divo02 said:

Yes, and I respect you immensely for keeping it clean, even with all of my sexual innuendo and Kama Sutra talk.

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

I'd prefer to not bring Ice into it though...what do you call it...a "triangle of love." I ain't down with that shit Battier!

divo02 said:

All I did was suggest that, while we are having our "love" session, we bring IceNine in, so that you can bend him over, stick your finger in his ass, and wipe shit on his upper lip. I suggested you Sanchez him.

You were down with it then. Your needs and wants are changing. I just don't know if you're the same person I used to want to be with.

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

Oh yeah, I'll still do that!!! Just none of that bondage, sexual intercourse thing you wanted us to do.

divo02 said:

Listen, sweetheart, if you're not mature enough to handle a little bondage and intercourse, then umm, well, maybe I should just find someone who is.

BattierBeMyDaddy said:

I'm cool with it...just not with IceNine's hairy ass & back. Plus, he'll be talking about boxing or something and just totally ruin the moment.

divo02 said:

Oh. Well, I suppose talking about some sweaty man beating another sweaty man could...ruin the moment. Unless one of the men is Oscar de la Hoya.

Anyways, yeah. I see where you're coming from!

Isn't Oscar gay?

divo02 said:

All the better. I'd love to watch the two of you together.

That isn't something to be controlled with rules, it's something to be controlled with common human decency. Don't send anything private in nature to somebody you don't trust.

I think the best way to summarize it is "it's frowned upon, except in cases of extreme comedic value". If you do it, it better be funny dammit

ian said:

i won't show anyone yours, if you don't show anyone mine.


goodness, we might be red-faced

AaronUnlimited said:

Oh my... yes indeed

ian said:

And just this once, I don't want to watch.

Aerogram said:

oh, it's nothing passe like sex. it's really ugly flaming over moderation issues.

in fact, on second thought, maybe there SHOULD be a thread, comprised solely of the run-ins ian and i have. it would make for great reading, watching to viscious bastads launch assaults on each other, only to both completely wuss out, shake hands, hug, and get over themselves and each other at the end of the day.

ian?

That's it, account locked.

katt said:

That's what "blocking" is for...

Posting org notes and private messages should not be allowed without the sender's permission. That's just assholeishness A private flame war is better than a public one...drama is for drama queens!

Tina (~!~)

NettieSmiles said:

That's an interesting point, especially when people are continually told to take it to email or Orgnotes. When you do that, I think you are basically saying "this isn't something that should be public." So why allow these private exchanges to become public? Why should it concern "the Org"?

Orgnotes are a substitute for emails. To the best of my knowledge, this feature was introduced to allow easily accessible private messaging for people to socialize one on one. If it has the effect of creating private behavior that must then be arbitrated by moderators, that is very unfortunate and, in my view, unnecessary. I'm pretty sure the mods get sent Otgers' emails that are deemed offensive, but it must be very tiring to get involved in all this private stuff.

The focus should be on public behavior. The responsibility of this unpaid staff should be limited to what goes on in public, and people who are bothered by Orgnotes should be told to not take their private feuds to the forums and to use their blocking feature as a courtesy to the moderator, just so he/she does not have to read whatever Orgnotes or emails are sent.

I agree Aero. we mods have neither the time nor the desire to arbitrate private arguments and squabbles. As far as I am concerned, private Orgnotes are none of my business and usually (except in extreme circumstances, where someone is being genuinely harrassed, threatened and persecuted perhaps) I never get involved in such private matters.

Although posting private Orgnotes isn't in the rules, it is as I say "frowned upon" and there have been very few cases where such posts went unsnipped

Unless it's funny, and it was posted by me to get a cheap laugh. Then, it's brilliantly witty.

mcmeekle said:[quote]

MrBliss said:

I disagree, if you send someone something I think you relinquish ownership. It's up to the recipient to decide if it remains private or not. If you want the content to remain private, either don't send it or trust that the recipient wont make it public.

The posting of orgnotes should simply follow standard site rules.
quote]


ditto that

from: XxAxX
subject: posting orgnotes

hey ian, what do you think about all those arseholes bitching about people posting orgnotes? what a bunch of crybabies! they make me wanna puke, really!!

seeya

XxAxX