independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Want Tots Without Allergies? Try Sucking on Their Pacifiers
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 05/06/13 6:40am

SUPRMAN

avatar

Want Tots Without Allergies? Try Sucking on Their Pacifiers

Study suggests transferring adult bacteria to infants' mouths through saliva may train immune system to ignore allergens

May 6, 2013


By Barbara Bronson Gray
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, May 6 (HealthDay News) -- A new Swedish study suggests that parents who want to protect their infants from developing allergies should try a simple approach to introducing their children to the wide world of microbes: Just pop their pacifiers into their own mouths before giving them back to their babies.

Although that may sound disgusting or even risky to some, researchers found that the transfer of oral bacteria from adults to infants seems to help train the immune system to ignore germs that don't pose a threat.

"The immune system's purpose is to differentiate between harmless and harmful," said Dr. Ron Ferdman, a pediatric allergist at Children's Hospital Los Angeles. "If your immune system is not presented with enough microbes, it just defaults to doing harmful attacks against things that are not harmful, like food, cat dander or dust mites."

A report released last week from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics showed that the number of American children with allergies has increased dramatically in recent years: about 13 percent have skin allergies and 17 percent have respiratory allergies.

The Swedish researchers set out to learn whether very early microbial exposure during the first months of life affects allergy development. They found that children whose parents sucked on their pacifiers to clean them were less likely to have asthma, eczema and sensitivity to allergens than children whose parents did not clean the pacifiers this way.

The authors concluded that parental sucking of their baby's pacifiers may help decrease the risk of allergy caused by transfer of microbes through the parent's saliva.

For the study, published online May 6 in the journal Pediatrics, 206 pregnant women in Sweden were initially recruited as participants, and 187 of their infants were included in the research. The scientists sought families with at least one allergic parent to see if they could identify a different immune response in the children.

The researchers studied the transfer of microbes in the parents' saliva by fingerprinting bacterial DNA in 33 infants' saliva, of which 21 had parents who sucked on their pacifiers.

A total of 187 babies were followed until the child was 18 months old, and 174 were followed until they were 36 months old. The researchers chose to evaluate the children at those specific points in time because some diseases, such as eczema, develop early in life, said Dr. Bill Hesselmar, an associate professor at Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, in Gothenberg, Sweden.

Introducing solid foods into an infant's diet did not seem to affect the study results, Hesselmar said. "We found differences in the oral microbial flora already at 4 months of age, at an age when most children are still on breast milk."

Ferdman, who was not associated with the research, urged caution in interpreting the results of the study. "It's a small number of babies studied, so it's hard to generalize," he said.

He also expressed concern that results may not be widely applicable because the data were taken solely from Swedish participants, who are not a genetically diverse population.

Other researchers have expressed concern about dirty pacifiers.

Dr. Tom Glass, a professor of forensic sciences, pathology and dental medicine at Oklahoma State University, presented research at the American Society for Clinical Pathology in Boston last November that found a wide range of disease-causing bacteria, fungus and mold on children's pacifiers. They also found that pacifiers can grow a slimy coating of bacteria called a biofilm that alters the normal bacteria in the children's mouths, spurring inflammation and potentially increasing the risk of developing gastrointestinal problems or even ear infections.

The value of using a parent's saliva to clean a dirty pacifier has been known for some time, Glass said. "We have for a long time advocated that if you're at the Walmart and the baby drops the pacifier, you're better off putting the pacifier in your mouth [to clean it] because you have immunoglobulin components that fight bacteria in your saliva."

Glass expressed concern that the researchers did not identify the specific microbes transferred from parents to the pacifiers. "We don't know what the parents are actually transmitting to the child," he said.

What should parents do to help prevent allergies in their children? "Babies need to be exposed to the world, and exposure to the normal microbial environment is protective," Ferdman said. "Breast-feed for at least four to six weeks if you can. Don't smoke, and don't expose your children to secondhand smoke."

More information

Find out more about the risks and benefits of pacifiers from the

American Academy of Family Physicians.

http://health.usnews.com/...fiers?page

Interesting.

This is one of those things, that even knowing better, people aren't likely to do better. Telling a parent they are better of using their mouth to clean a pacifier a child drops is most likely a non-starter for most.

It also seems contradictory when parents are teaching children not to pick up things and put it in their mouth for the child to see the parent do it with their pacifier.

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 05/06/13 10:00am

morningsong

I heard about this on the new this morning too. Is that something? I still wonder if there still isn't antibodies that the mother passes along just through immediate breastfeeding.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 05/06/13 6:08pm

paintedlady

avatar

doody

I think it is better to SLOWLY introduce babies to new foods. These days parents overfeed and introduce their babies to foods too quickly. Breastfeeding should counter act any hypersensitivity of the body's histamines to new foods anyways .... forget the saliva, that is what titty milk is for.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 05/06/13 8:15pm

ZombieKitten

avatar

Once kids are eating they should eat dirt!
I'm the mistake you wanna make
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 05/06/13 10:33pm

dJJ

ZombieKitten said:

Once kids are eating they should eat dirt!

Always thought that was natures joke.

When they start to eat, the food ends up in a radius of 3 meters around the mouth.

This way they gather some extra germs and microbes as additves in their food, to build up a solid resitance on their own.

They'r not just playing with their food. And it's not a weak hand-spoon-mouth coordination.

They are busy building up a healthy resistance.

99% of my posts are ironic. Maybe this post sides with the other 1%.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 05/07/13 1:20am

ZombieKitten

avatar

dJJ said:



ZombieKitten said:


Once kids are eating they should eat dirt!



Always thought that was natures joke.



When they start to eat, the food ends up in a radius of 3 meters around the mouth.



This way they gather some extra germs and microbes as additves in their food, to build up a solid resitance on their own.



They'r not just playing with their food. And it's not a weak hand-spoon-mouth coordination.



They are busy building up a healthy resistance.






Exactly :nod:

Kids who grew up on farms who collected eggs from the chickens, milked cows, rode horses and had dogs, and kittens twice a year, they never had allergies and rarely got sick thanks to early exposure to a wide array of microbes. It's probably likely they were breastfed too.
I'm the mistake you wanna make
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 05/07/13 4:51am

paintedlady

avatar

ZombieKitten said:

dJJ said:

Always thought that was natures joke.

When they start to eat, the food ends up in a radius of 3 meters around the mouth.

This way they gather some extra germs and microbes as additves in their food, to build up a solid resitance on their own.

They'r not just playing with their food. And it's not a weak hand-spoon-mouth coordination.

They are busy building up a healthy resistance.

Exactly nod Kids who grew up on farms who collected eggs from the chickens, milked cows, rode horses and had dogs, and kittens twice a year, they never had allergies and rarely got sick thanks to early exposure to a wide array of microbes. It's probably likely they were breastfed too.

nod

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 05/07/13 10:22am

kitbradley

avatar

So if I have this kid, we are in a shopping mall and the kid drops his pacifer on the floor, I'm supposed to pick the thing up and put it in my mouth???? Ummmm. I don't think so. sick

"It's not nice to fuck with K.B.! All you haters will see!" - Kitbradley
"The only true wisdom is knowing you know nothing." - Socrates
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 05/07/13 2:50pm

dJJ

kitbradley said:

So if I have this kid, we are in a shopping mall and the kid drops his pacifer on the floor, I'm supposed to pick the thing up and put it in my mouth???? Ummmm. I don't think so. sick

Just put it back in the mouth of your kid then.

99% of my posts are ironic. Maybe this post sides with the other 1%.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 05/07/13 3:32pm

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Wouldn't sticking it up your arse make it even better. lol

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 05/07/13 3:48pm

kitbradley

avatar

dJJ said:

kitbradley said:

So if I have this kid, we are in a shopping mall and the kid drops his pacifer on the floor, I'm supposed to pick the thing up and put it in my mouth???? Ummmm. I don't think so. sick

Just put it back in the mouth of your kid then.

Okay! Thanks!

"It's not nice to fuck with K.B.! All you haters will see!" - Kitbradley
"The only true wisdom is knowing you know nothing." - Socrates
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 05/07/13 9:18pm

ZombieKitten

avatar

dJJ said:

kitbradley said:

So if I have this kid, we are in a shopping mall and the kid drops his pacifer on the floor, I'm supposed to pick the thing up and put it in my mouth???? Ummmm. I don't think so. sick

Just put it back in the mouth of your kid then.

falloff

I'm the mistake you wanna make
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 05/07/13 9:19pm

ZombieKitten

avatar

2freaky4church1 said:

Wouldn't sticking it up your arse make it even better. lol

You're 50% right!

Stick it in YOUR arse then stick it in your baby's, effectively rePOOPulating their gut!

I'm the mistake you wanna make
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Want Tots Without Allergies? Try Sucking on Their Pacifiers