independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince is not as original as I thought
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 07/18/05 12:54pm

funkii

avatar

you could probably do this kind of analasis on an endless amount of musicians
[Edited 8/1/05 13:30pm]
You saw the apple
hanging on the tree,
But missed the orchid
in your gaze
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 07/18/05 3:05pm

Tiffypoo2004

well original or not P is and always will be the most talented singer, songwriter, and musician known to man in my opinion. biggrin
[Edited 7/18/05 15:06pm]
[Edited 7/18/05 15:06pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 07/18/05 3:24pm

thedog

laurarichardson said:

White Horse as a pattern for Erotic City. No I hear a Funkadelic tribute. White House is some fake Euro-funk.


I'm sorry, but it's plain to see that erotic city is modeled after Laid back's white horse. All he did was tone down the techno stuff and maybe he added some funkadelic in it, but white horse is the main influence on that song. Euro or not.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 07/18/05 3:41pm

jbell

Rose I'm wondering when some of these dimwits are going to refer to you as a "hater" for just starting an interesting thread.

I am also wondering if some of these authors that maintain everybody borrows for everybody crap (and that may be so), are the same ones that say rap is crap and use sampling as one of their reasons for saying so.


Stay strong Rose.
[Edited 7/18/05 15:41pm]
[Edited 7/18/05 20:41pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 07/18/05 10:19pm

prodigalfan

avatar

SynthiaRose said:

Wow. What a disappointing debate.

I'm not going to respond to half of this.

First, I'm obviously a Prince fan. In my post I said I loved him, but I keep learning that things I associate with him didn't spring innately from him.


I've been accused of "stealing" others "concepts" in my list, when my list is a summary of observations. Of course the summary pulls from things on the board and books and interviews, etc. It's not conceived as original. rolleyes


Next, a couple have pointed out the criticism about Wendy spurring his use of metaphor. Of course I know poetry has metaphor and art in general have metaphor. That's not the point. The point is that PRINCE started using it for HIS music at someone else's suggestion.

Just like with using his falsetto. Someone mentioned other soul singers use falsettos. Again, that's not the point. I'd rather read that Prince decided this would be his signature voice instead of reading that a manager suggested it to him.

Same thing with the other complaints. HE incorporated things into his already ongoing schtick after others suggested it. I don't know why it's so difficult for people to comprehend.

The theory that no one can be original is faulty. People think original thoughts everyday ... meaning they think, analyze, create, and synthesize without regard to what's gone before. Even if their creation parallels something already made ... it's original because they, using their minds alone, conceived it. They didn't look and imitate. What has gone before should be inspiration and stimuli not whole building blocks of an artist's design.

Anyway, instead of looking at the issue and dissecting it .. for some reason people want to act like I'm the opponent, when I'm clearly a fan who feels bamboozled.

You all can be delusional if you want, but if you've believed something to be genius and actually find it's a patchquilt of other things and that said person couldn't come up with his own schtick on his own ... it's a big let down.


Actually I have been reading this thread, and I get where you are coming from.
I too thought Prince created in a vacuum, and to realize that he is actually influenced by others and "borrows" from former associated musicians (Cymone, Jesse) it is a bit disappointing. For me, it is coming to the realization that Prince is after all human, and not some demigod musical prodigy. He is a quick learner, very peristent and talented in playing multi instruments and expressing his thoughts into music but probably not a musical genius that will be talked about centuries later the way Mozart and Beehtoven (sp?) is.
And it is disappointing, but does not in any diminish his relevance today.
biggrin
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 07/18/05 10:21pm

prodigalfan

avatar

paisleypark4 said:




Yes..I wouldnt have had more of an appreciation for George Clinton, James Brown, Jimi, jazz music, or even any slow jam if it wasnt for Prince.


That is too bad, considering at one time, these are the teachers and Prince was the student.
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 07/18/05 10:24pm

prodigalfan

avatar

SexyBeautifulOne said:

SynthiaRose said:

Wow. What a disappointing debate.

I'm not going to respond to half of this.

First, I'm obviously a Prince fan. In my post I said I loved him, but I keep learning that things I associate with him didn't spring innately from him.


I've been accused of "stealing" others "concepts" in my list, when my list is a summary of observations. Of course the summary pulls from things on the board and books and interviews, etc. It's not conceived as original. rolleyes


Next, a couple have pointed out the criticism about Wendy spurring his use of metaphor. Of course I know poetry has metaphor and art in general have metaphor. That's not the point. The point is that PRINCE started using it for HIS music at someone else's suggestion.

Just like with using his falsetto. Someone mentioned other soul singers use falsettos. Again, that's not the point. I'd rather read that Prince decided this would be his signature voice instead of reading that a manager suggested it to him.

Same thing with the other complaints. HE incorporated things into his already ongoing schtick after others suggested it. I don't know why it's so difficult for people to comprehend.

The theory that no one can be original is faulty. People think original thoughts everyday ... meaning they think, analyze, create, and synthesize without regard to what's gone before. Even if their creation parallels something already made ... it's original because they, using their minds alone, conceived it. They didn't look and imitate. What has gone before should be inspiration and stimuli not whole building blocks of an artist's design.

Anyway, instead of looking at the issue and dissecting it .. for some reason people want to act like I'm the opponent, when I'm clearly a fan who feels bamboozled.

You all can be delusional if you want, but if you've believed something to be genius and actually find it's a patchquilt of other things and that said person couldn't come up with his own schtick on his own ... it's a big let down.


Ahhh, you're disappointed, that's a shame. NOT! You're entitled to your opinions and so are we, the facts that they differ are just par for the course around here, hun. Deal with it!

If you are as truly disappointed and let down as you are trying to convince us you are because of stuff you've read around here and in some books. That only show's that you are the one that's "easily led and a follower".

If it's about the music, what difference does it make how it came about?

If you feel so "bamboozled" because you found out Prince is a human entertainer, and not the mythical, mystical, demigod, you've built up in your mind, then perhaps it's time for you to move on. There comes a time in a person's life when things that once held high relevance, just no longer does it. It happens!

If you've got any "good" Prince stuff, on your way out, post a list, I'm sure some "delusional" person around here will be glad to take it off your hands.

Buh-bye! wave


Did Synthia strike a nerve with you? Your response seems a bit harsh.
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 07/18/05 10:27pm

prodigalfan

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

Don't confuse "genius" and "originality". One does not have to be original to be a genius; one can improve upon an established genre or idea.

For clarification on the "genius" thing, find out what other musicians say about Prince. I think you'll find that almost universally, across the whole pop-rock-funk spectrum, he is considered a "genius".

I certainly consider him one.


Good point. I am sure Mozart and other "geniuses" have been influenced by predescesors.
So it is true that originality is not a prerequisite for genuis
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 07/18/05 10:31pm

prodigalfan

avatar

laurarichardson said:



"He's not the first singer to use "purple rain" as a lyric. "

Do you really think Prince was listening to "America"? The Purple things seems to go back to his dad.



Since Prince was influenced by Joni Mitchell, it would not surprise me that he did listen to America. After all he grew up in the 70's in Minneapolis MINNESOTA. They probably didn't have a soul/RB radio station or like my hometown only played "soul" music for part of the day. So you listen to whatever you can.

But what is this about Purple going back to his dad. I would like to hear more about this.
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 07/18/05 10:34pm

prodigalfan

avatar

SexyBeautifulOne said:

SynthiaRose said:




Yeah, I acknowledged in an above post that it was "Erotic City" not Bitch, as I mistated, that mimicked White Horse. EC came after White Horse I believe, although it seems they both were on radio at the same period.


Erotic City mimics White Horse?

disbelief You just don't know when to quit, do you?


You know I never really realized it until today, but the bass line is very similar to white horse. I don't know which came first. One thing, EC wasn't something written years prior to release. Prince says he wrote it after going to a Parliment concert or the Parliment induction ceremony. I dunno I am hazy about it in an interview he talked about being blown away by Parliment and went home after the show and wrote EC.
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 07/19/05 12:54am

SexyBeautifulO
ne

prodigalfan said:

SexyBeautifulOne said:



Ahhh, you're disappointed, that's a shame. NOT! You're entitled to your opinions and so are we, the facts that they differ are just par for the course around here, hun. Deal with it!

If you are as truly disappointed and let down as you are trying to convince us you are because of stuff you've read around here and in some books. That only show's that you are the one that's "easily led and a follower".

If it's about the music, what difference does it make how it came about?

If you feel so "bamboozled" because you found out Prince is a human entertainer, and not the mythical, mystical, demigod, you've built up in your mind, then perhaps it's time for you to move on. There comes a time in a person's life when things that once held high relevance, just no longer does it. It happens!

If you've got any "good" Prince stuff, on your way out, post a list, I'm sure some "delusional" person around here will be glad to take it off your hands.

Buh-bye! wave


Did Synthia strike a nerve with you? Your response seems a bit harsh.



Not hardly. Sometimes the truth is.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 07/19/05 1:00am

vainandy

avatar

DorothyParkerWasCool said:

The irony is that no one is really that original. Everybody takes ideas and synthesizes them into something. Prince didn't create the sounds, image and ideas, yet he put them in a bag and came up with himself. That's all everybody really does. Everyone you listed has lifted something from the people that influenced them. If you check out their influences you will see how "original" they are as well, but that does not detract from their contributions. Because the greats transcend their era and that's nearly impossible if you didn't come up with something of your own.
[Edited 7/17/05 13:08pm]


Exactly.
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 07/19/05 1:14am

vainandy

avatar

[quote]

SynthiaRose said:

Handclapsfingasnapz said:


that too. nod



Yeah, I acknowledged in an above post that it was "Erotic City" not Bitch, as I mistated, that mimicked White Horse. EC came after White Horse I believe, although it seems they both were on radio at the same period.[/quote]


"White Horse" was long out of style on R&B radio before "Erotic City" came out. As usual, when it comes to R&B, pop stations were late when they picked up "White Horse" so some of them were still playing "White Horse". After "Erotic City" dropped, every DJ I heard at the time, both R&B and pop, began mixing these two jams because they were very similar.
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 07/19/05 1:32am

coldbloodedque

What da ...

You obviously do not know anything about music.

Did you know that George Clinton used to play on the up beat until he hired a bass player by the name of Bootsy Collins. Bootsy was previously employed by someone named James Brown where he learn to play on the one and keep it in the pocket.

George Clinton adopted the sound that Bootsy brought with him and the result was Parliament.

Did George Clinton steal from Bootsy or did he steal from James Brown. Did Bootsy steal from James Brown.

Did John Coltrane steal from Charlie Parker or did Charlie Parker steal from Lester Young.

The whole concept that you present is ridiculous

You played him like he was Ja Rule trying to be like Tupac.

Of course he was influenced but there is no artist like him and there will never be another like him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 07/19/05 1:58am

Christopher

avatar

he new how to blend everything and make it into his own. i admire what he did in the 80s. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 07/19/05 2:31am

ThataintFunky

avatar

Christopher said:

he new how to blend everything and make it into his own. i admire what he did in the 80s. smile


INDEED!

In my opinion no Prince-Collection is really complete without the ones he inherited the skills from ...

To get a first impression of an artist catalogue, the "best-off-collections" are great. I think these are assential:

James Brown - Foundations Of Funk: A Brand New Bag: 1964-1969
James Brown - Funk Power 1970: A Brand New Thang
James Brown - Make It Funky: The Big Payback: 1971-1975

Parliament - 20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection
Funkadelic - Music for Your Mother
Bootsy Collins - Glory B Da' Funk's on Me! The Bootsy Collins Anthology

Sly and the Family Stone - The Essential Sly & the Family Stone

Jimi Hendrix - Experience Hendrix: The Best of Jimi Hendrix

Marvin Gaye - The Very Best of Marvin Gaye

Curtis Mayfield - People Get Ready: The Curtis Mayfield Story

Ohio Players - Funk on Fire: The Mercury Anthology


If you are unfamiliar with the above mentioned artists:
Go buy those collections!

[Edited 7/19/05 2:43am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 07/19/05 4:49am

OskarKristio

Tiffypoo2004 said:

well original or not P is and always will be the most talented singer, songwriter, and musician known to man in my opinion. biggrin
[Edited 7/18/05 15:06pm]
[Edited 7/18/05 15:06pm]


I wouldn't go that far man cool , but hey I like the guy a lot, id say in contempory music in say last 50 - 100 years , as an idividual artist...
muscician,performer, singer, songwriter. I would probably put him in the top 10 in that period.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 07/19/05 5:31am

TurnItUp

thedog said:

It's Erotic city that sounds like white horse, not irristible bitch.


Neither song sounds the same to me. The first time I heard the music to white horse was when Monifa sampled it for her song Do you really wanna...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 07/19/05 5:50am

laurarichardso
n

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

laurarichardson said:


-----
You know I would not be surprised if other people did it before Prince but, some artist may have been serious and using it to sell records.

Ant-Music for Ant people Adam and the Ants.

David Bowie and his whole Space Oddity thing.

Maybe Funkadelic. With the Cult Mantra that is found inside the Maggot Brain CD.

mmmmm, perhaps. but the thing with dm is that he didn't do that album for the money.

-----
I don't know about that. He was building a cult following especially for his live shows and he still has that to this day. Prince lives off of his concert revenue.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 07/19/05 5:52am

laurarichardso
n

jbell said:

Rose I'm wondering when some of these dimwits are going to refer to you as a "hater" for just starting an interesting thread.

I am also wondering if some of these authors that maintain everybody borrows for everybody crap (and that may be so), are the same ones that say rap is crap and use sampling as one of their reasons for saying so.


Stay strong Rose.
[Edited 7/18/05 15:41pm]
[Edited 7/18/05 20:41pm]

-----
Being influenced by another artist is not the same as ripping off a whole song.
Nine time out of ten it is the same damm music we have heard sampled 100 times.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 07/19/05 7:45am

dekabes

avatar

eek
Hmm this is an interesting topic and I'm sorry I've join late but I think SynthiaRose might have misinterpreted the word "original" when it comes to Prince. He comes from a long line of blues artists including Ray Charles and of course James Brown and has adopted many blues elements in his music as well as added new ones (i.e. the drum machine) It is critical that SynthiaRose listens widely and read less Prince related material to understand what "original" actually means in music lexicon. For example, James Brown's Papa got a brand new bag considered to be the antecendent of the song, Kiss, contains elements of Miles Davis's So What from the Kind of Blue album. Would this be considered un original of JB? Some of Hendrix's songs from Electric Ladyland have musical elements "lifted" from Hopi Indian tribe. Great talent or a fraud?
Calling Prince "unoriginal" is (no jab at SynthiaRose personally)naive without having to shout out the Rolling Stones, The Beatles, Traffic, Cream, Led Zepplin who all decidedly used every blues riff ever created by blues musicians from the 20's thru 50's. Check the records!

If you really want to see how unoriginal artist can be then look into america's favorite filmmaker, Steven Spielberg but that's another forum cool
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 07/19/05 8:10am

SynthiaRose

LauraRichardson said

: Stop taking everything Prince ever wrote, did or said so seriously. He was a young guy trying to sell records. He used his Uptown manifesto as a marketing tool. Why some people are still taking it seriously 20 plus years later is beyond me.


I've never thought of Prince as someone who pandered ... or who just made music that sounded good and you could dance to. I take his art seriously ... as an expression of his soul. So yeah .. don't want to discover too much about that soul that is counterfeit.
[Edited 7/19/05 8:12am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 07/19/05 8:12am

SynthiaRose

dekabes said:

He comes from a long line of blues artists including Ray Charles and of course James Brown and has adopted many blues elements in his music as well as added new ones (i.e. the drum machine) It is critical that SynthiaRose listens widely and read less Prince related material to understand what "original" actually means in music lexicon.



You could be right.

I did grow up listening to Prince in a vacuum as opposed to on a blues-soul continuum that could have offered a wider berth for comparison.

I initially thought of him as a rare creature out of whose eccentric head all kinds of idiosyncratic things were springing ...

... don't know if I would say that now. I'm not sure the things that most define him have neatly sprung from him alone.

But don't get me wrong, I didn't think his music was from scratch. I understand that all artists expand on what comes before. So I'm not totally naive.


I'm not up in arms about generic imitation. But there are things that seem definitively Prince that are not unique to him at all. I'm not sure any of the main characteristics that define him are unique. And that's a bit amazing considering his god status.



I'm not sure it's completely fair, though, to scrutinize Prince by picking apart his mimicry ... this is certainly a case where the sum is greater than its parts ... and there are some songs that are in a realm of their own ...despite the well=worn borrowed elements.
[Edited 7/19/05 8:16am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 07/19/05 8:48am

DorothyParkerW
asCool

dekabes said:

eek
Hmm this is an interesting topic and I'm sorry I've join late but I think SynthiaRose might have misinterpreted the word "original" when it comes to Prince. He comes from a long line of blues artists including Ray Charles and of course James Brown and has adopted many blues elements in his music as well as added new ones (i.e. the drum machine) It is critical that SynthiaRose listens widely and read less Prince related material to understand what "original" actually means in music lexicon. For example, James Brown's Papa got a brand new bag considered to be the antecendent of the song, Kiss, contains elements of Miles Davis's So What from the Kind of Blue album. Would this be considered un original of JB? Some of Hendrix's songs from Electric Ladyland have musical elements "lifted" from Hopi Indian tribe. Great talent or a fraud?
Calling Prince "unoriginal" is (no jab at SynthiaRose personally)naive without having to shout out the Rolling Stones, The Beatles, Traffic, Cream, Led Zepplin who all decidedly used every blues riff ever created by blues musicians from the 20's thru 50's. Check the records!

If you really want to see how unoriginal artist can be then look into america's favorite filmmaker, Steven Spielberg but that's another forum cool



worship thumbs up!

Excellent post.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 07/19/05 8:50am

DorothyParkerW
asCool

SynthiaRose said:

dekabes said:

He comes from a long line of blues artists including Ray Charles and of course James Brown and has adopted many blues elements in his music as well as added new ones (i.e. the drum machine) It is critical that SynthiaRose listens widely and read less Prince related material to understand what "original" actually means in music lexicon.



You could be right.

I did grow up listening to Prince in a vacuum as opposed to on a blues-soul continuum that could have offered a wider berth for comparison.

I initially thought of him as a rare creature out of whose eccentric head all kinds of idiosyncratic things were springing ...

... don't know if I would say that now. I'm not sure the things that most define him have neatly sprung from him alone.

But don't get me wrong, I didn't think his music was from scratch. I understand that all artists expand on what comes before. So I'm not totally naive.


I'm not up in arms about generic imitation. But there are things that seem definitively Prince that are not unique to him at all. I'm not sure any of the main characteristics that define him are unique. And that's a bit amazing considering his god status.



I'm not sure it's completely fair, though, to scrutinize Prince by picking apart his mimicry ... this is certainly a case where the sum is greater than its parts ... and there are some songs that are in a realm of their own ...despite the well=worn borrowed elements.
[Edited 7/19/05 8:16am]



I would simply recommend you going back and researching a few legendary musicians. Prince is no different from any of them and believe me, none of them exhisted in a vaccum, no one does. Just broaden your palate and learn the history and you can understand all of them and music better.

[Edited 7/19/05 8:52am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 07/19/05 8:56am

SynthiaRose

DorothyParkerWasCool said:

SynthiaRose said:




You could be right.

I did grow up listening to Prince in a vacuum as opposed to on a blues-soul continuum that could have offered a wider berth for comparison.

I initially thought of him as a rare creature out of whose eccentric head all kinds of idiosyncratic things were springing ...

... don't know if I would say that now. I'm not sure the things that most define him have neatly sprung from him alone.

But don't get me wrong, I didn't think his music was from scratch. I understand that all artists expand on what comes before. So I'm not totally naive.


I'm not up in arms about generic imitation. But there are things that seem definitively Prince that are not unique to him at all. I'm not sure any of the main characteristics that define him are unique. And that's a bit amazing considering his god status.



I'm not sure it's completely fair, though, to scrutinize Prince by picking apart his mimicry ... this is certainly a case where the sum is greater than its parts ... and there are some songs that are in a realm of their own ...despite the well=worn borrowed elements.
[Edited 7/19/05 8:16am]



I would simply recommend you going back and researching a few legendary musicians. Prince is no different from any of them and believe me, none of them exhisted in a vaccum, no one does. Just broaden your palate and learn the history and you can understand all of them and music better.

[Edited 7/19/05 8:52am]


I listen to classical, rock, and pop. I've long loved jazz singers (Ella, Billie, Louie) for years and am just starting to get into jazz musicians... I just bought some parker, davis, and a 2-disc historical review.

It's just that i've never been a fan of funk or the james, sly, etc. sound that seemed to influence Prince.


When I say I listened to Prince in a vacuum ... I mean all my other favorites were rock and pop and there was no one similar to compare him to. So,he was in a kickass league of his own!

For the record, I'm sure someone better schooled in funk could STILL feel as I do ... as far as questioning Prince's originality.


[Edited 7/19/05 8:58am]
[Edited 7/19/05 9:00am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 07/19/05 9:03am

DorothyParkerW
asCool

SynthiaRose said:

DorothyParkerWasCool said:




I would simply recommend you going back and researching a few legendary musicians. Prince is no different from any of them and believe me, none of them exhisted in a vaccum, no one does. Just broaden your palate and learn the history and you can understand all of them and music better.

[Edited 7/19/05 8:52am]


I listen to classical, rock, and pop. I've long loved jazz singers (Ella, Billie, Louie) for years and am just starting to get into jazz musicians... I just bought some parker, davis, and a 2-disc historical review.

It's just that i've never been a fan of funk or the james, sly, etc. sound that seemed to influence Prince.


Well I would suggest giving them more of a chance because if you like Prince odds are you would like them too. Although Prince added some more elements to the mix. Along with the people u mentioned, I would add Miles' Electric period,Paliament/Funkadelic anything by Santana, Stevie Wonder, Bobby Womack, Bill Withers, Little Richard, Larry Graham's solo work, Bootsy Collins' solo work and Joni Mitchell. I really gained more respect for Prince after having a better understanding of his influences.
[Edited 7/19/05 9:06am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 07/19/05 9:18am

onenitealone

avatar

Maybe I shouldn't post on this thread as it's obviously going to be showing up on 'My Org' for the next 5 weeks lol but...

as simple and as obvious as this sounds, I'm surprised that anyone would think less of Prince - or any other artist - by 'discovering' their actual influences. We are ALL - yes, you & I - products of our environment. We soak up 'influences' (consciously or unconsciously) and translate them into something we call our own every single day. Maybe you and I do it on a personal level; we just get to see Prince's on a musical level. And the fact he can do it, give reference to those influences and still churn out something undeniably 'Prince' - that's talent.

So, no big news to me. shrug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 07/19/05 9:25am

SynthiaRose

onenitealone said:

Maybe I shouldn't post on this thread as it's obviously going to be showing up on 'My Org' for the next 5 weeks lol but...

as simple and as obvious as this sounds, I'm surprised that anyone would think less of Prince - or any other artist - by 'discovering' their actual influences. We are ALL - yes, you & I - products of our environment. We soak up 'influences' (consciously or unconsciously) and translate them into something we call our own every single day. Maybe you and I do it on a personal level; we just get to see Prince's on a musical level. And the fact he can do it, give reference to those influences and still churn out something undeniably 'Prince' - that's talent.

So, no big news to me. shrug



I don't question that basic level of creation.
Again, does Prince have any thing definitive that he didn't take from someone else?

If not, then don't just shrug it off and give him a pass..

But I"m not going to keep forcing this....
It's as doomed as the argument about how very derivative Christianity is ...


Anyway, DorothyParker... I do listen to quite a bit of Little Richard and Stevie ... I'll check out the other ones you named.


The effect could be that Prince becomes run of the mill after that.

Anyway, goin' to work now...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 07/19/05 9:31am

DorothyParkerW
asCool

SynthiaRose said:

onenitealone said:

Maybe I shouldn't post on this thread as it's obviously going to be showing up on 'My Org' for the next 5 weeks lol but...

as simple and as obvious as this sounds, I'm surprised that anyone would think less of Prince - or any other artist - by 'discovering' their actual influences. We are ALL - yes, you & I - products of our environment. We soak up 'influences' (consciously or unconsciously) and translate them into something we call our own every single day. Maybe you and I do it on a personal level; we just get to see Prince's on a musical level. And the fact he can do it, give reference to those influences and still churn out something undeniably 'Prince' - that's talent.

So, no big news to me. shrug



I don't question that basic level of creation.
Again, does Prince have any thing definitive that he didn't take from someone else?

If not, then don't just shrug it off and give him a pass..

But I"m not going to keep forcing this....
It's as doomed as the argument about how very derivative Christianity is ...


Anyway, DorothyParker... I do listen to quite a bit of Little Richard and Stevie ... I'll check out the other ones you named.


The effect could be that Prince becomes run of the mill after that.

Anyway, goin' to work now...


hmm U're kinda all or nothing huh... cry Uncle Uncle....
[Edited 7/19/05 9:33am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince is not as original as I thought