[Edited 6/27/12 22:32pm]

Why...just why???

Okay, I couldn't even finish looking at those pictures......

That was a complete buzz kill!!!!!

Wow...........

I'm cryin' AND PUKING at the same time...

This girl seems to be posing. Like she's unaware that her leg is decaying. So sad.

The hell is so great about drugs and alcohol? I really don't get this nonsense on any LEVEL.

Look at how many lives drugs has destroyed.

photo #7 has nothing to do with this kroc stuff which makes me wonder if the others are fake

the photo i mention IS real, i remember this from a few years ago as being published in british national press

rachel whitear was a victim of heroin overdose, her family wanted the photo public & told a story of an intelligent family orientated person & her decent into drug abuse. shocking & so sad.

http://www.telegraph.co.u...spect.html

[Edited 6/27/12 10:38am]

I can't even bring myself to READ the whole story.

DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE THE URGE TO FUCK THE REST OF HER SKIN OFF???

whut? you sayin it's just me???

LIARS!!!

fuck a duck

excited said:

photo #7 has nothing to do with this kroc stuff which makes me wonder if the others are fake

the photo i mention IS real, i remember this from a few years ago as being published in british national press

rachel whitear was a victim of heroin overdose, her family wanted the photo public & told a story of an intelligent family orientated person & her decent into drug abuse. shocking & so sad.

http://www.telegraph.co.u...spect.html

Yeah, I thought at one point the pics may be fake or nothing to do with this stuff

Why does the cooked up codeine have to be mixed with lighter fluid or gasoline?

lauralevesque said:

This girl seems to be posing. Like she's unaware that her leg is decaying. So sad.

in one of the other photos same girl is grimacing in pain as another woman is peeling the skin off her leg. While high they can't feel it and don't care I guess.

SometimesIwonder said:

Could you please put a stronger warning about how disturbing these photos are for the link.

I actually agree. What has been seen cannot be unseen. A warning about graphic images would be cool.

Also, ugh. I have a lot of thoughts, but don't really have the words right now.

Cerebus said:

SometimesIwonder said:

Could you please put a stronger warning about how disturbing these photos are for the link.

I actually agree. What has been seen cannot be unseen. A warning about graphic images would be cool.

I'm not going to make a big deal out of it but in the heading i put NSFW. Also i assumed that after seeing the photo in the post, people would come to the conclusion that the other pictures would be just as graphic or more so. People have the choice to click on a link or not......I'm just saying.

Regardless, i hear what your saying and thanks.

[Edited 6/27/12 21:29pm]

JoeyC said:

Cerebus said:

I actually agree. What has been seen cannot be unseen. A warning about graphic images would be cool.

I'm not going to make a big deal out of it but in the heading i put NSFW. Also i assumed that after seeing the photo in the post, people would come to the conclusion that the other pictures would be just as graphic or more so. People have the the choice to click on a link or not......I'm just saying.

Regardless, i hear what your saying and thanks.

NSFW means a THOUSAND things. Graphic Images means graphic images. Some people might find the story NSFW, still want to read it, but not want to see the one image included in the thread. With no warning, they don't have that choice.

It's cool either way - whatever works for you for sure. I'm not sensitive about it myself. But that image is pretty rough.

Edit: Keep leavin' off whole words n' shit.

[Edited 6/27/12 21:32pm]

Cerebus said:

JoeyC said:

I'm not going to make a big deal out of it but in the heading i put NSFW. Also i assumed that after seeing the photo in the post, people would come to the conclusion that the other pictures would be just as graphic or more so. People have the the choice to click on a link or not......I'm just saying.

Regardless, i hear what your saying and thanks.

NSFW means a THOUSAND things. Graphic Images means graphic images. Some people might find the story NSFW, still want to read it, but not want to see the one image included in the thread. With no warning, they don't have that choice.

It's cool either way - whatever works for you for sure. I'm not sensitive about it myself. But that image is pretty rough.

Edit: Keep leavin' off whole words n' shit.

Sometimesiwonder stated that the link has disturbing pictures. She didn't complain about the photo in the post.

Why did you feel the need to speak about the picture(s) if you weren't "sensitive" about it ? Are you a moderator ?

[Edited 6/27/12 22:55pm]

JoeyC said:

Cerebus said:

NSFW means a THOUSAND things. Graphic Images means graphic images. Some people might find the story NSFW, still want to read it, but not want to see the one image included in the thread. With no warning, they don't have that choice.

It's cool either way - whatever works for you for sure. I'm not sensitive about it myself. But that image is pretty rough.

Edit: Keep leavin' off whole words n' shit.

Sometimesiwonder stated that the link has disturbing pictures. She didn't complain about the photo in the post.

Why did you feel the need to speak about the picture(s) if you weren't "sensitive" about it ? Are you a moderator ?

Wow. Overreact much?

No, I'm not. And no moderators would have known or cared if you hadn't gone out of your way to pout, remove your post and change the title to "delete" becuase somebody has an opinion.

The image of a girl with needle sores all over her body and her lower leg rotting off was hardcore. How many times do you see something like that at the org? If I thought it needed to be moderated I would have reported it. I simply suggested you warn of graphic images (I wasn't ordering you to do something, or demanding), and I thought we were discussing it like adults. Clearly, I was WAY wrong.

Cerebus said:

JoeyC said:

Sometimesiwonder stated that the link has disturbing pictures. She didn't complain about the photo in the post.

Why did you feel the need to speak about the picture(s) if you weren't "sensitive" about it ? Are you a moderator ?

Wow. Overreact much?

No, I'm not. And no moderators would have known or cared if you hadn't gone out of your way to pout, remove your post and change the title to "delete" becuase somebody has an opinion.

The image of a girl with needle sores all over her body and her lower leg rotting off was hardcore. How many times do you see something like that at the org? If I thought it needed to be moderated I would have reported it. I simply suggested you warn of graphic images (I wasn't ordering you to do something, or demanding), and I thought we were discussing it like adults. Clearly, I was WAY wrong.

Dude, don't flatter yourself. Your not that special. Peace.

You just deleted a perfectly good thread.

JoeyC said:

Cerebus said:

Wow. Overreact much?

No, I'm not. And no moderators would have known or cared if you hadn't gone out of your way to pout, remove your post and change the title to "delete" becuase somebody has an opinion.

The image of a girl with needle sores all over her body and her lower leg rotting off was hardcore. How many times do you see something like that at the org? If I thought it needed to be moderated I would have reported it. I simply suggested you warn of graphic images (I wasn't ordering you to do something, or demanding), and I thought we were discussing it like adults. Clearly, I was WAY wrong.

Dude, don't flatter yourself. Your not that special. Peace.

OK

KidaDynamite said:

You just deleted a perfectly good thread.

For no reason, apparently.

i see the bitches won out again