Something in the water [does not compute] and Ballad of Dorothy Parker.
Those songs are without peer and have yet to be touched by even P himself. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
but why are you trying to find an excuse for how others react? cant you just accept that some folks arent amused by what they feel is lesser quality work?
i use kate bush as perfect example of an artist who can release an album twenty years after she first appeared that still grabs universal acclaim from her fanbase. and these fans arent "asskissers" either cause The Red Shoe's was panned by much of her fanbase when it was first released... i just can't buy your theory...expecially after reading some so many reasoned comments on this thread. And I use Bruce Springsteen as an example of and artist who can release and album some 20 years later and still grab universal acclaim from his fan base. So what? You tell me-what theory have I offered up? I simply am suggesting that not everyone thinks Prince's material has gone down hill. I say it ebbs and flows. Some old stuff I like, some I don't. Some new stuff I like, some I don't. It always come down to personal taste.I suggest that people's tastes are based partly on their experiences in life---no big deal. I am sorry if it seems like I am making excuses for people not liking Prince's newer stuff. However, people can rarely articulate why the music hits them differently exactly. They can speculate on and on about why Prince has gone wrong, but sometimes people just change. I used to love MAc and Cheese. I ate too much now I don't like it.It doesn't make Prince's music any less--just one person's opinion about it. As far as Kate Bush goes. How long does she wait between albums? How much total material has she released? She and Prince are both superb artists, but they are different beasts. Same with their audiences. [Edited 8/13/06 14:13pm] "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
First up. Sales figures. Of course they don't tell you how good things are. Duh, that wasn't my point. You were disputing the fact that most people don't like Prince's new stuff as much as the old. The sales figures are a pretty good indication to the contrary. No one other than the hardcore P fans buy his new stuff. Again, the sales figures speak for themselves.Comparing the figures to Dirty Mind is a cheap shot I won't waste time with.
You are missing my point. Look at the US sales for any Prince album other than Purple Rain, BAtman, and Diamonds and Pearls. They aren't stellar numbers. They are between 500,000 to 2 million mostly. The point is that PRINCE's hardcore fans are usually the ones historically bought his albums. Hell, you think Dirty Mind's sales are a cheap shot? Why? Look at his US sales for Parade. The fact is Prince is and was rarely a blockbuster album seller and his sales are primarily his fanbase. If his albums are promoted and hyped more-they sell more. Your indicator is poor. How many copies did Come or The Gold Experience sell? Great albums--sales mean nothing. Here in the UK the Musicology tour had zero impact, but even in the States the buzz more than likely made people replay old copies of The Hits rather than pick up the new stuff. Well here in the USA Prince's tour ruled the summer and it was like 1984 or at least 1991 again. Sure, I won't argue that people came for nostalgia (who goes to concerts for new songs?). However, it wasn't like Neil Diamond. Prince was kickin' ass on the tour. He was invigorated, fresh, and the audience loved it. Did you go see the tour? Or are you just speculating on what the atmosphere here was? If you want I could bore you with the list of people I've met who all say Prince lost it, but it probably wouldn't get us anywhere. And I could bore you with a list of people I've met who became fans between 1996 and now. Who cares? What does that prove? People are different. The fact that you're even disputing that it's the majority view tells me you're in denial. I've heard it said on TV, read it in magazines. Face it, it's the dominant view! I can't even believe anyone would argue such an obvious point.
TV and magazines? Wow. Nothing like having your own mind. When I flip on the TV I see Prince on American Idol, The Grammy's, The Superbowl, The Tonight Show, and Good Morning America. When I open a magazine I see Prince mentioned at least once in every new issue of Rolling Stone--sometimes with a picture,. Also, I see him in the newest GQ being hailed as the best ever. That being said, I don't need to hear it on TV or read it. To me, Prince has still got it. Sorry if he doesn't do it for you. What I am saying is that it isn't the dominant view. It's only your view. It's how you see things. Maybe it's how the UK sees things, but Prince has been hotter here in the US than he has been since the early 90's. He is back from the wilderness. Maybe you should pick up a copy of the new USA GQ. Its's not just something I've heard on TV. That's experience. Maybe if you'd been at the Musicology Tour you'd understand. Don't get me wrong, I love my brothers in the UK, but you have to remember that it took you all until 1986 to get hip to Prince. He didn't even hit #1 until 1994. We see things different that's all. [Edited 8/13/06 14:15pm] "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said: However, people can rarely articulate why the music hits them differently exactly. what you talkin bout willis? folks have articulated very nicely within this very thread. Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In my opinion, the music he's done over the last 10 years is just as good as it was during the other years. Just because he's not getting any radio play doesn't mean a thing.Too much is expected out of Prince by a lot of people. With each new album he's always expected to come out with this brand new cutting edge sound that no ones ever done before, Sell 100 million albums, Be played on the radio again and be as popular as he was back in the Purple Rain era. It's NOT going to happen. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: skywalker said: However, people can rarely articulate why the music hits them differently exactly. what you talkin bout willis? folks have articulated very nicely within this very thread. What I mean is this: Yes, people can say things like "Because of changing his faith Prince's writing went to shit." However people rarely admit that they are in a different place than they were when Prince was new to them. Hearing Prince when you are 6th grader is different than hearing Prince as a 36 year old. Lost of thing in life change based on experience and such. People seem to dismiss this and seem to find it easier to speculate on things like Prince's personal problems (which none at this site really know)affecting his music. Think about it. People attribute their appreciation of art only to the art without considering themselves. [Edited 8/13/06 14:44pm] "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said: sosgemini said: what you talkin bout willis? folks have articulated very nicely within this very thread. What I mean is this: Yes, people can say things like "Because of changing his faith Prince's writing went to shit." However people rarely admit that they are in a different place than they were when Prince was new to them. Hearing Prince when you are 6th grader is different than hearing Prince as a 36 year old. Lost of thing in life change based on experience and such. People seem to dismiss this and seem to find it easier to speculate on things like Prince's personal problems (which none at this site really know)affecting his music. Think about it. People attribute their appreciation of art only to the art without considering themselves. [Edited 8/13/06 14:44pm] why cant we just take folks for their word? Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThePunisher said: In my opinion, the music he's done over the last 10 years is just as good as it was during the other years. Just because he's not getting any radio play doesn't mean a thing.Too much is expected out of Prince by a lot of people. With each new album he's always expected to come out with this brand new cutting edge sound that no ones ever done before, Sell 100 million albums, Be played on the radio again and be as popular as he was back in the Purple Rain era. It's NOT going to happen.
Thats very true, but then if we didn't expect something good each new release, would that not mean we had no enthusiasm to his music? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThePunisher said: In my opinion, the music he's done over the last 10 years is just as good as it was during the other years. Just because he's not getting any radio play doesn't mean a thing.Too much is expected out of Prince by a lot of people. With each new album he's always expected to come out with this brand new cutting edge sound that no ones ever done before, Sell 100 million albums, Be played on the radio again and be as popular as he was back in the Purple Rain era. It's NOT going to happen.
Ihave to dismisss completely ur argument.It doesn't matter if P is regularly played on the radios, we;re discussing his creativity during the last 10 years as P fans not as regular listener. IMHO it is clear that the standard P has set during the 80's was the peak of his creativity, and it doesn't mean that his music is irrelevant now, just that u can't go as far as P did with his blend of pop, soul,funk,blues,jazz... In a nutshell u can't discover America twice. Mind u i'm talking about popularity but artistic creativity.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
why cant we just take folks for their word? I think that often we can. There are a lot of intelligent people at this site. However, there are a lot of folks often proclaim their highly subjective opinions as fact. It is not an assumed fact that "orgers dislike Prince's music in the last 10 years". However, I've got people trying to convince me that the entire UK thinks Prince sucks shit. It's the internet. People are gonna bitch and moan about how they see things and there viewpoint--that doesn't make it the truth. One person's Dirty Mind is another person's 3121. [Edited 8/13/06 17:18pm] "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HERE IS YOUR ANSWER....
Prince's music suffer's today as a result of a few things. 1. More than ANYTHING... the genre. The funk/rock music hybrid he uniquely shaped,.. is restrictive by virtue of it being the only musical style he basically works in. I mean really man,...how many funk rock jams can one write over a 28 year period,...year after year after year.....before that shit gets old hat?? There's more to music than funk and rock!!! Is he truly a musician?.....Or a funk/rock musician?? 2. Prince's older work had the ability to walk the line between being commerically exciting and being truly different from anything else at the time. Not only musically,...but visually and themeatically he was constantly pushing the envelope of what could be SUCCESSFULLY done in pop music. Not just in a bussiness sense but in an artistic sense as well. Like Madonna,..his defining characteristic was to be constantly provoking listeners and watchers. But unlike her,..he was doing it "musically" as well. 3. Something happenned...beginning with Grafitti Bridge...where he just did a COMPLETE about face. For example,...what most people have yet to appreciate is the ground breaking work with song arranging he was doing during the LoveSexy era....ending with the Batman soundtrack. The freeform, improvisational-like techniques he was using to actually construct the songs themselves were were like NOTHING in pop music before him or since. Batdance is a perfect example of this,...there has NEVER been a top 10 song like it in pop music ever. Changing tempos and rythms 3 difeerent times in the same song,..sporadic sounds and phrases. As with Lovesexy and the Black Album,..he was not merely writing songs,...he was taking those melodies and grooves and rythms and attempting to reshape them in a completeley different form. ....And then with Graffitti Bridge ...it all stopped. The innovation, the pushing limits. Whatever happened that made him just completely stop like that,...would be interesting to know. . [Edited 8/13/06 18:04pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said: why cant we just take folks for their word? I think that often we can. There are a lot of intelligent people at this site. However, there are a lot of folks often proclaim their highly subjective opinions as fact. It is not an assumed fact that "orgers dislike Prince's music in the last 10 years". However, I've got people trying to convince me that the entire UK thinks Prince sucks shit. It's the internet. People are gonna bitch and moan about how they see things and there viewpoint--that doesn't make it the truth. One person's Dirty Mind is another person's 3121. [Edited 8/13/06 17:18pm] hey, im all for clarifying the difference between fact and opinion but you cant discredit someone's opinion by physcologically analyzing them. Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hey, im all for clarifying the difference between fact and opinion but you cant discredit someone's opinion by physcologically analyzing them. It's not about psychoanalyzing anybody. It's hoping that people will give a more interesting answer than the usual " it's a fact that it is shit because I don't like it." "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
amateur said: because prince went from young to very very old.
[Edited 8/12/06 1:53am] Very Very OLD??? He's not OLD, the man gets better every year, His music sounds like lounge music,but Ive noticed some changes ,for the better. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said: hey, im all for clarifying the difference between fact and opinion but you cant discredit someone's opinion by physcologically analyzing them. It's not about psychoanalyzing anybody. It's hoping that people will give a more interesting answer than the usual " it's a fact that it is shit because I don't like it." folks have been giving interesting, meaningful and thought out answers...re-read some of the comments... (with that being said...do orgers really dislike prince's music? i liked this thread better when i thought it was just a hypothetical question and not a declaration...) [Edited 8/13/06 21:59pm] Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: skywalker said: It's not about psychoanalyzing anybody. It's hoping that people will give a more interesting answer than the usual " it's a fact that it is shit because I don't like it." folks have been giving interesting, meaningful and thought out answers...re-read some of the comments... (with that being said...do orgers really dislike prince's music? i liked this thread better when i thought it was just a hypothetical question and not a declaration...) [Edited 8/13/06 21:59pm] It would be more interesting to Poll the Orgers - See what majority and minority there are that fit the Question? Reasons? 1. We all grow up n different Media environments, Musical tastes do tend to shift through different Generations. 2. People do change as they grow older and there tastes change with them. This isn't a bad thing, I still love Prince's work, but just not as enthusiastic as 10+ years ago. 3. When something is "New" it is always exciting, but then can become familiar and eventually mediocre. Again not bad, just the way things go. So, do all the Long termers really think Prince sucked over the last 10 years? Do all the younger Orgers enjoy the last 10 years more purely because they are younger and "Fresher" with Princes Music? It is all individual, I love Emancipation, yet a lot of Folk here don't. I don't enjoy the Black Album, but a lot of People here do etc. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purpledisc said: sosgemini said: folks have been giving interesting, meaningful and thought out answers...re-read some of the comments... (with that being said...do orgers really dislike prince's music? i liked this thread better when i thought it was just a hypothetical question and not a declaration...) [Edited 8/13/06 21:59pm] It would be more interesting to Poll the Orgers - See what majority and minority there are that fit the Question? Reasons? 1. We all grow up n different Media environments, Musical tastes do tend to shift through different Generations. 2. People do change as they grow older and there tastes change with them. This isn't a bad thing, I still love Prince's work, but just not as enthusiastic as 10+ years ago. 3. When something is "New" it is always exciting, but then can become familiar and eventually mediocre. Again not bad, just the way things go. So, do all the Long termers really think Prince sucked over the last 10 years? Do all the younger Orgers enjoy the last 10 years more purely because they are younger and "Fresher" with Princes Music? It is all individual, I love Emancipation, yet a lot of Folk here don't. I don't enjoy the Black Album, but a lot of People here do etc. truth is, some here seem to be a lot more attached to prince himself, and what they perceive to be changes in his attitude than the actual music... which is open to interpretation. suffice to say, i studied the subject of spiritual themes in prince's music for my masters in civilization and for me it's a case of "the more they change, they more they stay the same..." might be that the fans have changed more than prince, in some cases. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sexyfunkystrange said: ....And then with Graffitti Bridge ...it all stopped. The innovation, the pushing limits. Whatever happened that made him just completely stop like that,...would be interesting to know. . tres interesante . " the embassy shut to keep the fools out " - as above, so below. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Not the last 10 years- but since Musicology- Its not as naughty, sexy, provocative, thought-provoking--- all the things you think about & never say. "she don't blush cause she so damn free...when she making love its' like surgery"- Prince (I love you in me) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said: First up. Sales figures. Of course they don't tell you how good things are. Duh, that wasn't my point. You were disputing the fact that most people don't like Prince's new stuff as much as the old. The sales figures are a pretty good indication to the contrary. No one other than the hardcore P fans buy his new stuff. Again, the sales figures speak for themselves.Comparing the figures to Dirty Mind is a cheap shot I won't waste time with.
You are missing my point. Look at the US sales for any Prince album other than Purple Rain, BAtman, and Diamonds and Pearls. They aren't stellar numbers. They are between 500,000 to 2 million mostly. The point is that PRINCE's hardcore fans are usually the ones historically bought his albums. Hell, you think Dirty Mind's sales are a cheap shot? Why? Look at his US sales for Parade. The fact is Prince is and was rarely a blockbuster album seller and his sales are primarily his fanbase. If his albums are promoted and hyped more-they sell more. Your indicator is poor. How many copies did Come or The Gold Experience sell? Great albums--sales mean nothing. And I could bore you with a list of people I've met who became fans between 1996 and now. Who cares? What does that prove? People are different. The fact that you're even disputing that it's the majority view tells me you're in denial. I've heard it said on TV, read it in magazines. Face it, it's the dominant view! I can't even believe anyone would argue such an obvious point.
TV and magazines? Wow. Nothing like having your own mind. When I flip on the TV I see Prince on American Idol, The Grammy's, The Superbowl, The Tonight Show, and Good Morning America. When I open a magazine I see Prince mentioned at least once in every new issue of Rolling Stone--sometimes with a picture,. Also, I see him in the newest GQ being hailed as the best ever. That being said, I don't need to hear it on TV or read it. To me, Prince has still got it. Sorry if he doesn't do it for you. What I am saying is that it isn't the dominant view. It's only your view. It's how you see things. Maybe it's how the UK sees things, but Prince has been hotter here in the US than he has been since the early 90's. He is back from the wilderness. Maybe you should pick up a copy of the new USA GQ. Its's not just something I've heard on TV. That's experience. Maybe if you'd been at the Musicology Tour you'd understand. Don't get me wrong, I love my brothers in the UK, but you have to remember that it took you all until 1986 to get hip to Prince. He didn't even hit #1 until 1994. We see things different that's all. [Edited 8/13/06 14:15pm] This is the downside of the internet. You often get in pointless arguments with people who keep forgetting what the argument is and throw up a dozen red herrings to try and cloud the issue. First of all, sales. You're not seriously trying to argue that NPS, Rave, and TRC sold as well as his 80s albums are you? The bottom line is if you compiled a list of the best selling albums of his career around the world there wouldn't be any from the last 10 years in the Top 5 or even the top 10. The Musicology figures were boosted by Prince's little scam with the concert tickets. Now for your red herrings. Trying to say that this has got something to do with my being from the UK is yet another cop out of yours. That has nothing to do with it. As for him being in magazines and on TV a lot. Again, you miss the point. We're talking about the perception that he's lost it artisically, not how much exposure he's getting. Those are different issues. Do try and keep up. As for my "having a mind of my own", another red herring. Reading negative things about his current output doesn't affect my view. My own fucking ears affect my view! The Musicology Tour; another red herring. The Rolling Stones create a massive buzz every time they tour. That doesn't mean people give a damn about their latest albums. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Finally, your delusion that yours is not the minority view. Even most orgers who like P's new music aren't so deluded as to think that. You want proof? How's this? A few months ago there was an org poll to find people's 50 favourite albums. Naturally this being a Prince site, the little man got a disproportionate number of entries. About 6 I think. Guess what? None from the last 10 years! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sexyfunkystrange said: HERE IS YOUR ANSWER....
Prince's music suffer's today as a result of a few things. 1. More than ANYTHING... the genre. The funk/rock music hybrid he uniquely shaped,.. is restrictive by virtue of it being the only musical style he basically works in. I mean really man,...how many funk rock jams can one write over a 28 year period,...year after year after year.....before that shit gets old hat?? There's more to music than funk and rock!!! Is he truly a musician?.....Or a funk/rock musician?? 2. Prince's older work had the ability to walk the line between being commerically exciting and being truly different from anything else at the time. Not only musically,...but visually and themeatically he was constantly pushing the envelope of what could be SUCCESSFULLY done in pop music. Not just in a bussiness sense but in an artistic sense as well. Like Madonna,..his defining characteristic was to be constantly provoking listeners and watchers. But unlike her,..he was doing it "musically" as well. 3. Something happenned...beginning with Grafitti Bridge...where he just did a COMPLETE about face. For example,...what most people have yet to appreciate is the ground breaking work with song arranging he was doing during the LoveSexy era....ending with the Batman soundtrack. The freeform, improvisational-like techniques he was using to actually construct the songs themselves were were like NOTHING in pop music before him or since. Batdance is a perfect example of this,...there has NEVER been a top 10 song like it in pop music ever. Changing tempos and rythms 3 difeerent times in the same song,..sporadic sounds and phrases. As with Lovesexy and the Black Album,..he was not merely writing songs,...he was taking those melodies and grooves and rythms and attempting to reshape them in a completeley different form. ....And then with Graffitti Bridge ...it all stopped. The innovation, the pushing limits. Whatever happened that made him just completely stop like that,...would be interesting to know. . [Edited 8/13/06 18:04pm] This is very interesting, but I think the mistake is to assume that because the music changed that it got worse. Is Dirty mind better or worse than Lovesexy? That is entirely subjective. They are different however. I think Prince pushed the black album/lovesexy sound as far as he could or wanted too. Maybe he became bored with it. Maybe he felt it was creatively a dead end. Is Lovesexy better than TRC? Who knows? What I do hear is 2 incredibly creative and thought provoking pieces of workn but very different. Anyone that doesn't hear how creative Prince still is isn't really paying attention. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Heiress said:[quote] purpledisc said: It would be more interesting to Poll the Orgers - See what majority and minority there are that fit the Question? Reasons? 1. We all grow up n different Media environments, Musical tastes do tend to shift through different Generations. 2. People do change as they grow older and there tastes change with them. This isn't a bad thing, I still love Prince's work, but just not as enthusiastic as 10+ years ago. 3. When something is "New" it is always exciting, but then can become familiar and eventually mediocre. Again not bad, just the way things go. So, do all the Long termers really think Prince sucked over the last 10 years? Do all the younger Orgers enjoy the last 10 years more purely because they are younger and "Fresher" with Princes Music? It is all individual, I love Emancipation, yet a lot of Folk here don't. I don't enjoy the Black Album, but a lot of People here do etc. truth is, some here seem to be a lot more attached to prince himself, and what they perceive to be changes in his attitude than the actual music... which is open to interpretation. suffice to say, i studied the subject of spiritual themes in prince's music for my masters in civilization and for me it's a case of "the more they change, they more they stay the same..." might be that the fans have changed more than prince, in some cases.[/quote] Yes, thats what I was trying to say. we all change over time and on some level so does our interests. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
skywalker said:
I only use these type of songs as examples, because you say that Lolita represents Prince falling off. However, I claim that Lolita hearkens back to old school early 80's Prince/The Time type jams--not a decline in artistry. Exactly! That song is pure "old Prince"....in other words....."good or the best Prince". Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: because it lost a lot of it's depth in layering and little ideas floating in and out of the songs, that real prince magic is gone,
replaced with simply strong but formulaic compositions. prince is starting to sound more and more like any regular good musician with regular good tunes. his tunes simply aren't really special anymore. in the past 10 years there hasn't been a single "Anna Stesia" or "Crystal Ball" or "Computer Blue", "Interactive", "Joy In Repetition" or "Gett Off". there are a handfull of extremely good songs, almost up to par with anything on his early releases. but they are far, far outnumbered by average, repetative and forgettable tunes. What about Beautiful Strange? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince has LOST absolutely NOTHING.
Times change and so do people. In the last 10 years Prince has given me as good a collection of music as anyone in my collection has. 2 say that he has slipped says more about u than Prince. Maybe your taste has changed, grown, shifted or move into a different direction. If that is the case, that is NOT a reflection on Prince’s musical output. Has Prince’s music changed? Yes, that is the sign of talented MUSICIAN. They don’t stay in ONE place. How boring would it be if Prince was doing the same music that he was 10 years ago? 4 my taste, that would be SAD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince really hasn't changed in the last 10 years. He got all artsy/fartsy beginning in 1985 and he never snapped out of it. He has remained artsy/fartsy since then and mixes an occasional current trend in his music every now and then. The reason a lot of us old fans feel Prince's music ain't up to par like it used to be, is because we don't like the new trends in mainstream music. Why don't we like them? Because new trends in music by all mainstream artists is boring ass bullshit.....and that's not an opinion, it's a fact.
Prince is just as artsy/fartsy as ever, just look at albums like "The Rainbow Children". I've always preferred the Prince before 1985 that could fit in and sound really well on mainstream R&B radio. However, these days (considering what mainstream R&B music has turned into), I'll take artsy/fartsy any day (as long as he keeps some funk in it) and Prince still dishes it out. Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
(with that being said...do orgers really dislike prince's music? i liked this thread better when i thought it was just a hypothetical question and not a declaration...) I agree. Except for it never was a hypothetical. The thread title assumnes that orgers dislike Prince's music in the last 10 years. It's probably true for some, but certainly not true for all. It would be more interesting to Poll the Orgers - See what majority and minority there are that fit the Question? Reasons?
1. We all grow up n different Media environments, Musical tastes do tend to shift through different Generations. 2. People do change as they grow older and there tastes change with them. This isn't a bad thing, I still love Prince's work, but just not as enthusiastic as 10+ years ago. 3. When something is "New" it is always exciting, but then can become familiar and eventually mediocre. Again not bad, just the way things go. So, do all the Long termers really think Prince sucked over the last 10 years? Do all the younger Orgers enjoy the last 10 years more purely because they are younger and "Fresher" with Princes Music? It is all individual, I love Emancipation, yet a lot of Folk here don't. I don't enjoy the Black Album, but a lot of People here do etc. And that's all I am saying. People have different tastes for many reasons.That's great and fine. However, just because you don't like something means that it has no value. Many people seem to give such cut and dry answers that sum up to "I don't like Prince's new music. Therefore, Prince has lost his talent." It's simply not true-just an opinion. The entire thread is based on the false assumption that every orger dislikes Prince's music in the past 10 years. "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
truth is, some here seem to be a lot more attached to prince himself, and what they perceive to be changes in his attitude than the actual music... which is open to interpretation.
suffice to say, i studied the subject of spiritual themes in prince's music for my masters in civilization and for me it's a case of "the more they change, they more they stay the same..." might be that the fans have changed more than prince, in some cases. Agreed totally. "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is the downside of the internet. You often get in pointless arguments with people who keep forgetting what the argument is and throw up a dozen red herrings to try and cloud the issue. You can always choose not to respond in this "pointless argument". There is no need to be rude. If you are still going to bless me with your time, please refresh my memory. What are you trying to convince me of? That you and everyone else in the world thinks Prince has lost it artistically? Correct me if I am wrong. First of all, sales. You're not seriously trying to argue that NPS, Rave, and TRC sold as well as his 80s albums are you? Did I ever argue this? No. I was reiterating the fact that sales don't really show artistic quality-Prince rarely has blockbuster sales numbers. Remember your quote-- "Prince has lost it.The fact is it's only the Prince nerds who don't think that. For godsakes the sales figure alone can tell you that!" Did you ever find out how many copies Dirty Mind sold in 1980? You tell me that "Prince has lost it" then you point to album sales. Why? The bottom line is if you compiled a list of the best selling albums of his career around the world there wouldn't be any from the last 10 years in the Top 5 or even the top 10. This information is from the RIAA (recording industry of america) website: http://www.riaa.com/gp/database (search for Prince under artist) Prince's top 7 selling albums Purple Rain -13 million 1999 -4 Million Musicology -2 million Emancipation -2 Million Diamonds and Pearls -2 million Batman -2 million ATWIAD- 2million What's this? Two albums from the last 10 years are in Prince's top 5 selling albums?!?!? Everything else is 1million or less. A few albums at 500,000 or slightly higher interestingly are: Dirty Mind, Prince, Lovesexy, Graffiti Bridge, Come, and The Gold Experience These are album sales when he was with WB. Not just independent one off or NPG releases. Again, what do sales prove? Popular taste. Popular taste in no way indicates talent. You are the one who keeps using sales as some kind of barometer of quality. The Musicology figures were boosted by Prince's little scam with the concert tickets. And Batman selling well had nothing to do with the fact that it was part of the Batman hype? It's called proper and smart marketing. Now for your red herrings. Trying to say that this has got something to do with my being from the UK is yet another cop out of yours. That has nothing to do with it. As for him being in magazines and on TV a lot. Again, you miss the point. The point of me bringing up TV and mags is this. You said: "The fact that you're even disputing that it's the majority view tells me you're in denial. I've heard it said on TV, read it in magazines. Face it, it's the dominant view! I can't even believe anyone would argue such an obvious point." I simply was stating what I see on TV and in the magazines because you thought it was a valid barometer of "the majority view". We're talking about the perception that he's lost it artisically, not how much exposure he's getting. Those are different issues. Do try and keep up. As for my "having a mind of my own", another red herring. Reading negative things about his current output doesn't affect my view.
Again, you yourself used your mom's opinion as an example that "prince has lost it". You yourself said that you can tell Prince has lost it because of of what you hear and see on TV and in magazines. My own fucking ears affect my view! Exactly. It's not how everyone else sees things it's how you see/hear things. How everyone else thinks/feels about Prince. And how you or your mother think/feel about Prince are not always the same. The Musicology Tour; another red herring. The Rolling Stones create a massive buzz every time they tour. That doesn't mean people give a damn about their latest albums. We weren't talking exclusively about albums. You told me that everyone but Prince nerds think he "has lost it". The millions that went to the Musicology tour in droves suggests otherwise. They may not give a damn about Prince's latest album but their asses were sure filling up seats on the tour. Again, your viewpoint is not universal. [Edited 8/14/06 12:25pm] "New Power slide...." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |