Graycap23 said:

Timmy84 said:

Exactly. Plus everyone agreed that the case wasn't really handled properly. Not guilty perhaps, innocent? No.

I guess this is the only case where that question applies?

What are you talking about?

Graycap23 said:

Timmy84 said:

Exactly. Plus everyone agreed that the case wasn't really handled properly. Not guilty perhaps, innocent? No.

I guess this is the only case where that question applies?

What are you going on about?

[Edited 11/20/12 11:15am]

I give up.

It makes a little more sense after reading complete article on yahoo. I never thought he could of done it himself during the short time frame that night. OJ still guilty whether he physically did it himself or he hired someone.

jaimestarr79 said:

It makes a little more sense after reading complete article on yahoo. I never thought he could of done it himself during the short time frame that night. OJ still guilty whether he physically did it himself or he hired someone.

They found two set of footprints that night of the murder. I'm trying to think back if that came from the prosecutor.

JustErin said:

Naw, it was the Illuminati.

Graycap23 said:

What if O.J. didn’t do it? Film suggests serial killer—not Simpson—murdered Brown, Goldman

By Dylan Stableford, Yahoo! News | The Lookout – 18 hrs ago

• Print

Simpson, Rogers (AP/FBI/File)

Is O.J. Simpson innocent of murder after all? An explosive new documentary suggests that he is.

In the film "My Brother the Serial Killer," set to air Wednesday on the Investigation Discovery network, Clay Rogers, the brother of convicted serial killer Glen Rogers, claims Glen murdered Simpson's ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ron Goldman—the pair Simpson was accused—and controversially acquitted—of slaying in 1995.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/oj-innocent-glen-rogers-murder-nicole-194119077.html

I remember this day like it was yesterday. I remember i was in college. I was supposed to be in class but i was in my dorm awaiting the verdict. It seemed like the whole was frozen in time waiting for this verdict. I get class about 15 minutes late. Keep in mind I'm the only black guy in this class of about 50 people. wow what a reaction!!!! Even I thought he was guilty. But the way people reacted was interesting. wow that's all we talked about in that class for the next two days. Here the it was an Anatomy Class....and the teacher is talking about OJ for the next two days. I think he was guilty....but there was definitely reasonable doubt. so under the law he had to go free.....even though everyone knew he did it. I watched that trial night and day. I even recorded it when I couldn't watch it live. It was like a real life csi tv show.

A prevous supervisor/advisor of mine who resides in Marina Del Rey knows the Simpson family. She told me that OJ did not do it but his son from his first marriage did and that OJ took the fall to protect the son.

Kanye

rdhull said:

A prevous supervisor/advisor of mine who resides in Marina Del Rey knows the Simpson family. She told me that OJ did not do it but his son from his first marriage did and that OJ took the fall to protect the son.

Kanye

Eh I don't believe that anymore that I believe the serial killer did it.

rdhull said:

A prevous supervisor/advisor of mine who resides in Marina Del Rey knows the Simpson family. She told me that OJ did not do it but his son from his first marriage did and that OJ took the fall to protect the son.

Kanye

JustErin said:

rdhull said:

A prevous supervisor/advisor of mine who resides in Marina Del Rey knows the Simpson family. She told me that OJ did not do it but his son from his first marriage did and that OJ took the fall to protect the son.

Kanye

I know it sounds outrageous Im just saying lol.

remember oj's friend AC. does anybody remember what AC's alibi was? where was he the night of the murder?

AC had nothing to gain if that's what you're suggesting lol

rdhull said:

JustErin said:

I know it sounds outrageous Im just saying lol.

But what fall? Dude pleaded innocent.

jaimestarr79 said:

remember oj's friend AC. does anybody remember what AC's alibi was? where was he the night of the murder?

With OJ's son?

Timmy84 said:

AC had nothing to gain if that's what you're suggesting lol

Why would AC put himself at risk during the high speed chase? just because he was oj's friend??? the police could of shot up the vehicle and killed them both for resisting arrest . If it werent oj an ac in the car....and they were regular brothas...they probably would of been shot on the spot. Ac has to be just as shady as OJ. Shit I got some high school classmates that i wouldn't give them a ride down the street due to their shady past...LOL>

[Edited 11/20/12 13:31pm]

jaimestarr79 said:

regular brothas...

If this new guy did it, wouldn't his DNA be all over the crime scene as well?

If they really want to clear him as a potential suspect, they should just test for his DNA. That is, if there's any samples left.

I still think OJ did it. Everybody knows why the gloves didn't fit. And there was enough evidence at the time to prove he was guilty, but due to laws at the time and bad prosecution, there was no conviction.

He was found not-guilty, but he wasn't innocent of Nicole and Ron's murders.

jaimestarr79 said:

Timmy84 said:

AC had nothing to gain if that's what you're suggesting lol

Why would AC put himself at risk during the high speed chase? just because he was oj's friend??? the police could of shot up the vehicle and killed them both for resisting arrest . If it werent oj an ac in the car....and they were regular brothas...they probably would of been shot on the spot. Ac has to be just as shady as OJ. Shit I got some high school classmates that i wouldn't give them a ride down the street due to their shady past...LOL>

[Edited 11/20/12 13:31pm]

So you think he had something to do with it? If he did, why was OJ the one with the gun, disguise outfit and all that junk?

ThruTheEyesOfWonder said:

If this new guy did it, wouldn't his DNA be all over the crime scene as well?

If they really want to clear him as a potential suspect, they should just test for his DNA. That is, if there's any samples left.

I still think OJ did it. Everybody knows why the gloves didn't fit. And there was enough evidence at the time to prove he was guilty, but due to laws at the time and bad prosecution, there was no conviction.

He was found not-guilty, but he wasn't innocent of Nicole and Ron's murders.

No one will convince me OJ didn't do it. You could see how SMUG he looked after the verdict was read. Johnnie Cochran was the ONLY reason OJ didn't serve time... that and successfully making Furhman out to be a villain lol

JustErin said:

Naw, it was the Illuminati.

imago said:

Well, fleeing in an SUV would have been an unecessary theatrical display then.

OJ did it.

Graycap23 said:

I give up.

it is odd that folks will admit that errors can be made in the justice system while steadfastly refusing to apply that whole 'errors can be made' concept to this particular case.

imo the media sensationalized the OJ lawsuit to the point where it might be a hundred years before an jury impartial enough to fairly weigh the evidence will be born

I don't see what was so unique about this case. It wasn't that the prosecution didn't have anything to prove - there were enough evidence to lock OJ up - it's just that the media's attention and the prosecution's negligence that led to their downfall and was a reason OJ basically "got away with murder". It reminds me of Klaus von Bulow (or whoever his name was) and his case in the murder of his wife.

[Edited 11/20/12 16:45pm]

XxAxX said:

Graycap23 said:

I give up.

it is odd that folks will admit that errors can be made in the justice system while steadfastly refusing to apply that whole 'errors can be made' concept to this particular case.

imo the media sensationalized the OJ lawsuit to the point where it might be a hundred years before an jury impartial enough to fairly weigh the evidence will be born

just because mistakes were made doesn't mean the jury got it right. the fact is Guilt is a legal term and it is not the the same as did they do it or not. That is a basic fact that I would have thought most people would grasp.

Timmy84 said:

I don't see what was so unique about this case. It wasn't that the prosecution didn't have anything to prove - there were enough evidence to lock OJ up - it's just that the media's attention and the prosecution's negligence that led to their downfall and was a reason OJ basically "got away with murder". It reminds me of Klaus von Bulow (or whoever his name was) and his case in the murder of his wife.

[Edited 11/20/12 16:45pm]

Klaus didnt do it. His son from a prevous marriage did.

rdhull said:

Timmy84 said:

I don't see what was so unique about this case. It wasn't that the prosecution didn't have anything to prove - there were enough evidence to lock OJ up - it's just that the media's attention and the prosecution's negligence that led to their downfall and was a reason OJ basically "got away with murder". It reminds me of Klaus von Bulow (or whoever his name was) and his case in the murder of his wife.

[Edited 11/20/12 16:45pm]

Klaus didnt do it. His son from a prevous marriage did.

Really? How did they come to that conclusion?

Timmy84 said:

CarrieMpls said:

The case may be closed but that doesn't mean the truth is known. Innocent folks go to jail all the time, the opposite happens too.

Exactly. Plus everyone agreed that the case wasn't really handled properly. Not guilty perhaps, innocent? No.

Hello! O.J. was found not guilty, so why is everybody automatically assuming he murdered Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman? After all, there was a massive pool of blood at the crime scene, yet only a few drops of blood were found inside the Ford Bronco O.J. was allegedly driving away from the murder scene. And why is it that no one to this very day has actually found the murder weapon plus any other incriminating evidence (blood-soaked clothers, blood-stained Bruno Magli shoes)? And how could O.J. slaughter two people with one of them allgeedly fighting him back very hard, hightail from the scene of the crime, dispose of the murder weapon and bloody clothes to someplace which no one could ever find, go back to his house, tap on Kato Kaelin's guest house door, go insdie his own house, take a shower, pack his clothes for a golf trip to Chicago, and catch a limo to LAX, all of this happening in around 75 to 90 minutes?

OJ was found not innocent in one trial, but he lost another trial soon afterward.

I suppose there was not definitive evidence to convict him, and the defense established the possibility that the police could both make errors as well as be biased. None of this says he did not do it IMO, just that the jury was not convinced that there was enough evidence to say he did do it.

But one thing stands out in Johnny Cochran's closing argument. He asked the jury to send a message. And that, they did! Where one group saw overwhelming evidence, another group overwhelmingly distrusted the legal system/police.

728huey said:

Timmy84 said:

Exactly. Plus everyone agreed that the case wasn't really handled properly. Not guilty perhaps, innocent? No.

Hello! O.J. was found not guilty, so why is everybody automatically assuming he murdered Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman? After all, there was a massive pool of blood at the crime scene, yet only a few drops of blood were found inside the Ford Bronco O.J. was allegedly driving away from the murder scene. And why is it that no one to this very day has actually found the murder weapon plus any other incriminating evidence (blood-soaked clothers, blood-stained Bruno Magli shoes)? And how could O.J. slaughter two people with one of them allgeedly fighting him back very hard, hightail from the scene of the crime, dispose of the murder weapon and bloody clothes to someplace which no one could ever find, go back to his house, tap on Kato Kaelin's guest house door, go insdie his own house, take a shower, pack his clothes for a golf trip to Chicago, and catch a limo to LAX, all of this happening in around 75 to 90 minutes?

Why was he found not guilty? Prosecution negligence, the media, OJ's own backtracking words, etc.