independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Associated artists & people > Manuela puts her 2c in on facebook
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 9 <123456789>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 04/28/09 9:31am

goodlookingmof
o

meltedman said:

I think what Mani is doing is great...Prince is a blatant homophobe who needs to be called out once and for all. You have Perez Hilton and now Ellen praising him...but do you think either one would be welcome at HIS dinner table? Not in a million years. Prince preaches to them how being gay is EVIL, that is why he reads the bible to them. I am happy Mani came out about this and is letting people know that he is an extremely flawed individual instead of him always looking golden in the public eye.

Manuela...Hats off to you my dear! It is about time somebody came forward!

preach my brother

true
I do not respect anyone who views gays as inferior or sinners.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 04/28/09 9:36am

GaryMF

avatar

laurarichardson said:

GaryMF said:


Who the **** do you think you are to speak for a deity/God???? Especially one you claim to believe in???

There are many people who believe in this same deity/God and would not agree with your statement.

-----
He is not speaking a deity.[


Huh? Your first sentence is unintelligible .

Some of you biblical scholars might not know this but if you read the bible many times men are admonished for spilling the seeds.
The bible speaks of sexual relations for procreation purposes. If you not suppose to even have sex unless your married or spill the seeds why on god's green earth would any one think that homosexuality would be okay.


You need to go back and re-read the Bible. The spilling of seed you refer to is actually in reference to one man, Onan, who is admonished for doing that. And it had to do with a bigger backstory of the fact that Onan had married his late brother's wife as part of the tribal obligations back then (long story) but didnt' want to have another child.

Modern conservative people have used this story to say mastrubation is wrong, evil, etc. yet it actually comes from a VERY SPECIFIC story in the Bible with very specific circumstances.

The original Judeo-Christian religion was not against sex that was not procreative. Actually, in ancient law/tradition, a woman could demand a divorce from her husband if he was not "performing his husbandly duties" often enough. Sex was understood to be a normal part of life, not just for procreating.

The idea that sex is only for making children came much later and driven mainly by the Roman Cathlolic church.

If your not a Christian then I would not worry about but it, don't keep screaming that nothing in the bible disapproves of homosexuality.
[Edited 4/28/09 8:02am]

Your post, as usual, is very narrowminded.

First you assume that only christians should be able to speak on the Bible.

Secondly, you are making your own interpretations.

I personally have read the Bible in the original language, have you?

So by defintion, you're reading an interperation in English, and secondly you are making leaps of logic by taking specific phrases and trying to apply them to 21st century politics (i.e. gay marriage).

And the person I replied to made a blanket statement saying that God disapproves of gay marriate and Interracial marriage. Clearly, the Bible does not address either of these 2 modern topics of marriage.

And if you actually were able to read and comprehend, I did not "scream that nothing in the bible dissapproves of homosexuality".

What I said to the person who was attempting to quote passages from Leviticus was that if you're going to take those passages as things you must adhere to, then you shoudl also take the passages which are in the same book about dietary laws, not mixing fabrics in teh same garments, etc. Right wing people love to quote one line in the Bible and ignore others right next to it.

moreover, I poitned out that the word translated as "abomination" is believed to mean "against ritual". And regardless of how you tranlsate it in English, the same word is used to describe thigns like eating pork, wearing linin/ewool garments etc.

So if yo uare going to use those passages as your support, then you better not be eating at Red Lobster or wearing wool & linen suits. Otherwise you are a HUGE hypocrite.
[Edited 4/28/09 9:46am]
rainbow
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 04/28/09 10:58am

DesireeNevermi
nd

manuela tryna talk about Prince's views...what the hell are her views? Fornicating heffer messing around with a married man then tryna gold dig her way to another celebrity while still talking about her ex and using his name when its beneficial to her. yeah wutevs mani fanny.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 04/29/09 10:21am

laurarichardso
n

GaryMF said:[quote]

laurarichardson said:



You need to go back and re-read the Bible. The spilling of seed you refer to is actually in reference to one man, Onan, who is admonished for doing that. And it had to do with a bigger backstory of the fact that Onan had married his late brother's wife as part of the tribal obligations back then (long story) but didnt' want to have another child.

Modern conservative people have used this story to say mastrubation is wrong, evil, etc. yet it actually comes from a VERY SPECIFIC story in the Bible with very specific circumstances.

The original Judeo-Christian religion was not against sex that was not procreative. Actually, in ancient law/tradition, a woman could demand a divorce from her husband if he was not "performing his husbandly duties" often enough. Sex was understood to be a normal part of life, not just for procreating.

The idea that sex is only for making children came much later and driven mainly by the Roman Cathlolic church.

If your not a Christian then I would not worry about but it, don't keep screaming that nothing in the bible disapproves of homosexuality.
[Edited 4/28/09 8:02am]

Your post, as usual, is very narrowminded.

First you assume that only christians should be able to speak on the Bible.

Secondly, you are making your own interpretations.

I personally have read the Bible in the original language, have you?

So by defintion, you're reading an interperation in English, and secondly you are making leaps of logic by taking specific phrases and trying to apply them to 21st century politics (i.e. gay marriage).

And the person I replied to made a blanket statement saying that God disapproves of gay marriate and Interracial marriage. Clearly, the Bible does not address either of these 2 modern topics of marriage.

And if you actually were able to read and comprehend, I did not "scream that nothing in the bible dissapproves of homosexuality".

What I said to the person who was attempting to quote passages from Leviticus was that if you're going to take those passages as things you must adhere to, then you shoudl also take the passages which are in the same book about dietary laws, not mixing fabrics in teh same garments, etc. Right wing people love to quote one line in the Bible and ignore others right next to it.

moreover, I poitned out that the word translated as "abomination" is believed to mean "against ritual". And regardless of how you tranlsate it in English, the same word is used to describe thigns like eating pork, wearing linin/ewool garments etc.

So if yo uare going to use those passages as your support, then you better not be eating at Red Lobster or wearing wool & linen suits. Otherwise you are a HUGE hypocrite.
[Edited 4/28/09 9:46am]

-----
Your not worth my time because I am not even talking about homosexuality and
Leviticus. I am talking about not spilling the seeds. If God put boils on a man, skin for the spilling the seeds what in the world do, you think would happen with sex without marriage and please do not say it was the Catholic Church that came up with it. Have you never heard of the Ten Commandments? They are very easy to understand and the come from the Old Testament.

Or do we all then to go out a read the Bible in the original language to understand the Ten Commandments. eek

Of course somethings in the Bible are open to interpretation and should be adjusted to modern day thinking but I think God was really clear on whoring around.

Some conservatives read what the want to read in the Bible (they ignore not judging people) but some liberals read what they want to read from the bible to suit their behavior. In the end you can’t have it both ways.

In addtion, I am not Jewish so I will eat all the seafood I want.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 04/29/09 10:23am

laurarichardso
n

DesireeNevermind said:

manuela tryna talk about Prince's views...what the hell are her views? Fornicating heffer messing around with a married man then tryna gold dig her way to another celebrity while still talking about her ex and using his name when its beneficial to her. yeah wutevs mani fanny.

-----
Exactly she really needs to shut the hell up and all of the people supporting her homewrecking butt need to as well.

Run around with a married man is okay but don't support gay marrigage and you need to be burn at the stake.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 04/29/09 10:26am

laurarichardso
n

stanleylieber said:

laurarichardson said:


-----
How arrogant can you be to think that your opinion invalidates millions of other people's belief. eek


that's sort of the definition of the abrahamic religions though. part of the reason the hebrews and later the christian cults were so unpopular with their contemporaries is that they tried to proscribe acknowledging the other so-called gods. "there is only one god," etc. pretty arrogant, right.

-----
Why are Christians and Hebrews considered arrogant for preaching to people? They did not put a gun or sword to their heads. In addtion, are Buddish and Hindus arrogant for believeing in their many Gods and pusing their religion.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 04/29/09 10:51am

stanleylieber

avatar

laurarichardson said:

stanleylieber said:



that's sort of the definition of the abrahamic religions though. part of the reason the hebrews and later the christian cults were so unpopular with their contemporaries is that they tried to proscribe acknowledging the other so-called gods. "there is only one god," etc. pretty arrogant, right.

-----
Why are Christians and Hebrews considered arrogant for preaching to people? They did not put a gun or sword to their heads. In addtion, are Buddish and Hindus arrogant for believeing in their many Gods and pusing their religion.


see the post i quoted.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 04/29/09 10:52am

stanleylieber

avatar

laurarichardson said:

How arrogant can you be to think that your opinion invalidates millions of other people's belief.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 04/29/09 10:54am

dollwoman

DesireeNevermind said:

manuela tryna talk about Prince's views...what the hell are her views? Fornicating heffer messing around with a married man then tryna gold dig her way to another celebrity while still talking about her ex and using his name when its beneficial to her. yeah wutevs mani fanny.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 04/29/09 12:14pm

purplecam

avatar

disbelief at this whole thread.
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 04/29/09 12:17pm

stanleylieber

avatar

purplecam said:

disbelief at this whole thread.


why so negative?
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 04/29/09 1:24pm

purplecam

avatar

stanleylieber said:

purplecam said:

disbelief at this whole thread.


why so negative?

I'm not being negative or positive. I'm just shaking my head at this thread.
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 04/29/09 1:27pm

stanleylieber

avatar

purplecam said:

stanleylieber said:



why so negative?

I'm not being negative or positive. I'm just shaking my head at this thread.


that ain't neutral.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 04/29/09 1:29pm

purplecam

avatar

stanleylieber said:

purplecam said:


I'm not being negative or positive. I'm just shaking my head at this thread.


that ain't neutral.

Why does it matter to you?
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 04/29/09 1:32pm

stanleylieber

avatar

purplecam said:

stanleylieber said:



that ain't neutral.

Why does it matter to you?


what kind of question is that? what does it matter to you? biggrin

i'm just saying. all this judging going on, about people judging.

we can test this experimentally. watch:

lotusflower disbelief
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 04/29/09 1:36pm

purplecam

avatar

stanleylieber said:

purplecam said:


Why does it matter to you?


what kind of question is that? what does it matter to you? biggrin

i'm just saying. all this judging going on, about people judging.

we can test this experimentally. watch:

lotusflower disbelief

That's your right to do that. I'm not judging anyone but you just wanna go there. Are you trying to start shit today? You need to stay in your lane and do you. Get into that.
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 04/29/09 1:45pm

stanleylieber

avatar

purplecam said:

stanleylieber said:



what kind of question is that? what does it matter to you? biggrin

i'm just saying. all this judging going on, about people judging.

we can test this experimentally. watch:

lotusflower disbelief

That's your right to do that. I'm not judging anyone but you just wanna go there. Are you trying to start shit today? You need to stay in your lane and do you. Get into that.


sorry. i keep trying to hold people to their own (stated) standards. you're right. that's nuts.

do me a favor though. can we get a break from the positivity police when you don't agree with the negative things that are being said? the double-standard is irritating.

(this isn't just directed at you.)

if negativity is bad in and of itself, then that includes negativity about negativity.

sorry for starting trouble. i'm all finished.
it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 04/29/09 1:48pm

DesireeNevermi
nd

typing popcorn crash pc biggrin popcorn
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 04/29/09 1:55pm

purplecam

avatar

stanleylieber said:

purplecam said:


That's your right to do that. I'm not judging anyone but you just wanna go there. Are you trying to start shit today? You need to stay in your lane and do you. Get into that.


sorry. i keep trying to hold people to their own (stated) standards. you're right. that's nuts.

do me a favor though. can we get a break from the positivity police when you don't agree with the negative things that are being said? the double-standard is irritating.

Maybe when you stop feeling the need to try and analize any and everyone that may be considered to be positive. Now that's irritating. I'm done too.
[Edited 4/29/09 13:59pm]
I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 04/29/09 2:14pm

LAtimesinc

Even if Prince is against gay marriage I'm with him! I am bisexual and I feel that marriage should be between a man and woman but...I feel that gay couple's should have the right to share with there mate or even share benefits and medical as offered from there (work)company to spouses. My two pense!

Manuela is a woman scorned who is out for revenge...safely, lol

What I don't understand about people that want to work for Prince or date him is, they know it will not last long but they seem to think they have what it takes to make someone like him happy...what are you thinking? He changes some people like he changes cloths. Why do you think he should keep you around when he has let go of so many other people? I'll tell you why; Prince has seen all kinds and within the first few minutes of conversation he can tell if you are ginuwine or not and get bored.
I may come off with my head up Prince's ass...so be it! Just stop mistakin' my love for him as ass kissin, I just Love him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 04/29/09 3:37pm

squirrelgrease

avatar

stanleylieber said:

lotusflower disbelief


Hater.
If prince.org were to be made idiot proof, someone would just invent a better idiot.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 04/29/09 3:52pm

funkteer

avatar

SoulAlive said:

meltedman said:

I think what Mani is doing is great...Prince is a blatant homophobe who needs to be called out once and for all. You have Perez Hilton and now Ellen praising him...but do you think either one would be welcome at HIS dinner table? Not in a million years. Prince preaches to them how being gay is EVIL, that is why he reads the bible to them. I am happy Mani came out about this and is letting people know that he is an extremely flawed individual instead of him always looking golden in the public eye.

Manuela...Hats off to you my dear! It is about time somebody came forward!


Didn't Ellen recently get married to her partner? If so,it seems odd and hypocritical for any celebrity who's against gay marriage to appear on her show.



FYI--- Look around you. This country is very divided on the issue of gay marriage. Prince is not the only one with an opinion, or a religious belief.
"It's hard 4 me 2 say what's right when all I want to do is wrong..."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 04/29/09 3:54pm

funkteer

avatar

catpark said:

kyla said:

Doc Funkenberry Prince just taped with Tavis Smiley on way to Ellen. more on http://www.docfb.com spread the word47 minutes ago · Comment
·
Manuela Testolini at 07:49 on 23 April
i hope she asks him how he feels about gay marriage. something tells me he won't be as pointed as Miss California


Manuela puts her 2c in on facebook

lol oh my my...there seems to be a few ex's having digs lately..oh my my lol
why does Mani care? did Prince cut her allowance down or something and now Eric is bitching at her? falloff



Maybe she is jealous of Bria. If she was happy with the sex addict, she wouldn't be so catty toward Prince.
"It's hard 4 me 2 say what's right when all I want to do is wrong..."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 04/29/09 3:56pm

funkteer

avatar

StephaniePlum said:

freakyfeet said:

Again - people posting "friends" PERSONAL messages from Facebook.

They kindly added you as a friend - why are you then making their comments available to the general public ?

That's pretty sad.



People shouldn't post anything on these social networking sites that they wouldn't want widely spread and/or known. And that especially goes for those people who will add almost anybody who requests as a "friend", and grow their list of friends into the multiple hundreds; you don't know who you can really trust and who you can't.


Exactly! Once you press the send or post button, you have given up your right to privacy.
"It's hard 4 me 2 say what's right when all I want to do is wrong..."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #174 posted 04/29/09 4:05pm

DesireeNevermi
nd

Mani thought Prince was special. Prince thought Mani was special. They thought they were special together. Turns out they both just a couple average hos watching the snow in April.


i don't know what that means. beer
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #175 posted 04/29/09 4:13pm

SCNDLS

avatar

DesireeNevermind said:

Mani thought Prince was special. Prince thought Mani was special. They thought they were special together. Turns out they both just a couple average hos watching the snow in April.


i don't know what that means. beer

falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #176 posted 04/29/09 8:24pm

tat2s

DesireeNevermind said:

Mani thought Prince was special. Prince thought Mani was special. They thought they were special together. Turns out they both just a couple average hos watching the snow in April.


i don't know what that means. beer


HAHAHAHAHA.....

How is she going to pay rent now??? this is clearly in violation of the hush hush agreement he makes errbody sign off on - No more alimony 4 u!!
[Edited 4/29/09 20:24pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #177 posted 04/29/09 10:02pm

GaryMF

avatar

laurarichardson said:


Your not worth my time because I am not even talking about homosexuality and
Leviticus. I am talking about not spilling the seeds. If God put boils on a man, skin for the spilling the seeds what in the world do,
you think would happen with sex without marriage and please do not say it was the Catholic Church that came up with it. Have you never heard of the Ten Commandments? They are very easy to understand and the come from the Old Testament.

Or do we all then to go out a read the Bible in the original language to understand the Ten Commandments. eek

Of course somethings in the Bible are open to interpretation and should be adjusted to modern day thinking but I think God was really clear on whoring around.

Some conservatives read what the want to read in the Bible (they ignore not judging people) but some liberals read what they want to read from the bible to suit their behavior. In the end you can’t have it both ways.

In addtion, I am not Jewish so I will eat all the seafood I want.

First, you are the one who is connecting spilling the seed to homosexuality.

Since you brought it up, it comes from the Book of Genesis. THat is where the biblical reference to "spilling seed is". You should read your own source.

The Catholics interpreted that to say masturbation is wrong. but the "spilling the seed" is actually referring to the fact that Onan "pulled out" when having sex with his late brother's wife.

Secondly, YES You should read the 10 commandments in the original language. Then You might learn that the 10 commandments appear TWICE in the Bible, in Exodus and later in Dueteronomy and THEY ARE NOT EXACTLY THE SAME BOTH TIMES!!!

You act like you know what you are talking about but clearly you have not studied the Bible. And you can eat as much seafood as you like. I was referring to the other poster who was quoting Leviticus to say being gay is wrong but doesnt' care about other passages in Levitius.

It seems you are not capable of having an intelligent discussion on this based on the text. instead you are referring to Bible stories you are vaguely familiar with. How sad.
rainbow
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #178 posted 04/29/09 10:12pm

Ottensen

DesireeNevermind said:

Mani thought Prince was special. Prince thought Mani was special. They thought they were special together. Turns out they both just a couple average hos watching the snow in April.


i don't know what that means. beer


You crazy as hell falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #179 posted 04/30/09 1:15am

Rogue588

avatar

GaryMF said:

laurarichardson said:

GaryMF said:


Who the **** do you think you are to speak for a deity/God???? Especially one you claim to believe in???

There are many people who believe in this same deity/God and would not agree with your statement.


-----
He is not speaking a deity.



Huh? Your first sentence is unintelligible .


Most of her posts are...

funkteer said:

SoulAlive said:

Didn't Ellen recently get married to her partner? If so,it seems odd and hypocritical for any celebrity who's against gay marriage to appear on her show.



FYI--- Look around you. This country is very divided on the issue of gay marriage. Prince is not the only one with an opinion, or a religious belief.

Yes, but they weren't the ones pimping their wares on a show hosted by someone whose lifestyle he condemned. As has been said, that's hypocritical.

DesireeNevermind said:

Mani thought Prince was special. Prince thought Mani was special. They thought they were special together. Turns out they both just a couple average hos watching the snow in April.


i don't know what that means. beer

• Did you first think Prince was gay? •

Wendy: He’s a girl, for sure, but he’s not gay. He looked at me like a gay woman would look at another woman. Lisa: Totally. He’s like a fancy lesbian.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 9 <123456789>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Associated artists & people > Manuela puts her 2c in on facebook