AaronAlmighty said: hmmm... where'd i ... put my...
oh! here it is! gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: AaronAlmighty said: hmmm... where'd i ... put my...
oh! here it is! gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * guess the letters! [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 12:35:21 PST 2004 by AaronAlmighty] "oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AaronAlmighty said: cborgman said: AaronAlmighty said: hmmm... where'd i ... put my...
oh! here it is! gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * guess the letters! [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 12:35:21 PST 2004 by AaronAlmighty] i'd like to buy a vowel, pat... Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: AaronAlmighty said: cborgman said: AaronAlmighty said: hmmm... where'd i ... put my...
oh! here it is! gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * guess the letters! [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 12:35:21 PST 2004 by AaronAlmighty] i'd like to buy a vowel, pat... how bout i buy you a bowel!? "oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AaronAlmighty said: cborgman said: AaronAlmighty said: cborgman said: AaronAlmighty said: hmmm... where'd i ... put my...
oh! here it is! gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron Aaron * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * guess the letters! [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 12:35:21 PST 2004 by AaronAlmighty] i'd like to buy a vowel, pat... how bout i buy you a bowel!? how 'bout you take me midget bowling... ahhh, midgets... the fun that unites us all Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: You raise an interesting point, Sassy, and I think the minstrel show parallel is right-on.
Importantly, I don't think we should be so reactionary as to abhor all quirky, stereotypical images of gay men -- it's part of what makes us unique (which I'm rather proud of in some regard) and, in fact, some of us do naturally act like that. By learning to be embarrassed about those of us who lisp, gesture like girls or prefer runway shows and Potterybarn to, say, boxing or NASCAR, we're effectively relinquishing part of our self-determination. I sort of fit a more conventional "masculine" affect, but I rather hate that so many of us hold "straight-acting" as some sort of litmus test of value and conduct. What does it mean, anyway -- that we like to treat women poorly, fart to impress our buddies, wear bad shoes and shoot fags? That's not unlike ethnic minorities who used to fall into the trap of judging one-another on a capacity to look, sound and "act" white. Let's not go through that phase either. On the other hand, there ARE those of us who simply don't act like Jack on Will & Grace. I think more important than being upset about guys like him being made more accessible to mainstream currency, we should be about the business of getting those of us who fit other archetypes more frequently seen as well. I personally don't get too much joy out of the one-dimensional hedonism and plasticity we so often allow ourselves to engender, but, like ethnic minorities, our public battle has got to be about establishing a respect for our comprehensiveness as much as "behaving" for the world. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 10:50:07 PST 2004 by Lammastide] I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassyBritches said: Lammastide said: You raise an interesting point, Sassy, and I think the minstrel show parallel is right-on.
Importantly, I don't think we should be so reactionary as to abhor all quirky, stereotypical images of gay men -- it's part of what makes us unique (which I'm rather proud of in some regard) and, in fact, some of us do naturally act like that. By learning to be embarrassed about those of us who lisp, gesture like girls or prefer runway shows and Potterybarn to, say, boxing or NASCAR, we're effectively relinquishing part of our self-determination. I sort of fit a more conventional "masculine" affect, but I rather hate that so many of us hold "straight-acting" as some sort of litmus test of value and conduct. What does it mean, anyway -- that we like to treat women poorly, fart to impress our buddies, wear bad shoes and shoot fags? That's not unlike ethnic minorities who used to fall into the trap of judging one-another on a capacity to look, sound and "act" white. Let's not go through that phase either. On the other hand, there ARE those of us who simply don't act like Jack on Will & Grace. I think more important than being upset about guys like him being made more accessible to mainstream currency, we should be about the business of getting those of us who fit other archetypes more frequently seen as well. I personally don't get too much joy out of the one-dimensional hedonism and plasticity we so often allow ourselves to engender, but, like ethnic minorities, our public battle has got to be about establishing a respect for our comprehensiveness as much as "behaving" for the world. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 10:50:07 PST 2004 by Lammastide] I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. and that is my problem with the whole thing. i certainly don't mind seeing the effeminate gay character, but it has to be balanced, and often is not. seeing that same stock character being a vast majority of what is represented as the gay man on tv subconciously drives people to believe that the vast majority of gay men in real life are the same way. of course, people should not be allowing TV and movies to determine reality, but sadly much of the american public does. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassyBritches said: Lammastide said: You raise an interesting point, Sassy, and I think the minstrel show parallel is right-on.
Importantly, I don't think we should be so reactionary as to abhor all quirky, stereotypical images of gay men -- it's part of what makes us unique (which I'm rather proud of in some regard) and, in fact, some of us do naturally act like that. By learning to be embarrassed about those of us who lisp, gesture like girls or prefer runway shows and Potterybarn to, say, boxing or NASCAR, we're effectively relinquishing part of our self-determination. I sort of fit a more conventional "masculine" affect, but I rather hate that so many of us hold "straight-acting" as some sort of litmus test of value and conduct. What does it mean, anyway -- that we like to treat women poorly, fart to impress our buddies, wear bad shoes and shoot fags? That's not unlike ethnic minorities who used to fall into the trap of judging one-another on a capacity to look, sound and "act" white. Let's not go through that phase either. On the other hand, there ARE those of us who simply don't act like Jack on Will & Grace. I think more important than being upset about guys like him being made more accessible to mainstream currency, we should be about the business of getting those of us who fit other archetypes more frequently seen as well. I personally don't get too much joy out of the one-dimensional hedonism and plasticity we so often allow ourselves to engender, but, like ethnic minorities, our public battle has got to be about establishing a respect for our comprehensiveness as much as "behaving" for the world. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 10:50:07 PST 2004 by Lammastide] I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. Hopefully people will be comfortable to be themselves whether it's the lisping draq queen or the passable straight guy who in all actuality loves to suck cock. The idea that we have to conform to anything sucks. Like Madonna said...express yourself, don't repress yourself. 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassyBritches said: I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. well i don't think that's quite how stereotypes work. after all, i don't ever recall reading about a rash of black men deciding they were going to take up tap-dancing-while-eating-watermelon in the 30's to emulate movie and radio stars "oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: SassyBritches said: Lammastide said: You raise an interesting point, Sassy, and I think the minstrel show parallel is right-on.
Importantly, I don't think we should be so reactionary as to abhor all quirky, stereotypical images of gay men -- it's part of what makes us unique (which I'm rather proud of in some regard) and, in fact, some of us do naturally act like that. By learning to be embarrassed about those of us who lisp, gesture like girls or prefer runway shows and Potterybarn to, say, boxing or NASCAR, we're effectively relinquishing part of our self-determination. I sort of fit a more conventional "masculine" affect, but I rather hate that so many of us hold "straight-acting" as some sort of litmus test of value and conduct. What does it mean, anyway -- that we like to treat women poorly, fart to impress our buddies, wear bad shoes and shoot fags? That's not unlike ethnic minorities who used to fall into the trap of judging one-another on a capacity to look, sound and "act" white. Let's not go through that phase either. On the other hand, there ARE those of us who simply don't act like Jack on Will & Grace. I think more important than being upset about guys like him being made more accessible to mainstream currency, we should be about the business of getting those of us who fit other archetypes more frequently seen as well. I personally don't get too much joy out of the one-dimensional hedonism and plasticity we so often allow ourselves to engender, but, like ethnic minorities, our public battle has got to be about establishing a respect for our comprehensiveness as much as "behaving" for the world. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 10:50:07 PST 2004 by Lammastide] I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. Hopefully people will be comfortable to be themselves whether it's the lisping draq queen or the passable straight guy who in all actuality loves to suck cock. The idea that we have to conform to anything sucks. Like Madonna said...express yourself, don't repress yourself. exactly... its about showing the diverse swath of people that exist within the gay culture, just as is true with any particular culture. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AaronAlmighty said: SassyBritches said: I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. well i don't think that's quite how stereotypes work. after all, i don't ever recall reading about a rash of black men deciding they were going to take up tap-dancing-while-eating-watermelon in the 30's to emulate movie and radio stars I think he meant gay actors. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 12:59:54 PST 2004 by Lammastide] Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: SassyBritches said: Lammastide said: You raise an interesting point, Sassy, and I think the minstrel show parallel is right-on.
Importantly, I don't think we should be so reactionary as to abhor all quirky, stereotypical images of gay men -- it's part of what makes us unique (which I'm rather proud of in some regard) and, in fact, some of us do naturally act like that. By learning to be embarrassed about those of us who lisp, gesture like girls or prefer runway shows and Potterybarn to, say, boxing or NASCAR, we're effectively relinquishing part of our self-determination. I sort of fit a more conventional "masculine" affect, but I rather hate that so many of us hold "straight-acting" as some sort of litmus test of value and conduct. What does it mean, anyway -- that we like to treat women poorly, fart to impress our buddies, wear bad shoes and shoot fags? That's not unlike ethnic minorities who used to fall into the trap of judging one-another on a capacity to look, sound and "act" white. Let's not go through that phase either. On the other hand, there ARE those of us who simply don't act like Jack on Will & Grace. I think more important than being upset about guys like him being made more accessible to mainstream currency, we should be about the business of getting those of us who fit other archetypes more frequently seen as well. I personally don't get too much joy out of the one-dimensional hedonism and plasticity we so often allow ourselves to engender, but, like ethnic minorities, our public battle has got to be about establishing a respect for our comprehensiveness as much as "behaving" for the world. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 10:50:07 PST 2004 by Lammastide] I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. Hopefully people will be comfortable to be themselves whether it's the lisping draq queen or the passable straight guy who in all actuality loves to suck cock. The idea that we have to conform to anything sucks. Like Madonna said...express yourself, don't repress yourself. exactly... its about showing the diverse swath of people that exist within the gay culture, just as is true with any particular culture. ...And "swath"? Who uses that word? Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AaronAlmighty said: SassyBritches said: I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. well i don't think that's quite how stereotypes work. after all, i don't ever recall reading about a rash of black men deciding they were going to take up tap-dancing-while-eating-watermelon in the 30's to emulate movie and radio stars Well, quite honestly, it doesn't really matter what you think about how stereotypes work. With Hollywood and the entertainment industry the fact is that there are about 3 roles for the black man. The goofy guy that gets teamed up with the smart uptight white guy from whom he learns some invaluable lesson. The criminal. And the professional who is the butt of all jokes due to his well spoken and "appropriate" demeanor. The reason for this is because Hollywood is only hiring black actors for these roles. The only films or tv shows that feature other views, perspectives and character types are the ones created by black producers...of which there are few. You may live in a big city that has developed its own stereotypes but most of America is not a big city. Most of America is a bunch of folks that don't have everyday interaction with ethnic and racial diversity. Sadly, tv effects their view. With all that said, my fear for the gay man (in media) is this same fate. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under?" I've never seen it. (But I want to largely because that delicious Peter Kraus is in it. )
Anyway... is the gay couple on that show pretty progressive? Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: cborgman said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: SassyBritches said: Lammastide said: You raise an interesting point, Sassy, and I think the minstrel show parallel is right-on.
Importantly, I don't think we should be so reactionary as to abhor all quirky, stereotypical images of gay men -- it's part of what makes us unique (which I'm rather proud of in some regard) and, in fact, some of us do naturally act like that. By learning to be embarrassed about those of us who lisp, gesture like girls or prefer runway shows and Potterybarn to, say, boxing or NASCAR, we're effectively relinquishing part of our self-determination. I sort of fit a more conventional "masculine" affect, but I rather hate that so many of us hold "straight-acting" as some sort of litmus test of value and conduct. What does it mean, anyway -- that we like to treat women poorly, fart to impress our buddies, wear bad shoes and shoot fags? That's not unlike ethnic minorities who used to fall into the trap of judging one-another on a capacity to look, sound and "act" white. Let's not go through that phase either. On the other hand, there ARE those of us who simply don't act like Jack on Will & Grace. I think more important than being upset about guys like him being made more accessible to mainstream currency, we should be about the business of getting those of us who fit other archetypes more frequently seen as well. I personally don't get too much joy out of the one-dimensional hedonism and plasticity we so often allow ourselves to engender, but, like ethnic minorities, our public battle has got to be about establishing a respect for our comprehensiveness as much as "behaving" for the world. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 10:50:07 PST 2004 by Lammastide] I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. Hopefully people will be comfortable to be themselves whether it's the lisping draq queen or the passable straight guy who in all actuality loves to suck cock. The idea that we have to conform to anything sucks. Like Madonna said...express yourself, don't repress yourself. exactly... its about showing the diverse swath of people that exist within the gay culture, just as is true with any particular culture. ...And "swath"? Who uses that word? people with a good vocabulary... as much as you dip into the more exquisite deep end of the vernacular pool, i would be mystified to learn you have never dropped "swath" into a conversation. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: Lammastide said: cborgman said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: SassyBritches said: Lammastide said: You raise an interesting point, Sassy, and I think the minstrel show parallel is right-on.
Importantly, I don't think we should be so reactionary as to abhor all quirky, stereotypical images of gay men -- it's part of what makes us unique (which I'm rather proud of in some regard) and, in fact, some of us do naturally act like that. By learning to be embarrassed about those of us who lisp, gesture like girls or prefer runway shows and Potterybarn to, say, boxing or NASCAR, we're effectively relinquishing part of our self-determination. I sort of fit a more conventional "masculine" affect, but I rather hate that so many of us hold "straight-acting" as some sort of litmus test of value and conduct. What does it mean, anyway -- that we like to treat women poorly, fart to impress our buddies, wear bad shoes and shoot fags? That's not unlike ethnic minorities who used to fall into the trap of judging one-another on a capacity to look, sound and "act" white. Let's not go through that phase either. On the other hand, there ARE those of us who simply don't act like Jack on Will & Grace. I think more important than being upset about guys like him being made more accessible to mainstream currency, we should be about the business of getting those of us who fit other archetypes more frequently seen as well. I personally don't get too much joy out of the one-dimensional hedonism and plasticity we so often allow ourselves to engender, but, like ethnic minorities, our public battle has got to be about establishing a respect for our comprehensiveness as much as "behaving" for the world. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 10:50:07 PST 2004 by Lammastide] I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. Hopefully people will be comfortable to be themselves whether it's the lisping draq queen or the passable straight guy who in all actuality loves to suck cock. The idea that we have to conform to anything sucks. Like Madonna said...express yourself, don't repress yourself. exactly... its about showing the diverse swath of people that exist within the gay culture, just as is true with any particular culture. ...And "swath"? Who uses that word? people with a good vocabulary... as much as you dip into the more exquisite deep end of the vernacular pool, i would be mystified to learn you have never dropped "swath" into a conversation. No, but I'm definitely gonna add it as of today. Thanks! Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under?" I've never seen it. (But I want to largely because that delicious Peter Kraus is in it. )
Anyway... is the gay couple on that show pretty progressive? just my opinion, but i think so, yes. they are portrayed as a boring everyday couple, which bizarrely enough feels like progress to me. but last time i saw it, they had seperated Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under?" I've never seen it. (But I want to largely because that delicious Peter Kraus is in it. )
Anyway... is the gay couple on that show pretty progressive? I watch it religiously. It's pretty good that way (being progressive re: gay male relationships), but it's still a TV show. A GREAT one, in fact--when does it come back on again?! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: Lammastide said: Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under?" I've never seen it. (But I want to largely because that delicious Peter Kraus is in it. )
Anyway... is the gay couple on that show pretty progressive? just my opinion, but i think so, yes. they are portrayed as a boring everyday couple, which bizarrely enough feels like progress to me. but last time i saw it, they had seperated They're back together--at least, tentatively. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AnotherLoverToo said: Lammastide said: Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under?" I've never seen it. (But I want to largely because that delicious Peter Kraus is in it. )
Anyway... is the gay couple on that show pretty progressive? I watch it religiously. It's pretty good that way (being progressive re: gay male relationships), but it's still a TV show. A GREAT one, in fact--when does it come back on again?! I don't know when it comes back on, but I do want to see it. Peter Krause aside, I've heard only good things about this series. Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This actually is a topic I've thought about a lot lately. How gay men are depicted in the media has bugged me primarily for it's one-sidedness.
What TV shows and films could you all recommend that show us in more diverse ways? Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under?" I've never seen it. (But I want to largely because that delicious Peter Kraus is in it. )
Anyway... is the gay couple on that show pretty progressive? This is a fantastic show. I actually stopped watching it because it was TOO depressing, lol. The characters were all very multi-dimensional and fleshed out so well. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: This actually is a topic I've thought about a lot lately. How gay men are depicted in the media has bugged me primarily for it's one-sidedness.
What TV shows and films could you all recommend that show us in more diverse ways? that's pretty much the best one i can think of. i can think of a great game though... "the sims" treats the gay and lesbian relationships just as it does a heterosexual relationship, but just as in real life, doesn't allow them to marry, but does encourage them to adopt kids. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: Lammastide said: This actually is a topic I've thought about a lot lately. How gay men are depicted in the media has bugged me primarily for it's one-sidedness.
What TV shows and films could you all recommend that show us in more diverse ways? that's pretty much the best one i can think of. Geez, that's depressing. It's 2004! Makes me want to get back to my screenwriting. i can think of a great game though... "the sims" treats the gay and lesbian relationships just as it does a heterosexual relationship, but just as in real life, doesn't allow them to marry, but does encourage them to adopt kids.
How funny. I had no idea the Sims allowed gay characters. Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: cborgman said: Lammastide said: This actually is a topic I've thought about a lot lately. How gay men are depicted in the media has bugged me primarily for it's one-sidedness.
What TV shows and films could you all recommend that show us in more diverse ways? that's pretty much the best one i can think of. Geez, that's depressing. It's 2004! Makes me want to get back to my screenwriting. isn't it though? Lammastide said: cborgman said: i can think of a great game though... "the sims" treats the gay and lesbian relationships just as it does a heterosexual relationship, but just as in real life, doesn't allow them to marry, but does encourage them to adopt kids.
How funny. I had no idea the Sims allowed gay characters. oh, yes... it blew my mind the first time i noticed. [This message was edited Tue Jan 6 13:45:15 PST 2004 by cborgman] Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: bananacologne said: Because the mainstream media in general (ESPECIALLY TV) has no interest in gay men with a voice and something interesting or important 2 say unless they're protesting, or shouting it so they can be heard.
It's much more fun (not 2 mention easier) 2 show the muscle mary's in go-go shorts, collared slave bois, drag queens & twinkys during a Pride or Folsom Street Fair day. Look! Look! Look at the fags in the funny clothes Mommy!!! Well, that's my Im done. Yuppers, you hit the nail on the head. Gay people are still a novelty - so-called "mainstream society" can't digest gay folks as three-dimensional people who can function alongside anyone else in a generic, copacetic manner without having to dress outrageously and scream "FAAABULOUS!!!" every three damn seconds. It's like in the early to mid '70s, when black people were "accepted" by so-called mainstream society, but only if they had huge afros, dressed like pimps and soul hoochies, and talked jive...because, you know, it was easier to see people who are "different" as entertaining stereotypes than it was to actually have to humanize and...GAK!...get to KNOW them. Maybe 20 years from now, the role of gay folks in "mainstream culture" will be a bit more nuanced and flexible - 'course, I'll be too damn old to enjoy it by then, grumblefrunklebumblegrrr... PS: I 4got 2 add: '...or dead' 2 that list. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassyBritches said: AaronAlmighty said: SassyBritches said: I agree with you! And hopefully, gay men will not feel monetarily pressured into representing the same gay stereotype over and over again. well i don't think that's quite how stereotypes work. after all, i don't ever recall reading about a rash of black men deciding they were going to take up tap-dancing-while-eating-watermelon in the 30's to emulate movie and radio stars Well, quite honestly, it doesn't really matter what you think about how stereotypes work. With Hollywood and the entertainment industry the fact is that there are about 3 roles for the black man. The goofy guy that gets teamed up with the smart uptight white guy from whom he learns some invaluable lesson. The criminal. And the professional who is the butt of all jokes due to his well spoken and "appropriate" demeanor. The reason for this is because Hollywood is only hiring black actors for these roles. The only films or tv shows that feature other views, perspectives and character types are the ones created by black producers...of which there are few. You may live in a big city that has developed its own stereotypes but most of America is not a big city. Most of America is a bunch of folks that don't have everyday interaction with ethnic and racial diversity. Sadly, tv effects their view. With all that said, my fear for the gay man (in media) is this same fate. i'm sorry, but i just don't subscribe to the theory that people emulate what they see in the media. and i've taken hours upon hours of college classes saying that they do and saying that they don't, so i don't form my opinion lightly. i don't really see otherwise sane gay men starting to run around snapping their fingers and lisping just because that a-hole on Bravo does it. "oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I refer to it as Gaysploitation.
The problem is not that people will emulate the stereotypes. When gay men are presented as queens, it makes it difficult for gay men with masculine mannerisms to identify with their own sexuality. They take one look and think "that can't be me". It also makes it difficult to come out to others who are taught these stereotypes/expectations. When a gay man is out and comfortable, these images don't really bother him and can be taken for what they are worth: just a bit of fun. But really, Gaysploitation can be dangerous. ie. Queer As Folk; Jack on Will & Grace. It is dangerous to present a diverse group of people such as homosexuals as being one type. And it's not like I have to explain to you what a stereotype is. All gay men are not the guy from Queer Eye; All black men are not 50 Cent. It is convenient marketing towards people who have preconceived notions for a group of people. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: AnotherLoverToo said: Lammastide said: Does anyone here watch "Six Feet Under?" I've never seen it. (But I want to largely because that delicious Peter Kraus is in it. )
Anyway... is the gay couple on that show pretty progressive? I watch it religiously. It's pretty good that way (being progressive re: gay male relationships), but it's still a TV show. A GREAT one, in fact--when does it come back on again?! I don't know when it comes back on, but I do want to see it. Peter Krause aside, I've heard only good things about this series. They're progressive, but very multi-dimensional and very up and down. They're not the perfect happy gay couple, they're not the depressing self-loathing couple, they're not flaming queens either. I love them, almost as much as I loved Beecher and Keller from Oz | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: Lammastide said: cborgman said: Lammastide said: This actually is a topic I've thought about a lot lately. How gay men are depicted in the media has bugged me primarily for it's one-sidedness.
What TV shows and films could you all recommend that show us in more diverse ways? that's pretty much the best one i can think of. Geez, that's depressing. It's 2004! Makes me want to get back to my screenwriting. isn't it though? Lammastide said: cborgman said: i can think of a great game though... "the sims" treats the gay and lesbian relationships just as it does a heterosexual relationship, but just as in real life, doesn't allow them to marry, but does encourage them to adopt kids.
How funny. I had no idea the Sims allowed gay characters. oh, yes... it blew my mind the first time i noticed. Almost all of my sims are bi. I love letting them meet and then move in together. I dress them up and take pictures of their wedding (I have to do it myself instead of it automatically happening). I even had a surrogate father living with a lesbian couple. I had a man cheating on his wife with a male neighbor (I know it's wrong, but it makes great entertainment). She saw them kissing and slapped the shit out of the other man! It was perfect. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |