint an equipment issue either. I aint no 'beardy' hi-fi freak, but I have invested a fair amount on a good set-up over a few years, possibly makes the smaller issues more noticable, dont know for sure.

I wish somebody would ban the words; Michael'fucking'Jackson from this site, can we at least agree on that? smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 11/19/06 2:58pm

bonedaddy

like I said, I agree that mastering fucks up a lot of music today, but it's just one part of the process. It also improves some shitty recordings. But my question is, why does Musicology sound fine to me, but A Million Days sound fucked up to me. Those are on the same album, probably mastered together. But not recorded together.

Mastering is fine, when it's done correctly.
The Musicology example you give, is exactly what I have said. If they are recorded at slightly different levels, maybe due to music style or instrumentation, or even a different studio, for example, as soon as someone 'tweaks it' the slightly louder recordings (that are on the limit or perfect at that point), are made too 'loud' (distorted slightly).
So.. (takes breath!) if 'A Million Days' was recorded at a high level originally, bad mastering would have made it 'fucked up' as you would say.


The Black Album reference you made is a bad example, in my oppinion. I didn't say he can't pull a record if he don't want it out. I said that I can't see why he would have anything to do with the finished product, once he has given the tapes to the record company, they are two different things. Same as the masters issue.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 11/20/06 3:39am

mikek1

MrHappyRave4 said:

mikek1 said:

This album sound horrible.It's compressed and distorted; far too loud.
It literally gives me an headache.

For you is better sounding than this and that is the truth.

It's either universal's fault or the actual guy who mastered it but someone needs to be accountable.

If i ever interviewed Prince i would bring this up first.


Is this a Michael Jackson fan writing this, and just wanting to hate on Prince? What expertise do you base your claims of "horrible compression and distortion"?


Are you stupid?

THIS IS NOT PRINCE'S FAULT! It;s the record label's and the mastering engineer!
I LIKE THE SONGS ALOT; that's why i am bothered by what has been done to them.

YES THERE IS COMPRESSION! That's common unfortunately these days. You can cheque yourself with the correct equipment. There is also clipping.

These big record labels do not care about quality, they just want it to be as loud as possible 'to cut through on radio' which is stupidity at his worst example.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 11/20/06 6:04am

lilgish

avatar

I'm no audiophile, but damn if you can't hear who that shit peaks. You have to adjust all kinds of levels when listening to the album.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 11/20/06 9:00am

ElectricBlue

avatar

mikek1 said:

This album sound horrible.It's compressed and distorted; far too loud.
It literally gives me an headache.

For you is better sounding than this and that is the truth.

It's either universal's fault or the actual guy who mastered it but someone needs to be accountable.

If i ever interviewed Prince i would bring this up first.


The beauty about Prince is, in about a year he will have a new album cool You have a few months to go
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 11/20/06 7:33pm

TotalAlisa

avatar

mikek1 said:

This album sound horrible.It's compressed and distorted; far too loud.
It literally gives me an headache.

For you is better sounding than this and that is the truth.

It's either universal's fault or the actual guy who mastered it but someone needs to be accountable.

If i ever interviewed Prince i would bring this up first.




lol lol lol ... this is the funniest thing i have read on this forum in the longest time... with the exception of this picture
lol

Prince looks like a lil skinny fair complexion Little richard.... LOLOLLOLOL

He's lil richards love child lol
[Edited 11/20/06 19:43pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 11/20/06 7:46pm

TotalAlisa

avatar

minneapolisgenius said:

IdeaLady said:

lol You people R something else....I have listened 2 many songs over the

years that have bothered my ears...Hurt ?? give me a BREAK..

NOTHING that Prince

has EVER recorded has Hurt or offended,or disturbed me like the "Rap Crap"


that some folks R cranking up 2 listern 2 these days...Besides you can always

turn it down or off completely....

Not even "Gangsta Glam"? razz


this proves to me that prince had relations with a man lol lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 11/20/06 9:19pm

XxKristinaxX

avatar

HA...you got issues. 3121 is GREAT 2 me. Better than musicology for me, even tho musicology was great.
Let's go down 2 the holy river,
If we drown then we'll be delivered.
If we don't then we'll never see the light.
If U die before U try,
U'll have 2 come back and face the light.
When U believe it, U got a good reason 2 cry.

www.myspace.com/xxchina
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 11/20/06 11:21pm

jodude911

metalorange said:

The good thing is you don't keep banging on about the same thing endlessly.
Does this mean you are going to start a thread about every Prince album with the same basic concept? Ever a chance to bash Prince, eh? Stop beating a dead horse.


Are you saying what I think you're saying?
Are you calling Prince a dead horse???
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 11/21/06 2:21am

metalorange

avatar

jodude911 said:

metalorange said:

The good thing is you don't keep banging on about the same thing endlessly.
Does this mean you are going to start a thread about every Prince album with the same basic concept? Ever a chance to bash Prince, eh? Stop beating a dead horse.


Are you saying what I think you're saying?
Are you calling Prince a dead horse???


Nah, I was talking about Mikek1 who not long ago started basically the same thread topic about The Gold Experience album being badly mastered. I was saying is he going to start a thread about each album on the same topic.

To be honest, I'm surprised so many people can hear the awful sound quality as Mikek1 can, so I guess he's got a point, personally as I've said before, the album and others sound fine on my system.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 11/21/06 5:34am

Shapeshifter

avatar

mikek1 said:

This album sound horrible.It's compressed and distorted; far too loud.
It literally gives me an headache.

For you is better sounding than this and that is the truth.

It's either universal's fault or the actual guy who mastered it but someone needs to be accountable.

If i ever interviewed Prince i would bring this up first.


It's not unlistenable. It's just not very good. wink
There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 11/21/06 6:13am

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

TotalAlisa said:

minneapolisgenius said:


Not even "Gangsta Glam"? razz


this proves to me that prince had relations with a man lol lol

lol
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 11/22/06 1:55am

Bumhole

avatar

laurarichardson said:

minneapolisgenius said:


Not even "Gangsta Glam"? razz


-----
Good Lord. Get a life. Your still living in 90 with the Gangster Glam comments.
Nothing is wrong with 3121. We got a lot of people on this board who are RnB phobic.


Uh...the thread's about the quality of the sound. wacky Fuck all to do with RnB phobia.

Though now you come to mention it, Prince is at his worst when he churns out mediocre RnB that other people do way better. I agree with you, and God bless you! hug
There's a Bumhole in my Heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 11/22/06 5:40am

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

Bumhole said:

laurarichardson said:


-----
Good Lord. Get a life. Your still living in 90 with the Gangster Glam comments.
Nothing is wrong with 3121. We got a lot of people on this board who are RnB phobic.


Uh...the thread's about the quality of the sound. wacky Fuck all to do with RnB phobia.

Though now you come to mention it, Prince is at his worst when he churns out mediocre RnB that other people do way better. I agree with you, and God bless you! hug

lol That's what I said. nod
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 4 <1234
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > 3121 is totally unlistenable!