Author | Message |
Sign “O” the Times: New Dutch Alliance DVD !! Haven't been at the org for a while ...
so probably this is old news Just bought it at the Free Record Shop Sign "O" the Times: New Dutch Alliance DVD !! Widescreen! Digitally Remastered Release year 2006 Pal, region 2 Artikelnummer 501030 Released by Video/FilmExpress,the ones who also released the terrible chipmunk version! But this one is the Alliance Atlantis release (identical to the Canadian release?) Price : 6,99 euro at the Free Record Shop!! But be aware ... this new release looks a lot like the terrible chipmunk version. Be sure that you get the one with the release-number 501030! I first got the new sleeve with the old DVD, so check those numbers. I can’t assure you they do have the new release at your local Free Record Shop. The old and the new release have the same order-number! So the employee will not understand what you’re talking about if you ask him about the new version. There’s only one SOTT DVD in his administration. But if a new DVD will be ordered, it most probably will be the new version that will arrive. I haven’t watched it yet, So, tomorrow I let you know if I’m happy with this new release!! .... I've watched the new release: Indeed ... this new version is much, much better. The sound and picture quality is really excellent, but it's still sped up!! [Edited 10/18/06 10:19am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Goede tip!
Bedankt! Ik ga straks ff winkelen. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: Goede tip!
Bedankt! Ik ga straks ff winkelen. I can’t assure you they do have the new release at your local Free Record Shop. The old and the new release have the same order-number! So the employee will not understand what you’re talking about if you ask him about the new version. There’s only one SOTT DVD in his administration. But if a new DVD will be ordered, it most probably will be the new version that will arrive. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Maakt niet uit, joh, ik vergelijk gewoon serie nummers tot ik de juiste heb.
Wat is de 'chipmunk' versie? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: Maakt niet uit, joh, ik vergelijk gewoon serie nummers tot ik de juiste heb.
Wat is de 'chipmunk' versie? De oude nederlandse versie ... die is veel te snel! Daardoor klinkt Prince's stem als een chipmunk (tekenfilmserie) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThataintFunky said: HamsterHuey said: Maakt niet uit, joh, ik vergelijk gewoon serie nummers tot ik de juiste heb.
Wat is de 'chipmunk' versie? De oude nederlandse versie ... die is veel te snel! Daardoor klinkt Prince's stem als een chipmunk (tekenfilmserie) Aik, da's niet goed! Gelukkig heb ik die gemist. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: Wat is de 'chipmunk' versie? Chipmunk, hamster, klinkt allemaal hetzelfde! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThataintFunky said: HamsterHuey said: Goede tip!
Bedankt! Ik ga straks ff winkelen. I can’t assure you they do have the new release at your local Free Record Shop. The old and the new release have the same order-number! So the employee will not understand what you’re talking about if you ask him about the new version. There’s only one SOTT DVD in his administration. But if a new DVD will be ordered, it most probably will be the new version that will arrive. Currently you cannot order a dvd, or cd for that matter, through FreeRS, due to a new computersystem. This will hopefully be sorted in about a month. Since the dvd isn't selling all that well, it's not likely that the SOTT copy in your local store is a new (AA) version. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
According to HOUSEQUAKE this new dutch version is really very good ... but still 4% too fast | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Indeed ... this new version is much, much better.
The sound and picture quality is really excellent, but it's still sped up!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: Maakt niet uit, joh, ik vergelijk gewoon serie nummers tot ik de juiste heb.
Wat is de 'chipmunk' versie? Dutch is even more fucked up than Finnish It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.
- Lammastide | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I was just thinking about this. I saw the DVD at Suncoast Video here in New Jersey and was going to buy. But I remembered another dicussion indicating that the US version had poor quality. I have the original SOTT on VHS but its so old I don't think it will play anymore. Come to think of it I don't even have a VHS player anymore!
Anyone know where I can order the Canadian version online? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FuNkeNsteiN said: HamsterHuey said: Maakt niet uit, joh, ik vergelijk gewoon serie nummers tot ik de juiste heb.
Wat is de 'chipmunk' versie? Dutch is even more fucked up than Finnish No, believe me; Finnish wins. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HamsterHuey said: FuNkeNsteiN said: Dutch is even more fucked up than Finnish No, believe me; Finnish wins. It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.
- Lammastide | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I thought this was a great post on about the dispute between the technical quality of NTSC vs PAL, it was posted over at Housequake:
Originally posted by BeberGold on 22-09-06 at 11:34 "In addition to that, if you want the best quality ... it is known that the NTSC standard is better quality than PAL (but I don't believe it is noticeable to the human eye)." Totally wrong. NTSC is considerably worse quality than PAL - it has less vertical resolution and the colour standard is universally considered to be very poor. If something is filmed in native NTSC (29.97fps) it will have more information per second than PAL, but the human eye does not process the increase until you get to framerates of around 48 fps and therefore the extra information is wasted. Most if not all movies are shot on film at 24 fps and achieve 29.97 playback on DVD by using a telecine method to duplicate frames - therefore the NTSC version is not showing more information/resolution but inserting superflous duplicate frames to achieve the framerate. This is why on fast panning scenes there is noticable judder in NTSC DVDs. "I've never understood this speed up arguement. It was recorded on Film - 24 frames a second Coverted to NTSC - 30 frames a second Later converted to PAL - 25 frames a second ” It is very rare that an NTSC film (DVD) is encoded at 29.97 fps. That would mean approx 20% extra frames, which would force lower bitrate to be used in the encoding resulting in lower quality. The NTSC version is (usually) encode at 24 fps (23.976) with 3:2 pulldown - this means that on playback every second extra frames are added by the DVD player to achieve 29.97 fps - this keeps the original speed/length as each second only 24 frames of the source are shown - the extra frames are just that - extra. The 24 fps film master is (usually) just speeded up to 25 fps for the PAL version. That's 4%. Rarely noticable in films, but obvious in musicals etc where the pitch of the voice is more apparent. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
metalorange said: I thought this was a great post on about the dispute between the technical quality of NTSC vs PAL, it was posted over at Housequake:
Originally posted by BeberGold on 22-09-06 at 11:34 "In addition to that, if you want the best quality ... it is known that the NTSC standard is better quality than PAL (but I don't believe it is noticeable to the human eye)." Totally wrong. NTSC is considerably worse quality than PAL - it has less vertical resolution and the colour standard is universally considered to be very poor. If something is filmed in native NTSC (29.97fps) it will have more information per second than PAL, but the human eye does not process the increase until you get to framerates of around 48 fps and therefore the extra information is wasted. Most if not all movies are shot on film at 24 fps and achieve 29.97 playback on DVD by using a telecine method to duplicate frames - therefore the NTSC version is not showing more information/resolution but inserting superflous duplicate frames to achieve the framerate. This is why on fast panning scenes there is noticable judder in NTSC DVDs. "I've never understood this speed up arguement. It was recorded on Film - 24 frames a second Coverted to NTSC - 30 frames a second Later converted to PAL - 25 frames a second ” It is very rare that an NTSC film (DVD) is encoded at 29.97 fps. That would mean approx 20% extra frames, which would force lower bitrate to be used in the encoding resulting in lower quality. The NTSC version is (usually) encode at 24 fps (23.976) with 3:2 pulldown - this means that on playback every second extra frames are added by the DVD player to achieve 29.97 fps - this keeps the original speed/length as each second only 24 frames of the source are shown - the extra frames are just that - extra. The 24 fps film master is (usually) just speeded up to 25 fps for the PAL version. That's 4%. Rarely noticable in films, but obvious in musicals etc where the pitch of the voice is more apparent. 4% should not be noticable as a chipmunk effect! It's standard practice to go from 24 to 25 frames a second for all PAL euro releases.... now I used to have an Empire Strikes Back laserdisc that was 24 to 29.97 (must have been a mistake that went to the presses) and I instantly heard a slight chipmunk effect. And this was not a bootleg! My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FuNkeNsteiN said: HamsterHuey said: Maakt niet uit, joh, ik vergelijk gewoon serie nummers tot ik de juiste heb.
Wat is de 'chipmunk' versie? Dutch is even more fucked up than Finnish have you tried reading or understanding Islandic!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hello I'm new here
I am thinking about buying the dvd, so what do I ask for? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
par said: Hello I'm new here
I am thinking about buying the dvd, so what do I ask for? depends on where you live! ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ufoclub said: 4% should not be noticable as a chipmunk effect! It's standard practice to go from 24 to 25 frames a second for all PAL euro releases.... now I used to have an Empire Strikes Back laserdisc that was 24 to 29.97 (must have been a mistake that went to the presses) and I instantly heard a slight chipmunk effect. And this was not a bootleg! This 4% is very annoying, and very noticeable. If you've listened to a lot of Prince (and I suppose you have), you immediately notice the "chipmunk effect": Prince doesn't use his Camille-voice live! But the overall quality of this new dutch release is outstanding, so this is the first time I'm enjoying the chipmunk version. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThataintFunky said: ufoclub said: 4% should not be noticable as a chipmunk effect! It's standard practice to go from 24 to 25 frames a second for all PAL euro releases.... now I used to have an Empire Strikes Back laserdisc that was 24 to 29.97 (must have been a mistake that went to the presses) and I instantly heard a slight chipmunk effect. And this was not a bootleg! This 4% is very annoying, and very noticeable. If you've listened to a lot of Prince (and I suppose you have), you immediately notice the "chipmunk effect": Prince doesn't use his Camille-voice live! But the overall quality of this new dutch release is outstanding, so this is the first time I'm enjoying the chipmunk version. I want to hear this... I'll just speed up a recording by 4% and see.... My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DAFUNKYOU said: I was just thinking about this. I saw the DVD at Suncoast Video here in New Jersey and was going to buy. But I remembered another dicussion indicating that the US version had poor quality. I have the original SOTT on VHS but its so old I don't think it will play anymore. Come to think of it I don't even have a VHS player anymore!
Anyone know where I can order the Canadian version online? http://www.amazon.ca/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ufoclub said: ThataintFunky said: This 4% is very annoying, and very noticeable. If you've listened to a lot of Prince (and I suppose you have), you immediately notice the "chipmunk effect": Prince doesn't use his Camille-voice live! But the overall quality of this new dutch release is outstanding, so this is the first time I'm enjoying the chipmunk version. I want to hear this... I'll just speed up a recording by 4% and see.... Most fans adore the speeded-up voice songs, I would have thought that most would therefore think the 4% increase was an improvement! And fitting for the concert of an album where the most Camille tracks appear! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm in Australasia. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ufoclub said: ThataintFunky said: This 4% is very annoying, and very noticeable. If you've listened to a lot of Prince (and I suppose you have), you immediately notice the "chipmunk effect": Prince doesn't use his Camille-voice live! But the overall quality of this new dutch release is outstanding, so this is the first time I'm enjoying the chipmunk version. I want to hear this... I'll just speed up a recording by 4% and see.... you don't need to ... Moonraker's Wonderboy does have the same speed as the dutch DVD! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
par said: I'm in Australasia.
Order the canadian version at amazon! [Edited 10/20/06 23:17pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |