Author | Message |
Copyright clearance on IWD4U? I want to put my cover of IWD4U on my next record.
I've checked Harry Fox Agency and CALLED Warner Brothers and left messages. is there ANYBODY on this site who has connections or KNOWS somebody who has connections to get me some kind of clearance on this song? Surely it can be done, I think there's already two covers of it floating around. My version is way better, but, you know, art is blind or something. www.beaurocks.com Trees are made of WOOD! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Legally you do not need any kind of clearance at all. Just pay the license fee. But some labels make their acts get an ok from the intrested parties before they will put one on an album. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Unfortunately, you just pay the fee on songs that are publicly licenced. i.e., Prince (or WB) has okayed only a small number of his hits to be licensed on their site (the Harry Fox site). For the rest of his catalog, you DO have to have some crazy ass kind of approval from Warner Bros. I seriously wonder if Prince's people put the whole damn WB catalog on hold to spite WB.
I can't just release the record and "oops!" pay him on the flipside. You have to have legal documents okaying your copy of the song before you can print CDs of it. The Verve put out a song with a Rolling Stones sample on it, planning to comp them on the flipside. And now, thanks to some ass-kicking lawsuits from the Stones, the Stones get every dime that song and album will ever make for the Verve (Vervepipe? I forget which). No thanks. [Edited 2/20/06 14:37pm] www.beaurocks.com Trees are made of WOOD! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
beauhall said: Unfortunately, you just pay the fee on songs that are publicly licenced. i.e., Prince (or WB) has okayed only a small number of his hits to be licensed on their site (the Harry Fox site). For the rest of his catalog, you DO have to have some crazy ass kind of approval from Warner Bros. I seriously wonder if Prince's people put the whole damn WB catalog on hold to spite WB.
I can't just release the record and "oops!" pay him on the flipside. You have to have legal documents okaying your copy of the song before you can print CDs of it. The Verve put out a song with a Rolling Stones sample on it, planning to comp them on the flipside. And now, thanks to some ass-kicking lawsuits from the Stones, the Stones get every dime that song and album will ever make for the Verve (Vervepipe? I forget which). No thanks. [Edited 2/20/06 14:37pm] did u try contactng the attorney that handled the copyright? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A little of topic but that is an excellent cover. I really liked it, good work. "What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thank you very much!
I just registered for the rights at warnerchappel.com! Hey hey! I'll finally get to add the song to my CD! Well. Gotta wait to hear from the suits, but MAN! I'm excited. I tried to get permission in time for the release of my CD, but I couldn't pull it off, but now... I think I'm just going to re-release the CD with this song on there as well. www.beaurocks.com Trees are made of WOOD! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
beauhall said: I want to put my cover of IWD4U on my next record.
I've checked Harry Fox Agency and CALLED Warner Brothers and left messages. is there ANYBODY on this site who has connections or KNOWS somebody who has connections to get me some kind of clearance on this song? Surely it can be done, I think there's already two covers of it floating around. My version is way better, but, you know, art is blind or something. EXCELLENT job on both I Would Die 4 u and Life Can Be So Nice..i usually dont like covers of songs that i like but you did both of these tunes justice..good work!... Check it out ...Shiny Toy Guns R gonna blowup VERY soon and bring melody back to music..you heard it here 1st! http://www.myspacecomment...theone.mp3 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
beauhall said: Unfortunately, you just pay the fee on songs that are publicly licenced. i.e., Prince (or WB) has okayed only a small number of his hits to be licensed on their site (the Harry Fox site). For the rest of his catalog, you DO have to have some crazy ass kind of approval from Warner Bros. I seriously wonder if Prince's people put the whole damn WB catalog on hold to spite WB.
I can't just release the record and "oops!" pay him on the flipside. You have to have legal documents okaying your copy of the song before you can print CDs of it. The Verve put out a song with a Rolling Stones sample on it, planning to comp them on the flipside. And now, thanks to some ass-kicking lawsuits from the Stones, the Stones get every dime that song and album will ever make for the Verve (Vervepipe? I forget which). No thanks. [Edited 2/20/06 14:37pm] you make it sound like the Rolling Stones were wrong for defending their rights. the song by the Verve was a rewrite of the Stones song no question about it. Same thing happened to George Harrison in the late 70's..the judge deemed "my sweet lord" to be an unconsious rewrite of "He's so fine" and lost $$$..Artists have a right to decide who does what with their music | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleRein said: beauhall said: Unfortunately, you just pay the fee on songs that are publicly licenced. i.e., Prince (or WB) has okayed only a small number of his hits to be licensed on their site (the Harry Fox site). For the rest of his catalog, you DO have to have some crazy ass kind of approval from Warner Bros. I seriously wonder if Prince's people put the whole damn WB catalog on hold to spite WB.
I can't just release the record and "oops!" pay him on the flipside. You have to have legal documents okaying your copy of the song before you can print CDs of it. The Verve put out a song with a Rolling Stones sample on it, planning to comp them on the flipside. And now, thanks to some ass-kicking lawsuits from the Stones, the Stones get every dime that song and album will ever make for the Verve (Vervepipe? I forget which). No thanks. [Edited 2/20/06 14:37pm] you make it sound like the Rolling Stones were wrong for defending their rights. the song by the Verve was a rewrite of the Stones song no question about it. Same thing happened to George Harrison in the late 70's..the judge deemed "my sweet lord" to be an unconsious rewrite of "He's so fine" and lost $$$..Artists have a right to decide who does what with their music how can i hear your version, sounds cool [Edited 2/20/06 18:36pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SlamGlam said: ohh thanks, didnt see the link. Very cool, ....And i love youre Life can be so nice even better. Loved the abrubt ending. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
you dont need a license for a cover as long as you dont materially change it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WOW Musically that is HOT AS HELL!!!! LOVE THE ARRANGEMENT. My name is Prince and I want your money | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleRein said: beauhall said: Unfortunately, you just pay the fee on songs that are publicly licenced. i.e., Prince (or WB) has okayed only a small number of his hits to be licensed on their site (the Harry Fox site). For the rest of his catalog, you DO have to have some crazy ass kind of approval from Warner Bros. I seriously wonder if Prince's people put the whole damn WB catalog on hold to spite WB.
I can't just release the record and "oops!" pay him on the flipside. You have to have legal documents okaying your copy of the song before you can print CDs of it. The Verve put out a song with a Rolling Stones sample on it, planning to comp them on the flipside. And now, thanks to some ass-kicking lawsuits from the Stones, the Stones get every dime that song and album will ever make for the Verve (Vervepipe? I forget which). No thanks. [Edited 2/20/06 14:37pm] you make it sound like the Rolling Stones were wrong for defending their rights. the song by the Verve was a rewrite of the Stones song no question about it. Same thing happened to George Harrison in the late 70's..the judge deemed "my sweet lord" to be an unconsious rewrite of "He's so fine" and lost $$$..Artists have a right to decide who does what with their music no ones knows who actually owns that little tune. The Staples Singers used it long before the Stones ever did. Fuck the funk - it's time to ditch the worn-out Vegas horns fills, pick up the geee-tar and finally ROCK THE MUTHA-FUCKER!! He hinted at this on Chaos, now it's time to step up and fully DELIVER!!
KrystleEyes 22/03/05 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
beauhall said: The Verve put out a song with a Rolling Stones sample on it, planning to comp them on the flipside.
And now, thanks to some ass-kicking lawsuits from the Stones, the Stones get every dime that song and album will ever make for the Verve (Vervepipe? I forget which). No thanks. [Edited 2/20/06 14:37pm] Look, [Name calling snip - luv4u] , don't talk about stuff you don't know, okay? The Stones got ZILCH because they don't own the rights to that song. http://www.insidecx.com/i...verve.html From Urban Hymns sprouted the single "Bittersweet Symphony." The song has ushered them into the mass mind set with a vengeance. Right out of the gate, heavy rotation on MTV and radio were a given. The symphonic piece has become such a staple that Nike has adopted the rights to use the song to hock sneakers, in their ever present television ad campaign. Without it, Richard Ashcroft's mug may not have graced a recent cover of Rolling Stone magazine. For every positive there is a negative. The fallout from the origins of the dramatic number has been brutal. A minor bit of sampling of an old Rolling Stones tune "The Last Time", took greed to new heights. Ex Stones manager Allen Klein owns the rights to the tune, so he stirred up enough shit to capture 100% of the band's royalties from the single. © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
beauhall said: Thank you very much!
I just registered for the rights at warnerchappel.com! Hey hey! I'll finally get to add the song to my CD! Well. Gotta wait to hear from the suits, but MAN! I'm excited. I tried to get permission in time for the release of my CD, but I couldn't pull it off, but now... I think I'm just going to re-release the CD with this song on there as well. How 'bout INVESTIGATING before acting? The publishing to ALL of Prince's back catalogue is NOT handled by Warner Chappell, but by UNIVERSAL. This has been since late 2000 IIRC, and it was just renewed and was debated mid-December: http://www.prince.org/msg/7/170664 More info: http://groups.google.com/...970?hl=en& http://groups.google.com/...83b?hl=en& Here's another handy tool: http://www.ascap.com/ace/...ode=search Yes, the frigging ASCAP site, I must be a genius. And look what comes up when you enter When Doves Cry: Publishers/Administrators: CONTROVERSY MUSIC % UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP 2440 SEPULVEDA BLVD. SUITE 100 LOS ANGELES , CA, 90064 Tel. (310) 235-4700 Ghee, whaddaya know: a professional tool is more useful than asking a bunch on [Snip - luv4u] on a fan forum. [Edited 2/21/06 1:43am] Just FYI, 2 seconds on google gave me this: http://www.vocalist.org.u...songs.html But then I discovered an interesting legal fact: Once a song has been commercially released by an artist, that artist's song may be re-recorded and released by anyone who chooses to do so. This holds true, provided that the melody/lyric isn't substantially altered in the "cover" version, and that they pay proper fees/royalties directly to the song's copyright holder. (On the flip side, if you release a disc with cover songs on it, then try to obtain proper licensing after the fact, you're no longer eligible—and possibly subject to penalties/prosecution for copyright infringement!) All I needed to do was investigate who owned the publishing rights to those Jimi Hendrix and Billy Joel songs. This information (including each publisher's address) was readily available through the following Performance Rights organizations: BMI (www.bmi.com) ASCAP (www.ascap.com) SESAC (www.sesac.com) Later, I found that the above "publisher's search" process could be sped up considerably by going through the Music Publishers' Association's web site (www.mpa.org). After obtaining both publishers' contact info, I was left with that resounding "Now what?" feeling. Again, the ol' internet paid off. I found I needed to send to each publisher what's referred to as a Notice of Intention to Obtain Compulsory License for Making and Distributing Sound Recordings. After more cyber searching, I finally found out what the heck that was—at the overwhelmingly incomprehensible (to my neophyte self) U.S. Copyright Office web site. Reading that document was almost enough to make me toss in the towel (and my cookies). But then, much to my satisfaction, I came across this totally "pre-fab" (RTF) letter, designed by a friendly webmaster—"fill-in-the-blanks" style—for submission to artists' publishers. This letter appeared to adhere to the specifications (PDF) prescribed by the US Copyright Office. [Edited 2/21/06 1:50am] © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BartVanHemelen said: Look, [Name calling snip - luv4u], don't talk about stuff you don't know, okay? The Stones got ZILCH because they don't own the rights to that song.
Goddammit Bart... you're STILL an asshole aren't you? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MartyMcFly said: BartVanHemelen said: Look, [Name calling snip - luv4u], don't talk about stuff you don't know, okay? The Stones got ZILCH because they don't own the rights to that song.
Goddammit Bart... you're STILL an asshole aren't you? So? Save your anger for those who spread lies, bullshit and hype. [Let's not ruin it for others ok? - luv4u] © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BartVanHemelen said: MartyMcFly said: Goddammit Bart... you're STILL an asshole aren't you? So? Save your anger for those who spread lies, bullshit and hype. As i said before Bart started his rant, The Staples Singers used the said piece of music long before The Stones did. I heard Richard Ashcroft talking about it in a radio 2 interview.He was very perplexed about the whole affair because it had been told to him that it wasnt clear if anyone owned it. Fuck the funk - it's time to ditch the worn-out Vegas horns fills, pick up the geee-tar and finally ROCK THE MUTHA-FUCKER!! He hinted at this on Chaos, now it's time to step up and fully DELIVER!!
KrystleEyes 22/03/05 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
Congrats beauhall Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That's the Bart I remember! Haven't seen him post in this forum in a while.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
calldapplwondery83 said: That's the Bart I remember! Haven't seen him post in this forum in a while.
Check his profile... Fan level: "not a fan" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thanks for the info in Universal.
ODDLY ENOUGH THOUGH, BART, the Warner Chappel site DOES have that song listed in their database. I have no clue why or how and honestly, couldn't care. I will pursue the Warner connection until I find out otherwise, (which, thank you, I now know otherwise) so I'll pursue Universal again. However, I contacted them about 7 months ago, trying to gain permission before I released my last CD. I left phone messages, emails, flowers, a singing telegram, and they never called me back. You would think they would welcome people doing covers so they can get more royalties, but nope. They never called back. Therefore, I have to continue to wonder who REALLY can grant the permission? Did they not call back because they didn't have a mother? I don't think so. I'm starting to wonder should I just hire a damn lawyer to handle this stupid little problem? My cover IS a great interpretation of the song, and it would/should do justice to the original, it's not like I'm sampling it for a rap about beatin' down hoes or something. Anyhow - thanks to everybody who liked the songs, and even thanks to Bart for your input. [edit: cleaned up my hostility and mother jokes ] [Edited 2/21/06 9:06am] www.beaurocks.com Trees are made of WOOD! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator | Bart, meet Beau Beau, meet Bart Two of the orgs most "unique" personalities. All Rights Reserved. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
google "compulsory licence" you shoud be able to find out the process. Like I said it sounds like it is more of a paying the lincece royalty.
One is called Audio Manufacture Licence Application (AMLA) . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LMFAO, I never investigate anything before asking because I know Bart will investigate it for me. I just tune out all the hissy-fit stuff. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
beauhall said: I want to put my cover of IWD4U on my next record.
Hey, Mr. Hall! When's the next record comin'?!! I still have 'Unh!' in my car! Easy, kid! my edit is this: I really like the cover of "Life Can Be So Nice" much better. That shit's rockin' my phones for the third time tonight! another-> my edit is over [Edited 2/21/06 11:41am] "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BartVanHemelen said: buncha informative, although, historically oh-so-nasty stuff
Can you even create music? have a beer-> "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
nayroo2002 said: beauhall said: I want to put my cover of IWD4U on my next record.
Hey, Mr. Hall! When's the next record comin'?!! I still have 'Unh!' in my car! Easy, kid! my edit is this: I really like the cover of "Life Can Be So Nice" much better. That shit's rockin' my phones for the third time tonight! another-> my edit is over [Edited 2/21/06 11:41am] yeah, I really REALLY like my version of "Life", but it's too close to the original. I like IWD4U better because when I do it live, people barely recognize it as a cover. I REALLY like that - because the folks that DO see that it's a cover all high-five, like they're in on the secret handshake. I did a gig two weeks ago where a lady told me that she really liked the whole set, but liked that "I Would Die For Shoes" song the most. You know my new CD - IWD4U fits better with it - and - you know at the very end of my version where everything stops except the drums? That's how I do it live - just say "you..." take off my guitar and walk off the stage with the drummer still kicking. www.beaurocks.com Trees are made of WOOD! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"I Don't Want These Memories" is badass!
I like the "Life..." cover better cuz it's such an obscure Prince song, but you gave it just the right amount of ass-kickin' it needed! Brilliant! Don't get me wrong, I've heard these covers by you for awhile now, and "I Would Die 4 U" is also amazing! I'm just a sucker for a screamin' guitar! Thanks for the tunes, Mr. Hall! "Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |