Anxiety said: NuPwrSoul said: Okay let's kill the metaphor.
What I understood from your use of it was that you try to stay neutral regarding the NPGMC. However, when something occurs at the NPGMC that you find to be polarizing, you can remain neutral for only so long before you have to take a stand on the issue. So my question to you is, after you have made a determination--and your determination is that the club is at fault--do you return back to a neutral position vis a vis the club? And if so, why? Or, do these faults begin to accummulate in your perspective of the club, thereby ending your neutral stance? If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother? Am I understanding this right when it seems as if being part of the Famdom is convenient on one's own terms? This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Super! 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: Anxiety said: NuPwrSoul said: Okay let's kill the metaphor.
What I understood from your use of it was that you try to stay neutral regarding the NPGMC. However, when something occurs at the NPGMC that you find to be polarizing, you can remain neutral for only so long before you have to take a stand on the issue. So my question to you is, after you have made a determination--and your determination is that the club is at fault--do you return back to a neutral position vis a vis the club? And if so, why? Or, do these faults begin to accummulate in your perspective of the club, thereby ending your neutral stance? If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother? Am I understanding this right when it seems as if being part of the Famdom is convenient on one's own terms? isn't that how fandom (or famdom, if you will) always works? it's not a religion. it's music. you dig it and what's going on around it, or you don't. sounds like a matter of convenience to me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: ian said: they are his problem, not yours.
And that is pretty much what we're saying... Some common ground | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: Anxiety said: NuPwrSoul said: Okay let's kill the metaphor.
What I understood from your use of it was that you try to stay neutral regarding the NPGMC. However, when something occurs at the NPGMC that you find to be polarizing, you can remain neutral for only so long before you have to take a stand on the issue. So my question to you is, after you have made a determination--and your determination is that the club is at fault--do you return back to a neutral position vis a vis the club? And if so, why? Or, do these faults begin to accummulate in your perspective of the club, thereby ending your neutral stance? If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother? Am I understanding this right when it seems as if being part of the Famdom is convenient on one's own terms? This flirts with the dangerous presumption that whenever you have anything positive to say about Prince, you're somehow automatically a "fam", and when you have anything critical to say about him or his work, you're automatically "anti-Prince" across the board. I'm sorry, I don't live in that (sur)reality. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Supernova said: Anxiety said: NuPwrSoul said: Okay let's kill the metaphor.
What I understood from your use of it was that you try to stay neutral regarding the NPGMC. However, when something occurs at the NPGMC that you find to be polarizing, you can remain neutral for only so long before you have to take a stand on the issue. So my question to you is, after you have made a determination--and your determination is that the club is at fault--do you return back to a neutral position vis a vis the club? And if so, why? Or, do these faults begin to accummulate in your perspective of the club, thereby ending your neutral stance? If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother? Am I understanding this right when it seems as if being part of the Famdom is convenient on one's own terms? This flirts with the dangerous presumption that whenever you have anything positive to say about Prince, you're somehow automatically a "fam", and when you have anything critical to say about him or his work, you're automatically "anti-Prince" across the board. I'm sorry, I don't live in that (sur)reality. Ah, so you're anti-Prince then? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ian said: Except that Anxiety said this: Anxiety said: I wonder how "relaxed" about moderating they'll feel at NPGMC if this guy decides to take matters into his hands at Berlin next month, and someone LITERALLY gets "bashed"?
It is reasonable, is it not, to ask how we arrived at such comments based on the original post that started this discussion? You don't feel it was a LEAP at all? Look, I stand by that comment. If that makes me a drama queen, so be it. If it keeps someone from beating the holy hell out of me next month when I'm walking home from Berlin half-drunk in the middle of the night, all the better. Just sayin'. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ian said: Ah, so you're anti-Prince then?
You are asking for such a PINCH. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
While I don't think this poster had malicious intent in mind, it certainly isn't a topic that should have a blind eye turned towards it. I am in LA and you would think we would have gay fans galore and really there are only a few of us in the Bumpsquad (LA's fan group). I have always been treated with respect and with love. I have never felt out of place in a mostly straight scene.
This post made some people feel badly. These gatherings aren't about bad vibes but good times. This poster took his own negative feelings about his lack of being able to turn one of these chicks out at the end of the night and foisted it on the gay community in that group. It's hardly our fault if he cannot connect with women as well as the gay men did that night and we shouldn't have to even for one second have to deal with this kind of negativity. . [This message was edited Tue Sep 30 20:05:04 PDT 2003 by SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy] 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: ian said: Ah, so you're anti-Prince then?
You are asking for such a PINCH. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NettieSmiles said: If you and me were at the club (Berlin), I'm sure I would've danced my behind off with you, my bad knee permitting me to get my groove on ! If you and me were at NPGMC having this dialogue, I would be just as passionate, because I believe that what happens here and what happens there should be kept on their prospective homefronts. If the moderators over there refuse to act in some way regarding TPvision, then let them stew in their hypocrisy! And if the mods are banning people for any reason other than "flaming", they are still hypocrites! Unfortunately, we will have to see how they handle this situation. If anything, TP's "warning" should be edited, deleted or whatever it takes to promote unity. I'd buy all that for a dollar. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Supernova said: Anxiety said: NuPwrSoul said: Okay let's kill the metaphor.
What I understood from your use of it was that you try to stay neutral regarding the NPGMC. However, when something occurs at the NPGMC that you find to be polarizing, you can remain neutral for only so long before you have to take a stand on the issue. So my question to you is, after you have made a determination--and your determination is that the club is at fault--do you return back to a neutral position vis a vis the club? And if so, why? Or, do these faults begin to accummulate in your perspective of the club, thereby ending your neutral stance? If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother? Am I understanding this right when it seems as if being part of the Famdom is convenient on one's own terms? This flirts with the dangerous presumption that whenever you have anything positive to say about Prince, you're somehow automatically a "fam", and when you have anything critical to say about him or his work, you're automatically "anti-Prince" across the board. I'm sorry, I don't live in that (sur)reality. Nothing I said "flirts" with anything. I straight out asked you a question. That being: since you said "If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother?" does this mean you consider yourself part of Prince's famdom at your convenience? - It was you who brought up the "brother" part. Technically the word is purely short for "family." It's a sincere, albeit unanswered, question. Why insert the word "brother" if we're all so anti-"fam"? It's only those who have a problem with it who attach a negative connotation. This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Super!
What up, Supa! This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: Super!
What up, Supa! Yay!! I thought my hug got lost in the mix 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: Nothing I said "flirts" with anything. I straight out asked you a question. That being: since you said "If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother?" does this mean you consider yourself part of Prince's famdom at your convenience? - It was you who brought up the "brother" part. Technically the word is purely short for "family." It's a sincere, albeit unanswered, question. Why insert the word "brother" if we're all so anti-"fam"? It's only those who have a problem with it who attach a negative connotation. Actually, you're right, I'm sorry. What you said doesn't flirt with an either-or mentality at all. It WALLOWS in it. My statement, to be painfully clear, meant that just because you don't agree with the words or deeds of any particular person or entity, it's not cause to reject the entirety of something for which you have an affinity. My mother has some political views that I find really uncool. But she's my mother. I love her. And for every one thing on which we disagree, there are a hundred priceless things she's taught me throughout my life. If someone you care about does something you thought was really stupid, do they suddenly become dead to you? Are they suddenly beneath reproach? No? Then reread: If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NuPwrSoul said: theblueangel said: So NuPwrSoul, do you disagree with this member's post? Just curious what your take on it is.
To be quite honest, I only skimmed the post at first and thought nothing of it. Then I saw stymie's/cdaryl's response that basically said "I have something to say about this but I won't" which triggered in my mind that she found something objectionable, so then I re-read it more closely to see what the possible problems would be with the post. (This is why I say if you want understanding, a possible option is to engage the post and respectfully point out the issues with which you are at variance. Otherwise, if you let it stand or if the moderators let it stand, then people who don't know or aren't familiar with or sensitive to certain issues will take those things for granted as being harmless.) But here's my answer to your question BlueAngel, which I also posted on the thread at issue at the NPGMC: Someone who is a long-time Prince fan who has gone to Prince concerts or Prince-related events should be used to being in the company of people from all walks of life, because Prince historically has attracted a very mixed crowd. But I am not going to lie, I'm a long-time Prince fan and I live in New York City, which has some of the most visible and socially active gay communities in the country, and I still am uncomfortable if I am in a social setting that is predominantly gay. That's just me being honest. I also recognize that my discomfort is my problem, not anyone else's and I do my best fight any sense of paranoia or irrationality and just have a good time with whomever I am with. So while I can identify with the discomfort, I would never use the words that the writer of this post used. And I certainly would not invoke God to condemn or cast generalizations about others in expressing any discomfort, which is a personal problem. . Grammar Edit. [This message was edited Tue Sep 30 16:23:45 PDT 2003 by NuPwrSoul] Lots of respect to you for being so forthright and well spoken. ...and welcome back, btw. Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Supernova said: Nothing I said "flirts" with anything. I straight out asked you a question. That being: since you said "If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother?" does this mean you consider yourself part of Prince's famdom at your convenience? - It was you who brought up the "brother" part. Technically the word is purely short for "family." It's a sincere, albeit unanswered, question. Why insert the word "brother" if we're all so anti-"fam"? It's only those who have a problem with it who attach a negative connotation. Actually, you're right, I'm sorry. What you said doesn't flirt with an either-or mentality at all. It WALLOWS in it. My statement, to be painfully clear, meant that just because you don't agree with the words or deeds of any particular person or entity, it's not cause to reject the entirety of something for which you have an affinity. My mother has some political views that I find really uncool. But she's my mother. I love her. And for every one thing on which we disagree, there are a hundred priceless things she's taught me throughout my life. If someone you care about does something you thought was really stupid, do they suddenly become dead to you? Are they suddenly beneath reproach? No? Then reread: If my brother behaves like a boob, is he not still my brother? That's cool if you don't want to answer the question. I just find it very odd that all the loudly, self-proclaimed anti-fams might sometimes use the phrase "my brother" as an analogy to Prince when it's convenient to suit their cause (whatever it may be). Admittedly, that fam thing is corny as hell tho. This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: That's cool if you don't want to answer the question.
I just find it very odd that all the loudly, self-proclaimed anti-fams might sometimes use the phrase "my brother" as an analogy to Prince when it's convenient to suit their cause (whatever it may be). Admittedly, that fam thing is corny as hell tho. Ummm...I did answer your question. Unless perhaps your question has more to do with semantics than it has to do with meaning, in which case whatever, you win whatever it is you're trying to win, because semantics mean fuck-all to me 9 times outta 10. So are you saying that by virtue of being part of a fan community centered around Prince, his definition of "family" must automatically be adopted by us? Maybe I need to start asking YOU some questions! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Supernova said: That's cool if you don't want to answer the question.
I just find it very odd that all the loudly, self-proclaimed anti-fams might sometimes use the phrase "my brother" as an analogy to Prince when it's convenient to suit their cause (whatever it may be). Admittedly, that fam thing is corny as hell tho. Ummm...I did answer your question. Unless perhaps your question has more to do with semantics than it has to do with meaning, in which case whatever, you win whatever it is you're trying to win, because semantics mean fuck-all to me 9 times outta 10. So are you saying that by virtue of being part of a fan community centered around Prince, his definition of "family" must automatically be adopted by us? Maybe I need to start asking YOU some questions! Maybe, cuz I'm still confused at this whole part 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Supernova said: That's cool if you don't want to answer the question.
I just find it very odd that all the loudly, self-proclaimed anti-fams might sometimes use the phrase "my brother" as an analogy to Prince when it's convenient to suit their cause (whatever it may be). Admittedly, that fam thing is corny as hell tho. Ummm...I did answer your question. Unless perhaps your question has more to do with semantics than it has to do with meaning, in which case whatever, you win whatever it is you're trying to win, because semantics mean fuck-all to me 9 times outta 10. Now, now. You're getting quite testy about this whole thing, aren't ya? So are you saying that by virtue of being part of a fan community centered around Prince, his definition of "family" must automatically be adopted by us?
Nice effort. If you actually think that's what I said, you're not comprehending ANYTHING I said. It's really not that serious. I got my answer. Time for new frontiers... This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: Nice effort. If you actually think that's what I said, you're not comprehending ANYTHING I said. It's really not that serious. I got my answer. Time for new frontiers... In other words, you don't know what the hell you're talking about either. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That would be you.
As I said, nice effort. It's not that serious. Unless you allow it to be. This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ummm, can someone give me a link to this quote or tell me where it is?
Thanks. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
First staircase on the left
Enter the "time" room Enter "U Tell Us" Go to "Member Connection" Click on "Chicagonation NPGMC party review"... 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: First staircase on the left
Enter the "time" room Enter "U Tell Us" Go to "Member Connection" Click on "Chicagonation NPGMC party review"... Thanks Supa. I had to jump in over there. Hope I wasn't too harsh. heh [This message was edited Tue Sep 30 20:33:42 PDT 2003 by 2the9s] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Supernova said: Nice effort. If you actually think that's what I said, you're not comprehending ANYTHING I said. It's really not that serious. I got my answer. Time for new frontiers... In other words, you don't know what the hell you're talking about either. i understood all that 'nova said...she knows what she's talkin 'bout. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: It's not that serious. Unless you allow it to be.
If you're not going to make the effort to be clearer after I've wasted my time trying to approach your question as many different ways as I could imagine, then you're right - consider it forgotten. I hope you ain't under any bridges I need to cross in the near future, 'else I'm screwed! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: Anxiety said: Supernova said: Nice effort. If you actually think that's what I said, you're not comprehending ANYTHING I said. It's really not that serious. I got my answer. Time for new frontiers... In other words, you don't know what the hell you're talking about either. i understood all that 'nova said...she knows what she's talkin 'bout. I must be reaaal tired cuz I didn't have any idea what it meant. I'll give it a fresh read tomorrow 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: Supernova said: It's not that serious. Unless you allow it to be.
If you're not going to make the effort to be clearer after I've wasted my time trying to approach your question as many different ways as I could imagine, then you're right - consider it forgotten. I hope you ain't under any bridges I need to cross in the near future, 'else I'm screwed! You don't worry your bushy little head (I say looking at your avatar) about that, I don't hold grudges about such minor things. I'm too kind hearted to do things of such malice. This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: Anxiety said: Supernova said: Nice effort. If you actually think that's what I said, you're not comprehending ANYTHING I said. It's really not that serious. I got my answer. Time for new frontiers... In other words, you don't know what the hell you're talking about either. i understood all that 'nova said...she knows what she's talkin 'bout. Muchas gracias, Dansa. This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |