..do u still feel the same about all that?

I'm glad this gruesome hand thingy is gone...

I trust some of u r the same 1s that r gonna demand concessions on lotuflow3r because u paid a NPGMC membership...

Don't multi post to bump your thread

Oh and here's links for others to read:


http://prince.org/msg/3/262693

http://prince.org/msg/3/253025

luv4u said:

Aww cmon..u made me change the phrasing of the question.. dont blame me sheesh lol

Cmon admit it...some o' y'all a feelin a lil SHEEPISH about the issue now.. baaa baaa


those threads ur directing us 2 dont say much... 'simple agreement between parties'

What does it all mean....?

so what's YOUR position? answer your own question.

Anxiety said:

I never supported the mob mentality of PFU..
Whats urs, c'in as ur 1 o the head honchos?

I C the picture threads r alive n well, sooo some agreement was reached was it?

MrBiGsTuFf said:

i believed there needed to be some dialog and clarification from prince's camp; meanwhile, as usual on the internet, some people got carried away.

i think over the past year, there have been efforts to reverse the alienation his legal bullying spread across the fan sites. i think there's more distance to go, and that 2009 is likely to be an interesting year.

Anxiety said:

Right.. So was there some dialog and clarification from Prince's camp? Do tell..
And what efforts 2 reverse alienation his 'legal bullyin' have been made and by whom, pls clarify..
(I like the use of ur emotive language... 'bullyin' instead of 'rights' btw)

Posting of Prince pics is obviously allowed now, right?

MrBiGsTuFf said:

i told as much as i wanna tell. my "emotive" language paints a picture of how i felt about it at the time, just as i've also spoken my piece about the here and now...which is much more important as far as i'm concerned.

MrBiGsTuFf said:

depends on what the pics are. if they're pics taken by outside sources, such as magazines or wire services, then they're not necessarily prince's property to control.

if the images were created by/for prince, then we enter into different territory in which permission usually becomes an issue.

but this is really more site discussion than anything, and i'm fairly certain that was a direction you wanted to avoid.

Anxiety said:

Ah cmon Anx.. level with me here...
U focus efforts collectively 2 a call 2 arms...and now u wanna keep us in the dark about the outcomes? U wanna sweep it under the rug? cmon..

So if u cant tell me what dialog and/or clarification took place as a moderator of this site (if any) who will? What r the reverse alienation efforts of which u speak?

Am I allowed 2 post copyrighted pictures of Prince here or not?

MrBiGsTuFf said:

i didn't *personally* focus those efforts. if you want a definitive response about what PFU accomplished, you should contact the sitemaster of the .org or the sitemaster of housequake.

and anyway, what are you looking for? proof of some kind of treaty? some official declaration which brought solid closure to the issues? well, you're not gonna find it because it never happened. relations just smoothed and got better over the past year, what can i tell you. it's an ongoing process.

as for the pics of prince, i believe i addressed that in one of the posts above.

and this is looking a whole lot more like a site discussion topic than a thread about the attitudes of people who were PFU supporters.

Anxiety said:

Dont gimme that bulltish Anx... there r dozens of picture threads right here in PM&M.. U dont categorize them as site discussion. I'm talkin about Prince and his MUSIC and his creative control over his own IMAGE(S)..

Can I post pictures from album covers and magazines here legally yes or no?

Anxiety said:

ur full of it

MrBiGsTuFf said:

ok