japanrocks said: this lotus flower website hopefully will be so good that we will not need places like the org or housequake
i mean, i think that is what prince really wants and after all, he is Prince (the reason we are here) Unfortunately, this in not possible. What is so wonderful about HQ & the Org is our freedom of speech, our ability to post our opinions both positive and negative. This will never happen on an official Prince site. Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Gav said: Damn, there's more conspiracy theories here than ever !
Firstly, the simple reason that nothing's been said is that as many of you know, I look after the Prince liaison and legal statements for Housequake and I've been snowed under with my day job - in fact I only found out HQ was closed by email from one of the other mods this morning. As some have noticed, relations with official sources have been very good of late, however mostly because we've been "playing the game" and trying our best to not offend P. An example of this is how we've had a header that doesn't even mention Prince's name nor shows his photo. A couple of weeks ago, one member put together some excellent lotusflower "inspired" banners that used a symbol that looked a bit like Prince's but with a flower modification. As they didn't infringe copyright, we took the decision to put these live, along with the official banners we were supplied directly by P. Roughly 24 hours later, we got a very blunt email saying "this must be removed" from one of his team. We tried to discuss this explaining that it's very difficult to have a fan website that doesn't have a picture of Prince or even show his symbol, however P was adamant that we don't "imply official status". As someone else noticed on this thread, this was quite frankly the straw that broke the camels back and Aaron came to the belief that this really isn't a fun thing to do any more. Please remember that this is just a hobby for Aaron. It costs him money to run (we can't take donations any more as it changes our legal status and this was used by Prince's legal representation to claim we were a commercial organisation - nice huh ?) and take up a great deal of his time. Would you spend time and money on something you didn't enjoy ? Is HQ over ? I personally don't know but I've spent a great deal of time playing "united nations" to repair relationships between Prince and all the PFU members (I brokered the "ceasefire" between the PFU and Prince) so I'm not about to give up yet. It Ain't Over ! ps - thanks for the notes of support for HQ. This isn't about Prince.org vs Housequake, this is purely about fans rights to support an artist in a reasonable manner. Thanks Gav for the update. Hoping this isn't a permanent decision. Maybe every time Prince announces a new project all the sites should shut down for a month and avoid this drama altogether. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thebumpsquad said: 2elijah said: Now, we have the situation with the banners that was posted on the Housequake site, which apparently Aaron was asked to remove it from P's camp, because the banners created by a fan, that was posted on HQ, was just too similar to P's official banner, which may have caused fans to be confused as to which one was the "official" banner. Not to be an anal pedant, but there is a difference between a "header" and a "banner". The image in question was a header made specifically for Housequake by one of it's members. It's purpose was to add a splash of colour to the Housequake site and was in keeping with Prince's current theme. Prince's camp already supplied LotusFlow3r banners which contained LotusFlow3r text and linked to Prince's official LotusFlow3r site. Still, other than that, nice round-up of events. No problem, this is why I stated to correct me, if wrong. Okay, question....was the header created for HQ similar to that of the Lotusflow3r banner? Did it have P's symbol incorporated in it? Just asking because I only read, (different stories by HQ members) Did the HQ header also contain the words "Lotusflow3r.com" on that header as well? Just like P's official banner? If so, if there was a Prince fan, who was/is not a member of HQ, who just happened to click on the HQ site and saw the HQ header, and ifin fact contained the "Lotusflow3r.com" on it as well, I wonder if that fan would assume HQ somehow had some connection to P's official camp. I mean we seen what happened to the fake blog who took it upon themselves to use the name of Prince's site as the name of their blog, and confused some fans if it was official or not. If you look at the very top of HQ, in "small/fine print" it says "unofficial site", but if you look at the Org's Header, it is in larger letters for anyone to notice that the Org is an "unofficial site" and the Org has no images of Prince on their header, well other than the likeness of his name. You know what they say about words in "small/fine print" though, people always seem to miss it or claim they never read it. Anyway, there are different stories circulating about what the HQ header contained. Also, if you google "lotusflow3r" there are over 15 pages of blogs and other sites that discuss or announce's Prince's anticipated opening of his website. Some even copied the purple ticket that is displayed on P's official site, e and posted it on their site as a separate "stand-alone" pic (so-to-speak) for viewers to look at, although it is not "clickable", but they still took the image from his site to display on their own. So I guess P does seem to have a lot to deal with, in making sure no one tries to pull the music off his page or use images from his site, to use as headers for their own. I'm not saying that is what HQ did, since I didn't see what it actually looked like on HQ. Anyway, hopefully things calm down, and didn't affect the opening of P's site. [Edited 1/31/09 8:44am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
emm said: mdiver said: That, dear emm, was exactly why i posted what i did..... there are some people out there there is a difference. i was on your ass for suggesting that all quakers were fammy. this back and forth had nothing to do with the quake. as i said in orgnote, the hardcore spread their love on both sites. and that's okay too! there's room for everybody. btw i've decided you're not allowed to post here anymore till you can sing everlasting now by heart. THAT is not gonna happen | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: Just recently, he had a radio personality play a few of his new tracks, what do some fans do? They go and download/copy the songs from that site, then post it for other fans to listen to elsewhere. When there are unauthorized sites playing his new songs, people post the links to it, and share it with others. others. Then fans get pissed at Prince because the links are pulled off. Why? It’s his music. If he chooses to give it away for free, then it’s up to him, but if not, the choice is still his. All the above and people wonder why artists get pissed over people stealing their music. First of all, what was the purpose of Prince allowing the radio station to preview the songs? Answer: to generate hype. Tell me, when is more hype generated? A) When A limited amount of people local to the radio station hear a live broadcast, or, B) When someone makes those tracks available online for all to hear and all the fans with an internet connection hear them... The only correct answer is B! Whomever took the time to record and upload those tracks helped Prince by blowing up the hype worldwide... I myself would not have known about the broadcast if not for postings at HQ, and due to the fact that I had to work at the time of the broadcast would not have heard the tracks yet if not for the hard work of other fans that want to spread the hype. Personally, If I had not heard the tracks I would not believe the hype surrounding the LotusFlow3r project. In fact, I might not even know about LotusFlow3r or MPLSound if not for HQ... I don't read the L.A. Times, I don't visit Dr. Funkberry for "celebrity news", so, yeah, I wouldn't know about the new official site either... And let's be real here, the tracks were originally streamed in very low quality. I can't imagine anyone who likes them being satisfied with their lossy quality rather than purchasing the album when it comes out. Nobody has "stolen" anything from LotusFlow3r, yet... Obviously, when the album comes out, some WILL download it rather than buy it, some will do so because they are angry at Prince and his business practices. Oh, well, this is why good customer relations is a must in any business. I myself will buy any physical release that is available. I will not be buying downloads or paying to join a website. This decision has nothing to do with the current situation at HQ, and everything to do with my past experiences from joining Prince's websites and purchasing downloads from him. Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: these fan sites exist to serve the fan community.
these fan sites celebrate the persona and artistry of prince, but these sites do not exist to serve prince. because this is true, i think it's counterproductive of aaron to shut down HQ in reaction to a request from prince's camp. (and i'm saying this as someone who has his fingers crossed that HQ will reopen soon.) the end result is, the fan community suffers. and these sites exist to serve the fan community. the end result is, we all cower once again at the gravity of prince's ever-evolving rules and regulations regarding online behavior. yet these sites do not exist to serve prince. (and i'm saying this as someone who has been all too pleased to help out prince's camp with whatever they've needed with regards to the org, and i'm also saying this as someone who has acquired a great deal of patience for prince's demands (if i do say so myself, lol).) i think aaron should reconsider his decision and re-open HQ. i think he should think long and hard about the focus of his site, and how best to serve the intended audience of an unofficial fan site. i think there's a way to bridge the gap between prince's camp and a proudly independent fan site. i think there's a way to balance diplomacy and compromise with strong standards and firm boundaries. i think once you work that recipe out, it benefits the fans, it keeps our favorite purple people eater appeased, and everyone gets what they wants or at least they don't care as much about what they can't have. i don't blame aaron for locking up HQ for good. i really don't. but i really hope he finds a way to bring it back, because it would make a lot of people happy. and it's THOSE people who HQ - and the .org - serve. Very well said, we'll have to wait and see on this. Peace ... & Stay Funky ...
~* The only love there is, is the love "we" make *~ www.facebook.com/purplefunklover | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How does this site (prince.org) stay unscathed with the gallery of photos? My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ufoclub said: How does this site (prince.org) stay unscathed with the gallery of photos?
you obviously haven't been in the gallery for a while cutie ixnay on anybay ingthay elsebay atthay aymay atchcay ishay attentionbay | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm trying to figure something out.
Housequake seem's to be P's bitch. I mean, they'll do anything he asks. Shut down this, post up that, ban her, ban him, close that. But they're always the ones getting kicked in the ass. The org seem's to be minding its own bid'ness, doing whatever it wants...but it's unscathed (save for the gallery). Am I mistaken? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
macbos said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:
macbos said: I already don't spend my money for Prince since 10 years... I make copy's and downloads and later buy it secondhand. This way i don't support Mr. Prince direct with my money (which he uses to pay lawyers against his fans) wink [Edited 1/30/09 3:00am] If someone punches you in the face, expect to get punched back attitude? I tell U something: I spent my hard earned money for records, concerts and whatever exists from Prince & Co. for YEARS (1983-1999) and then Mr. Prince (ab)used MY money to sue UPTOWN... This was the first action against his own fanbase the rest (PFU / Croke Park / Websherrif and... and.. and...) is well known & documented here. I decided to prevent, that he can in the future (ab)use MY money again for actions like this. I indeed paid many many years for his (good and hard) 'work' even when the quality was pretty low (almost everything after the Symbol Album - and btw. Planet Earth isn't worth one single cent) so why should i spend more money for this awful burned out ex-artist? NJET! If someone punches you in the face, expect to get punched back Your justifications are just ridiculous. Like I said, don't spend your money on Prince if you don't want to. But, don't then turn around and steal the merchandise instead. It's stupid to think that because of some perceived slight, that it's then ok to be a thief! Hey, I don't like you Walmart, so I'm gonna steal a TV and be righteous about it! You buy a product, not a person. Just because you've spent $$ on someone's product means they have to do what you want for the rest of their life? You pay for a concert ticket and if the show goes on, Prince owes you NOTHING after you walk out those venue doors. You buy a CD, that's it, you've got your PRODUCT. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
emm said: ufoclub said: How does this site (prince.org) stay unscathed with the gallery of photos?
you obviously haven't been in the gallery for a while cutie ixnay on anybay ingthay elsebay atthay aymay atchcay ishay attentionbay Oh! You speak French!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
djThunderfunk said: 2elijah said: Just recently, he had a radio personality play a few of his new tracks, what do some fans do? They go and download/copy the songs from that site, then post it for other fans to listen to elsewhere. When there are unauthorized sites playing his new songs, people post the links to it, and share it with others. others. Then fans get pissed at Prince because the links are pulled off. Why? It’s his music. If he chooses to give it away for free, then it’s up to him, but if not, the choice is still his. All the above and people wonder why artists get pissed over people stealing their music. First of all, what was the purpose of Prince allowing the radio station to preview the songs? Answer: to generate hype. Tell me, when is more hype generated? A) When A limited amount of people local to the radio station hear a live broadcast, or, B) When someone makes those tracks available online for all to hear and all the fans with an internet connection hear them... The only correct answer is B! Whomever took the time to record and upload those tracks helped Prince by blowing up the hype worldwide... I myself would not have known about the broadcast if not for postings at HQ, and due to the fact that I had to work at the time of the broadcast would not have heard the tracks yet if not for the hard work of other fans that want to spread the hype. Personally, If I had not heard the tracks I would not believe the hype surrounding the LotusFlow3r project. In fact, I might not even know about LotusFlow3r or MPLSound if not for HQ... I don't read the L.A. Times, I don't visit Dr. Funkberry for "celebrity news", so, yeah, I wouldn't know about the new official site either... And let's be real here, the tracks were originally streamed in very low quality. I can't imagine anyone who likes them being satisfied with their lossy quality rather than purchasing the album when it comes out. Nobody has "stolen" anything from LotusFlow3r, yet... Obviously, when the album comes out, some WILL download it rather than buy it, some will do so because they are angry at Prince and his business practices. Oh, well, this is why good customer relations is a must in any business. I myself will buy any physical release that is available. I will not be buying downloads or paying to join a website. This decision has nothing to do with the current situation at HQ, and everything to do with my past experiences from joining Prince's websites and purchasing downloads from him. Well, of course you're entitled to either purchase or not purchase any music from an artist. If HQ or the Org didn't exist, you would have more than likely heard about the new music from another source I'm sure, as there were many articles about the new site posted on the internet. Secondly, just to let you know, my post doesn't "bash" any Prince fans, it was simply stating what has been going on between Prince fans and their actions with P's music and apparently what most fans know by now, that P apparently doesn't like people downloading his music for free or providing links to download his songs, more than likely unless he decides to allow it to be downloaded for free. But in this internet age, he is not the only artist faced with this problem, I'm sure we all know that by now. Third, Are you kidding me? You state because the songs were streamed in low quality on that radio station, that fans wouldn't find a way to pull it off their for free? Dude, whether those songs were streamed in low quality or not, there are some fans who will take a new Prince song any way they could get it...lol: believe that. I've seen it happen. Also, I didn't make my post to put down any HQ or Org members who are fans of Prince. I happen to be a member of HQ and the Org, but I post more on the org and mostly in their politics and religion section. Not too much on the other forums, and don't post much in HQ at all, for a while. Just saying, it's a two-way street, and I am not talking about all his fans, because he does have a large, and dedicated fan base or most of them wouldn't be on either of these sites, and other sites, discussing and purchasing his music, sharing concert stories, and attending his concerts. Keep in mind, you also have those that demand that P gives them new and more music, while at the same time, publically stating on both of these sites, that they'll find a way to download his music for free, and sometimes states, they do it to get back at him because they don't like something he did. Then you have the so-called fans that b*tch when that artist decides to pull unauthorized links that gives them free access to his music, as though they paid for it. Go figure. It's not like it's a surprise how Prince is with his music, and of course it doesn't mean anyone has to like his actions, that is why we all have the choice of purchasing his music or not. But if you post on a site and announce that you will no longer buy or listen to P's music, then return 6 months later, when something like this recent situation happened with HQ closing, "until further notice," which was a decision of the HQ owner himself, for reasons he chose to close it, then who is going to take your seriously? It's obvious then, that the individual making those same statements or umpteen complaints is still buying/purchasing P's music. Either you buy the music or you don't or you continue to be a fan or don't. Thing is, there'll always be one to replace you. It makes no sense for people to get all twisted over an artist who tries hard to protect his image/rights to his music/hearsay/false information, but in his "fan/fam" world, it's almost impossible. Anyway, thanks for your reply. [Edited 1/31/09 9:33am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: Well, of course you're entitled to either purchase or not purchase any music from an artist. If HQ or the Org didn't exist, you would have more than likely heard about the new music from another source I'm sure, as there were many articles about the new site posted on the internet. Secondly, just to let you know, my post doesn't "bash" any Prince fans, it was simply stating what has been going on between Prince fans and their actions with P's music and apparently what most fans know by now, that P apparently doesn't like people downloading his music for free or providing links to download his songs, more than likely unless he decides to allow it to be downloaded for free. But in this internet age, he is not the only artist faced with this problem, I'm sure we all know that by now. Third, Are you kidding me, whether those songs were on streamed in low quality, some fans will take it anyway they can, believe that, and Lastly, I didn't make my post to put down any HQ or Org members who are fans of Prince. I happen to be a member of HQ and the Org, but I post more on the org and mostly in their politics and religion section. Not too much on the other forums. Just saying, it's a two-way street, and I am not talking about all his fans, because he does have a large, and dedicated fan base or most of them wouldn't be on either of these sites, and other sites, discussing and purchasing his music, sharing concert stories, and attending his concerts, but then you have those that also demand that P gives them new and more music, while at the same time, publically stating on both of these sites, that they'll find a way to download his music for free, to get back at him because they don't like something he did or that he is trying to protect his own material. Then you have the so-called fans that b*tch when that artist decides to pull unauthorized links that gives them free access to his music, as though they paid for it. Go figure. It's not like it's a surprise how Prince is with his music, and of course it doesn't mean anyone has to like his actions, that is why we all have the choice of purchasing his music or not. But if you post on a site and announce that you will no longer buy or listen to P's music, then return 6 months later, when something like this recent situation happened with HQ closing, until further notice, which was a decision of the HQ owner himself, for reasons he chose to do so, then who is going to take your seriously? It's obvious then, that the individual making umpteen complaints is still buying/purchasing P's music, then why come back on these unofficial sites, and repeat the same BS complain over and over again? Either you buy the music or you don't or you continue to be a fan or don't. Thing is, there'll always be one to replace you. It makes no sense for people to get all twisted over an artist who tries hard to protect his image/rights to his music/hearsay/false information, but in his "fan/fam" world, it's almost impossible. I'm not here to accuse you of bashing anybody, in fact of all of your points the only one I addressed is the subject of the songs previewed on the Steve Jones' radio show. I just can't imagine anyone who likes the 4 tracks being satisfied with the existing quality. If you like them, then the hype worked, and you will buy the album. In the meantime, if you downloaded them, you can continue to feed the hype by playing them again and again while you wait for the LP. No different than 20 years ago, recording a new single on the radio or a performance on TV and listening to it over and over hyping yourself for the new album. As a member of HQ I'm positive they did not allow posting of links to these tracks except to post the link to the radio station to hear the original stream live and while it lasted the archive the station provided. No links to copies made and posted were allowed. I have no comment on the rest of your posts, am not bashing you, and am not accusing you of bashing others. I just feel that any sharing of copies of that broadcast helps rather than hurts Prince. I know he disagrees. He's sooooo wrong... Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serena said: macbos said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:
attitude? I tell U something: I spent my hard earned money for records, concerts and whatever exists from Prince & Co. for YEARS (1983-1999) and then Mr. Prince (ab)used MY money to sue UPTOWN... This was the first action against his own fanbase the rest (PFU / Croke Park / Websherrif and... and.. and...) is well known & documented here. I decided to prevent, that he can in the future (ab)use MY money again for actions like this. I indeed paid many many years for his (good and hard) 'work' even when the quality was pretty low (almost everything after the Symbol Album - and btw. Planet Earth isn't worth one single cent) so why should i spend more money for this awful burned out ex-artist? NJET! If someone punches you in the face, expect to get punched back Your justifications are just ridiculous. Like I said, don't spend your money on Prince if you don't want to. But, don't then turn around and steal the merchandise instead. It's stupid to think that because of some perceived slight, that it's then ok to be a thief! Hey, I don't like you Walmart, so I'm gonna steal a TV and be righteous about it! You buy a product, not a person. Just because you've spent $$ on someone's product means they have to do what you want for the rest of their life? You pay for a concert ticket and if the show goes on, Prince owes you NOTHING after you walk out those venue doors. You buy a CD, that's it, you've got your PRODUCT. I agree whole heartedly with your response and being the fam that I am, I shall now go and delete all of Mr Nelson's bootlegs I have on my computer. j/k [Edited 1/31/09 9:53am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
djThunderfunk said: 2elijah said: Well, of course you're entitled to either purchase or not purchase any music from an artist. If HQ or the Org didn't exist, you would have more than likely heard about the new music from another source I'm sure, as there were many articles about the new site posted on the internet. Secondly, just to let you know, my post doesn't "bash" any Prince fans, it was simply stating what has been going on between Prince fans and their actions with P's music and apparently what most fans know by now, that P apparently doesn't like people downloading his music for free or providing links to download his songs, more than likely unless he decides to allow it to be downloaded for free. But in this internet age, he is not the only artist faced with this problem, I'm sure we all know that by now. Third, Are you kidding me, whether those songs were on streamed in low quality, some fans will take it anyway they can, believe that, and Lastly, I didn't make my post to put down any HQ or Org members who are fans of Prince. I happen to be a member of HQ and the Org, but I post more on the org and mostly in their politics and religion section. Not too much on the other forums. Just saying, it's a two-way street, and I am not talking about all his fans, because he does have a large, and dedicated fan base or most of them wouldn't be on either of these sites, and other sites, discussing and purchasing his music, sharing concert stories, and attending his concerts, but then you have those that also demand that P gives them new and more music, while at the same time, publically stating on both of these sites, that they'll find a way to download his music for free, to get back at him because they don't like something he did or that he is trying to protect his own material. Then you have the so-called fans that b*tch when that artist decides to pull unauthorized links that gives them free access to his music, as though they paid for it. Go figure. It's not like it's a surprise how Prince is with his music, and of course it doesn't mean anyone has to like his actions, that is why we all have the choice of purchasing his music or not. But if you post on a site and announce that you will no longer buy or listen to P's music, then return 6 months later, when something like this recent situation happened with HQ closing, until further notice, which was a decision of the HQ owner himself, for reasons he chose to do so, then who is going to take your seriously? It's obvious then, that the individual making umpteen complaints is still buying/purchasing P's music, then why come back on these unofficial sites, and repeat the same BS complain over and over again? Either you buy the music or you don't or you continue to be a fan or don't. Thing is, there'll always be one to replace you. It makes no sense for people to get all twisted over an artist who tries hard to protect his image/rights to his music/hearsay/false information, but in his "fan/fam" world, it's almost impossible. I'm not here to accuse you of bashing anybody, in fact of all of your points the only one I addressed is the subject of the songs previewed on the Steve Jones' radio show. I just can't imagine anyone who likes the 4 tracks being satisfied with the existing quality. If you like them, then the hype worked, and you will buy the album. In the meantime, if you downloaded them, you can continue to feed the hype by playing them again and again while you wait for the LP. No different than 20 years ago, recording a new single on the radio or a performance on TV and listening to it over and over hyping yourself for the new album. As a member of HQ I'm positive they did not allow posting of links to these tracks except to post the link to the radio station to hear the original stream live and while it lasted the archive the station provided. No links to copies made and posted were allowed. I have no comment on the rest of your posts, am not bashing you, and am not accusing you of bashing others. I just feel that any sharing of copies of that broadcast helps rather than hurts Prince. I know he disagrees. He's sooooo wrong... Okay, no problem, your points are well taken, and I also agree with you that, HQ didn't allow any members to post unauthorized links to the new songs as well. The only link that was posted there and here on the Org was in fact from the original stream from that radio show, while it lasted. Nice chatting with you. Peace. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: Okay, no problem, your points are well taken, and I also agree with you that, HQ didn't allow any members to post unauthorized links to the new songs as well. The only link that was posted there and here on the Org was in fact from the original stream from that radio show, while it lasted. Nice chatting with you. Peace. Yes, good chat, Isn't it great when people can discus, agree, disagree, whatever... without getting nasty? Peace to you as well my friend... Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
djThunderfunk said: 2elijah said: Okay, no problem, your points are well taken, and I also agree with you that, HQ didn't allow any members to post unauthorized links to the new songs as well. The only link that was posted there and here on the Org was in fact from the original stream from that radio show, while it lasted. Nice chatting with you. Peace. Yes, good chat, Isn't it great when people can discus, agree, disagree, whatever... without getting nasty? Peace to you as well my friend... True, I'm shocked as well... and thanks again.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: djThunderfunk said: I'm not here to accuse you of bashing anybody, in fact of all of your points the only one I addressed is the subject of the songs previewed on the Steve Jones' radio show. I just can't imagine anyone who likes the 4 tracks being satisfied with the existing quality. If you like them, then the hype worked, and you will buy the album. In the meantime, if you downloaded them, you can continue to feed the hype by playing them again and again while you wait for the LP. No different than 20 years ago, recording a new single on the radio or a performance on TV and listening to it over and over hyping yourself for the new album. As a member of HQ I'm positive they did not allow posting of links to these tracks except to post the link to the radio station to hear the original stream live and while it lasted the archive the station provided. No links to copies made and posted were allowed. I have no comment on the rest of your posts, am not bashing you, and am not accusing you of bashing others. I just feel that any sharing of copies of that broadcast helps rather than hurts Prince. I know he disagrees. He's sooooo wrong... Okay, no problem, your points are well taken, and I also agree with you that, HQ didn't allow any members to post unauthorized links to the new songs as well. The only link that was posted there and here on the Org was in fact from the original stream from that radio show, while it lasted. Nice chatting with you. Peace. Actually there were links to the songs from the radio show here on the org and the moderators took action and deleted those posts. I always thought HQ was much more stricter than the Org. But I think if they did not follow the requests from Prince's camp about bootlegs etc then they needed to be reprimanded. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Serena said: macbos said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:
attitude? I tell U something: I spent my hard earned money for records, concerts and whatever exists from Prince & Co. for YEARS (1983-1999) and then Mr. Prince (ab)used MY money to sue UPTOWN... This was the first action against his own fanbase the rest (PFU / Croke Park / Websherrif and... and.. and...) is well known & documented here. I decided to prevent, that he can in the future (ab)use MY money again for actions like this. I indeed paid many many years for his (good and hard) 'work' even when the quality was pretty low (almost everything after the Symbol Album - and btw. Planet Earth isn't worth one single cent) so why should i spend more money for this awful burned out ex-artist? NJET! If someone punches you in the face, expect to get punched back Your justifications are just ridiculous. Like I said, don't spend your money on Prince if you don't want to. But, don't then turn around and steal the merchandise instead. It's stupid to think that because of some perceived slight, that it's then ok to be a thief! Hey, I don't like you Walmart, so I'm gonna steal a TV and be righteous about it! You buy a product, not a person. Just because you've spent $$ on someone's product means they have to do what you want for the rest of their life? You pay for a concert ticket and if the show goes on, Prince owes you NOTHING after you walk out those venue doors. You buy a CD, that's it, you've got your PRODUCT. Sorry: WHAT? You accuse me to 'steal' Prince's music? Are You serious? Do you really count a legal bought SECONDHAND record as 'stolen'? Then i have to tell you (and i don't want to dis U) that i think your point of view is pretty strong fogged and your paradigm (steal a TV or a GM car) are far-fetched: I can buy a car also secondhand and for the TV i can change the store. And with my method i can do some kind of charity to the secondhand store owner; HE makes the money with me and HE need it sure more than the (any) artist. Your comment Just because you've spent $$ on someone's product means they have to do what you want for the rest of their life? is also a little bit incorrect: Do You know the colloquialism "Don't bite the hand that feeds you"?[Edited 1/31/09 10:01am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: HatrinaHaterwitz said: The thing that gets me is...just because I said I'm nohttp://prince.org/msg/t giving Prince any more of my money, they immediately start in with "If you hate Prince so much...blah, blah, blah..." I've never said anything of the sort. I don't hate Prince, couldn't if I wanted to but I'm sick of his shit! I feel like after 30 years of voluntarily supporting his every whim and giving him my money, I've earned the right...not to...and to say so, as much as I feel like it, damn it! Ok, I'm done cussing...for you! For now! Okay, I'll excuse you this time lady... But seriously though, the guy can't seem to win with some members of HQ or the Org. Is there a time when the members of both sites are not b*tching about wanting more from P? In the past he was nice enough to issue tickets to members of his fan club first, where they had the opportunity to get the best seats before the tickets were opened to the general public. Then when there were passwords given exclusively to members of his club, you still had members here and on HQ giving out the passwords to non-members of his club. Then every time it seems there's news about P putting out new music, you have had members posting false info on the tracks or finding ways to get the music for free, and even admitting publically, they will find a way to download it for free when the release date of P's music comes out. Just recently, he had a radio personality play a few of his new tracks, what do some fans do? They go and download/copy the songs from that site, then post it for other fans to listen to elsewhere. When there are unauthorized sites playing his new songs, people post the links to it, and share it with others. others. Then fans get pissed at Prince because the links are pulled off. Why? It’s his music. If he chooses to give it away for free, then it’s up to him, but if not, the choice is still his. All the above and people wonder why artists get pissed over people stealing their music. Then there was some person who created a “fake” blog with the same name as Prince’s new site, which confused many Prince fans who thought it was “the real deal” (including me, but it turns out it wasn’t an official blog that belonged to Prince), and it took the mods from the Org to notify members that the blog was indeed "fake" and did not belong to P or his camp. Then on that same "fake" blog, someone posted the "so-called" lyrics to a poem called “Lotus Flower”, mislead some fans into thinking those so-called lyrics posted were the actual words to Prince’s song, supposedly with the same name, and it turned out the "so-called" lyrics posted on that blog, by a poster there, actually belonged to a poet who had been dead for years now. (Earlier that day, I googled the name of that poem, because I got suspicious as to how it could be a song, with such long verses attached to it, and found out that the so-called lyrics posted on that fake blog, actually belonged to a poet who had been dead years ago.) Then the person who posted that poem, apparently had the nerve to use someone else’s username from the HQ site, to made it look like that actual member of HQ posted the so-called lyrics to P's song on the fake blog. Now, we have the situation with the banners that was posted on the Housequake site, which apparently Aaron was asked to remove it from P's camp, because the banners created by a fan, that was posted on HQ, was just too similar to P's official banner, which may have caused fans to be confused as to which one was the "official" banner. So now Aaron decides to suddenly close down HQ the day before the anticipated or supposed opening date of P's official site.(because we are still not sure when P's official site was actually scheduled to open) and now you have some members from HQ and the Org blaming P, when they should be directing their anger, questions and concerns about the HQ closing to Aaron, the owner of HQ, who made the conscious decision to close HQ "until further notice" without notifying members of his site in advance first before closing it down, and leaving the members of hQ in thee dust. So I guess you can say, a lot has happened over the past few weeks. Popcorn anyone? [Edited 1/31/09 6:52am] Oh please, I'll bet you dollars to donuts the majority of the recent controversial stuff was deliberately done to get folks talking! By who? I won't say but think of who could possibly benefit from such foolishness. I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: 2elijah said: Okay, no problem, your points are well taken, and I also agree with you that, HQ didn't allow any members to post unauthorized links to the new songs as well. The only link that was posted there and here on the Org was in fact from the original stream from that radio show, while it lasted. Nice chatting with you. Peace. Actually there were links to the songs from the radio show here on the org and the moderators took action and deleted those posts. I always thought HQ was much more stricter than the Org. But I think if they did not follow the requests from Prince's camp about bootlegs etc then they needed to be reprimanded. You are talking about the link to the original online, radio show that the Mods "were apparently allowed" to post on here and HQ, that streamlined the songs and interview from their online radio station for listeners. When that online radio station finally took the link to those songs/interview out of their archives, that link was no longer accessible on the Org or on HQ . You can even ask the Mods here about that. It was a couple of days after that, where there was an "unauthorized link" to the new songs, that showed up in the PM&M forum on the Org, that was posted by an orger here, and that is when the Mods deleted that link. You have to do the research first before posting something that you're unclear about, instead of posting just to posting my dear. [Edited 1/31/09 10:48am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ToraToraDreams said: I'm trying to figure something out.
Housequake seem's to be P's bitch. I mean, they'll do anything he asks. Shut down this, post up that, ban her, ban him, close that. But they're always the ones getting kicked in the ass. The org seem's to be minding its own bid'ness, doing whatever it wants...but it's unscathed (save for the gallery). Am I mistaken? No, you're not! Sadly, over the years I've watched the 'Quake gleefully spread it's legs and take it any and every way P felt like doing it, without so much as kiss on the forehead when all is said and done. (Sorry but that's the best way I can describe it without cussing for 2Elijah's sake. ) The Org over the years has never sought P's approval, so it just doesn't spread for him. Simple as that. I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pplrain said: Actually there were links to the songs from the radio show here on the org and the moderators took action and deleted those posts. I always thought HQ was much more stricter than the Org. But I think if they did not follow the requests from Prince's camp about bootlegs etc then they needed to be reprimanded. Say what?!? HQ maintained very strict rules when discussing boots. Nothing even remotely illegal was allowed. The only thing that was allowed was discussion of the material that is in circulation. This is not enough for Prince's "camp". They would censor any and all discussion of bootlegs. Unfortunately for Prince and his "camp", those of us living in a free society with freedom of speech can and will discuss bootlegs in circulation if we so desire. Banning discussions involving buying, selling, trading, downloading, sharing and any other form of distribution is quite sufficient. And HQ was very strict on this point. According to the info provided by Gav in his post, HQ was not "reprimanded" for not following requests about Boots. If there was a "reprimand", it involved banners. see Gav's post or Ben's editorial for the details. Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
some people cant stand that Prince doesnt need/care to worry about "holding on" to faithless "followers" of him | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
macbos said:[quote] Serena said: Sorry: WHAT? You accuse me to 'steal' Prince's music? Are You serious? Do you really count a legal bought SECONDHAND record as 'stolen'? Then i have to tell you (and i don't want to dis U) that i think your point of view is pretty strong fogged and your paradigm (steal a TV or a GM car) are far-fetched: I can buy a car also secondhand and for the TV i can change the store. And with my method i can do some kind of charity to the secondhand store owner; HE makes the money with me and HE need it sure more than the (any) artist. Your comment Just because you've spent $$ on someone's product means they have to do what you want for the rest of their life? is also a little bit incorrect: Do You know the colloquialism "Don't bite the hand that feeds you"?
[Edited 1/31/09 10:01am] Well you've edited your original comments, but they sure gave the impression, if not stated outright, that you were willing to steal because you didn't think he deserved your money...but you still deserved his product. So, if that's what the 'copying and downloading' refers to (if official releases), then yes, you are stealing. Buying used copies is perfectly ok, then you aren't directly lining his evil pockets. But if you can't honestly say that you haven't gotten more enjoyment out of his music than the money you've put in, then I feel sorry for you. To be able to listen to SOTT and STILL be amazed by it, is certainly worth more than the $20 I paid so long ago. Your colloquialism doesn't mesh with the rest of what you've been saying. You still want his music, but don't want to pay for it. Who's biting who? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mordang said: At least I hope that the information on historic facts, releases, interviews, performances etc, which you could find in such an abundance on HQ wil be saved for the fans/public. HQ is more than a forum, it is a great source of information on anything in Prince's career.
It is by far the best source of information on Prince anywhere on the net. If Aaron has finally had enough then i hope someone else will pick up the baton. Prince, Your hardcore fans are at these place's, if you continue to try and censor our speech then we will leave you to try and win 'Mr general public' over with albums they never even hear about. I know you will never be short of money and will live the life you want to live, but i also believe when you move on from this world you will want to be recognised as one of the greatest musicians/song writers in history and not a complete control freak that constantly attacked the people that enjoy your music. Remember the 'slave' era? yes people look back at that as you being a fool and not as a pioneer. I am looking forward to hearing your new music and like what i've heard so far, i am also one that has enjoyed your recent albums also. I will also run the risk of buying tickets to see you even when it's not 100% sure you will even play them. Good luck with the launch of your website. C/B | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ya but wouldn't we be curious as to why someone wasn't buying prince's products no mo. haha i mean i can imagine someone asking you in a store one day
"Hay are you a prince fan?" "ya! but i dont buy his stuff no mo" "Why is that?" "well thats a long story....." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Chrisebabey said: mordang said: At least I hope that the information on historic facts, releases, interviews, performances etc, which you could find in such an abundance on HQ wil be saved for the fans/public. HQ is more than a forum, it is a great source of information on anything in Prince's career.
It is by far the best source of information on Prince anywhere on the net. If Aaron has finally had enough then i hope someone else will pick up the baton. C/B This is so true, especially after they'd created the new 'reference' structure. There was a lot of work put into all of that, so hopefully Aaron will reconsider. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: purplecam said: You know what? I'm not sad about this at all. In fact, I saw this coming. Things have been going quite bad on that site for quite a while now and I'm not in the least bit surprised. Whether you like the rules or not, Prince doesn't want certain things done on these sites. No, he doesn't own them but if he communicating with the sites, then it shows that he knows enough about them to acknowlegde them, even if it isn't in a way fans would want him to.
Prince asked for a banner that wasn't officially sanctioned to be taken down. Aaron went into a fit and shut down HQ. All he had to do was take the damn thing down and go from there. Or better yet, there were official banners that Prince's camp not only gave HQ, but they were displaying, even though you had to go all the way to the bottom to see it. Why couldn't they have put those banners up top there? I doesn't matter to me, HQ's goose was cooked for a while so for this to happen, it confirmed what I already knew. Maybe if HQ comes back, there'll be different leadership with different mods who'll treat ALL the members with respect. In any event, when is Lotusflow3r going to come on? I'm ready for some new music!!!!! I HOPE TO GOD that you run around in the picture threads and demand that the fans stop posting photos of Prince in appreciation like they do because he doesn't want that either. Hell I wouldn't be opposed to that myself. As much as I love Prince I really don't see the point of 6 or 7 different threads posting the same 30 or so damn pics over and over every week. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'll play it first and tell you what it is later. -Miles Davis- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This thread is mental.
Prince didnt want people to think HQ was official - He sent them pretty official looking banners... It's nothing more than showing he can excercise control. I miss the site already. It opened as one of my homepages, and I checked the site almost daily.Even subscribed to the RSS feed. It was outstanding. The wealth of knowlege was nothing short of awesome, From reviews, collectables, concert info, unreleased material, general bios, the discography all well presented. All that and more, and it was only going to get better.. Then the guy who the site is about decided to get involved... When an artist decideds to get involved with a fan site you'd think it would bring something good. I dont even need to mention the social aspects of the site. Genuine friendships were formed - Actual friendships, whereby people went out of their way to visit and meet each other.I think a some people even found their partners on the quake... thats something. Why cant Prince see what the fansites really are? Rather than just "what it says about me".through his doller signed eyes. There are other sites - for example, this one. Sorry but everyone has their preference of Coke or Pepsi.I seriously hope Arron changes his mind. [Edited 1/31/09 11:52am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |