independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > prince.org site discussion > Posting questions regarding pedophiles and related nature.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 06/27/05 8:54pm

AlienX2050

avatar

Posting questions regarding pedophiles and related nature.

Shouldn't threads like this be deleted?

I've seen this done twice on this site.

Out of all the controversial discussions that take place on the forums...

I just don't see a need to even entertain this sort of shit.

.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 06/27/05 10:06pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

I agree
canada

Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 06/28/05 8:00am

REDBABY

avatar

Whats related nature? confuse
if sexy was a colour it would be red batting eyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 06/28/05 9:37am

sosgemini

avatar

its a topic....as long as we arent offering information to hook adults up with kids i dont see the harm in talking about it.....


care to expand on why you find discussing the subject so offensive? (well, beyond the perverse and illegal nature of it..)


and keep in mind that we would have to then delete all mj and r kelly threads...


wink
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 06/28/05 11:55am

p0procks

by deleting the thread doesn't delete the problem...

education, debate and discussion on certain subjects are needed to raise awareness.

"normal" healthy adults don't do around abusing children so it is unlikely any threads would "turn" people into child abusers and i think any mods would happily remove any pro-child abuse material (not that i think anyone would post such ideas)


it's the taboos around such subjects that stop people reporting incidents of abuse.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 06/28/05 9:29pm

AlienX2050

avatar

sosgemini said:

its a topic....as long as we arent offering information to hook adults up with kids i dont see the harm in talking about it.....


care to expand on why you find discussing the subject so offensive? (well, beyond the perverse and illegal nature of it..)


and keep in mind that we would have to then delete all mj and r kelly threads...


wink


hmmm Trying to see how to explain it.

Speaking of MJ and R Kelly threads are different I think...Maybe I'm seeing it differently. hmmm

Example...There was a thread a while ago. And this person posted pictures of a girl that was every bit of the 13-14 yrs old.

I doubt very seriously she was 17-18.

The orger asked if he was a pedophile for being attracted to girls as such. As I recalled, there were pictures posted of girls in their undies or maybe showing a small portion of their undies. It was threading that line of pornography and modeling and kids.

Doesn't matter, these were kids in the pictures. It was questionably risky, maybe to some orgers and maybe not to others.

Another thread that was posted yesterday. This thread was deleted. There was a question posed...An orger described his cousin, a man who shows a 14 young old and a 16 year old pornography. He then went into asking do we think his cousin is a pedophile.

You know as I type this, I'm thinking that you can't stop people from doing stupid shit like this.

What's my point? hmmm I'm not sure. I guess I wish I had control over people posting shit like that but I don't.


Sooooo...nevermind.
confused

..
[Edited 6/28/05 21:38pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 06/28/05 9:37pm

sosgemini

avatar

AlienX2050 said:

sosgemini said:

its a topic....as long as we arent offering information to hook adults up with kids i dont see the harm in talking about it.....


care to expand on why you find discussing the subject so offensive? (well, beyond the perverse and illegal nature of it..)


and keep in mind that we would have to then delete all mj and r kelly threads...


wink


hmmm Trying to see how to explain it.

Speaking of MJ and R Kelly threads are different I think...Maybe I'm seeing it differently. hmmm

Example...There was someone who posted pictures of a girl that was every bit of the 13-14 yrs old.

I doubt very seriously she was 17-18.

This person was asking if he was a pedophile for being attracted to girls as such. As I recalled, there were pictures posted of girls showing their undies...It was threading that line of pornography and modeling and kids.

Doesn't matter, these were kids in pictures that were questionably risky, maybe to some orgers and maybe not to others.

Another thread that was posted yesterday. This thread was deleted. There was a question posed...An orger described his cousin, a man who shows a 14 young old and a 16 year old pornography. He then went into asking do we think his cousin is a pedophile.

You know as I type this, I'm thinking that you can't stop people from doing stupid shit like this.

What's my point? hmmm I'm not sure. I guess I wish I had control over people posting shit like that but I don't.


Sooooo...nevermind.
confused

..
[Edited 6/28/05 21:34pm]



interesting...if someone is posting pictures and posing questions i would consider that "trolling" and would probably close up the thread....its obvious the person doesnt have an interest in having a serious discussion on the topic....


i assumed you were talking abou legitimate threads discussing the topic...

wink
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 06/28/05 9:40pm

AlienX2050

avatar

sosgemini said:

AlienX2050 said:



hmmm Trying to see how to explain it.

Speaking of MJ and R Kelly threads are different I think...Maybe I'm seeing it differently. hmmm

Example...There was someone who posted pictures of a girl that was every bit of the 13-14 yrs old.

I doubt very seriously she was 17-18.

This person was asking if he was a pedophile for being attracted to girls as such. As I recalled, there were pictures posted of girls showing their undies...It was threading that line of pornography and modeling and kids.

Doesn't matter, these were kids in pictures that were questionably risky, maybe to some orgers and maybe not to others.

Another thread that was posted yesterday. This thread was deleted. There was a question posed...An orger described his cousin, a man who shows a 14 young old and a 16 year old pornography. He then went into asking do we think his cousin is a pedophile.

You know as I type this, I'm thinking that you can't stop people from doing stupid shit like this.

What's my point? hmmm I'm not sure. I guess I wish I had control over people posting shit like that but I don't.


Sooooo...nevermind.
confused

..
[Edited 6/28/05 21:34pm]



interesting...if someone is posting pictures and posing questions i would consider that "trolling" and would probably close up the thread....its obvious the person doesnt have an interest in having a serious discussion on the topic....


i assumed you were talking abou legitimate threads discussing the topic...

wink


I guess it's all in how a person views the thread.

Honestly, I'm thinking there's no reason to bother about this because people will post what they want.

I'm not gonna save the world by complaining about this on the internet.
confused
...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 06/29/05 12:02am

Dewrede

avatar

AlienX2050 said:

sosgemini said:

its a topic....as long as we arent offering information to hook adults up with kids i dont see the harm in talking about it.....


care to expand on why you find discussing the subject so offensive? (well, beyond the perverse and illegal nature of it..)


and keep in mind that we would have to then delete all mj and r kelly threads...


wink


hmmm Trying to see how to explain it.

Speaking of MJ and R Kelly threads are different I think...Maybe I'm seeing it differently. hmmm

Example...There was a thread a while ago. And this person posted pictures of a girl that was every bit of the 13-14 yrs old.

I doubt very seriously she was 17-18.

The orger asked if he was a pedophile for being attracted to girls as such. As I recalled, there were pictures posted of girls in their undies or maybe showing a small portion of their undies. It was threading that line of pornography and modeling and kids.

Doesn't matter, these were kids in the pictures. It was questionably risky, maybe to some orgers and maybe not to others.

Another thread that was posted yesterday. This thread was deleted. There was a question posed...An orger described his cousin, a man who shows a 14 young old and a 16 year old pornography. He then went into asking do we think his cousin is a pedophile.

You know as I type this, I'm thinking that you can't stop people from doing stupid shit like this.

What's my point? hmmm I'm not sure. I guess I wish I had control over people posting shit like that but I don't.


Sooooo...nevermind.
confused

..
[Edited 6/28/05 21:38pm]





The thread you refered to first included no underage pictures at all !
The other thread you refered to wasn't started by a pedophile , or anything !
On the contrary ; the person who started that thread was thinking somebody he
knew is a pedophile and that worried him !
He merely wanted advice and/or other people's opinions !
[Edited 6/29/05 7:32am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 06/29/05 1:25am

Teacher

Most folks know by now that I strongly agree, I can't see the need to discuss sick shit like this on a site that doesn't / shouldn't have this sort of topics as their main focus. I wish Ben would see it's hurting people's opinions of the site, and it's credibility in the Prince community... if it's at all possible to sink any lower.
This has NOTHING to do with whether it's illegal or not, it's a sense of propriety and normalcy that make me want to ban this crap from the site. I'm not saying I'm normal, I'm just saying that perverted shit should be banned from existing on a website that makes a play at being well behaved. It's all pretense though sigh


twocents
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 06/29/05 2:21am

sosgemini

avatar

Teacher said:

Most folks know by now that I strongly agree, I can't see the need to discuss sick shit like this on a site that doesn't / shouldn't have this sort of topics as their main focus. I wish Ben would see it's hurting people's opinions of the site, and it's credibility in the Prince community... if it's at all possible to sink any lower.
This has NOTHING to do with whether it's illegal or not, it's a sense of propriety and normalcy that make me want to ban this crap from the site. I'm not saying I'm normal, I'm just saying that perverted shit should be banned from existing on a website that makes a play at being well behaved. It's all pretense though sigh


twocents



a line has to be drawn somewhere, to that i agree....but this site is dedicated to an artist that once sung about insist.....
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 06/29/05 2:27am

Dewrede

avatar

Dewrede said:[quote]AlienX2050 said:

lotsa nonsense



Hey , apparently you people didn't see my reply so i'm gonna have to quote myself again ! disbelief ;


The thread you refered to first included no underage pictures at all !
The other thread you refered to wasn't started by a pedophile , or anything !
On the contrary ; the person who started that thread was thinking somebody he
knew is a pedophile and that worried him !
He merely wanted advice and/or other people's opinions !
[Edited 6/29/05 0:03am]

[Edited 6/29/05 7:32am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 06/29/05 6:42am

TheFrog

Absolutely should not be banned unless it's inciting paedophilic behaviour.

The thread referred to with pictures of a girl - there was nothing to suggest that she was underage at all.

What that thread was trying to do (and it generated some good debate) was initiate a discussion on whether people felt guilty for finding younger girls attractive, in the sense that the law draws a relatively arbitrary line in the sand, and says, "don't cross it". In the UK it's 16, in some other European countries it's lower, and in other countries worldwide, it's older. The issue as I read it, was stimulated by that - there was a girl who may have been 19, or may have been 15. Had she been 15 years and 364 days old in the UK, it's paedophilic to want to have sex with her. Had she been 16 years and 1 day old in the UK, it's not paedophilic - or IS it indicative of paedophilic tendencies nevertheless? How about if she's actually 19 but she looks to many as if she's only 15?

I thought that was a great thread, and would have been horrified if it had been locked.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 06/29/05 7:31am

Dewrede

avatar

nod exactly
[Edited 6/29/05 7:31am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 06/29/05 7:32am

sosgemini

avatar

where was this thread located? in gd? i dont recall seeing anything like this in p&r...

i've noticed a slight increase in the amount of p&r threads that stay in GD.....i know a lot of folks dont like the p&r forum but theres a reason its there....touchy subjects insight emotional responces...
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 06/29/05 7:34am

Dewrede

avatar

The thread that's supposed to have pictures of underage girls
(which it didn't) was posted about 2/3 months ago , the other one a few days ago

they were both in 'gd'
[Edited 6/29/05 7:35am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 06/30/05 1:24am

Teacher

sosgemini said:

Teacher said:

Most folks know by now that I strongly agree, I can't see the need to discuss sick shit like this on a site that doesn't / shouldn't have this sort of topics as their main focus. I wish Ben would see it's hurting people's opinions of the site, and it's credibility in the Prince community... if it's at all possible to sink any lower.
This has NOTHING to do with whether it's illegal or not, it's a sense of propriety and normalcy that make me want to ban this crap from the site. I'm not saying I'm normal, I'm just saying that perverted shit should be banned from existing on a website that makes a play at being well behaved. It's all pretense though sigh


twocents



a line has to be drawn somewhere, to that i agree....but this site is dedicated to an artist that once sung about insist.....


Wait just a minute...sounds an awful lot like you're suggesting we as appreciators of Prince's music should condone and even appreciate whatever Prince has ever sung about. I'll never do either of those things concerning incest or believing in Jehovah.

I know that's not what you're saying, but be careful with your rhetoric.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 06/30/05 3:10am

EarthAirFireWa
ter

p0procks said:

by deleting the thread doesn't delete the problem...

education, debate and discussion on certain subjects are needed to raise awareness.

"normal" healthy adults don't do around abusing children so it is unlikely any threads would "turn" people into child abusers and i think any mods would happily remove any pro-child abuse material (not that i think anyone would post such ideas)


it's the taboos around such subjects that stop people reporting incidents of abuse.


nod clapping
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 06/30/05 8:43am

sosgemini

avatar

Teacher said:

sosgemini said:




a line has to be drawn somewhere, to that i agree....but this site is dedicated to an artist that once sung about insist.....


Wait just a minute...sounds an awful lot like you're suggesting we as appreciators of Prince's music should condone and even appreciate whatever Prince has ever sung about. I'll never do either of those things concerning incest or believing in Jehovah.

I know that's not what you're saying, but be careful with your rhetoric.



tolerate.....tolerate....not appreciate....


big difference there....
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 06/30/05 9:54am

AlienX2050

avatar

Teacher said:

Most folks know by now that I strongly agree, I can't see the need to discuss sick shit like this on a site that doesn't / shouldn't have this sort of topics as their main focus. I wish Ben would see it's hurting people's opinions of the site, and it's credibility in the Prince community... if it's at all possible to sink any lower.
This has NOTHING to do with whether it's illegal or not, it's a sense of propriety and normalcy that make me want to ban this crap from the site. I'm not saying I'm normal, I'm just saying that perverted shit should be banned from existing on a website that makes a play at being well behaved. It's all pretense though sigh


twocents


You're so right. I'm starting to see that a lot of Prince fans are just up in the fucking air about anything.

I can't get down like that.

I'm upset at this because I've been a part of community that sort of thinks it's okay to discuss this sort of shit...dealing with kids.

The line is drawn right there. Why should I even expose myself to this subject when there's no right ends about it.

People accepted Prince fucking with Mayte before she was of age....and I guess people thought that was sexy.

hmmm

Oh well....still, it's like what's the point. People are who they are here.

..
[Edited 6/30/05 9:56am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 06/30/05 9:55am

AlienX2050

avatar

EarthAirFireWater said:

p0procks said:

by deleting the thread doesn't delete the problem...

education, debate and discussion on certain subjects are needed to raise awareness.

"normal" healthy adults don't do around abusing children so it is unlikely any threads would "turn" people into child abusers and i think any mods would happily remove any pro-child abuse material (not that i think anyone would post such ideas)


it's the taboos around such subjects that stop people reporting incidents of abuse.


nod clapping


So this subject is a taboo?

hmmm

Taboos concerns right and wrong.

There's no right in pedophile related shit.
..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 06/30/05 10:01am

sosgemini

avatar

AlienX2050 said:

Teacher said:

Most folks know by now that I strongly agree, I can't see the need to discuss sick shit like this on a site that doesn't / shouldn't have this sort of topics as their main focus. I wish Ben would see it's hurting people's opinions of the site, and it's credibility in the Prince community... if it's at all possible to sink any lower.
This has NOTHING to do with whether it's illegal or not, it's a sense of propriety and normalcy that make me want to ban this crap from the site. I'm not saying I'm normal, I'm just saying that perverted shit should be banned from existing on a website that makes a play at being well behaved. It's all pretense though sigh


twocents


You're so right. I'm starting to see that a lot of Prince fans are just up in the fucking air about anything.

I can't get down like that.

I'm upset at this because I've been a part of community that sort of thinks it's okay to discuss this sort of shit...dealing with kids.

The line is drawn right there. Why should I even expose myself to this subject when there's no right ends about it.

People accepted Prince fucking with Mayte before she was of age....and I guess people thought that was sexy.

hmmm

Oh well....still, it's like what's the point. People are who they are here.

..
[Edited 6/30/05 9:56am]


wait a minute...you dont have to subject yourself to the subject..read the headline and move on....

and nobody is claiming or accepting that prince slept with mayte...somethings fishy about your posts....im gonna have to check out the mod portal and find out who your other accounts are..

hmm
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 06/30/05 10:33am

AlienX2050

avatar

sosgemini said:

AlienX2050 said:



You're so right. I'm starting to see that a lot of Prince fans are just up in the fucking air about anything.

I can't get down like that.

I'm upset at this because I've been a part of community that sort of thinks it's okay to discuss this sort of shit...dealing with kids.

The line is drawn right there. Why should I even expose myself to this subject when there's no right ends about it.

People accepted Prince fucking with Mayte before she was of age....and I guess people thought that was sexy.

hmmm

Oh well....still, it's like what's the point. People are who they are here.

..
[Edited 6/30/05 9:56am]


wait a minute...you dont have to subject yourself to the subject..read the headline and move on....

and nobody is claiming or accepting that prince slept with mayte...somethings fishy about your posts....im gonna have to check out the mod portal and find out who your other accounts are..

hmm


I could careless what you look into...lol

Do your thing....

You accept what you accept.

...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 06/30/05 12:00pm

Teacher

sosgemini said:

Teacher said:



Wait just a minute...sounds an awful lot like you're suggesting we as appreciators of Prince's music should condone and even appreciate whatever Prince has ever sung about. I'll never do either of those things concerning incest or believing in Jehovah.

I know that's not what you're saying, but be careful with your rhetoric.



tolerate.....tolerate....not appreciate....


big difference there....



I should tolerate incest because Prince sang about it? HELL NO! shake If you think like that, I suggest you... I don't know what I'd suggest for that problem, but it's serious.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 06/30/05 12:23pm

sosgemini

avatar

Teacher said:

sosgemini said:




tolerate.....tolerate....not appreciate....


big difference there....



I should tolerate incest because Prince sang about it? HELL NO! shake If you think like that, I suggest you... I don't know what I'd suggest for that problem, but it's serious.



no...who here has posted pictures of incest? who here has posted stories about their personal involvement with incest? who here has encouraged incest?

but tolerating the "discussion" (not the act itself) of incest is healthy for us...would you rather ignore it all together?keep it hush hush like in the 50's and 60's? and let people get away with it?

or would you have people discuss why its wrong and the punishment for it and why its important for victims to speak up...

those are your options..whats it gonna be?
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 06/30/05 1:34pm

Teacher

sosgemini said:

Teacher said:




I should tolerate incest because Prince sang about it? HELL NO! shake If you think like that, I suggest you... I don't know what I'd suggest for that problem, but it's serious.



no...who here has posted pictures of incest? who here has posted stories about their personal involvement with incest? who here has encouraged incest?

but tolerating the "discussion" (not the act itself) of incest is healthy for us...would you rather ignore it all together?keep it hush hush like in the 50's and 60's? and let people get away with it?

or would you have people discuss why its wrong and the punishment for it and why its important for victims to speak up...

those are your options..whats it gonna be?



It's gonna be the same as it ever was... ban the shit from this site, it doesn't belong here. End of my discussion. twocents
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 06/30/05 2:15pm

lilgish

avatar

AlienX2050 said:

sosgemini said:

its a topic....as long as we arent offering information to hook adults up with kids i dont see the harm in talking about it.....


care to expand on why you find discussing the subject so offensive? (well, beyond the perverse and illegal nature of it..)


and keep in mind that we would have to then delete all mj and r kelly threads...


wink


hmmm Trying to see how to explain it.

Speaking of MJ and R Kelly threads are different I think...Maybe I'm seeing it differently. hmmm

Example...There was a thread a while ago. And this person posted pictures of a girl that was every bit of the 13-14 yrs old.

I doubt very seriously she was 17-18.

The orger asked if he was a pedophile for being attracted to girls as such. As I recalled, there were pictures posted of girls in their undies or maybe showing a small portion of their undies. It was threading that line of pornography and modeling and kids.

Doesn't matter, these were kids in the pictures. It was questionably risky, maybe to some orgers and maybe not to others.




That was just thesexofit being stupid falloff he's was joking, plus he's like 20/21 years old. He was joking, everyone who knows thesexofit knows his humor.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 07/01/05 11:39am

GrayKing

avatar

AlienX2050 said:


hmmm Trying to see how to explain it.

Speaking of MJ and R Kelly threads are different I think...Maybe I'm seeing it differently. hmmm

Example...There was a thread a while ago. And this person posted pictures of a girl that was every bit of the 13-14 yrs old.

I doubt very seriously she was 17-18.

The orger asked if he was a pedophile for being attracted to girls as such. As I recalled, there were pictures posted of girls in their undies or maybe showing a small portion of their undies.



all you have to do is walk down the street to see a portion of a 14 year old girl's underwear these days.
"Awards are like hemorrhoids. Sooner or later, every asshole gets one."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 07/01/05 11:41am

GrayKing

avatar

Teacher said:

sosgemini said:




no...who here has posted pictures of incest? who here has posted stories about their personal involvement with incest? who here has encouraged incest?

but tolerating the "discussion" (not the act itself) of incest is healthy for us...would you rather ignore it all together?keep it hush hush like in the 50's and 60's? and let people get away with it?

or would you have people discuss why its wrong and the punishment for it and why its important for victims to speak up...

those are your options..whats it gonna be?




It's gonna be the same as it ever was... ban the shit from this site, it doesn't belong here. End of my discussion. twocents



Teacher has issued her Royal Proclamation. All must obey rolleyes
"Awards are like hemorrhoids. Sooner or later, every asshole gets one."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 07/01/05 11:44am

Universaluv

So basically by its own definition this thread should be deleted.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > prince.org site discussion > Posting questions regarding pedophiles and related nature.