purplerabbithole said:

You might love the music and his cute ass but I don't get a compassionate vibe from you about him whatsoever. I try to take a middle of the line approach (try, doesn't mean I always succeed.) I don't thinkPrince is as bad as you think, I don't think Mayte is as saintly as she feels the need to depict herself as and I disapprove of the title and labeling of the book. But I don't hate either person. I feel pity for them. But I think BOTH were/are equally capable of being passive-aggressive delusional boneheads. I am sorry but Mayte, on that Ex-Wives show, blaming lack of purple rain money for not being able to make an obligation to a friend (no babysitter) is horseshit. I am a single mother with two kids. I don't have PR money either. I get my mom, friends or Care.com to watch my kids. Plus, the woman was earning money on the freaking show (as well as other jobs.) whilst she was filming it. Plus, she dated Tommy Lee..people with no money and no connections wouldn't even have a way to enter into those social circles. No she doesn't have PR money...but even a "modest" home in Los Angeles county is expensive. My uncle used to live in L.A. County (not HOllywood) and he had two jobs to pay for a shitty little 1200 square foot ranch in Rancho Cucamanga (SIC).'

I do think she loved Prince and her son. I do think she isn't intentionally mean or cruel. She seemed to work hard. She does seem compassionate in many ways about PRince) She seems pleasant but I do detect that she is more opportunist than she makes out.

PennyPurple said:

I think the reason we are all here, is because we all LOVE Prince.

.

Purple peen.....

[Edited 4/12/17 21:01pm]

[Edited 4/12/17 21:04pm]

I totally agree with you. She was something else on that reality show. I am not sure why Prince's name was brought up, the little girl is not his. I think she felt a way about the other wives that has kids by their exes and she did not.

PennyPurple said:

Misslink88 said:

Please, if you have some facts that directly disprove all the ones I've brought up, feel free to share them. I have no problem assimilating new information if it is deemed appropriate. It is the wise thing to do, although I perfectly understand if you're unable to do it.

I, and others have shown you the facts over and over again. You keep on with the falsehoods. It doesn't do any good to keep showing you the facts, when you keep making all the false accusations, It is a wise thing to open your eyes to what others are saying. You'd much rather argue and insult.

Real estate listing links: Facts

Auction House and Mayte Sued by Prince link: Fact

Residency Requirements for filing a divorce in NY excerpt: Fact

Prince Interviews excerpts: Fact

Responses to above facts by Pennypurple: 0

Arguments with Pennypurple over facts: see responses from Pennypurple above

Insults: see responses from Pennypurple above

Facts provided by Pennypurple to disprove above facts: 0

I've read the book: Fact

Shit disturbed: See Facts above

purplerabbithole said:

She has admitted to Prince saying hurtful rhings to her, but I don't recall a single thing she admitted to that may have hurt Prince. We are all capable of hurting thise we love with words and deeds. But Mayte never accepted a morsel of responsibility for the outcome of her relationship with Prince. Of course outside forces can influence, but to say everyone but her is at fault is disingenous. Exposing Prince to make him more "human"? how about herself? Why just him?

BillieBalloon said:

purplerabbithole said:

Mayte admitted to saying things to hurt Prince?----doubtful that she would admit that .

She has admitted to Prince saying hurtful rhings to her, but I don't recall a single thing she admitted to that may have hurt Prince. We are all capable of hurting thise we love with words and deeds. But Mayte never accepted a morsel of responsibility for the outcome of her relationship with Prince. Of course outside forces can influence, but to say everyone but her is at fault is disingenous. Exposing Prince to make him more "human"? how about herself? Why just him?

I have yet to hear where a couple, married or not, have not said hurtful things at some point to each other.

.

Mayte touches on this on page 246 and 247 of the book. There was a hailstorm of hurtful things that were being said between the two of them. There was an argument about her not going to a basketball game with him, they both said hurtful things then.

.

Mayte has never led us to believe that she didn't say hurtful things to him. It's a fact she did.

.

You must've skipped that part in your book.

Misslink88 said:

PennyPurple said:

I, and others have shown you the facts over and over again. You keep on with the falsehoods. It doesn't do any good to keep showing you the facts, when you keep making all the false accusations, It is a wise thing to open your eyes to what others are saying. You'd much rather argue and insult.

Real estate listing links: Facts

Auction House and Mayte Sued by Prince link: Fact

Residency Requirements for filing a divorce in NY excerpt: Fact

Prince Interviews excerpts: Fact

Responses to above facts by Pennypurple: 0

Arguments with Pennypurple over facts: see responses from Pennypurple above

Insults: see responses from Pennypurple above

Facts provided by Pennypurple to disprove above facts: 0

I've read the book: Fact

Shit disturbed: See Facts above

It's not a fact that they filed for divorce in NY, in FACT, we don't know where they filed at...FACT

purplerabbithole said:

You might love the music and his cute ass but I don't get a compassionate vibe from you about him whatsoever. I try to take a middle of the line approach (try, doesn't mean I always succeed.) I don't thinkPrince is as bad as you think, I don't think Mayte is as saintly as she feels the need to depict herself as and I disapprove of the title and labeling of the book. But I don't hate either person. I feel pity for them. But I think BOTH were/are equally capable of being passive-aggressive delusional boneheads. I am sorry but Mayte, on that Ex-Wives show, blaming lack of purple rain money for not being able to make an obligation to a friend (no babysitter) is horseshit. I am a single mother with two kids. I don't have PR money either. I get my mom, friends or Care.com to watch my kids. Plus, the woman was earning money on the freaking show (as well as other jobs.) whilst she was filming it. Plus, she dated Tommy Lee..people with no money and no connections wouldn't even have a way to enter into those social circles. No she doesn't have PR money...but even a "modest" home in Los Angeles county is expensive. My uncle used to live in L.A. County (not HOllywood) and he had two jobs to pay for a shitty little 1200 square foot ranch in Rancho Cucamanga (SIC).'

I do think she loved Prince and her son. I do think she isn't intentionally mean or cruel. She seemed to work hard. She does seem compassionate in many ways about PRince) She seems pleasant but I do detect that she is more opportunist than she makes out.

Sorry, fact is I love Prince, another fact is you can love somebody and still dislike some of the things they do. Sometimes I'm astonished at some of the things Prince has done, but I'm not from the celebrity world. I'm also astonished at some of the things other celebrities have done for instance Mick Jagger and Ron Woods having new babies, who will probably grow up without their biological fathers, that doesn't make me like them any less...

PennyPurple said:

Ill remind you of that part stating facts. He asked her to go to a basketball game, She doesn't want to go, she was tired and depleted. She said, "no thanks". which turned into a blowout with prince reminding her of how many womem would go with him and finally he looks her in the eye and says FU. Her response, "what did you say"?


She is clear about Prince saying hurtful things and what they were, not once does she state what the hurtful things were that she said to him. Read it. Prince comes off looking like a bully, she comes off looking like a tired and long suffering wife.

BillieBalloon said:

PennyPurple said:

I have yet to hear where a couple, married or not, have not said hurtful things at some point to each other.

.

Mayte touches on this on page 246 and 247 of the book. There was a hailstorm of hurtful things that were being said between the two of them. There was an argument about her not going to a basketball game with him, they both said hurtful things then.

.

Mayte has never led us to believe that she didn't say hurtful things to him. It's a fact she did.

.

You must've skipped that part in your book.

Ill remind you of that part stating facts. He asked her to go to a basketball game, She doesn't want to go, she was tired and depleted. She said, "no thanks". which turned into a blowout with prince reminding her of how many womem would go with him and finally he looks her in the eye and says FU. Her response, "what did you say"? She is clear about Prince saying hurtful things and what they were, not once does she state what the hurtful things were that she said to him. Read it. Prince comes off looking like a bully, she comes off looking like a tired and long suffering wife.

Read page 246 where she states that they were fighting like her mother and father fighted.

.

I'm at work so I don't have the book with me, but I think 247 was also where she threw Mani up to him, again. Again I don't have the book with me right now.

PennyPurple said:

Misslink88 said:

Real estate listing links: Facts

Auction House and Mayte Sued by Prince link: Fact

Residency Requirements for filing a divorce in NY excerpt: Fact

Prince Interviews excerpts: Fact

Responses to above facts by Pennypurple: 0

Arguments with Pennypurple over facts: see responses from Pennypurple above

Insults: see responses from Pennypurple above

Facts provided by Pennypurple to disprove above facts: 0

I've read the book: Fact

Shit disturbed: See Facts above

It's not a fact that they filed for divorce in NY, in FACT, we don't know where they filed at...FACT

Guess you missed it the first time.

Reply #374 posted 04/10/17 7:16pm

Misslink88

DD55 said: Just an FYI..... NEW YORK DIVORCE RECORDS New York State Vital Records issues New York divorce records for events that occurred in the State of New York, including the five (5) boroughs of New York City. Who Can Order? You may request copies of New York divorce records as long as you are named on the record being ordered*. Your name must also appear on the credit or debit card that is being used for payment. * If you are not named on the record, you must submit a New York State court order as proof of entitlement. Divorce Certificate A certified copy of the divorce certificate. This is not a copy of the divorce decree. Divorce records are available for events that occurred within the State of New York (including New York City) from 1963 to six months before today's date. First Copy: $45.00 Additional Copies: $45.00 Looks like that is why no one has a copy or could get a copy underlined (assuming it was in NY) my edit.... Let me just add, the State of New York isn't giving anything for free! [Edited 4/10/17 19:05pm] Yep...IF that's where it was filed and IF the residency requirements had been met.

Is it a FACT that they filed in NY?

Misslink88 said:

PennyPurple said:

Guess you missed it the first time.

Reply #374 posted 04/10/17 7:16pm

Misslink88

DD55 said: Just an FYI..... NEW YORK DIVORCE RECORDS New York State Vital Records issues New York divorce records for events that occurred in the State of New York, including the five (5) boroughs of New York City. Who Can Order? You may request copies of New York divorce records as long as you are named on the record being ordered*. Your name must also appear on the credit or debit card that is being used for payment. * If you are not named on the record, you must submit a New York State court order as proof of entitlement. Divorce Certificate A certified copy of the divorce certificate. This is not a copy of the divorce decree. Divorce records are available for events that occurred within the State of New York (including New York City) from 1963 to six months before today's date. First Copy: $45.00 Additional Copies: $45.00 Looks like that is why no one has a copy or could get a copy underlined (assuming it was in NY) my edit.... Let me just add, the State of New York isn't giving anything for free! [Edited 4/10/17 19:05pm] Yep...IF that's where it was filed and IF the residency requirements had been met.

So here's the full listing of the auction items in March/16.

http://natedsanders.com/mobile/catalog.aspx?auctionid=61&displayby=2&lotsperpage=100&category=1

Do you think the items were purposfully over-priced?

This is item that has me most confused. It was in MN, on him, for the aired special. So how did it become part of the "contents" of the house in Spain?

Misslink88 said:

PennyPurple said:

Guess you missed it the first time.

Reply #374 posted 04/10/17 7:16pm

Misslink88

DD55 said: Just an FYI..... NEW YORK DIVORCE RECORDS New York State Vital Records issues New York divorce records for events that occurred in the State of New York, including the five (5) boroughs of New York City. Who Can Order? You may request copies of New York divorce records as long as you are named on the record being ordered*. Your name must also appear on the credit or debit card that is being used for payment. * If you are not named on the record, you must submit a New York State court order as proof of entitlement. Divorce Certificate A certified copy of the divorce certificate. This is not a copy of the divorce decree. Divorce records are available for events that occurred within the State of New York (including New York City) from 1963 to six months before today's date. First Copy: $45.00 Additional Copies: $45.00 Looks like that is why no one has a copy or could get a copy underlined (assuming it was in NY) my edit.... Let me just add, the State of New York isn't giving anything for free! [Edited 4/10/17 19:05pm] Yep...IF that's where it was filed and IF the residency requirements had been met.

Don't forget the residency requiremnts in NY are pretty open...

"Residing "continuously" in the state does not mean that the party can not have left the state during the period of residency nor does it mean that the party does not have another residence elsewhere outside New York." source wiki

Side note, divorce law in NYS was changed in may ways in 2010 by Gov Patterson, I don't know what the law was in 2000 or the extent of the changes. What we are reading today is the NYS in place now, divorce law could have been different 10 yrs prior.

They could have had and apt or extended stay at some point that she used for an residency address. Also, my other point was unless you are one of the two parties, you cannot get a copy from the State of NY. Did she get a divorce in NY, I dont' know, but she was staying with her sister in Harlem at the time.

Again, fan logic and fact may be two different things. I really don't know, I just think so based on the situation. Only Mayte knows.

DD55 said:

Misslink88 said:

Don't forget the residency requiremnts in NY are pretty open...

"Residing "continuously" in the state does not mean that the party can not have left the state during the period of residency nor does it mean that the party does not have another residence elsewhere outside New York." source wiki

Side note, divorce law in NYS was changed in may ways in 2010 by Gov Patterson, I don't know what the law was in 2000 or the extent of the changes. What we are reading today is the NYS in place now, divorce law could have been different 10 yrs prior.

They could have had and apt or extended stay at some point that she used for an residency address. Also, my other point was unless you are one of the two parties, you cannot get a copy from the State of NY. Did she get a divorce in NY, I dont' know, but she was staying with her sister in Harlem at the time.

Again, fan logic and fact may be two different things. I really don't know, I just think so based on the situation. Only Mayte knows.

Divorce laws for NY in 2000 can be easily researched. In most places there is a legal requirement that you "live separate and apart" for one year prior to filing. Whomever is the petitioner files where they reside. Mayte spent that year living in Spain. Her passport would indicate the level of "continuous" residency in NY. But, again, it would all be speculation since she's not said where they divorced.

Misslink88 said:

DD55 said:

Divorce laws for NY in 2000 can be easily researched. In most places there is a legal requirement that you "live separate and apart" for one year prior to filing. Whomever is the petitioner files where they reside. Mayte spent that year living in Spain. Her passport would indicate the level of "continuous" residency in NY. But, again, it would all be speculation since she's not said where they divorced.

Does NOT have to be continious residency.

DD55 said:

Misslink88 said:

Divorce laws for NY in 2000 can be easily researched. In most places there is a legal requirement that you "live separate and apart" for one year prior to filing. Whomever is the petitioner files where they reside. Mayte spent that year living in Spain. Her passport would indicate the level of "continuous" residency in NY. But, again, it would all be speculation since she's not said where they divorced.

Does NOT have to be continious residency.

We've been over this. Take it up with Family Law.

http://www.jdbar.com/Statutes/DRL-230/drl-230.html

DRL 230

Required residence of parties

An action to annul a marriage, or to declare the nullity of a void marriage, or for divorce or separation may be maintained only when:

1. The parties were married in the state and either party is a resident thereof when the action is commenced and has been a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately preceding, or

2. The parties have resided in this state as husband and wife and either party is a resident thereof when the action is commenced and has been a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately preceding, or

3. The cause occurred in the state and either party has been a resident thereof for a continuous period of at least one year immediately preceding the commencement of the action, or

4. The cause occurred in the state and both parties are residents thereof at the time of the commencement of the action, or

5. Either party has been a resident of the state for a continuous period of at least two years immediately preceding the commencement of the action.

Misslink88 said:

DD55 said:

Does NOT have to be continious residency.

We've been over this. Take it up with Family Law.

http://www.jdbar.com/Statutes/DRL-230/drl-230.html

DRL 230

Required residence of parties

An action to annul a marriage, or to declare the nullity of a void marriage, or for divorce or separation may be maintained only when:

1. The parties were married in the state and either party is a resident thereof when the action is commenced and has been a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately preceding, or

2. The parties have resided in this state as husband and wife and either party is a resident thereof when the action is commenced and has been a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately preceding, or

3. The cause occurred in the state and either party has been a resident thereof for a continuous period of at least one year immediately preceding the commencement of the action, or

4. The cause occurred in the state and both parties are residents thereof at the time of the commencement of the action, or

5. Either party has been a resident of the state for a continuous period of at least two years immediately preceding the commencement of the action.

I used the word continious... but that doesn't mean every minute, you can have a residence and be away, or traveling, or at a second residence. You don't have to be physicially in the state for that time.

DD55 said:

Misslink88 said:

We've been over this. Take it up with Family Law.

http://www.jdbar.com/Statutes/DRL-230/drl-230.html

DRL 230

Required residence of parties

An action to annul a marriage, or to declare the nullity of a void marriage, or for divorce or separation may be maintained only when:

1. The parties were married in the state and either party is a resident thereof when the action is commenced and has been a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately preceding, or

2. The parties have resided in this state as husband and wife and either party is a resident thereof when the action is commenced and has been a resident for a continuous period of one year immediately preceding, or

3. The cause occurred in the state and either party has been a resident thereof for a continuous period of at least one year immediately preceding the commencement of the action, or

4. The cause occurred in the state and both parties are residents thereof at the time of the commencement of the action, or

5. Either party has been a resident of the state for a continuous period of at least two years immediately preceding the commencement of the action.

I used the word continious... but that doesn't mean every minute, you can have a residence and be away, or traveling, or at a second residence. You don't have to be physicially in the state for that time.

I think I just want to take myself out of the residency conversation. First, we don't know if it was NYS. I only assumed so because it's nearly impossible to get those records unless those records are yours. So, the media cant get them. Second, residency requirements are so easy to work around. When I bought my first house I knew I wouldn't be closing until Nov, so I used a friends address so my kids could start school in the school they would be going to and I didn't have to take them from one school to another. No one sent an investigator to my door. Third, I got a divorce in the State of New York, I don't think they care.... just pay your court fees and they are happy.

PennyPurple said:

She says they fought over his percieved transgressions with Manuella. Again, she positions herself as the down trodden wife. This is not admitting to hurting prince but just defending their marriage. Never does she admit any wrongdoing on her part in the whole book, only HIS.

Misslink88 said:

Doesn't seem to to be any explanation for that.

BillieBalloon said:

Misslink88 said:

This is item that has me most confused. It was in MN, on him, for the aired special. So how did it become part of the "contents" of the house in Spain?

Doesn't seem to to be any explanation for that.

I could be wrong...someone will correct me if I am. But wasn't that special recorded a few weeks before over the course of two nights?

Only focusing on the bad things someone does and being skeptical about any good behavior does't sound like love or even compassion. What do you love about him?--his guitar playing skills and his singing voice?

Obviously we don't know him but I can not divorce the man from the music entirely. The passion in his music does't come from a vacuum...To me, Prince can not be like the waste of a human being/vessel for GOd's music that salieri assumes Mozart is in the movie Amadeus. . One of the tragedies of the movie is that Salieri discovers too late that Mozart is in fact a human being (not just a musician) who might deserve his sympathy.

PennyPurple said:

purplerabbithole said:

You might love the music and his cute ass but I don't get a compassionate vibe from you about him whatsoever. I try to take a middle of the line approach (try, doesn't mean I always succeed.) I don't thinkPrince is as bad as you think, I don't think Mayte is as saintly as she feels the need to depict herself as and I disapprove of the title and labeling of the book. But I don't hate either person. I feel pity for them. But I think BOTH were/are equally capable of being passive-aggressive delusional boneheads. I am sorry but Mayte, on that Ex-Wives show, blaming lack of purple rain money for not being able to make an obligation to a friend (no babysitter) is horseshit. I am a single mother with two kids. I don't have PR money either. I get my mom, friends or Care.com to watch my kids. Plus, the woman was earning money on the freaking show (as well as other jobs.) whilst she was filming it. Plus, she dated Tommy Lee..people with no money and no connections wouldn't even have a way to enter into those social circles. No she doesn't have PR money...but even a "modest" home in Los Angeles county is expensive. My uncle used to live in L.A. County (not HOllywood) and he had two jobs to pay for a shitty little 1200 square foot ranch in Rancho Cucamanga (SIC).'

I do think she loved Prince and her son. I do think she isn't intentionally mean or cruel. She seemed to work hard. She does seem compassionate in many ways about PRince) She seems pleasant but I do detect that she is more opportunist than she makes out.

Sorry, fact is I love Prince, another fact is you can love somebody and still dislike some of the things they do. Sometimes I'm astonished at some of the things Prince has done, but I'm not from the celebrity world. I'm also astonished at some of the things other celebrities have done for instance Mick Jagger and Ron Woods having new babies, who will probably grow up without their biological fathers, that doesn't make me like them any less...

DD55 said:

BillieBalloon said:

Misslink88 said: Doesn't seem to to be any explanation for that.

I could be wrong...someone will correct me if I am. But wasn't that special recorded a few weeks before over the course of two nights?

Prince Vault has this to say:

The footage comes from a pay per view broadcast of the same name shown on 31 December 1999. The main feature is an edited version of a concert at Paisley Park Studios, Chanhassen, MN, USA, on 18 December 1999 (with additional footage from a performance by Morris Day & The Time from a concert the previous day). The main feature lasts approximately 113 minutes, with special features and "bonus groovez" lasting an additional 20 minutes.

DD55 said:

DD55 said:

I used the word continious... but that doesn't mean every minute, you can have a residence and be away, or traveling, or at a second residence. You don't have to be physicially in the state for that time.

I think I just want to take myself out of the residency conversation. First, we don't know if it was NYS. I only assumed so because it's nearly impossible to get those records unless those records are yours. So, the media cant get them. Second, residency requirements are so easy to work around. When I bought my first house I knew I wouldn't be closing until Nov, so I used a friends address so my kids could start school in the school they would be going to and I didn't have to take them from one school to another. No one sent an investigator to my door. Third, I got a divorce in the State of New York, I don't think they care.... just pay your court fees and they are happy.

Not to belabor the point, just for clarity. She wrote a letter March 2000 from Spain where she had been living for over a year. She then left Spain and moved to NY and was divorced May 2000, which means she was in NY for only 2 months. Again, IF it was granted in NY.

Misslink88 said:

DD55 said:

I think I just want to take myself out of the residency conversation. First, we don't know if it was NYS. I only assumed so because it's nearly impossible to get those records unless those records are yours. So, the media cant get them. Second, residency requirements are so easy to work around. When I bought my first house I knew I wouldn't be closing until Nov, so I used a friends address so my kids could start school in the school they would be going to and I didn't have to take them from one school to another. No one sent an investigator to my door. Third, I got a divorce in the State of New York, I don't think they care.... just pay your court fees and they are happy.

Not to belabor the point, just for clarity. She wrote a letter March 2000 from Spain where she had been living for over a year. She then left Spain and moved to NY and was divorced May 2000, which means she was in NY for only 2 months. Again, IF it was granted in NY.

Is it me or does the country of Spain (Coordinates 40.4637º N, 3.7492º W ) keep coming up around here and NO ONE wants to talk about what happened over there WHEN SHE WAS ALONE AND PARTYING DURING HER TIME OF MOURNING . For you people who have sent in her application for sainthood to yonder high, this was before Tommy. Do the math. Who really did what to whom?


I find it so odd that she would mention arguing with Prince about Mani and for some strange reason never mention Prince asking what she was doing over there ALONE?

She was all to happy to mention him burning shit, throwing clothes under Larry's porch, pouring remains out, etc. etc. etc. That paints a picture of a man that would definitely not bridle his tongue about where his woman was and what she was doing, espeically after a low blow "Mani" attack from her.

Come on people. Jiminy Cricket!

Menes said:

Misslink88 said:

Not to belabor the point, just for clarity. She wrote a letter March 2000 from Spain where she had been living for over a year. She then left Spain and moved to NY and was divorced May 2000, which means she was in NY for only 2 months. Again, IF it was granted in NY.

Is it me or does the country of Spain (Coordinates 40.4637º N, 3.7492º W ) keep coming up around here and NO ONE wants to talk about what happened over there WHEN SHE WAS ALONE AND PARTYING DURING HER TIME OF MOURNING . For you people who have sent in her application for sainthood to yonder high, this was before Tommy. Do the math. Who really did what to whom?


I find it so odd that she would mention arguing with Prince about Mani and for some strange reason never mention Prince asking what she was doing over there ALONE?

She was all to happy to mention him burning shit, throwing clothes under Larry's porch, pouring remains out, etc. etc. etc. That paints a picture of a man that would definitely not bridle his tongue about where his woman was and what she was doing, espeically after a low blow "Mani" attack from her.

Come on people. Jiminy Cricket!

It seemed to be an issue at the time because the press was asking P about Joaquin and the rumors.

Misslink88 said:

Yes they were. Mayte and Joaquin were linked as an item in the press.

BillieBalloon said:

Misslink88 said:

It seemed to be an issue at the time because the press was asking P about Joaquin and the rumors.

Yes they were. Mayte and Joaquin were linked as an item in the press.

Didn't Joaquin also move to NY around the same time? Didn't P state on George Lopez that "a lot of my stuff gets stolen" too?

Misslink88 said:

He moved to NY around late 97/early 98. P said on Lopez his stuff gets stolen.

BillieBalloon said:

Misslink88 said:

It seemed to be an issue at the time because the press was asking P about Joaquin and the rumors.

Yes they were. Mayte and Joaquin were linked as an item in the press.

Geez, you would think we were in church on Easter Sunday in here. It's so quiet. Let us pray.

Anyhoo, I bet none of her minions would dare challenge the notion that she had an affair with Joaquin PRIOR to her divorce and PRIOR to Tommy. If they believe wholeheartedly that she was faithful thru that time,( and was never accused of having an affair), they should state so. Publicly.

Even before the org got a hold of that information in 2003-04 there was an international whirlwind in the press about it. So much so that she had to proclaim her innocence. I should remind the congregation that this was BEFORE there was even a rumor about Prince and Mani having anything gping on that rose to the level of the rumors swirling around her.

The only reason that Prince's courting of Mani became part of a the rumormill in the states is because no one knew about Maytes rumored affairs in SPAIN!


Now, she was beloved in Spain so I am not sure why they would want to crucify her good name. It's not as if she was suddenly not putting asses in the seats at a concert and no longer contributing to the eoconomy. So ask yourself, If they felt so sorry for her, why even print it?

Maybe I didn't get the memo of what was said in the book, so I will ask again... Did she address her time in Spain (1998-2000) in the book and did she explain why Prince stopped visiting her while she reamained alone there? Something had to have happened.

For those of you who believe that since she had heard the rumor that "Prince is cheating on you with Mani" (she never saw it)... How is it possible that she remembered that rumor but can't remember the rumor about herself CHEATING TOO? The NSA must've redacted that part.