New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
Quality DVD..... Goodmorning 2 all of U...
Everybody is talking about the quality of the Vegas DVD. There are some things that can make the quality very bad on your dvd. 1: If you life in Europe and you have a NTSC copy from the club you must know that your dvd-player AND tv must be compatible with NTSC. Otherwise the quality is very bad.(I bought the PAL version and the quality is not good but better dan NTSC (they call it by joke "Never Twice Same Colour") 2:After watching the PAL version there were some things that i noticed... The whole concert is recorded on (i guess 5) Sony PD150 DV camera's, these camera's are good for normal recording but not for dynamic concerts like Vegas. These camera's have an autofocus (and the have used it), but it works slow...Each camera recorded on there own tape so to make a dvd like this u have to cut the tapes...(there was not a director who could give directions to the cameramen). During cutting the concert you can see that there are something not right. In the intro were the bandmembers are introduced the picture has been freezed. No problem but when you do not use the "de-interlace"you see that the picture will flickers. (some parts the used de-interlace" but some they dind't.On someparts the used filters to make it dynamic but on some parts the forgott it. This can be done on purpess, but i think (that's my prof. look on it, and personal meaning) when you use it on one part, use it on the whole concert. 3: to place a concert (80 minutes) on a dvd you have to use a DVD6... i guest they have put it on a DVD5 and reduced the bitrate so the quality is lower. Don't misunderstand me: I love the concert, great performance of each bandmember and ofcourse The man himself. But my professional eye (i'm a director and used to cut movies, concert's) had to say this...) Again the concert is great and i guess i will play it a lot... C U... | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Thanks for your professional, technical review of the DVD. It's very interesting.. please let us know if you notice anything else. Life it ain't real funky unless you got that orgPop. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
newena2001 said: Goodmorning 2 all of U...
Everybody is talking about the quality of the Vegas DVD. There are some things that can make the quality very bad on your dvd. 1: If you life in Europe and you have a NTSC copy from the club you must know that your dvd-player AND tv must be compatible with NTSC. Otherwise the quality is very bad.(I bought the PAL version and the quality is not good but better dan NTSC (they call it by joke "Never Twice Same Colour") 2:After watching the PAL version there were some things that i noticed... The whole concert is recorded on (i guess 5) Sony PD150 DV camera's, these camera's are good for normal recording but not for dynamic concerts like Vegas. These camera's have an autofocus (and the have used it), but it works slow...Each camera recorded on there own tape so to make a dvd like this u have to cut the tapes...(there was not a director who could give directions to the cameramen). During cutting the concert you can see that there are something not right. In the intro were the bandmembers are introduced the picture has been freezed. No problem but when you do not use the "de-interlace"you see that the picture will flickers. (some parts the used de-interlace" but some they dind't.On someparts the used filters to make it dynamic but on some parts the forgott it. This can be done on purpess, but i think (that's my prof. look on it, and personal meaning) when you use it on one part, use it on the whole concert. 3: to place a concert (80 minutes) on a dvd you have to use a DVD6... i guest they have put it on a DVD5 and reduced the bitrate so the quality is lower. Don't misunderstand me: I love the concert, great performance of each bandmember and ofcourse The man himself. But my professional eye (i'm a director and used to cut movies, concert's) had to say this...) Again the concert is great and i guess i will play it a lot... C U... Christ, who has nothing else to dso other than sit and analyze a simple concert DVD to this extent? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sabaisabai said: Thanks for your professional, technical review of the DVD. It's very interesting.. please let us know if you notice anything else.
you must be kidding | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Its all techno mumbojumbo to me too...but I know where you are coming from.
My copy of teh DVD is fairly poor qulaity (infact teh medium quality downloads are better) and its ahrd to see sometimes because teh stage lighting just makes Princes face appear liek a big spodge and,as mentioned, teh focus is crazy. But im still loving the gig and, as I discovered after returning my DVD to HMV 3 times, there appears to be changes in quality between the discs - maybe a bad batch??? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LaMont said: newena2001 said: Goodmorning 2 all of U...
Everybody is talking about the quality of the Vegas DVD. There are some things that can make the quality very bad on your dvd. 1: If you life in Europe and you have a NTSC copy from the club you must know that your dvd-player AND tv must be compatible with NTSC. Otherwise the quality is very bad.(I bought the PAL version and the quality is not good but better dan NTSC (they call it by joke "Never Twice Same Colour") 2:After watching the PAL version there were some things that i noticed... The whole concert is recorded on (i guess 5) Sony PD150 DV camera's, these camera's are good for normal recording but not for dynamic concerts like Vegas. These camera's have an autofocus (and the have used it), but it works slow...Each camera recorded on there own tape so to make a dvd like this u have to cut the tapes...(there was not a director who could give directions to the cameramen). During cutting the concert you can see that there are something not right. In the intro were the bandmembers are introduced the picture has been freezed. No problem but when you do not use the "de-interlace"you see that the picture will flickers. (some parts the used de-interlace" but some they dind't.On someparts the used filters to make it dynamic but on some parts the forgott it. This can be done on purpess, but i think (that's my prof. look on it, and personal meaning) when you use it on one part, use it on the whole concert. 3: to place a concert (80 minutes) on a dvd you have to use a DVD6... i guest they have put it on a DVD5 and reduced the bitrate so the quality is lower. Don't misunderstand me: I love the concert, great performance of each bandmember and ofcourse The man himself. But my professional eye (i'm a director and used to cut movies, concert's) had to say this...) Again the concert is great and i guess i will play it a lot... C U... Christ, who has nothing else to dso other than sit and analyze a simple concert DVD to this extent? How many fucking threads have you started talking about great Prince is lately? You would think you would have better things to do with your time. Oh wait, you don't as Prince is your God. How much time did you spend with this thread? I'm guessing more time then the poster spent with this thread. http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59882 Or with these all created in the last two weeks: http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59769 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59573 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59972 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59831 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59767 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59279 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59129 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59829 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59707 Or the countless threads where you have gushed over how great Prince is and how stupid everyone is who is disatisified with the club or whatever. This thread is actually quite interesting and you were just being your usually asshole self. I will sit back and wait for your response which I am sure will be something clever about my mother or whatever 
. [This message was edited Wed Sep 3 14:20:40 PDT 2003 by lovemachine] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LaMont said: newena2001 said: Goodmorning 2 all of U...
Everybody is talking about the quality of the Vegas DVD. There are some things that can make the quality very bad on your dvd. 1: If you life in Europe and you have a NTSC copy from the club you must know that your dvd-player AND tv must be compatible with NTSC. Otherwise the quality is very bad.(I bought the PAL version and the quality is not good but better dan NTSC (they call it by joke "Never Twice Same Colour") 2:After watching the PAL version there were some things that i noticed... The whole concert is recorded on (i guess 5) Sony PD150 DV camera's, these camera's are good for normal recording but not for dynamic concerts like Vegas. These camera's have an autofocus (and the have used it), but it works slow...Each camera recorded on there own tape so to make a dvd like this u have to cut the tapes...(there was not a director who could give directions to the cameramen). During cutting the concert you can see that there are something not right. In the intro were the bandmembers are introduced the picture has been freezed. No problem but when you do not use the "de-interlace"you see that the picture will flickers. (some parts the used de-interlace" but some they dind't.On someparts the used filters to make it dynamic but on some parts the forgott it. This can be done on purpess, but i think (that's my prof. look on it, and personal meaning) when you use it on one part, use it on the whole concert. 3: to place a concert (80 minutes) on a dvd you have to use a DVD6... i guest they have put it on a DVD5 and reduced the bitrate so the quality is lower. Don't misunderstand me: I love the concert, great performance of each bandmember and ofcourse The man himself. But my professional eye (i'm a director and used to cut movies, concert's) had to say this...) Again the concert is great and i guess i will play it a lot... C U... Christ, who has nothing else to dso other than sit and analyze a simple concert DVD to this extent? That's my job, analyze anything that has to do with TV, movie or other broadcasting... So please get the f... out of here or show some respect... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
so you know a lot about camera's! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LaMont said: Christ, who has nothing else to dso other than sit and analyze a simple concert DVD to this extent? well, let's see. he has 10 posts, and you have over 700.
so i'm guessing he has more time since you're so busy kissing prince's ass and attacking anyone around her who has anything slightly critical to say about anything prince has ever done. keep it up lamont, and you'll be banned from the org again. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WELL...I am not up P's ass and have just got the dvd - it rocks! Quality is fine to me and I have got high end tv and dvd players in the UK...Idid notice occasional flicker when the freeze frame stuff happens but other than that I reckon this is a cool dvd - it 'feels' live and that is great - the concert rocks! I was prepared for crap quality and 2 b honest had been put off buying it but am glad I did - £15 at hmv - my 2penneth... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
winterman said: so you know a lot about camera's!
??? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
suomynona said: LaMont said: Christ, who has nothing else to dso other than sit and analyze a simple concert DVD to this extent? well, let's see. he has 10 posts, and you have over 700.
so i'm guessing he has more time since you're so busy kissing prince's ass and attacking anyone around her who has anything slightly critical to say about anything prince has ever done. keep it up lamont, and you'll be banned from the org again. Attaqck me is you want, loser. I have done nothing to be banned and you dont say who gets banned. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lovemachine said: LaMont said: newena2001 said: Goodmorning 2 all of U...
Everybody is talking about the quality of the Vegas DVD. There are some things that can make the quality very bad on your dvd. 1: If you life in Europe and you have a NTSC copy from the club you must know that your dvd-player AND tv must be compatible with NTSC. Otherwise the quality is very bad.(I bought the PAL version and the quality is not good but better dan NTSC (they call it by joke "Never Twice Same Colour") 2:After watching the PAL version there were some things that i noticed... The whole concert is recorded on (i guess 5) Sony PD150 DV camera's, these camera's are good for normal recording but not for dynamic concerts like Vegas. These camera's have an autofocus (and the have used it), but it works slow...Each camera recorded on there own tape so to make a dvd like this u have to cut the tapes...(there was not a director who could give directions to the cameramen). During cutting the concert you can see that there are something not right. In the intro were the bandmembers are introduced the picture has been freezed. No problem but when you do not use the "de-interlace"you see that the picture will flickers. (some parts the used de-interlace" but some they dind't.On someparts the used filters to make it dynamic but on some parts the forgott it. This can be done on purpess, but i think (that's my prof. look on it, and personal meaning) when you use it on one part, use it on the whole concert. 3: to place a concert (80 minutes) on a dvd you have to use a DVD6... i guest they have put it on a DVD5 and reduced the bitrate so the quality is lower. Don't misunderstand me: I love the concert, great performance of each bandmember and ofcourse The man himself. But my professional eye (i'm a director and used to cut movies, concert's) had to say this...) Again the concert is great and i guess i will play it a lot... C U... Christ, who has nothing else to dso other than sit and analyze a simple concert DVD to this extent? How many fucking threads have you started talking about great Prince is lately? You would think you would have better things to do with your time. Oh wait, you don't as Prince is your God. How much time did you spend with this thread? I'm guessing more time then the poster spent with this thread. http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59882 Or with these all created in the last two weeks: http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59769 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59573 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59972 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59831 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59767 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59279 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59129 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59829 http://www.prince.org/msg...&tid=59707 Or the countless threads where you have gushed over how great Prince is and how stupid everyone is who is disatisified with the club or whatever. This thread is actually quite interesting and you were just being your usually asshole self. I will sit back and wait for your response which I am sure will be something clever about my mother or whatever
. [This message was edited Wed Sep 3 14:20:40 PDT 2003 by lovemachine] What kind of loser is on my dick to the point that they research my posts? Hey bitch, you can be the president of my fan club | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lamont flamed: Attaqck me is you want, loser.
What kind of loser is on my dick to the point that they research my posts? Hey bitch, you can be the president of my fan club You know flaming is not allowed in here lamont. Go and repent before Ian or your ass will be busted.  You are not my "friend" because you threaten my security. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |