independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Forgive my ignorance, but what is "Sister" inspired by exactly?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 01/21/05 9:22am

FunkMistress

avatar

jayaredee said:

The self expression is that he expresses himself.


I love this place. biggrin
CHICKENS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO COCAINE, SILKY HEN.
The Normal Whores Club
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 01/21/05 9:23am

FunkMistress

avatar

kdj997 said:

Mindflux said:

My word, this is challenging as you don't seem to comprehend what I am saying. I'm trying to find a point in your post, which is made even more difficult by the fact that you're not even responding to the issues I raised.

The point I made about it "must be about Prince" because he sings those lines in the first person was referencing the fact that YOU think the song is literal - hence, it must be Prince that was forced to have sex with his sister. That is not my belief and yet you are trying to use that point against me. I think you need to re-read what I wrote.

As for using a fantasy song by Queen as an example, its way off point and doesn't prove a thing. We are talking about the song Sister, there is no point comparing it to other writings. However, it does make me wonder just what you make of songs like "Starfish and Coffee" or "The Rainbow Children", for that matter.

The simple fact is, NOBODY can really know for certain whether a song is metaphorical or not, other than the artist. However, it is possible to make logical deductions and form a sound opinion.

Your point about most kid's sexual education is irrelevant. We know Prince's view and that is what is being discussed here. Sure, I sneaked a look at porn as a kid, but it wasn't left lying around the house, or put in front of me as a lesson. It was with Prince, so he's embellished the story and come up with the song Sister.

The argument was that you thought this song was nothing other than either literal or just for shock value. I disagreed. Simple. You were also incredibly insulting over nothing more than a simple disagreement - hence the strength of my own reply.

For me, you still haven't supported your case and I suspect it will stay that way.

Peace.


My point is fairly simplistic so I'll present it again like this: A guy like Prince has lets say a 50 ft ceiling when it comes to his type of creativity. While you have 2 ft ceiling, and you bump your head when ever you make even a slight move. I think you're having a hard time understanding the bility to create something out of nothing, or just for the sheer act of doing something creative. Because you're not able to associate that ability with yourself you have a hard time grasping how someone could write a fantasy song song about someone having sex with their sister. If I spoke in definitives saying crap like it's no way it could be taken anyway but face value, I was wrong because I don't know what was going through his mind at the time but I don't think that.

I can't forget the response you started out with



That right there is where I developed any accessment I've written about you. It seems like you have a hard time grasping the idea of creating something of a taboo subject out of nothing.

We know Prince's view and that is what is being discussed here. [\quote]

I don't know his view, even if you're going off of interviews did he say that disturbed him or was he just stating the truth.

As for using a fantasy song by Queen as an example, its way off point and doesn't prove a thing. We are talking about the song Sister, there is no point comparing it to other writings.


I wasn't going to respond to this but since I'm replying in the first place why not:

Well yeah it's a point. You implied that because Prince was singing in first person it had to be about him, whether it's in a metahorical state or not. Using the same logic I attempted to make that point. I just think that's a flawed train of thought to type what you typed.


Please stop trying to use big words; your "metahorical accessment" is killing me. evillol
[Edited 1/21/05 9:24am]
CHICKENS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO COCAINE, SILKY HEN.
The Normal Whores Club
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 01/21/05 9:31am

Taureau

avatar

Mindflux said:

Unlike you, I have put forward intelligent argument to support my case yet, amazingly, you have managed to gleam from this that I am an un-creative, moronic poser, eh? I'm loathed to do this, but let's just clear that up too. You ever heard the phrase "know thine enemy" - you would do well to heed that advice in future, it might prevent further outrageous, presumptious outbursts such as the above. Explain the following;

FACT - I have been a musician for 25 years and play 8 instruments
FACT - I play in a band that has produced 21 albums in a 20-year career
FACT - my own solo album is currently in production and has label interest
FACT - your entire post is built on folly and you have exposed yourself as the ignoramus here, though, please do enlighten us as to the creative mastery you have that so obviously enables you to judge it so well.

'Nuff said, methinks! wink


neutral
jerkoff.....drool BULLSEYE! cool
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 01/21/05 9:57am

kdj997

FunkMistress said:

kdj997 said:



Please stop trying to use big words; your "metahorical accessment" is killing me. evillol
[Edited 1/21/05 9:24am]


Ahh, stay in a womans place i.e. wiping the floors and giving guys like me blumpkins... whistling
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 01/21/05 9:58am

FunkMistress

avatar

kdj997 said:

FunkMistress said:



Please stop trying to use big words; your "metahorical accessment" is killing me. evillol
[Edited 1/21/05 9:24am]


Ahh, stay in a womans place i.e. wiping the floors and giving guys like me blumpkins... whistling


Does "blumpkins" mean "I got castrated by a catsuit-wearing lesbian"?
CHICKENS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO COCAINE, SILKY HEN.
The Normal Whores Club
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 01/21/05 10:04am

Handclapsfinga
snapz



it's a gotdamned SONG, not a scientific explanation of the universe. nor is it anything to get into silly tiffs with other people over, for that matter.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 01/24/05 5:07am

Mindflux

avatar

Ah well, its got to the point of being pointless!!

kdj - you can't sustain a logical debate my friend, so there is little point continuing. It wasn't that I can't see how something is created from nothing, far from it. Your flimsy argument that I am not "creative enough" to see that something could be written about nothing is both peurile and baseless. All I said was that I thought this song was about something - a point you fail to grasp.

Never mind, eh? The world still goes around and round.....
...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...

My dance project;
www.zubzub.co.uk

Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here;
www.zubzub.bandcamp.com

Go and glisten wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 01/24/05 9:53am

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

PurpleKnight said:

[color=mediumpurple]I dig the song (and worship the album obviously) but what is this song really about? I know Prince never actually had any incestuous relationship or anything with his sister


r u SURE about that?
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 01/26/05 12:23pm

kdj997

Mindflux said:

Ah well, its got to the point of being pointless!!

kdj - you can't sustain a logical debate my friend, so there is little point continuing. It wasn't that I can't see how something is created from nothing, far from it. Your flimsy argument that I am not "creative enough" to see that something could be written about nothing is both peurile and baseless. All I said was that I thought this song was about something - a point you fail to grasp.

Never mind, eh? The world still goes around and round.....


Don't go and revising history, your first post in this thread insulted everyone who thought the song didn't have a deep meaning. I never heard your "music" but I can bet it's full jumbled cryptic lyrics that only you understand. I'm willing to bet that Prince didn't get a chick pregnant who beared a child prior to 1978 but yet he still wrote a song called "Baby". That's just an example of creativity. That type of creativity takes more talent than someone who needs to write about something based on things they've actually lived through. I can only assume that whatever "songs" you attemptto write are based on things you've lived through and full of metaphors, if that's the case your creativity is inferior, it's that simple. In a sense you're just grounded.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 01/27/05 2:03am

Mindflux

avatar

And here you continue in your assumptive asshole mode! You know jack shit mate. My first post upset you, did it? GET OVER IT! It was hardly as abusive as your retort which, in essence, is what catalysed our debate.

All you display is that you know fuck all about creativity. It does not take more creativity to write fantasy songs than metaphoric songs and it is entirely un-quantifiable! How can you possibly be objective over whether something is more creative than something else. And here's what a fucking idiot you are - the song "Baby" is not about a baby, the word baby is a euphemism, so its not literally a baby (there really is a lack of a train of thought from you on this entire thread). And this also shoots down your entire argument - you said Sister was literal, not a metaphor. Now you are quoting an example of Prince's creativity about writing the song Baby without having had a baby ie NOT a literal song. Can you see your simplistic, kindergarten fuck up?!

And no, you haven't heard my music, so you can't judge and your assumptiveness lets you down again. You bet it contains "jumbled cryptic lyrics that only you understand" - well its instrumental, asshole! I'll bet that while our music is certainly not to everyone's tastes, its probably better than most music you've ever heard. Want to hear what we do - go to any music download site and look for Ozric Tentacles (or, for that matter, go to any record store and buy one of our albums).

Then, how about you reveal to us just how "creative" you are and let us hear some of the music you make that puts you in such a position to be such a good jusge of the creative process. I'll jump on your bandwagon and bet that you don't even play an instrument.

Get your education first then buy a pair of shoes!
[Edited 1/27/05 2:06am]
...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...

My dance project;
www.zubzub.co.uk

Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here;
www.zubzub.bandcamp.com

Go and glisten wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 01/27/05 3:16am

Snap

May I just add that making songs out of nothing meaningful aren't necessarily more creative or difficult -- it's the personal ones that are most painful (and difficult) to write, I'd think. I'm thinking of "The Beautiful Ones," "Empty Room," maybe even "The Grand Progression" and songs like that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 01/27/05 3:47am

kdj997

Mindflux said:

And here you continue in your having had a baby ie NOT a literal song. Can you see your simplistic, kindergarten fuck up?!

And no, you haven't heard my music, so you can't judge and your assumptiveness lets you down again. You bet it contains "jumbled cryptic lyrics that only you understand" - well its instrumental, asshole! I'll bet that while our music is certainly not to everyone's tastes, its passumptive asshole mode! You know jack shit mate. My first post upset you, did it? GET OVER IT! It was hardly as abusive as your retort which, in essence, is what catalysed our debate.

All you display is that you know fuck all about creativity. It does not take more creativity to write fantasy songs than metaphoric songs and it is entirely un-quantifiable! How can you possibly be objective over whether something is more creative than something else. And here's what a fucking idiot you are - the song "Baby" is not about a baby, the word baby is a euphemism, so its not literally a baby (there really is a lack of a train of thought from you on this entire thread). And this also shoots down your entire argument - you said Sister was literal, not a metaphor. Now you are quoting an example of Prince's creativity about writing the song Baby withoutrobably better than most music you've ever heard. Want to hear what we do - go to any music download site and look for Ozric Tentacles (or, for that matter, go to any record store and buy one of our albums).

Then, how about you reveal to us just how "creative" you are and let us hear some of the music you make that puts you in such a position to be such a good jusge of the creative process. I'll jump on your bandwagon and bet that you don't even play an instrument.

Get your education first then buy a pair of shoes!
[Edited 1/27/05 2:06am]


"the song "Baby" is not about a baby" - um, yeah I don't get how anyone can totally miss the theme of that song like you did. If you can convey a clear message, yeah, it takes a lot of creativity to create a metaphoric song, most people can't though. I actually listen to good music so I don't think I'll take the time out to find any "Ozric Tentacles".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 01/27/05 4:16am

Mindflux

avatar

Hehe - yup, too true. In all honesty, I haven't listened to Baby in probably 7 or 8 years. I always remembered it as being an ode to his woman. A quick check of the lyrics now shows that he's actually worried about the fact she is preganant. Still, at least I admit when I've made a mistake, eh?

However, it doesn't lend support to your argument - it negates it. The possibility also exists that Prince did get someone pregnant around that time. Who, except for Prince and the lady concerned, would really know? You bang on about how an extreme tune like Sister is not fantasy (ok, Prince had an incestuous affair with his sister, if that's what you want to believe) and now switch your focus to a tune that may be (in your view, probably is) fantasy. Its a bit inconsistent really.

I care not whether you want to listen to my band or not - though, it may expand your musical horizons a bit, so its worth a go. Don't let our little tiff put you off from hearing some great music! (btw, I'm not trying to be self-congratulating here, but I think people here might be surprised at the talent in this band - even Joe Satriani rated our guitar player as one of the best in the world).

Still, despite the jibes, this was an interesting debate, perhaps a little over-enthusiastic from both sides, but hey! You have your view, I have mine - lets just agree to disagree and keep on enjoying music which, of course, is what its all about.

Peace.
...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...

My dance project;
www.zubzub.co.uk

Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here;
www.zubzub.bandcamp.com

Go and glisten wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 01/27/05 4:26am

DavidEye

I guess we'll never know for sure,but I really don't think "Sister" is autobiographical.I think Prince just did it for the shock value.He probably thought..."let's see,the previous song is about oral sex,so why not have a song about another controversial topic (incest)?" I think it was "inspired" by his need to make a shocking album and there's nothing wrong with that wink

Oh and by the way...the song "Baby" does actually concern a baby lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 01/27/05 4:29am

jayaredee

DavidEye said:

I guess we'll never know for sure,but I really don't think "Sister" is autobiographical.I think Prince just did it for the shock value.He probably thought..."let's see,the previous song is about oral sex,so why not have a song about another controversial topic (incest)?" I think it was "inspired" by his need to make a shocking album and there's nothing wrong with that wink

Oh and by the way...the song "Baby" does actually concern a baby lol



That's what i think too. It was just shock value. Same goes with Jack U Off, when everyone speculates whether he's gay or not.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 01/27/05 4:29am

jayaredee

I think this topic deserves a lock
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 01/27/05 4:38am

DavidEye

jayaredee said:

DavidEye said:

I guess we'll never know for sure,but I really don't think "Sister" is autobiographical.I think Prince just did it for the shock value.He probably thought..."let's see,the previous song is about oral sex,so why not have a song about another controversial topic (incest)?" I think it was "inspired" by his need to make a shocking album and there's nothing wrong with that wink

Oh and by the way...the song "Baby" does actually concern a baby lol



That's what i think too. It was just shock value. Same goes with Jack U Off, when everyone speculates whether he's gay or not.



nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Forgive my ignorance, but what is "Sister" inspired by exactly?