dont walk, run to your nearest psychiatrist and get help.

Duhhh ??

Fhunkin said:

read faiths post on the npgmc, its a riot

I assumed it was a piss-take.
Either that or she's 6 years old.

Isn't Faith also a member of this site?

Boy... if you follow her posts, she's kinda scary herself. I think I'm going to call the police... I think she may come after us all and hurt us

2the9s said:

I think she said she doesn't post here anymore.

Wotta freakshow.

Ahh, I see !!

Not worth the attention ?

kendogg said:

She's gonna send each one of us an explosive sanddollar

IstenSzek said:

...laced with Anthrax

Then she's gonna sue George Michael for using her name in a song.

Yeah, and she's gonna hand deliver each one in a wheelchair, so when they explode with the Anthrax in our faces, she can claim that we were abusing a poor little disabled woman.

Faith and her dopplegangers.

Yes IM going to sue Faith for emotional distress. My lawyer said that I could sue her for millions because her posts might have hurt my feelings. Also IM going to sue NPGMC and force them to close the site because she is a member; and finally IM going to sue everyone in the world who uses the internet because they have access to the NPGMC where they can view her posts. Did I miss anything???

This is what I found out about this matter at:

http://www.cyber-stalking...alking.htm

This is what I read:

In my view, what distinguishes "cyberstalking" from "cyberharassment," is the combination of the pursuit and fear or harm aspects: the cyberstalker follows the individual around the Internet (e.g., reading and/or posting to usenet groups the individual frequents, using web sites to research and obtain personal information about the individual's online and offline life, looking for the individual in chat rooms, or repeatedly posting about the person, etc.) -- and as a result of the pursuit aspect as much as (or as well as) the content of any missives or statements, the individual experiences fear, some sense of dread, or actual harm. Making someone's life "miserable" by posting nasty untrue things about them may be harassment and may be actionable legally, but if the victim experiences fear or dread for their personal safety or if their safety or mental health is actually endangered, then it goes beyond "harassment" and falls under "cyberstalking," in my opinion.
[This message was edited Thu Jan 22 18:17:02 PST 2004 by Gus]
[This message was edited Thu Jan 22 18:17:40 PST 2004 by Gus]

*rollin up m'sleeves...*

Gus said:

messages/quotes from a mere messageboard are not "personal information" about one's "online and offline life". if you were to post actual personal info about yourself and someone were to see that, gather it up and use that against you, then you'd have a point--but, people only posted an opinion you made, not anything from the above. your cut n'paste testimonial is moot. besides, the people here are not gonna harm you in any way--sticks and stones may break your bones, but words (especially on a computer screen!) should never hurt you.

it's not your opinion, it's someone else's. you may agree with that opinion but that still doesn't make it yours. and with all the stuff you've said about using your posts/commentary without permission and having them "copyrighted"...like the stuff you've copied n'pasted isn't copyrighted? you seen that bit at the bottom of the website:

© Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003 ~ All rights reserved ~ http://www.cyber-stalking.net

gus, if what you believe about copyrighting one's words from websites, forums, etc. holds true to you...what in the world are you doing with someone else's words from another website? think about it.

in the immortal words of you-know-who, "i'm not saying this just 2 be nasty..." i mean no ill-will in all the above i've said. i'm merely pointing things out to ya, so don't get pissed off at me.

you gots to ...seriously.



mine!

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

I think someone is very confused. You think I'm the person you all are talking about. Now that's funny. Did someone actual gather up personal info about me? If they did then they are very confused about what they found and read about me. Her name is clearly posted for everyone to read. I would say that's gathering up information about the person and using that information to make her concerned about prince.org and it's members. I just passed on some information that I read. Take or leave it I don't care. But, don't come after me just because you don't like her. I'm a BIG FAT MAN that will sit on you. I'm sure you would like that. By the way I'm not even a member of the NPGMC. I don't think I would like it over there. I'm begining to think I won't like it here. This was not a very frendly welcome I got.

i just realized you will now think i'm related to faith some how. i'm not. i don't know her. i don't even like females. well i like my mother. but, that's as close as i want to get to any female ever again.

Gus said:

Suga, leave while you can. Nobody likes it here, it's not friendly, but it's like heroin. I've got purple and grey needle tracks. . .the day I die I'll be like, "don't turn off the juice yet, I need to check my orgnotes one more time". . .RUN!

Gus, I don't think anyone thinks you're the person in question. Dansa was just trying to make a point. Please don't sit on her. Please don't sit on me. If I were a big fat man, I promise I would not sit on you. Welcome to the Org.

Gus said:

uhhh, you are the same person. i am one of the mods here and i handled several of the requests you made for theblueangel to stop copying/pasting your quotes from the club.

sayin one's username isn't personal information. it identifies who you are online, your alias. nothing more.

whatevs.

1) if you don't like it here, why do you keep coming back to defend yourself? yes, this place ain't for everybody but still...if you don't like it here it may be in your best interest not to log on here anymore. plain and simple.

2) as for your "very frendly (sic)" comment--i dunno if that was directed towards the comment that i made. i was being as respectful towards you as i can be, i ain't bein mean.

MelissaC said:

psst! i scored another bunch of org for ya...c'mere and shoot it up, it's good shit!

Gus, it can be a friendly place here. True, people can be intolerant of newbies (I was one not long ago), but if you stay around you should be embraced.

And I agree with handclaps, don't take ish so personally. Remember : we are all safe behind our 's. It is totally anonymous, it's an *escape* from the real world. So just enjoy it and relax, say what ya want, people should respect you for it.

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

That is the first time I ever saw a mod shut it down like that! ROTFL! High five! LOLOL

I just wanna see this faith/gus person seriously take this to court instead of blowing hot air.

Lets see he/she/it on Judge Judy..."I'm suing because someone made fun of me on a message board and cut and paste some sentences I wrote"...

I'll make the popcorn...

Tom said:

judge judy would be done with this case in about 30 seconds.

"case dismissed. goodbye!"

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

Very pleased to see you expose this liar. Bravo.

Maybe Faith made a mistake by making this a legal issue, but her point is pretty simple: she is asking that people stop quoting her only to ridicule her and that they stop bothering her.

That seems like a pretty reasonable request to me.

Wait. So Faith is Gus?

Why do I feel like I'm watching a bad episode of Scooby Doo?