independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Here's what kinda bugs me about Prince.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 01/25/06 1:31pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

Excellent post, Anx.

I really couldn't agree more. Prince is one of the biggest hypocrites in music that way.

He doesn't want us to dwell on HIS past, but he himself dwells on the past music of his own musical heroes.

He doesn't want us to expect to hear any of his 80's sounds, but he expects us to jump onboard his latest James Brown impersonation.

I love him, but being a Prince fan is sometimes a frustrating experience as much as it is a wonderful one.

Prince's best music has always come from him setting the standard rather than following it, and right now he's lost somewhere in the 70's.

[Edited 1/25/06 13:33pm]
The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 01/25/06 1:32pm

Posthumous

booyah said:

Universaluv said:

Yeah well, ATWIAD and Paisley Park would easily fit in the Beatles catalog.


As a huge Prince fan and a huge Beatles fan, I don't get that statement at all... Now, granted, The Beatles had a huge variety of styles by the time Sgt. Pepper's came along, so perhaps they could fit in the same sense that, say, Being For The Benefit Of Mr. Kite and Within You Without You fit together, but I don't think either song sounds 'like' The Beatles. Maybe that's what you mean, in which case, maybe I do get that statement after all...


the beatles influence is obvious, but i think it's also pretty superficial. the real glue of the strong material on that album goes deeper than the decision to go for a beatles psychadelia sound.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 01/25/06 1:39pm

Universaluv

booyah said:

Universaluv said:

Yeah well, ATWIAD and Paisley Park would easily fit in the Beatles catalog.


As a huge Prince fan and a huge Beatles fan, I don't get that statement at all... Now, granted, The Beatles had a huge variety of styles by the time Sgt. Pepper's came along, so perhaps they could fit in the same sense that, say, Being For The Benefit Of Mr. Kite and Within You Without You fit together, but I don't think either song sounds 'like' The Beatles. Maybe that's what you mean, in which case, maybe I do get that statement after all...


No I'm not saying it sounds like John and Paul ghost-wrote those songs or anything. Just that those particular songs are blatantly Beatlesque.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 01/25/06 1:41pm

vainandy

avatar

Prince doesn't want people dwelling in the past but he's been doing it since 1985. He's done his damndest to bring The Beatles and James Brown back.
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 01/25/06 1:42pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

But the key difference is that Prince took his Beatles inspirations and put a Princely spin on it, whereas now he does his JB impersonation and simply blandly mimics absolutely everything about the guy's music.

And don't even get me started on the obvious lack of urgency in Prince's new music.

[Edited 1/25/06 13:43pm]
The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 01/25/06 1:43pm

Posthumous

Universaluv said:



Perhaps. You know the talk is that the upcoming "Ultimate Prince" is a remastered project. If that turns out to be the case it could be a good sign. Unless it tanks. neutral



i hope it's a way to test the waters for a reissue/remasters series, and i hope it leads to something that's beneficial for everyone involved - WB/rhino, prince, and the fans.

i know, that's asking too much. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 01/25/06 1:45pm

vainandy

avatar

skywalker said:

However, Prince needs to realize that HIS fans would rather have Prince's old school (1982ish) than James's, Sly's, or anyone else's old school.


eek I think the org must be messing up again and placing posts with other people's names. lol
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 01/25/06 1:48pm

Universaluv

vainandy said:

skywalker said:

However, Prince needs to realize that HIS fans would rather have Prince's old school (1982ish) than James's, Sly's, or anyone else's old school.


eek I think the org must be messing up again and placing posts with other people's names. lol



I wondered about that too. I thought "vainandy has hacked into skywalker's password!" smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 01/25/06 1:50pm

vainandy

avatar

Universaluv said:

skywalker said:


2. I also agree that Prince has as of late heralded the "old school" as the paragon of musicology (how music should be done). However, Prince needs to realize that HIS fans would rather have Prince's old school (1982ish) than James's, Sly's, or anyone else's old school. I like me some 70's funk, but Prince, if you are going to go old school, go 1982 not 197whatever. Do your own sound boy.[/b]
[Edited 1/25/06 13:11pm]



In 1985 he went back to 196whatever and a good portion of the fanbase (i.e. not vainandy) loves him for it.


You mean present fanbase. He has a large past fanbase also.
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 01/25/06 1:52pm

vainandy

avatar

Universaluv said:

vainandy said:



eek I think the org must be messing up again and placing posts with other people's names. lol



I wondered about that too. I thought "vainandy has hacked into skywalker's password!" smile


falloff
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 01/25/06 1:52pm

Universaluv

vainandy said:



You mean present fanbase. He has a large past fanbase also.


Yup, what you said. I thought it was implied, but yeah.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 01/25/06 2:00pm

BorisFishpaw

avatar

Have to agree with your little essay Anx.

Let's just say that I've had this same conversation with the people who matter,
and the problem is that Prince has very little interest in spending any time
in the vault sorting out what's there and compiling/finishing anything. He did
it once with Crystal Ball, and really has no interest in repeating it, or
wasting time (as he sees it) digging through the past when he could be doing
something new. That's all well and good, but the problem is he won't let
anyone else do it either (and anyway, Prince isn't always the best judge of
what old material should be released or what people actually want).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 01/25/06 2:02pm

booyah

avatar

vainandy said:

Prince doesn't want people dwelling in the past but he's been doing it since 1985. He's done his damndest to bring The Beatles and James Brown back.


I don't think he's even remotely tried to bring The Beatles back. He said himself he'd never even heard While My Guitar Gently Weeps before being asked to play it at the R'N'RHOF. Now Oasis - they've always been trying to bring The Beatles back. I would say that most of The Beatles influence on ATWIAD was channelled through Wendy & Lisa (and others), and that Prince was trying to integrate their sound, not The Beatles.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 01/25/06 2:07pm

andyman91

avatar

skywalker said:

Hey, I hope you don't mind if I jump in to give you guys my thoughts....

1. I agree with the fact that Prince rarely ignores the past when in concert. It was said that the "Musicology" was his realization of getting to do a James Brown soul revue, but, he 1st did that type o' thing with the "Parade" tour. Also, he has been doing covers of HIS favorites for longer than that. Joni Mitchell's "A Case of U" is a good example of this.Prince has done that one since at least 1983.

2. I also agree that Prince has as of late heralded the "old school" as the paragon of musicology (how music should be done). However, Prince needs to realize that HIS fans would rather have Prince's old school (1982ish) than James's, Sly's, or anyone else's old school. I like me some 70's funk, but Prince, if you are going to go old school, go 1982 not 197whatever. Do your own sound boy.

[Edited 1/25/06 13:11pm]


I seem to remember the Musicology tour being more about classic Prince than James & Sly, but maybe I missed something. Soul Man was the only song that kind of made me gag. I guess you're all referring to the horn section, which has been a big part of his music since 1986.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 01/25/06 2:09pm

vainandy

avatar

booyah said:

vainandy said:

Prince doesn't want people dwelling in the past but he's been doing it since 1985. He's done his damndest to bring The Beatles and James Brown back.


I don't think he's even remotely tried to bring The Beatles back. He said himself he'd never even heard While My Guitar Gently Weeps before being asked to play it at the R'N'RHOF. Now Oasis - they've always been trying to bring The Beatles back. I would say that most of The Beatles influence on ATWIAD was channelled through Wendy & Lisa (and others), and that Prince was trying to integrate their sound, not The Beatles.


Well whoever introduced him to the influence. He should have told them to shut up and play their instruments. lol
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 01/25/06 2:09pm

skywalker

avatar

Vainandy---- let me clarify. I don't think that Prince WAS been delving into the past nearly in 1985 nearly to the extent that he has recently with songs like "The Work". In 1985 it was fresh when Prince blended the MPLS sound with all things 1960's. However, now it's 21 years later and some of his JB type songs sound JUST LIKE James. I wish if he was goin' old school he'd STOP goin' James Brown and do his own sound.
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 01/25/06 2:12pm

skywalker

avatar

BOTTOM LINE FOR ME:

PRINCE if you choose to in the Delorean and go Back to the Future go to 1982 not to 197whatever. I want the MPLS old school if any old school at all.

[Edited 1/25/06 14:12pm]
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 01/25/06 2:14pm

vainandy

avatar

skywalker said:

Vainandy---- let me clarify. I don't think that Prince WAS been delving into the past nearly in 1985 nearly to the extent that he has recently with songs like "The Work". In 1985 it was fresh when Prince blended the MPLS sound with all things 1960's. However, now it's 21 years later and some of his JB type songs sound JUST LIKE James. I wish if he was goin' old school he'd STOP goin' James Brown and do his own sound.


It's like any other problem. It starts and then it spreads and escalates. evillol
.
.
[Edited 1/25/06 14:15pm]
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 01/25/06 2:24pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

I see where Skywalker is coming from.

If Prince must dwell in the past with his new music, at least dwell on HIS past and not the past of others.

I agree with that. Prince is always best when doing something new, but I'd rather hear Prince doing 80's Prince than 70's James.
The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 01/25/06 2:29pm

Universaluv

skywalker said:

BOTTOM LINE FOR ME:

PRINCE if you choose to in the Delorean and go Back to the Future go to 1982 not to 197whatever. I want the MPLS old school if any old school at all.

[Edited 1/25/06 14:12pm]


OK eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 01/25/06 2:35pm

vainandy

avatar

PurpleKnight said:

I see where Skywalker is coming from.

If Prince must dwell in the past with his new music, at least dwell on HIS past and not the past of others.

I agree with that. Prince is always best when doing something new, but I'd rather hear Prince doing 80's Prince than 70's James.


I agree with him too. I'm just having fun with him because we have fought so much in the past and now we finally agree on something. He's making progress. Soon he'll be bashing Prince with the best of us. lol
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 01/25/06 2:40pm

Posthumous

BorisFishpaw said:

Have to agree with your little essay Anx.

Let's just say that I've had this same conversation with the people who matter,
and the problem is that Prince has very little interest in spending any time
in the vault sorting out what's there and compiling/finishing anything. He did
it once with Crystal Ball, and really has no interest in repeating it, or
wasting time (as he sees it) digging through the past when he could be doing
something new. That's all well and good, but the problem is he won't let
anyone else do it either (and anyway, Prince isn't always the best judge of
what old material should be released or what people actually want).


figured as much. but certainly he understands a lot of money could come from it and he could at LEAST humor the idea of finding the right people to put an archival project into place. i mean, he has a huge fanbase full of knowledgable people - he has TONS of resources at hand. and i know he likes the money... smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 01/25/06 2:41pm

MIGUELGOMEZ

Posthumous said:

BorisFishpaw said:

Have to agree with your little essay Anx.

Let's just say that I've had this same conversation with the people who matter,
and the problem is that Prince has very little interest in spending any time
in the vault sorting out what's there and compiling/finishing anything. He did
it once with Crystal Ball, and really has no interest in repeating it, or
wasting time (as he sees it) digging through the past when he could be doing
something new. That's all well and good, but the problem is he won't let
anyone else do it either (and anyway, Prince isn't always the best judge of
what old material should be released or what people actually want).


figured as much. but certainly he understands a lot of money could come from it and he could at LEAST humor the idea of finding the right people to put an archival project into place. i mean, he has a huge fanbase full of knowledgable people - he has TONS of resources at hand. and i know he likes the money... smile





Oooooh Prince pick me...pick me.....pick me!!!!! wave



M
[Edited 1/25/06 14:42pm]
MyeternalgrattitudetoPhil&Val.Herman said "We want sweaty truckers at the truck stop! We want cigar puffing men that look like they wanna beat the living daylights out of us" Val"sporking is spooning with benefits"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 01/25/06 3:05pm

TulipsMakeMeVa
iny

meow85 said:

origmnd said:

What can u expect from someone who LIVES to be contradictory?

He gets off or lives off the internal male/female struggle within his mind and
soul.

Let's hope the little man & woman in his mind get into a ferocious screaming match and then have incredible make-up sex.

drooling





Now THATS what Im talkin about!
Get to the root of the issue---
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 01/25/06 3:13pm

skywalker

avatar

vainandy said:



I agree with him too. I'm just having fun with him because we have fought so much in the past and now we finally agree on something. He's making progress. Soon he'll be bashing Prince with the best of us. lol



Let's not get carried away. I used to argue with you because you'd declare your opinions as facts making statements like, "Prince lost it after 1984". I can dig the fact that you don't like Prince since 1985 and we are at an understanding. However, I'll still maintain my opinion that Prince has done shit since 1984 that has been as good or better than things he did before. I think Prince dabbling in the 60's in 1985 was different than just full out doing a James Brown impression like he has been doing as of late.

[Edited 1/25/06 15:14pm]
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 01/25/06 3:18pm

Universaluv

skywalker said:

vainandy said:



I agree with him too. I'm just having fun with him because we have fought so much in the past and now we finally agree on something. He's making progress. Soon he'll be bashing Prince with the best of us. lol



Let's not get carried away. I used to argue with you because you'd declare your opinions as facts making statements like, "Prince lost it after 1984". I can dig the fact that you don't like Prince since 1985 and we are at an understanding. However, I'll still maintain my opinion that Prince has done shit since 1984 that has been as good or better than things he did before. I think Prince dabbling in the 60's in 1985 was different than just full out doing a James Brown impression like he has been doing as of late.

[Edited 1/25/06 15:14pm]



Getting sucked back into this thread, dangit! You make it sound like every song he's done over the past 5 years is a JB rehash. Seriously, it's like 3 or 4 songs at most over the past few years that sound like a "JB impression".

Beyond that there are JB influenced songs, which he's always had.


.
[Edited 1/25/06 15:19pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 01/25/06 3:25pm

Posthumous

this is leading to an interesting question, at least for me to ask myself: when did i start to recognize the really blatant JB nods and influences in prince's stuff? if anything, i heard more sly, santana, joni and sly on the first three, and maybe we got a little james going on in 'controversy' with 'let's work'...i can hear it creeping in during the 1999 album, and it's all the way there with some of the stuff on 'purple rain' and the monster was out of the cage at LEAST on that tour. not to say that the early albums weren't funky, but i don't hear the blatant JB idol worship that i do on albums post-PR.

just a first thought. i'm sure you all will set me right. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 01/25/06 3:29pm

Universaluv

Posthumous said:

this is leading to an interesting question, at least for me to ask myself: when did i start to recognize the really blatant JB nods and influences in prince's stuff? if anything, i heard more sly, santana, joni and sly on the first three, and maybe we got a little james going on in 'controversy' with 'let's work'...i can hear it creeping in during the 1999 album, and it's all the way there with some of the stuff on 'purple rain' and the monster was out of the cage at LEAST on that tour. not to say that the early albums weren't funky, but i don't hear the blatant JB idol worship that i do on albums post-PR.

just a first thought. i'm sure you all will set me right. wink



Sounds about right to me. Possessed was the first time it really struck me as obvious. Other than that, it seems like his "Jamesmanship" was showcased alot more live than on record.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 01/25/06 3:30pm

Milty

avatar

hmmm.....good point. why should we beg for the old Prince when the only thing he is interested in is moving forward ie new music etc etc. but at the same time he's doing all this homage to his heros. ok that's cool too. contridictory but fine.

well you see the reason why this happens is cuz Prince can. he's done all that innovating. all the pioneering. he doesn't need to do it anymore. plus, i bet that the reason he's still rehashing the JB tributes, is prolly cuz he wants to dive right into something that he never really did b4. we all know he likes to preach (he always has) and this "school is in" thing is his way of preaching.

let's go back so we can move forward.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 01/25/06 3:32pm

Posthumous

Universaluv said:

Posthumous said:

this is leading to an interesting question, at least for me to ask myself: when did i start to recognize the really blatant JB nods and influences in prince's stuff? if anything, i heard more sly, santana, joni and sly on the first three, and maybe we got a little james going on in 'controversy' with 'let's work'...i can hear it creeping in during the 1999 album, and it's all the way there with some of the stuff on 'purple rain' and the monster was out of the cage at LEAST on that tour. not to say that the early albums weren't funky, but i don't hear the blatant JB idol worship that i do on albums post-PR.

just a first thought. i'm sure you all will set me right. wink



Sounds about right to me. Possessed was the first time it really struck me as obvious. Other than that, it seems like his "Jamesmanship" was showcased alot more live than on record.


and let me say too that i really don't mind all the nods to JB in prince's stuff...but let's call it what it is, which is derivative. that word gets a bad rap most of the time, but it's just what it is. and it's not the beginning and the end of prince's faults or strengths. like i said..it's just something that KINDA bugs me. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Here's what kinda bugs me about Prince.