they can be sent to here at www.mj.com/children/chandlers_inbox.asp

omgosh.. a forum for MJ? .. ban those jokers quick!..

a lot of prince fans dont like MJ..and u no y, cuz MJ is the only who can even be compared 2 prince and hes competition, always has been 2 prince. im a fan of both, and NO there are not too many. I bet if sumone started posting a lot of threads of lets say...Madonna or Justin Timberlake, nobody would complain.

I'll go look

No

Not on the 1st page anyway

i'd say no, there are times when there are just as many madonna, britney or beyoce threads....there are some valid mj threads with subjects that are being discusssed...however, there is an issue with folks creating mj threads to bait mj fans or us mods of the forum and those threads (which tend to be silly in nature or rehashed topics) need to be dealt with...


but the minute we start censoring discussion is the minute the org jumps the shark....


and one last comment, its a bit hard to determine if there is something going on within a forum if you aren't an active member of that forum. dont you all think?

sosgemini said:

Mach said:

i should have been more specific...im only talking about "trend" type questions...like, "are there too many silly threads in gd"...only those who are consistent posters would know the answer.

that is all...namaste.

yes there r 2 many threads about MJ ..go post that bullshit over at his site instead ...

sosgemini said:

I understood hun and was just playin with ya a bit

Blessed Day

Hell yeah! There are way too many. Aren't there sites for MJ just like this one? According to some on this site, MJ has the best fans int he world, so why haven't they started MJ.org??

theres about 5 different MJ fan sites

sosgemini said:

i wouldnt say that.. cause you have alot of 'readers' .. who just choose not to post in silly threads, but see the nonsense.. some who are constantly posting.. dont seem to 'see' the pattern of silliness and they'll keep doing it.... (like the bait threads .. 'do u think Prince can fight?' silly type threads)

Flowerz said:

i meant participants...not necessarily posters. thanks for letting me clarify my position.

sosgemini said:

I actually agree with you on all points.

Threads on his appearance in a magazine (i.e. the thread on Vogue Magazine), new album release details (i.e. the thread on the release of Thriller to celebrate its twenty-fifth anniversary) or discussions on his music and performance (i.e. what songs and albums orgers like and dislike), I think, are perfectly valid, and should not be banned.

However, there are certain orgers who create threads such as "Michael Jackson Syndrome," "Michael Jackson, image complex?" "What if Michael Jackson was again black?" "Another way Michael Jackson is like Elvis Presley" (a thread a moderator closed because it was a race bait), etc. are incredibly irritating.

It seems that these orgers (the same people most of the time) enjoy watching the people who like and dislike Michael Jackson beat a dead horse.

Moreover, there are times when Michael Jackson-related threads go WAY off topic.

I have reported a number of Michael Jackson threads in my frustration (sorry again to the moderators for my excessive reporting). I think if the orgers report inappropriate threads, the number of Michael Jackson threads will diminish.

Another thing: there have been instances when certain orgers bumped a number of the Michael Jackson threads for the sole purpose of bumping Michael Jackson threads. In fact, one of those orgers admitted this in a thread entitled "Christ Almighty when did this become MichaelJackson.org?"
[Edited 9/27/07 20:48pm]

moviestar08 said:

so take that shit over there then ..last i checked this Prince.org not MJ.org

L4OATheOriginal said:

Don't feed the or I won't allow PB & J sammiches in the chat room

luv4u said:

my bad ...

all people have to do is not read it i don't think the issue is that important.

heybaby said:

it is if u c 10 threads unnecessarily perhaps taken up bandwith or if ur searching 4 one thread and u can't find due 2 it's been pushed 2 other pages

L4OATheOriginal said:

its not that big of a deal. how hard is it to scroll up and down? personally i'm not into the michael jackson threads but i still say whatever. i maybe its just me

heybaby said:

i still suggest having one sticky and it can all get dumped there instead of what's happening now or even better yet ..post that crap on a site where pedophiles can roam free

Mach said:

stupid org glitch

L4OATheOriginal said:

MJ deserves a "sticky"??? NO WAY!!
(Prince himself is probably posting the MJ stuff. They're buddies)

xplnyrslf said:

or lumped in2 one thread and leave it at that ..