Author | Message |
Do today's stars last less long? ...So I was randomly surfing the Internet, and I came across This:
https://upbeatnews.com/sp...erm=nofame
...and that got me to thinking - do stars of today last less long than the stars of yesteryear used to? I mean, Prince lasted for what, 40 YEARS or something, didn't he? These guys are gone in less than TWO or THREE, some of them...!!! A bigger question is....after the Internet, is the amount of time a celeb lasts getting shorter IN GENERAL, as time goes on??!! ie. as more and more music and movies and shows etc etc etc get released, ie. as more media EXISTS? WHY that is happening is probably a question best left to the anthropologists (well, us too!), but first - IS it?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Longevity does not seem to be the goal anymore, branching your brand into other ventures seems to be the current trend. I hesrd the expectancy rate is 5 years. Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well, the push is behind the big idea and spectacle no matter what corner of Pop culture ur talking about. The push used to be behind making the artist a star but things change. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Todays "music" sucks | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. exactly. . & the attention span of many people under 30 is at about.. 10 minutes. I'll see you tonight..
in ALL MY DREAMS.. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'd be more of the opinion that they last longer. Kanye, Pharrell, Beyonce, Eminem, ... all famous for 20 years or so and still releasing number 1 albums. How many people with number 1s in the 60s were still releasing number 1s in the 80s and 90s? There's always been plenty of people who were only briefly famous. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If you are not flawless looking you are fucked. The 70s were great because ugly was in.
And, why so many Brit actors playing Americans? All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2freaky4church1 said: If you are not flawless looking you are fucked. The 70s were great because ugly was in.
And, why so many Brit actors playing Americans? I think Ed Sheeran would probably disagree. He's really popular but he's ugly as sin. His music is boring as fuck too. And yet, he's been very successful. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Come on, I like a lot of Ed Sheeran songs | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
domainator2010 said: Come on, I like a lot of Ed Sheeran songs Yes, I seen it. And as someone who hates 99% of The Beatles output, that movie was like pure torture to me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
domainator2010 said:
Isn't it impossible to answer? Like, how can we say that Ariana Grande, for example, will still be around in 15-20 years? We won't know until that time. The questions you're asking are impossible to answer right now. But I think jaawwnn has come as close as anyone could to provide an adequate answer by using the previous generation's pop stars as examples. Also, the pop charts haven't changed all that much. The majority of popular music has always been bad. Sometimes people look back at the pop charts in the 80s and think of Michael Jackson, Prince, Springsteen etc and think that ALL music was of that quality. It wasn't. Most of it was shit. For every Prince there were 20 Jermaine Stewarts. Flash in the pan pop stars who are long since forgotten. It hasn't changed much. Some will be remembered. Most will not. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
These names all became famous before the social media era... and all sold records when people were still buying CDs... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What about say a Katy Perry or Lady Gaga? People know the names still, but I'd argue unless you're a devout stan it's pretty difficult to name a recent "hit song," for either of them.... and both were quite massive specifically for their music at one point. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So what's the one song you like from the Beatles? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WhisperingDandelions said:
What about say a Katy Perry or Lady Gaga? People know the names still, but I'd argue unless you're a devout stan it's pretty difficult to name a recent "hit song," for either of them.... and both were quite massive specifically for their music at one point. I wouldn't be the best person to ask. I would struggle to name more than 5 songs for both of them combined over their entire career. But I'm sure they're still selling quite well. But even with my limited knowledge of the pop charts, I know that Lady Gaga had some big hits with songs from A Star Is Born and she has a new song out with Ariana Grande. I've never heard it nor do I know what it's called but I know it exists. A lot of people tend to confuse their own knowledge of things with that of the general public. Just because you don't know their recent songs doesn't necessarily mean that most other people don't. [Edited 9/16/20 1:58am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kpowers said:
So what's the one song you like from the Beatles? I actually can't think of any off the top of my head but it's likely that I like at least one of their songs. There are very few artists who I have a 100% dislike rate for. So I give The Beatles the benefit of the doubt. I do like a few John Lennon songs. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stars spend most of their lives as main sequence stars fusing hydrogen to helium in their centres. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^ HA! I'm having trouble with a list of folks on top spanning 10 years. There's some that rose to fame beginning 2009-2010 that are still applauded I guess. I was thinking this about actors who are the Streeps the Pacinos the DeNiros. Gosling was the hype a few years ago and then poof no so ... Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think few if any newer actors really sell movies/TV shows like the ones from earlier generations. It's mostly brands that make a lot of money like Marvel, DC, Mission Impossible, Disney live action remakes, Pixar, James Bond, Star Wars, etc. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
There's also the case that hip hop is the #1 genre now. Unlike earlier music, rap songs really only fit the original artist. They don't get covered like Yesterday, Johnny B. Goode, I Heard It Through The Grapevine, or Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer. I've heard smooth jazz versions of rap hits and even versions by classical orchestras, but hip hop songs don't become standards. There's unlikely going to be a Rod Stewart Great American Hip Hop Rhymes Songbook. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
domainator2010 said:
Like I said though, pop music has always been crap for the most part. If you want great modern music, you have to look outside the charts. Artists like Mayer Hawthorne, Tuxedo, Chromeo, The Chromatics, Dam-Funk, XL Middleton, Boulevards, Gaslight Anthem, Janelle Monae, Donald Glover and Ekkah. You won't typically find them in the pop charts but they're all relatively new artists who are super talented and better than the majority of any era's chart toppers. Great music still exists. You just need to look for it. And I'd argue that with the Advent of the internet, it's never been easier to find. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MickyDolenz said: There's also the case that hip hop is the #1 genre now. Unlike earlier music, rap songs really only fit the original artist. They don't get covered like Yesterday, Johnny B. Goode, I Heard It Through The Grapevine, or Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer. I've heard smooth jazz versions of rap hits and even versions by classical orchestras, but hip hop songs don't become standards. There's unlikely going to be a Rod Stewart Great American Hip Hop Rhymes Songbook. Interesting you say that since corps are people now maybe that it, it's not about the individual anymore. Time keeps on slipping into the future...
This moment is all there is... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think technology also changed the old idea of a movie star or music star. There was less competition in the past for entertainment, maybe board games. The 1980s was the rise of VCRs, cable TV & video games. Before that, you could only see a theatrical movie at the movies. Some older movies might be shown on local TV stations such as Elvis Presley week or Jimmy Stewart week. There were only 3 networks, plus PBS and a few local channels on the UHF dial. TV networks had their own movies like ABC Movie Of The Week. There was no MTV showing music performers 24 hours a day. Music acts could only be seen on shows like Soul Train, American Bandstand, Shindig, Midnight Special, Hee Haw, Solid Gold, etc. These programs only came on once a week and were 30 minutes to a hour long. People listened to radio stations that had similar playlists, now people choose what they want to hear with Youtube. Unless you bought the records, people only listening to the radio might not even know what the singers/bands looked like. Cable TV and later satellite & streaming platforms like Netflix had to fill hundreds of channels with something. So audiences became fragmented & segregated. It isn't most of the TV audience in USA watching the same programs like Gunsmoke, Columbo, or The Cosby Show. You also had to watch those programs live, you couldn't DVR it and watch them later and fast forward through the commercials. People can watch a channel that interests them like The Fishing Channel or something. Didn't have that in the 3 network days. News also changed, the older newspeople didn't really talk about celebrities. I think that the general public did not know much about the older stars, it was kind of like a "them & us". Social media & internet sites like Lipstick Alley killed that. There was no TMZ for the Rat Pack era. There was the National Inquirer which most people did not buy or read. I think society changing killed the old idea of a star too like with cancel culture. It's also not passive. If you listen to the radio, yhat's all there is to it, but with Youtube people leave comments on the songs good ones or trolling comments. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
domainator2010 said:
Well some of the artists I named are actually friends of mine but those that aren't, I found online. Some of them were recommendations from other orgers. I found some on YouTube. Quite a few good recommendations from Spotify too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well the 80's started off great with John Lennon's album Double Fantasy (Well except for the Yoko songs). Imagine (no pun intended) all the great music that could have been made during the 80's by John Lennon | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I kinda liked his song | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |