Anxiety said: seriously, i checked out HQ's complaints regarding NPGMC's most recent requests, and i came away from it with three thoughts:
1) i know i won't be sitting at the popular kids' table after this, but...i think it's well within NPGMC's rights to dictate what's done with its logos and with the photographs/illustrations/logos that it produces. to a certain extent, the internet is kind of like 'the wild frontier' in that you can't control all the material all the time, and everyone's gonna sneak off with SOMEthing you post on the web...but when a site appropriates something like the NPG logo, or when they manipulate photography produced specifically for a prince album, and when those appropriations are carried through not just by a user of the site, but by the designers and owners of the site, then i see no reason why they shouldn't be answerable to the owners of those images when they bring on the clampdown with regards to other people using their intellectual property. 2) not for nothin', but i harbor sincere doubts as to how unpleasant the missive from NPGMC must have been, though i could be wrong about this. it's always unpleasant to be slapped on the wrist for something, no matter how polite or diplomatic you try to be about it. considering the offerings of photo exclusives NPGMC has offered HQ in the past, i'd hardly suspect the club's webmasters have it in for HQ. again: i could be way off-track about this. but i don't think so. and i'm NOT saying HQ is lying or distorting any facts - i'm just saying that sometimes perspective can be a motherfucker. 3) this isn't the first time we've seen this happen - not only with HQ but with other sites as well. seems to happen in between releases of new prince product, right when fans are at their most restless, right when it's easiest to whip us all into a froth over whatEVER. do you think this is coincidence? really, i wish nothing but the best for the HQ folks, and i hope that in this latest round of general squawking amongst all involved, the folks at NPGMC remember the virtues of grace and mercy. it's all supposed to be about having fun, isn't it? for the rest of us, i would like to humbly recommend discussing this latest round of unpleasantness with as much respectful calm and proportionately dispassionate debate as can be mustered. seems we always have a kneejerk reaction whenever something like this happens, and this time maybe we can learn by being a little analytical and questioning what we question. not tellin' ya what to think or anything...i'm just sayin'. "not a fan" yeah...ok | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: 1) we dont use the symbol Rock he may - but you DO use the symbol..... <-----what's that? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
is this going on again? Christian Zombie Vampires | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thebumpsquad said: sosgemini said: 1) we dont use the symbol Rock he may - but you DO use the symbol..... <-----what's that? thats a font and its used within discussion...copywrite violation comes into play when you use someone else's logo or symbol as if its your own..... cha get? Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: hold up, wait a minute..the org is not part of this..the org does not post illegal content.....that is why the org has yet to face these types of problems.. Ummm, check your gallery before posting a reply like that. You'll find page after page after page of images taken from bootlegged DVD's. There's the 'illegal content' there. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thebumpsquad said: sosgemini said: hold up, wait a minute..the org is not part of this..the org does not post illegal content.....that is why the org has yet to face these types of problems.. Ummm, check your gallery before posting a reply like that. You'll find page after page after page of images taken from bootlegged DVD's. There's the 'illegal content' there. and who holds the copywrite on those images? not prince.....folks, we have already been down this path with what is acceptable and what isnt regarding the logo.....some one enlighten me. is there npgmc copywritten content on this site? if there is it will be removed.... but magazine covers with the symbol, fan created symbols are *not* owned by npgmc, prince, larry graham or jehovah god. Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Neversin said: They only fuck with Housequake.com so they can have an excuse and blame them for the lack of output on NPGMC.com... This is just usual practice for Prince's camp...
Housequake.com is everything NPGMC.com wants/is supposed to be... Neversin. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: Anxiety said: seriously, i checked out HQ's complaints regarding NPGMC's most recent requests, and i came away from it with three thoughts:
I agree wholeheartedly.1) i know i won't be sitting at the popular kids' table after this, but...i think it's well within NPGMC's rights to dictate what's done with its logos and with the photographs/illustrations/logos that it produces. to a certain extent, the internet is kind of like 'the wild frontier' in that you can't control all the material all the time, and everyone's gonna sneak off with SOMEthing you post on the web...but when a site appropriates something like the NPG logo, or when they manipulate photography produced specifically for a prince album, and when those appropriations are carried through not just by a user of the site, but by the designers and owners of the site, then i see no reason why they shouldn't be answerable to the owners of those images when they bring on the clampdown with regards to other people using their intellectual property. 2) not for nothin', but i harbor sincere doubts as to how unpleasant the missive from NPGMC must have been, though i could be wrong about this. it's always unpleasant to be slapped on the wrist for something, no matter how polite or diplomatic you try to be about it. considering the offerings of photo exclusives NPGMC has offered HQ in the past, i'd hardly suspect the club's webmasters have it in for HQ. again: i could be way off-track about this. but i don't think so. and i'm NOT saying HQ is lying or distorting any facts - i'm just saying that sometimes perspective can be a motherfucker. 3) this isn't the first time we've seen this happen - not only with HQ but with other sites as well. seems to happen in between releases of new prince product, right when fans are at their most restless, right when it's easiest to whip us all into a froth over whatEVER. do you think this is coincidence? really, i wish nothing but the best for the HQ folks, and i hope that in this latest round of general squawking amongst all involved, the folks at NPGMC remember the virtues of grace and mercy. it's all supposed to be about having fun, isn't it? for the rest of us, i would like to humbly recommend discussing this latest round of unpleasantness with as much respectful calm and proportionately dispassionate debate as can be mustered. seems we always have a kneejerk reaction whenever something like this happens, and this time maybe we can learn by being a little analytical and questioning what we question. not tellin' ya what to think or anything...i'm just sayin'. So do I I'm firmly planted in denial | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hmm all this makes me wanna keep my secret spot just that a secret! [Edited 2/9/05 14:32pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: letsgocrazy said: anyway, i think the Org needs to be very careful how it responds to HQ's situation right now - because if things ever turn you will want everyone to come to your aid too...
thing is, i really hope everything gets ironed out between NPG and HQ, to an extent where everyone is happy. but both sides - and i mean BOTH - need to do some give and take. it's hard to put a lot of work into a site like HQ only to have someone else tell you to tear it down, i'm sure. and i hope NPG is sensitive to that. at the end of the day, i would hope prince and the NPG camp appreciates the tribute to his work that inspires sites like HQ and the org, and takes that into account when moderating the content that ends up on these sites. Anxiety! U worded that so beautifully. Absolutely Priceless. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The best way to keep a secret is to NOT TELL ANYONE that you have a secret.
Just messin w/ ya! I'm firmly planted in denial | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
truefunksoldier said: pennylover said: I visit both sites and u can believe they have some lickass fans over at NPGMC. They even mention the org. I had 2 keep my composure. U have a few members on the NPGMC that r always running there mouth. All they do is visit the different sites and report back 2 NPG on what is being said and done on these web sites and it doesn’t take a blind person 2 know who is guilty of the spying. The reason I say this is because if u go 2 NPGMC u will have the same big mouth person answering on each post.
But they're selective. I've mentioned over there that Finess offers prince songs in his mixes, that he SELLS and MAKES MONEY from, and they turn a blind eye to that. That's no different than me making copies of Musicology and selling them online. It makes no sense whatsoever. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prodigalfan said: Dewrede said: I'm a newbie there too , but i really liked the video section What makes you think you have more right to moan than me ?! (no offense) [Edited 2/9/05 2:16am] Not you. I am talking about these newbies that have posted "Why don't you stop doing things to be narc'd on" and "I don't blame NPGMC". It is obvious these posters have come from NPGMC just to defend this little stunt, nothing else. One even said that he was "baaack to NPGMC". I don't need somebody to come into my house to eff with me. That is the only reason to join HQ, well then keep stepping! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prodigalfan said: TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: P.S. Prodical, I'm looking for the way to delete my account off the Quake. I wouldn't want to sully the quake with my radical sense of what's right and what's wrong.
Sorry if I offended you Orger, truly I am but the I just really want to keep the videos online. If you feel you are "sully the quake" and want to leave... that is your choice. Seriously, regardless of if you guys think we defend the club or that we're narcs or spies, I am not but I have discovered that the Quake is not a place for me. The same way you feel about the Quake is the same way I feel about the club. I probably would not have even responded to anything over there if it hadn't been that dig on Sam on that first page. I just thought that was pretty shitty. Since I will not be visiting there anymore I guess it doesn't matter whether my account gets deleted or not. You and I disagree on this. Perhaps I should have put more thought into what I said on the Quake. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nothinbutjoy said: The best way to keep a secret is to NOT TELL ANYONE that you have a secret.
Just messin w/ ya! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: prodigalfan said: Not you. I am talking about these newbies that have posted "Why don't you stop doing things to be narc'd on" and "I don't blame NPGMC". It is obvious these posters have come from NPGMC just to defend this little stunt, nothing else. One even said that he was "baaack to NPGMC". I don't need somebody to come into my house to eff with me. That is the only reason to join HQ, well then keep stepping! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: thebumpsquad said: Rock he may - but you DO use the symbol..... <-----what's that? thats a font and its used within discussion...copywrite violation comes into play when you use someone else's logo or symbol as if its your own..... cha get? Now I am really confused. So we can use the symbol when referring to the CD or that period of musical history but can't use the symbol as decoration on your unrelated posts (ie avatar)? That kindof sortof makes sense. I think... "Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: thebumpsquad said: Ummm, check your gallery before posting a reply like that. You'll find page after page after page of images taken from bootlegged DVD's. There's the 'illegal content' there. and who holds the copywrite on those images? not prince.....folks, we have already been down this path with what is acceptable and what isnt regarding the logo.....some one enlighten me. is there npgmc copywritten content on this site? if there is it will be removed.... but magazine covers with the symbol, fan created symbols are *not* owned by npgmc, prince, larry graham or jehovah god. This is interesting. Prince can't stop someone from drawing their own version of the symbol?? This is confusing. I never use the symbol anyway. Too lazy to open the emoticon menu to fetch it... just easier to type symbol. "Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prodigalfan said: sosgemini said: thats a font and its used within discussion...copywrite violation comes into play when you use someone else's logo or symbol as if its your own..... cha get? Now I am really confused. So we can use the symbol when referring to the CD or that period of musical history but can't use the symbol as decoration on your unrelated posts (ie avatar)? That kindof sortof makes sense. I think... now im not a lawyer but i play one on tv..(harharhar) but your sorta right... yes you can use it as an avi as long as its not copywritten material that the owner has objected to its use...but you cant design your own prince symbol and slap it on a can of beans, car, underwear or website as if prince is endorsing it... cha get? Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heck, i was putting the prince symbol on my trapper keeper way back before he added all the serifs and doilies and hoitie-toities to the symbol and changed his name to glyphie-pants.
i don't think the problem is with reproducing the symbol. i don't even think the problem is with reproducing the symbol with all the serifs and the squiggly shapes. i think it has more to do with a) what SOS just mentioned - namely, slapping his symbol on something to make it look like he's a part of it or that he endorses it, and b) with using versions of the symbol that were literally created by and/or for his web site or for NPG/NPGMC product as if those images were shareware clip-art. just hazarding guesses here. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: prodigalfan said: Sorry if I offended you Orger, truly I am but the I just really want to keep the videos online. If you feel you are "sully the quake" and want to leave... that is your choice. Seriously, regardless of if you guys think we defend the club or that we're narcs or spies, I am not but I have discovered that the Quake is not a place for me. The same way you feel about the Quake is the same way I feel about the club. I probably would not have even responded to anything over there if it hadn't been that dig on Sam on that first page. I just thought that was pretty shitty. Since I will not be visiting there anymore I guess it doesn't matter whether my account gets deleted or not. I saw that post about Sam Jennings. I don't know who he is. I guess he is the atty? Org, I truly don't mean to be mean... my response was truly knee jerk. I can't tell you how HOT WHITE ANGRY I was when I saw this happening again. And the velocity of my anger was unwarranted really since I already know how to capture streaming video and so this was really a moot point to me. It was just the point that I felt that HQ was really behaving and I see what I suspect is truly BOOTLEG stuff on ebay and private commercial websites operating without seemingly a second glance.. and I felt a bit victimized, and convinced that HQ was singled out because of direct competition with NPGMC. And it made me even more mad to see what was probably a dozen new posters posting their 3rd and 4th post ALL on that thread. I really didn't need to hear from NPGMCer coming over just to squawk "yeah you deserved to get dirt kicked in your face." (Ya know, you won the battle now just leave well enough alone.) I also have the org in mind when I get riled up. I have experienced 2 successive weeks where first HQ was down for a week and then the Org was down. I realized then that I couldn't bear to lose either one of these sites. So I will fight any threats to my new favorite form of entertainment. You and I disagree on this. Perhaps I should have put more thought into what I said on the Quake.
you have me at a disadvantage since you were able to match both of my screen names but I don't know your HQ handle. "Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prodigalfan said:[quote] TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: I saw that post about Sam Jennings. I don't know who he is. I guess he is the atty? Org, I truly don't mean to be mean... my response was truly knee jerk. I can't tell you how HOT WHITE ANGRY I was when I saw this happening again. And the velocity of my anger was unwarranted really since I already know how to capture streaming video and so this was really a moot point to me. It was just the point that I felt that HQ was really behaving and I see what I suspect is truly BOOTLEG stuff on ebay and private commercial websites operating without seemingly a second glance.. and I felt a bit victimized, and convinced that HQ was singled out because of direct competition with NPGMC. And it made me even more mad to see what was probably a dozen new posters posting their 3rd and 4th post ALL on that thread. I really didn't need to hear from NPGMCer coming over just to squawk "yeah you deserved to get dirt kicked in your face." (Ya know, you won the battle now just leave well enough alone.) I also have the org in mind when I get riled up. I have experienced 2 successive weeks where first HQ was down for a week and then the Org was down. I realized then that I couldn't bear to lose either one of these sites. So I will fight any threats to my new favorite form of entertainment. You and I disagree on this. Perhaps I should have put more thought into what I said on the Quake.
you have me at a disadvantage since you were able to match both of my screen names but I don't know your HQ handle. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prodigalfan said: Honestly, I don't see why NPGMC keeps effing with HQ.
They must be jealous that NPGMC is a dead board with nothing new or exciting to see and must stamp out competition to give the illusion of being a fresh site. the new thing is HQ must stop offering video downloads. Videos THAT APPEAR ON PUBLIC TV and such. NO bootlegs. Just stuff that is shown on launch.com but you have the ability to save it on your hard drive. I have been saving videos because god knows when this current popularity is over and we go into another dry spell (and you know there will be another dry spell), you won't be able to PAY to see some of Prince's videos on Launch.com or MTV. [Edited 2/8/05 12:45pm] thats not right! Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: truefunksoldier said: But they're selective. I've mentioned over there that Finess offers prince songs in his mixes, that he SELLS and MAKES MONEY from, and they turn a blind eye to that. That's no different than me making copies of Musicology and selling them online. It makes no sense whatsoever. Riiiight. Come on, do you really believe that? From a guy that doesn't even allow someone to use his symbol on a website that isn't making money? Finess is a bootlegger plain and simple. He repackages commercially available music, sells it, and makes money off of it. It's astonishing to me that he hasn't been sued.....yet. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Taking my seat the un-popoular kids table I have to add:
A couple of months back there was a video posted that was clearly from a bootlegged source (Triple Treat Tour performance). There was debate back and forth amoungst the HQ folks (NPGMC had nothing to do with it) about why the mods there were allowed to post boots and members were not. (Apparently it's in the user agreement when you sign up to participate in the forum not to post bootlegged material) The video was left to be downloaded and most of the members who questioned the actions were poo pooed and told to shut up by the mods and other members alike. So while HQ is a cool place and all I still think they tend to like to play the victim where NPGMC is concerned. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later. -Miles Davis- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ifsixwuz9 said: Taking my seat the un-popoular kids table I have to add:
A couple of months back there was a video posted that was clearly from a bootlegged source (Triple Treat Tour performance). There was debate back and forth amoungst the HQ folks (NPGMC had nothing to do with it) about why the mods there were allowed to post boots and members were not. (Apparently it's in the user agreement when you sign up to participate in the forum not to post bootlegged material) The video was left to be downloaded and most of the members who questioned the actions were poo pooed and told to shut up by the mods and other members alike. I think that was different. It was from the Homecoming DVD. Now Prince didn't release that one, but it is available in big record stores in The Netherlands (http://www.freerecordshop.be/pages/productview.asp?productid=706258), so we decided that it was the same as the SOTT DVD that is released. I assume you don't place the different SOTT DVD's under bootlegs either. If a member had posted something from the Homecoming DVD it would have been allowed also. There is no difference between moderators and members. [Edited 2/10/05 10:31am] Formerly known as Parade @ HQ and formerly proud owner of www.paradetour.com | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
truefunksoldier said: TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: For all you know, Finess has permission to do so.
Riiiight. Come on, do you really believe that? From a guy that doesn't even allow someone to use his symbol on a website that isn't making money? Finess is a bootlegger plain and simple. He repackages commercially available music, sells it, and makes money off of it. It's astonishing to me that he hasn't been sued.....yet. You don't know who Finess knows and as a friend of his, I believe what he tells me over something I read on a website. Folks over at the club already tried to trick on him, so please give it rest. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: truefunksoldier said: Riiiight. Come on, do you really believe that? From a guy that doesn't even allow someone to use his symbol on a website that isn't making money? Finess is a bootlegger plain and simple. He repackages commercially available music, sells it, and makes money off of it. It's astonishing to me that he hasn't been sued.....yet. You don't know who Finess knows and as a friend of his, I believe what he tells me over something I read on a website. Folks over at the club already tried to trick on him, so please give it rest. Believe what you want. Just remember who told you first that a copyright infringement lawsuit may very well be in Mr. Finess' future | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dothejump said: Ifsixwuz9 said: Taking my seat the un-popoular kids table I have to add:
A couple of months back there was a video posted that was clearly from a bootlegged source (Triple Treat Tour performance). There was debate back and forth amoungst the HQ folks (NPGMC had nothing to do with it) about why the mods there were allowed to post boots and members were not. (Apparently it's in the user agreement when you sign up to participate in the forum not to post bootlegged material) The video was left to be downloaded and most of the members who questioned the actions were poo pooed and told to shut up by the mods and other members alike. I think that was different. It was from the Homecoming DVD. Now Prince didn't release that one, but it is available in big record stores in The Netherlands (http://www.freerecordshop.be/pages/productview.asp?productid=706258), so we decided that it was the same as the SOTT DVD that is released. I assume you don't place the different SOTT DVD's under bootlegs either. If a member had posted something from the Homecoming DVD it would have been allowed also. There is no difference between moderators and members. [Edited 2/10/05 10:31am] I remember the hub bub and explanations given. I just find it very suspect that the product does not have a release date (unlike the rest of the known official Prince dvds for purchase on the site), or a picture of the front and back covers of the dvd jacket (also like the rest of the known official items). I also find it interesting that just because this particular shop sells it then well is must not be a boot. I say this because I have personally purchased boots from legit record stores myself so pardon me if I'm skeptical. And I wouldn't put it in the same category as SOTT because that has been in world wide release on vhs for years and just recently transferred to dvd by that Canadian affiliate of Universal. Anyhoo carry on... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later. -Miles Davis- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: prodigalfan said: you have me at a disadvantage since you were able to match both of my screen names but I don't know your HQ handle. NOOOO!!! That is NOT me. Gosh I am not *THAT* mean. I am kcam213. And I do remember arguing with you "Stymie". I meant to use Prodigalfan over there too but forgot and registered using my regular web name. And now I can't change my screenname. So that is why I use 2 different ones. I was the one that posted the case of Sony vs Universal Studios about the court case of taping live televised programs and copy right infringement rulings. And I did some name calling, purple koolaid drinkers and sheep. I am quite ashamed of my behavior now. And I knew I would be while I was doing it. But don't you ever get so mad and know that you are going to say something that you know later that you are going to have to apologize for, but you can't stop yourself from saying it anyway? "Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |