New topic
PrintableImago said: Actually one last thing. If her threads are being locked because they're terrible, than I completely agree and don't understand the point of this discussion.
 | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
It speaks volumes that even her Site Discussion threads merit jacking. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: It speaks volumes that even her Site Discussion threads merit jacking.
*##$*(^#$*($*)#($*()#$ | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ocean said: CarrieMpls said: If a thread gets out of hand before a mod can get in to clean it up, then it's going to be locked. Thems the breaks. It's a shame that people who insist on breaking site rules ruin it for others, but if you want to be annoyed about it, I'd be annoyed with them, rather than the mods who are just volunteering their time to help make the org a nice place to be. As for deleting posts, I'm with Mars in that we'd NEVER want to do that, rather actually show a snip has taken place. We don't want to be seen as being sneaky by deleting posts that no one knows about. It seems strange to me that mods would rather delete a whole thread than a whole post and I would think if org members were asked the majority would ask that whole post goes before a whole thread 
I am also not neccessarity mad at the mods ...who like u said are volunteering ...but along with volunteering I would expect them to answer org notes in regards to actions they take ...and maybe if their not sure if something is posted in a agressive way (like the 10th post) they should org note the person and ask before deleting ...I mean we all have a different sense of humor, different cultures, different backgrounds. Some of the censorship around here seems to be going in the extreme.... I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: ocean said: I'm annoyed because the two people involved dropped it and agreed it wasn't the place for an argument and it was still deleted...
It seems strange to me that mods would rather delete a whole thread than a whole post and I would think if org members were asked the majority would ask that whole post goes before a whole thread
I am also not neccessarity mad at the mods ...who like u said are volunteering ...but along with volunteering I would expect them to answer org notes in regards to actions they take ...and maybe if their not sure if something is posted in a agressive way (like the 10th post) they should org note the person and ask before deleting ...I mean we all have a different sense of humor, different cultures, different backgrounds. Some of the censorship around here seems to be going in the extreme.... I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO. And I missed this how???? 
I have GOT to start making an appointment in GD!  [Edited 5/13/09 20:58pm] "Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: ocean said: I'm annoyed because the two people involved dropped it and agreed it wasn't the place for an argument and it was still deleted...
It seems strange to me that mods would rather delete a whole thread than a whole post and I would think if org members were asked the majority would ask that whole post goes before a whole thread
I am also not neccessarity mad at the mods ...who like u said are volunteering ...but along with volunteering I would expect them to answer org notes in regards to actions they take ...and maybe if their not sure if something is posted in a agressive way (like the 10th post) they should org note the person and ask before deleting ...I mean we all have a different sense of humor, different cultures, different backgrounds. Some of the censorship around here seems to be going in the extreme.... I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noimageatall said: SCNDLS said: I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO. And I missed this how????
I have GOT to start making an appointment in GD!
[Edited 5/13/09 20:58pm]  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ocean said: SCNDLS said: I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO. That would have been absurd, but that was not what had happened. There were many offensive posts on that thread and even though I did not report it I was happy when it was gone. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: ocean said: I'm annoyed because the two people involved dropped it and agreed it wasn't the place for an argument and it was still deleted...
It seems strange to me that mods would rather delete a whole thread than a whole post and I would think if org members were asked the majority would ask that whole post goes before a whole thread
I am also not neccessarity mad at the mods ...who like u said are volunteering ...but along with volunteering I would expect them to answer org notes in regards to actions they take ...and maybe if their not sure if something is posted in a agressive way (like the 10th post) they should org note the person and ask before deleting ...I mean we all have a different sense of humor, different cultures, different backgrounds. Some of the censorship around here seems to be going in the extreme.... I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO. WowWith a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: ocean said: I don't know the thread in question ..but yes that sounds absurd
That would have been absurd, but that was not what had happened. There were many offensive posts on that thread and even though I did not report it I was happy when it was gone. oh ok  ....I didn't know the thread  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ocean said: Serious said: That would have been absurd, but that was not what had happened. There were many offensive posts on that thread and even though I did not report it I was happy when it was gone. oh ok ....I didn't know the thread
I wish I would not have clicked on it either. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: ocean said: I don't know the thread in question ..but yes that sounds absurd
That would have been absurd, but that was not what had happened. There were many offensive posts on that thread and even though I did not report it I was happy when it was gone.  No, I disagreed with your stance on falling in love on sight and I said so which I'm entitled to do. You don't have to like what I think and vice versa. If you have a problem with it either respond like an adult or avoid the thread. It's really quite easy. Also, the thread was deleted days after and about 10-15 pages AFTER our disagreement but immediatedly after Fauxie and Shanti posted some bullshit criticizing the purpose of the thread itself to which I responded to that. It had NOTHING to do, as far as I can tell, with you. Unless of course the usual suspect reported the posts.
What I said to you was really quite mild (calling your assertion "nuts") in comparison to things I've seen in other threads. When has calling an opinion "nuts" ever resulted in a thread being DELETED? Not snipped, not locked but DELETED???? I can't think of this happening before. So the only thing I can come up with is that it happened because it was MY thread and I got into it with certain Org darlings. Which is fine and further confirms what I've long suspected up in here anyway as far as the moderating from certain mods. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: ocean said: oh ok ....I didn't know the thread
I wish I would not have clicked on it either.  You came back over and over and over. Are you incapable of stopping yourself from clicking on a thread you don't want to go into??? Funny cuz I do it ALL the time. Just cuz you don't like it, it's obvious that a thread with over 600 posts and 6000 views with no pics and was only 3 days old was providing LOTS of fun and entertainment for lots of people. So just cuz you don't like what I said to you is cause for the whole thing to be deleted? I'm sorry but I just don't think you or anybody else is that important.
Oh and Ocean, by the way, right after I told Serious what I thought on my thread, one of her friends posted on one of your random thoughts threads basically calling me an asshole. I didn't report it cuz I really don't care what anybody on the Org thinks about me, but yeah, I caught that mess. It's shit like that that is getting your threads locked/deleted. [Edited 5/14/09 7:32am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Serious said:
I wish I would not have clicked on it either. You came back over and over and over. Are you incapable of stopping yourself from clicking on a thread you don't want to go into??? Funny cuz I do it ALL the time. Just cuz you don't like it, it's obvious that a thread with over 600 posts and 6000 views with no pics and was only 3 days old was providing LOTS of fun and entertainment for lots of people. So just cuz you don't like what I said to you is cause for the whole thing to be deleted? I'm sorry but I just don't think you or anybody else is that important. I don't know why it was deleted, I just said I am happy it was. I just wish I would not have clicked on it when I first did as then you would not have had the chance to post all the offensive things you did. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: SCNDLS said: You came back over and over and over. Are you incapable of stopping yourself from clicking on a thread you don't want to go into??? Funny cuz I do it ALL the time. Just cuz you don't like it, it's obvious that a thread with over 600 posts and 6000 views with no pics and was only 3 days old was providing LOTS of fun and entertainment for lots of people. So just cuz you don't like what I said to you is cause for the whole thing to be deleted? I'm sorry but I just don't think you or anybody else is that important. I don't know why it was deleted, I just said I am happy it was. I just wish I would not have clicked on it when I first did as then you would not have had the chance to post all the offensive things you did. If you are offended by someone calling your opinion "nuts" you are incredibly thin-skinned. I didn't curse you out or attack you personally I said that was "nuts" In comparison to all the madness that goes on in here THAT's what you decided to get your panties in a bunch over? Girl, please.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anyway. . . back to my point. I want a MOD not Serious to give me an explanation as to why the thread was deleted as opposed to snipped or locked since everything was going fine until the last 4-5 posts. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Serious said: That would have been absurd, but that was not what had happened. There were many offensive posts on that thread and even though I did not report it I was happy when it was gone. No, I disagreed with your stance on falling in love on sight and I said so which I'm entitled to do. You don't have to like what I think and vice versa. If you have a problem with it either respond like an adult or avoid the thread. It's really quite easy. Also, the thread was deleted days after and about 10-15 pages AFTER our disagreement but immediatedly after Fauxie and Shanti posted some bullshit criticizing the purpose of the thread itself to which I responded to that. It had NOTHING to do, as far as I can tell, with you. Unless of course the usual suspect reported the posts.
What I said to you was really quite mild (calling your assertion "nuts") in comparison to things I've seen in other threads. When has calling an opinion "nuts" ever resulted in a thread being DELETED? Not snipped, not locked but DELETED???? I can't think of this happening before. So the only thing I can come up with is that it happened because it was MY thread and I got into it with certain Org darlings. Which is fine and further confirms what I've long suspected up in here anyway as far as the moderating from certain mods. Yes you called me nutty for falling in love on first sight and found it very funny to make fun of my feelings. An adult respect other people's feelings even if they don't agree with them. And does not complain when others don't agree with her like you did when many orgers agreed with me and told you there was no reason to ridicule me. You obviously don't do that and I still talked to you in a respectful way, if that's not talking like an adult then I don't know. As I said I don't know why the thread was deleted at last, but it sure was not fun anymore for quite some time before. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noimageatall said: SCNDLS said: I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO. And I missed this how????
I have GOT to start making an appointment in GD!
[Edited 5/13/09 20:58pm] :lol It was called "Don't Believe the Hype" . . . cuz size matters. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Anyway. . . back to my point. I want a MOD not Serious to give me an explanation as to why the thread was deleted as opposed to snipped or locked since everything was going fine until the last 4-5 posts.
For you it might have been fine, for me it was not. But that probably was not the reason for deleting the thread. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noimageatall said: SCNDLS said: I agree. The rules as to when to snip vs. lock vs. delete seem very willy nilly and inconsistent. My dick thread for instance was straight up deleted because certain people insisted on coming into it to stir shit up. Sure I responded cuz I didn't appreciate the bullshit. However, the entire thread was deleted despite having over 600 posts and 6000 views instead of just snipping the 3 or 4 posts on the last page. That shit makes absolutely NO sense to me and makes me feel as though deletion rather than snipping or even locking was the solution strictly because it was a thread I started. Very inconsistent application of whatever rules the mods are following IMO. And I missed this how????
I have GOT to start making an appointment in GD!
[Edited 5/13/09 20:58pm] Believe me April it sounds as if it was fun but it was not.  With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: SCNDLS said: No, I disagreed with your stance on falling in love on sight and I said so which I'm entitled to do. You don't have to like what I think and vice versa. If you have a problem with it either respond like an adult or avoid the thread. It's really quite easy. Also, the thread was deleted days after and about 10-15 pages AFTER our disagreement but immediatedly after Fauxie and Shanti posted some bullshit criticizing the purpose of the thread itself to which I responded to that. It had NOTHING to do, as far as I can tell, with you. Unless of course the usual suspect reported the posts.
What I said to you was really quite mild (calling your assertion "nuts") in comparison to things I've seen in other threads. When has calling an opinion "nuts" ever resulted in a thread being DELETED? Not snipped, not locked but DELETED???? I can't think of this happening before. So the only thing I can come up with is that it happened because it was MY thread and I got into it with certain Org darlings. Which is fine and further confirms what I've long suspected up in here anyway as far as the moderating from certain mods. Yes you called me nutty for falling in love on first sight and found it very funny to make fun of my feelings. An adult respect other people's feelings even if they don't agree with them. And does not complain when others don't agree with her like you did when many orgers agreed with me and told you there was no reason to ridicule me. You obviously don't do that and I still talked to you in a respectful way, if that's not talking like an adult then I don't know. As I said I don't know why the thread was deleted at last, but it sure was not fun anymore for quite some time before. Ummmmm, you really need to relax cuz it's not that serious and I could care less and don't understand why you would care at all that a stranger online disagrees with you and called your opinion nutty. Unless you were scared as a chile by someone wearing a Mr. Peanut costume, I don't see how that's so offensive, especially in light of what is said on the Org. So why can't you just let it go and move on? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Serious said: I don't know why it was deleted, I just said I am happy it was. I just wish I would not have clicked on it when I first did as then you would not have had the chance to post all the offensive things you did. If you are offended by someone calling your opinion "nuts" you are incredibly thin-skinned. I didn't curse you out or attack you personally I said that was "nuts" In comparison to all the madness that goes on in here THAT's what you decided to get your panties in a bunch over? Girl, please. You called me nutty and the explanation you gave was a misreading of one of my posts. When people started to point it out to you you still sticked with your opinion .With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: noimageatall said: And I missed this how????
I have GOT to start making an appointment in GD!
[Edited 5/13/09 20:58pm] Believe me April it sounds as if it was fun but it was not. Everyone doesn't share the same opinion of what's fun or funny and I think she woulda had a grand ol' time. Just like how you ONLY fall in love with someone on first sight and I think that's nutty. See how that different opinion thing works? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: SCNDLS said: If you are offended by someone calling your opinion "nuts" you are incredibly thin-skinned. I didn't curse you out or attack you personally I said that was "nuts" In comparison to all the madness that goes on in here THAT's what you decided to get your panties in a bunch over? Girl, please. You called me nutty and the explanation you gave was a misreading of one of my posts. When people started to point it out to you you still sticked with your opinion .Last time I checked, I'm allowed to stick to my opinion regardless of what anyone else thinks. I think that's why it's called MY opinion. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Serious said: You called me nutty and the explanation you gave was a misreading of one of my posts. When people started to point it out to you you still sticked with your opinion .Last time I checked, I'm allowed to stick to my opinion regardless of what anyone else thinks. I think that's why it's called MY opinion. Yeah but the explanation you gave for your opinion was a misinterpretation of something you read. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Serious said: Believe me April it sounds as if it was fun but it was not. Everyone doesn't share the same opinion of what's fun or funny and I think she woulda had a grand ol' time. Just like how you ONLY fall in love with someone on first sight and I think that's nutty. See how that different opinion thing works? I did not say I only fall in love with someone at first sight. I said it usually is that way. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: SCNDLS said: Last time I checked, I'm allowed to stick to my opinion regardless of what anyone else thinks. I think that's why it's called MY opinion. Yeah but the explanation you gave for your opinion was a misinterpretation of something you read. Girl, I'm done with this cuz I don't know why you're trying so hard. So think what you want and I'll do the same.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Serious said: That would have been absurd, but that was not what had happened. There were many offensive posts on that thread and even though I did not report it I was happy when it was gone. No, I disagreed with your stance on falling in love on sight and I said so which I'm entitled to do. You don't have to like what I think and vice versa. If you have a problem with it either respond like an adult or avoid the thread. It's really quite easy. Also, the thread was deleted days after and about 10-15 pages AFTER our disagreement but immediatedly after Fauxie and Shanti posted some bullshit criticizing the purpose of the thread itself to which I responded to that. It had NOTHING to do, as far as I can tell, with you. Unless of course the usual suspect reported the posts.
What I said to you was really quite mild (calling your assertion "nuts") in comparison to things I've seen in other threads. When has calling an opinion "nuts" ever resulted in a thread being DELETED? Not snipped, not locked but DELETED???? I can't think of this happening before. So the only thing I can come up with is that it happened because it was MY thread and I got into it with certain Org darlings. Which is fine and further confirms what I've long suspected up in here anyway as far as the moderating from certain mods. Maybe you should just move on and respect that the thread was deleted. Instead of critisizing others to talk bullshit. Threads are deleted all the time here, it ain't that serious. Just because it was created by you does not mean it is better than a thread created by anyone else. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serious said: SCNDLS said: No, I disagreed with your stance on falling in love on sight and I said so which I'm entitled to do. You don't have to like what I think and vice versa. If you have a problem with it either respond like an adult or avoid the thread. It's really quite easy. Also, the thread was deleted days after and about 10-15 pages AFTER our disagreement but immediatedly after Fauxie and Shanti posted some bullshit criticizing the purpose of the thread itself to which I responded to that. It had NOTHING to do, as far as I can tell, with you. Unless of course the usual suspect reported the posts.
What I said to you was really quite mild (calling your assertion "nuts") in comparison to things I've seen in other threads. When has calling an opinion "nuts" ever resulted in a thread being DELETED? Not snipped, not locked but DELETED???? I can't think of this happening before. So the only thing I can come up with is that it happened because it was MY thread and I got into it with certain Org darlings. Which is fine and further confirms what I've long suspected up in here anyway as far as the moderating from certain mods. Maybe you should just move on and respect that the thread was deleted. Instead of critisizing others to talk bullshit. Threads are deleted all the time here, it ain't that serious. Just because it was created by you does not mean it is better than a thread created by anyone else. Ocean started this thread and I had a similar issue and would like an explanation. Isn't that what THIS forum is for? What is your problem? I mean really you need to go somewhere. So are you saying Ocean should also just get over it and not question why? [Edited 5/14/09 7:58am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: Serious said: Maybe you should just move on and respect that the thread was deleted. Instead of critisizing others to talk bullshit. Threads are deleted all the time here, it ain't that serious. Just because it was created by you does not mean it is better than a thread created by anyone else. Ocean started this thread and I had a similar issue and would like an explanation. Isn't that what THIS forum is for? What is your problem? I mean really you need to go somewhere. So are you saying Ocean should also just get over it and not question why? [Edited 5/14/09 7:58am] Ocean did not imply that her thread was deleted because it was started by her and other orgers are org darlings. With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |