Author | Message |
Prince Stops Online Only? Prince at times is an odguy. He makes any album named anunpronounceable symbol, He changes his name to a symbol. He tore up his wedding papers. Then he voews to sign no more contracts.
I thought i odd and unwise that Prince wouldn't sign anymore record contracts.Your record company is your life and blood. AN album is more than just hte work of an artist but of boff camera and corporate people. How was he planning on getting airplay,,money for touring,andadvertising. SOmehow Prince thought it would be wise if he sold albums on on MP3. Perhaps thebiggestmovement in MP3 but I can't see everybody downloading and I definetly can't see any artist without a record company. SO Musicology comes out and it's on CD in The US. Does this mean Prince realized he can't do without corporate sponsors> 3121 went the same route. Yes corporations are evil and wan't money, yes artists wan't to make music and be free. It's one of those paradoxes corporations can't exist without workers and workers can't exists without corporations. Till the average person gets a million dollars we're stuck with eachother. Working up a purple sweat. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince has been without a record company 4 a decade. I think he's done pretty well dispite that fact. Listen to me on The House of Pop Culture podcast on itunes http://itunes.apple.com/u...d438631917 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
The only thing he does with record companies now is use them as distributors... and I do believe there is a "one-record deal" contract with the label to do that.
The big factor being, he is not bound to a record label any longer, and he has owned his own work since Emancipation. That's pretty remarkable. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
so many words and so few facts. impressive "What kind of fuck ending is that?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
June7 said: The only thing he does with record companies now is use them as distributors... and I do believe there is a "one-record deal" contract with the label to do that.
The big factor being, he is not bound to a record label any longer, and he has owned his own work since Emancipation. That's pretty remarkable. well said..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fluid said: Prince at times is an odguy. He makes any album named anunpronounceable symbol, He changes his name to a symbol. He tore up his wedding papers. Then he voews to sign no more contracts.
I thought i odd and unwise that Prince wouldn't sign anymore record contracts.Your record company is your life and blood. AN album is more than just hte work of an artist but of boff camera and corporate people. How was he planning on getting airplay,,money for touring,andadvertising. SOmehow Prince thought it would be wise if he sold albums on on MP3. Perhaps thebiggestmovement in MP3 but I can't see everybody downloading and I definetly can't see any artist without a record company. SO Musicology comes out and it's on CD in The US. Does this mean Prince realized he can't do without corporate sponsors> 3121 went the same route. Yes corporations are evil and wan't money, yes artists wan't to make music and be free. It's one of those paradoxes corporations can't exist without workers and workers can't exists without corporations. Till the average person gets a million dollars we're stuck with eachother. Sounds to me like you work for a record company going through hard times or something. Are you trying to recruit Prince? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ElCapitan said: so many words and so few facts. impressive
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So even before The Rainbow Children he was doing his own thing?
I know he changed his name to a symbol to get out of a contract but he was on his on not long after that? I thought TRC was his first on his own without a contract. IS he under contract now cause he's getting video and airplay. Working up a purple sweat. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fluid said: So even before The Rainbow Children he was doing his own thing?
I know he changed his name to a symbol to get out of a contract but he was on his on not long after that? I thought TRC was his first on his own without a contract. IS he under contract now cause he's getting video and airplay. He's been doing his own thing since Emancipation in 1996. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
young, dumb, and no fun..
most of my threads are missing | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 8/12/06 1:03am] young, dumb, and no fun..
most of my threads are missing | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
young, dumb, and no fun..
most of my threads are missing | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
young, dumb, and no fun..
most of my threads are missing | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
young, dumb, and no fun..
most of my threads are missing | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fluid said:[quote]Prince at times is an odguy. He makes any album named anunpronounceable symbol, He changes his name to a symbol. He tore up his wedding papers. Then he voews to sign no more contracts.
I thought i odd and unwise that Prince wouldn't sign anymore record contracts.Your record company is your life and blood. AN album is more than just hte work of an artist but of boff camera and corporate people. How was he planning on getting airplay,,money for touring,andadvertising. SOmehow Prince thought it would be wise if he sold albums on on MP3. Perhaps thebiggestmovement in MP3 but I can't see everybody downloading and I definetly can't see any artist without a record company. SO Musicology comes out and it's on CD in The US. Does this mean Prince realized he can't do without corporate sponsors> 3121 went the same route. Yes corporations are evil and wan't money, yes artists wan't to make music and be free. It's one of those paradoxes corporations can't exist without workers and workers can't exists without corporations. Till the average person gets a million dollars we're stuck with eachother. Ok, I'm addressing all the areas of your paragraph that are highlighted green. No offense here, but where do you get your information from? Forbes magazine listed Prince making 50 Million dollars for Musicology (look it up), money he would have never gotten from a record contract (your average contract is 20 Million, depending on the artist). On the Housequake site, there is an interview with Prince on Jay Leno (2001), he explained how Mariah Carey was ripped off from the label and explained how the business works (look it up). Prince can do whatever he wants and will make more money (2 and 3x more) than his peers..and why? No Contract.....The man has been in the business literally for 30 years (1978) and YOU think he doesnt know what he's doing? Honestly dude, where did you get your information from? Prince needs no corporate sponsorship ..he is doing quite well. [Edited 8/12/06 1:12am] [Edited 8/12/06 1:15am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
young, dumb, and no fun..
most of my threads are missing | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fluid said: Prince at times is an odguy. He makes any album named anunpronounceable symbol, He changes his name to a symbol. He tore up his wedding papers. Then he voews to sign no more contracts.
I thought i odd and unwise that Prince wouldn't sign anymore record contracts.Your record company is your life and blood. AN album is more than just hte work of an artist but of boff camera and corporate people. How was he planning on getting airplay,,money for touring,andadvertising. SOmehow Prince thought it would be wise if he sold albums on on MP3. Perhaps thebiggestmovement in MP3 but I can't see everybody downloading and I definetly can't see any artist without a record company. SO Musicology comes out and it's on CD in The US. Does this mean Prince realized he can't do without corporate sponsors> 3121 went the same route. Yes corporations are evil and wan't money, yes artists wan't to make music and be free. It's one of those paradoxes corporations can't exist without workers and workers can't exists without corporations. Till the average person gets a million dollars we're stuck with eachother. Wow - not only does this post show a complete lack of understanding of the music industry and artist/lable realtionships, it mostly ignores what Prince has been doing and his acheivments over the last decade!! - Well done ...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...
My dance project; www.zubzub.co.uk Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here; www.zubzub.bandcamp.com Go and glisten | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
damn, good stuff ya got dude, how about sharing?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well to set the record straight, Record Companies are not 'the big bad wolf'
that people make them out to be. Many many artists have excellent relationships with their record company. It's all down to the details of your contract and the people you deal with. In Prince's case, he used to have a great relationship with his record company. Warner Bros gave him a huge amount of freedom, and when it came to control, Prince had more say than most. He had final say over pretty much everything. Prince and WB in the 80's worked great together. However it all went wrong in the 90's due to two main things. The new contract which Prince signed (after his original one had expired) and a major change over in management at WB. These two things combined to create a situation where Prince was under pressure to deliver 'hit' albums rather than being free to follow his muse. His new contract would only really benefit him financially if he shifted units like Madonna and Michael Jackson, if he didn't, he would be in danger of not recouping his costs. So there was a financial burden to maintain a 'Diamonds And Pearls' level of mainstream success (something that Prince hardly had a track record for previously). The other major problem was the management changeover ot WB, which meant Prince was left on his own, without the support of those high up who appreciated his music and talent. He was left with a very business orientated team of people to deal with, and that essensial rapport was lost. So as you can see the reality was that it wasn't all WB's fault, but it wasn't all Prince's fault either. Yes, in retrospect he should've known better than to sign that contract, and he has no-one but himself to blame for that, but it's not his fault that his record company changed into a more faceless, corporate unfriendly place. Truly a sad situation all round cuz there were no winners, only losers. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fluid said: Perhaps thebiggestmovement in MP3 but I can't see everybody downloading and I definetly can't see any artist without a record company. that is because you lack vision free mp3 is the way of the future / already happening now . artists with no record company - already happening now . " the embassy shut to keep the fools out " - as above, so below. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BorisFishpaw said: Well to set the record straight, Record Companies are not 'the big bad wolf'
that people make them out to be. Many many artists have excellent relationships with their record company. It's all down to the details of your contract and the people you deal with. In Prince's case, he used to have a great relationship with his record company. Warner Bros gave him a huge amount of freedom, and when it came to control, Prince had more say than most. He had final say over pretty much everything. Prince and WB in the 80's worked great together. However it all went wrong in the 90's due to two main things. The new contract which Prince signed (after his original one had expired) and a major change over in management at WB. These two things combined to create a situation where Prince was under pressure to deliver 'hit' albums rather than being free to follow his muse. His new contract would only really benefit him financially if he shifted units like Madonna and Michael Jackson, if he didn't, he would be in danger of not recouping his costs. So there was a financial burden to maintain a 'Diamonds And Pearls' level of mainstream success (something that Prince hardly had a track record for previously). The other major problem was the management changeover ot WB, which meant Prince was left on his own, without the support of those high up who appreciated his music and talent. He was left with a very business orientated team of people to deal with, and that essensial rapport was lost. So as you can see the reality was that it wasn't all WB's fault, but it wasn't all Prince's fault either. Yes, in retrospect he should've known better than to sign that contract, and he has no-one but himself to blame for that, but it's not his fault that his record company changed into a more faceless, corporate unfriendly place. Truly a sad situation all round cuz there were no winners, only losers. Thanks for breaking it down without romanticizing the situation or demonizing the parties involved. Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BorisFishpaw said: his record company changed into a more faceless,
corporate unfriendly place. Truly a sad situation all round cuz there were no winners, only losers. because music and money dont mix " the embassy shut to keep the fools out " - as above, so below. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Flowerz said: Ok, I'm addressing all the areas of your paragraph that are highlighted green. No offense here, but where do you get your information from? Forbes magazine listed Prince making 50 Million dollars for Musicology (look it up), money he would have never gotten from a record contract (your average contract is 20 Million, depending on the artist). On the Housequake site, there is an interview with Prince on Jay Leno (2001), he explained how Mariah Carey was ripped off from the label and explained how the business works (look it up). Prince can do whatever he wants and will make more money (2 and 3x more) than his peers..and why? No Contract.....The man has been in the business literally for 30 years (1978) and YOU think he doesnt know what he's doing? Honestly dude, where did you get your information from? Prince needs no corporate sponsorship ..he is doing quite well.
Prince would never make 50 million with a tour today (BTW, you're somehow confusing money that artist get for their contract and money earned from touring, I think), had not a major label made him successful and famous. To say he makes 2 or 3 times more than his peers (who exactly?), no matter what he does, is way off. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
calldapplwondery83 said: Flowerz said: Ok, I'm addressing all the areas of your paragraph that are highlighted green. No offense here, but where do you get your information from? Forbes magazine listed Prince making 50 Million dollars for Musicology (look it up), money he would have never gotten from a record contract (your average contract is 20 Million, depending on the artist). On the Housequake site, there is an interview with Prince on Jay Leno (2001), he explained how Mariah Carey was ripped off from the label and explained how the business works (look it up). Prince can do whatever he wants and will make more money (2 and 3x more) than his peers..and why? No Contract.....The man has been in the business literally for 30 years (1978) and YOU think he doesnt know what he's doing? Honestly dude, where did you get your information from? Prince needs no corporate sponsorship ..he is doing quite well.
Prince would never make 50 million with a tour today (BTW, you're somehow confusing money that artist get for their contract and money earned from touring, I think), had not a major label made him successful and famous. To say he makes 2 or 3 times more than his peers (who exactly?), no matter what he does, is way off. Not if they are selling the same amount of records, it's not off. Let's say Chamillionaire sells 500,000 records at $10 a pop. That's $5,000,000 in sales. His bitch ass is obligated to the record company for 75% of that. Now, Prince selling $5 million worth of records, he keeps the lions share of that. Thanks for the laughs, arguments and overall enjoyment for the last umpteen years. It's time for me to retire from Prince.org and engage in the real world...lol. Above all, I appreciated the talent Prince. You were one of a kind. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sacredwarrior said: BorisFishpaw said: his record company changed into a more faceless,
corporate unfriendly place. Truly a sad situation all round cuz there were no winners, only losers. because music and money dont mix Yes they do... but it's all about the balance. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BorisFishpaw said: Well to set the record straight, Record Companies are not 'the big bad wolf'
that people make them out to be. Many many artists have excellent relationships with their record company. It's all down to the details of your contract and the people you deal with. In Prince's case, he used to have a great relationship with his record company. Warner Bros gave him a huge amount of freedom, and when it came to control, Prince had more say than most. He had final say over pretty much everything. Prince and WB in the 80's worked great together. However it all went wrong in the 90's due to two main things. The new contract which Prince signed (after his original one had expired) and a major change over in management at WB. These two things combined to create a situation where Prince was under pressure to deliver 'hit' albums rather than being free to follow his muse. His new contract would only really benefit him financially if he shifted units like Madonna and Michael Jackson, if he didn't, he would be in danger of not recouping his costs. So there was a financial burden to maintain a 'Diamonds And Pearls' level of mainstream success (something that Prince hardly had a track record for previously). The other major problem was the management changeover ot WB, which meant Prince was left on his own, without the support of those high up who appreciated his music and talent. He was left with a very business orientated team of people to deal with, and that essensial rapport was lost. So as you can see the reality was that it wasn't all WB's fault, but it wasn't all Prince's fault either. Yes, in retrospect he should've known better than to sign that contract, and he has no-one but himself to blame for that, but it's not his fault that his record company changed into a more faceless, corporate unfriendly place. Truly a sad situation all round cuz there were no winners, only losers. great post. Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sacredwarrior said: fluid said: Perhaps thebiggestmovement in MP3 but I can't see everybody downloading and I definetly can't see any artist without a record company. that is because you lack vision free mp3 is the way of the future / already happening now . artists with no record company - already happening now . Major artists couldn't do it on MP3. If you or I made a record without a company and released it on the internet MP3 would help us. Someone like Mariah Carrey or Janet Jackson need the support of their record companies. BTW Prince signed a billlion dollar contract from what I heard. He shoudl have made some money off of that even if he didn't sell largley. TLC onthe other hand I don't see how they screwed. They made million but only had about $50,000 to take home with them and lived with their parents. They said to pay for videoas.and tours. 1st of all I thought companies pay for all that. Other artists tour and get on TV and they don't go bankrupt. They must have spent a hell of alot. Working up a purple sweat. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Revolution said: calldapplwondery83 said: Prince would never make 50 million with a tour today (BTW, you're somehow confusing money that artist get for their contract and money earned from touring, I think), had not a major label made him successful and famous. To say he makes 2 or 3 times more than his peers (who exactly?), no matter what he does, is way off. Not if they are selling the same amount of records, it's not off. Let's say Chamillionaire sells 500,000 records at $10 a pop. That's $5,000,000 in sales. His bitch ass is obligated to the record company for 75% of that. Now, Prince selling $5 million worth of records, he keeps the lions share of that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |