Author | Message |
Would you help Prince buy his masters from WB? The way I understand it is that in regards to the whole feud with WB, hypothetically, Prince could potentially buy his masters from Warner Brothers, but at an extraordinarily high price right? Or maybe he has enough money to do it, but on principle, he's against paying WB for something that should be, in his opinion, rightfully his so he continues the fight...
But what if his fans started a campaign to raise money to buy Prince's masters from Warners Brothers for him, would you contribute? How do you think Prince would react? Do you think he would use Londell to legally stop the campaign? If he accepted the fans' donation of his masters, do you think he would remaster them, or would he still be capricious with re-releases and remasterings? *I hate when I misspell simple words* edit [Edited 3/15/06 20:15pm] The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i wouldn't. i didn't sign a contract with warners in 1978...'sides, i think that ol' boy could handle this by himself as it is. it ain't like he's lacking the funds. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: i wouldn't. i didn't sign a contract with warners in 1978...'sides, i think that ol' boy could handle this by himself as it is. it ain't like he's lacking the funds.
Right, he might have enough money, but do you think on principle he would still hold the grudge and not buy them because he wants WB to GIVE them to him? (Gemini's are VERY stubborn. I'm one, and I know I can hold a hell of a grudge. ) The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
he already recouped the recording costs when he was with WB
technically he already owns them " the embassy shut to keep the fools out " - as above, so below. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jone70 said: Handclapsfingasnapz said: i wouldn't. i didn't sign a contract with warners in 1978...'sides, i think that ol' boy could handle this by himself as it is. it ain't like he's lacking the funds.
Right, he might have enough money, but do you think on principle he would still hold the grudge and not buy them because he wants WB to GIVE them to him? (Gemini's are VERY stubborn. I'm one, and I know I can hold a hell of a grudge. ) i'm bull-headed as hell too, and i'm a sagittarius (the polar opposite sign of gemini...go figure)...i don't hold grudges, though. as for prince, i'm sorta thinking he isn't holding a grudge against wb so much as simply perhaps seeing if they'll finally be like "fuck it" and give 'im his goods one day, no strings attached. i'm thinking that it won't happen. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No. His music doesnt mean that too me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sacredwarrior said: he already recouped the recording costs when he was with WB
technically he already owns them there's a bit more within the legalese than simply that, i'm thinking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | Twas not us who signed at that bottom line. So ... no.
In my opinion, it's his venture to persue or leave it be and focus on some killer new material. "The Gold Experience" was proof that he can move forward in any direction he wishes. When Prince is in "Warrior Mode" he can be quite dangerous. The back cataloge is only a retirement plan type venture. He's proved that he doesn't exactly need it if he wants to move on when he decided to leave Warner Brothers. The Beatles' surviving members my need their masters, but not Prince. All Rights Reserved. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: sacredwarrior said: he already recouped the recording costs when he was with WB
technically he already owns them there's a bit more within the legalese than simply that, i'm thinking. sure - the legal side of things blocks pure logic red tape crap " the embassy shut to keep the fools out " - as above, so below. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wouldn't.
With Prince's penchant for living in the present and focusing on new music, if he owned his masters he probably wouldn't care about giving them the remastering they so badly need. (Hearing the Ultimate compilation in all its ramstered glory vs. the sound quality of previous releases made this REALLY evident to me.) Remember all the specuation on the org about the condition of the master tapes in the vault and Alan Leed's comments that they're in bad shape? I'd rather Warners be the curator of his legacy. Also, if Prince did own his master tapes and acutally decided to remaster his back catalog, the re-releases would likely be censored. I don't have a problem with his new-found sprituality or his cleaning up his act, but I think he should just accept that the salacious material was part of his past. Remember him saying on Oprah that he doesn't regret anything in his past because it's gotten him where he is now? Okay, that's a bit off topic, so sue me. "I Was FINE Back in the Day!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleCharm said: No. His music doesnt mean that too me.
How much do you think they would cost? Didn't MJ buy the Beatles rights for millions? Say there were 50,000 fans that each donated $10. (Or 10,000 fans @ $50, or any combo in between.) That's half a million already. Then that half a mil could be invested into a high interest CD or a riskier hedge fund or something (I'm not a professional invester) for a year or two and earn more... could earning enough even be done or would WB always raise the price so that the "Prince Masters Purchase Fund" was always short? The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: i wouldn't. i didn't sign a contract with warners in 1978...'sides, i think that ol' boy could handle this by himself as it is. it ain't like he's lacking the funds.
Yep, he has the $$$ Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PicassoFace said: I wouldn't.
With Prince's penchant for living in the present and focusing on new music, if he owned his masters he probably wouldn't care about giving them the remastering they so badly need. (Hearing the Ultimate compilation in all its ramstered glory vs. the sound quality of previous releases made this REALLY evident to me.) Remember all the specuation on the org about the condition of the master tapes in the vault and Alan Leed's comments that they're in bad shape? I'd rather Warners be the curator of his legacy. Also, if Prince did own his master tapes and acutally decided to remaster his back catalog, the re-releases would likely be censored. I don't have a problem with his new-found sprituality or his cleaning up his act, but I think he should just accept that the salacious material was part of his past. Remember him saying on Oprah that he doesn't regret anything in his past because it's gotten him where he is now? Okay, that's a bit off topic, so sue me. Excellent points. Considering how entitled some fans feel now, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they had donated money to help him buy back his masters? Yikes! The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thats as bad his wanting fans to mail their european cd singles and boots to him.
jone70 said: PicassoFace said: I wouldn't.
With Prince's penchant for living in the present and focusing on new music, if he owned his masters he probably wouldn't care about giving them the remastering they so badly need. (Hearing the Ultimate compilation in all its ramstered glory vs. the sound quality of previous releases made this REALLY evident to me.) Remember all the specuation on the org about the condition of the master tapes in the vault and Alan Leed's comments that they're in bad shape? I'd rather Warners be the curator of his legacy. Also, if Prince did own his master tapes and acutally decided to remaster his back catalog, the re-releases would likely be censored. I don't have a problem with his new-found sprituality or his cleaning up his act, but I think he should just accept that the salacious material was part of his past. Remember him saying on Oprah that he doesn't regret anything in his past because it's gotten him where he is now? Okay, that's a bit off topic, so sue me. Excellent points. Considering how entitled some fans feel now, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they had donated money to help him buy back his masters? Yikes! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jone70 said: PurpleCharm said: No. His music doesnt mean that too me.
How much do you think they would cost? Didn't MJ buy the Beatles rights for millions? Say there were 50,000 fans that each donated $10. (Or 10,000 fans @ $50, or any combo in between.) That's half a million already. Then that half a mil could be invested into a high interest CD or a riskier hedge fund or something (I'm not a professional invester) for a year or two and earn more... could earning enough even be done or would WB always raise the price so that the "Prince Masters Purchase Fund" was always short? When I purchase his music and tickets for concert, the money he makes from me should go towards what is really important to him. He cleared $45 million in 2004 just from the Musicology Tour. There is no way in the world I would donate any money to a multi-millionaire. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm doing enough already, buying his records and tickets.
The only help Prince needs is his own, Warner's and of course their respective lawyers. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | Isn't it crazy that we know more about the legalities and politics of this music biz crap because Mr. P introduced his fans to it from his own hastles when we as fans became fans when THAT was not the focus of making a good album.
Advice to young aspiring musican's is one thing, but pulling a fan base in as outside council (lawers) is another. All Rights Reserved. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jone70 said: PurpleCharm said: No. His music doesnt mean that too me.
How much do you think they would cost? Didn't MJ buy the Beatles rights for millions? Say there were 50,000 fans that each donated $10. (Or 10,000 fans @ $50, or any combo in between.) That's half a million already. Then that half a mil could be invested into a high interest CD or a riskier hedge fund or something (I'm not a professional invester) for a year or two and earn more... could earning enough even be done or would WB always raise the price so that the "Prince Masters Purchase Fund" was always short? Just wait and see what all the contributors do and say when you try to give that half mill to a Lets Get Prince His Masters back fund. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I gave at the office.
Many of us have bought nearly his entire catalog, including 8 track, 12 inch, 45, cassette, CD, DVD, VHS, Beta, Laserdisc and now UMD, not to mention paid downloads through online retailers and the club. Then there's merchandising and concert tickets. I'd say that I've contributed quite nicely to a hypothetical "Masters" fund, and you know what? My contributions aren't going to stop anytime soon. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NightGod said: I gave at the office.
Many of us have bought nearly his entire catalog, including 8 track, 12 inch, 45, cassette, CD, DVD, VHS, Beta, Laserdisc and now UMD, not to mention paid downloads through online retailers and the club. Then there's merchandising and concert tickets. I'd say that I've contributed quite nicely to a hypothetical "Masters" fund, and you know what? My contributions aren't going to stop anytime soon. that, plus we would buy the remastered product if he released it soon as he got ownership of his masters back. so i don't see any reason to support him in any way other than that. and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
naw, yo. I am not "donating" money to a dude who's net worth is something in the $50,000,000-$100,000,000.00 range. Didn't his 2004 tour rake in about $40mil?
I can think of a million more worthy causes to give my meager funds to. Prince signed that deal with Warners in what 1991? He was a big boy when he signed it and had been in the biz long enough to know how that stuff works. I have already given him plenty money buying concert tix, albums, videos, dvd's, t-shirts, etc. He's getting even more of my money on Tuesday. Shit, that's it for me. [Edited 3/16/06 4:55am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I would sign up for something like this under these conditions:
- The deal is handled thru WB or affiliate - NOT NPGMC - You agree to pay a certain amount ahead of time - Those who take part in this "fund raising" get a special discount (say 50% off) - The project would only happen IF there was sufficient interest - If the project for any reason was cancelled or delayed, you would not be charged - You would receive ALL the remasters at once, not in installments Think of it, if we got half off for preordering - theoretically you could order the entire remaster series for around 100 bucks (talking about the WB years only). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jone70 said: The way I understand it is that in regards to the whole feud with WB, hypothetically, Prince could potentially buy his masters from Warner Brothers, but at an extraordinarily high price right? Or maybe he has enough money to do it, but on principle, he's against paying WB for something that should be, in his opinion, rightfully his so he continues the fight...
But what if his fans started a campaign to raise money to buy Prince's masters from Warners Brothers for him, would you contribute? How do you think Prince would react? Do you think he would use Londell to legally stop the campaign? If he accepted the fans' donation of his masters, do you think he would remaster them, or would he still be capricious with re-releases and remasterings? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NouveauDance said: jone70 said: The way I understand it is that in regards to the whole feud with WB, hypothetically, Prince could potentially buy his masters from Warner Brothers, but at an extraordinarily high price right? Or maybe he has enough money to do it, but on principle, he's against paying WB for something that should be, in his opinion, rightfully his so he continues the fight...
But what if his fans started a campaign to raise money to buy Prince's masters from Warners Brothers for him, would you contribute? How do you think Prince would react? Do you think he would use Londell to legally stop the campaign? If he accepted the fans' donation of his masters, do you think he would remaster them, or would he still be capricious with re-releases and remasterings? X 50 was here... I take it that's a resounding NO from you? The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WHO CARES
he got the funk thats all that matters " the embassy shut to keep the fools out " - as above, so below. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IstenSzek said: NightGod said: I gave at the office.
Many of us have bought nearly his entire catalog, including 8 track, 12 inch, 45, cassette, CD, DVD, VHS, Beta, Laserdisc and now UMD, not to mention paid downloads through online retailers and the club. Then there's merchandising and concert tickets. I'd say that I've contributed quite nicely to a hypothetical "Masters" fund, and you know what? My contributions aren't going to stop anytime soon. that, plus we would buy the remastered product if he released it soon as he got ownership of his masters back. so i don't see any reason to support him in any way other than that. exactly--so if it meant you were guaranteed to get a remastered product would you be willing to donate money to expedite that process? theoretically "we the fans" could wait the rest of our lives (or Prince's life) and not get any remasters because it may not ever be a priority to him. of course we all buy most everything he releases, but obviously he doesn't feel the need to remaster... or what if instead of donating the masters back to Prince, the fans "Prince Remaster Fund" was it's own entity, (run by a board of directors or the fans vote--majority rules). Sort of like those funds they set up for victims of natural disasters, etc? Oooh, Prince would not like something like that, I bet. The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sacredwarrior said: WHO CARES
he got the funk thats all that matters obviously you do or you wouldn't have posted that comment in RED on the thread. The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Prince don't need my $5 But I'd help find space @ PP for them shits | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jone70 said: sacredwarrior said: WHO CARES
he got the funk thats all that matters obviously you do or you wouldn't have posted that comment in RED on the thread. me? care about petty little unconsionable corporations and all their useless red tape? :belly laugh: " the embassy shut to keep the fools out " - as above, so below. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |