independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Why are Freedie Jackson, Queen Latifah, & (most recently) Raven Symone are still in denial about being non-straight?!?l
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 06/09/12 10:35pm

Timmy84

PurpleRighteous1 said:

dJJ said:

Saying you are gay is very different then participating in media circus. You can be gay and still be private about your love life.

The problem with that statement is announcing their sexuality creates a media circus that wasn't there before. And that circus will cause all kinds of issues in that celebrity's life whether they participate further or not. When you don't give them a story they make one (or more) up.

This. It's like damn if you do and damn if you don't.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 06/09/12 11:07pm

dJJ

Timmy84 said:

PurpleRighteous1 said:

The problem with that statement is announcing their sexuality creates a media circus that wasn't there before. And that circus will cause all kinds of issues in that celebrity's life whether they participate further or not. When you don't give them a story they make one (or more) up.

This. It's like damn if you do and damn if you don't.

Nothing is going to change when everybody stays in the closet.

Societal norms change when individuals stretch majorities' norm.

I want to be clear, that I don't judge anybody for choosing their own direction. May it be silent or open about being gay. I just want to challenge the people who choose the easy way out; every decision and behavior by a media person reinforces the norm. Not that I like that. It's just how it is.

I don't think start have to expose their private life to the public. However, when somebody is gay and doesn't out that (bring partner to red carpet, shows or mention it in interviews) , that person silently reinforces the heteroseksual standard.

It's not important if anybody is gay or straight, however it's also not something to hide or be ashamed about.

99% of my posts are ironic. Maybe this post sides with the other 1%.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 06/09/12 11:34pm

Timmy84

I see it like this, even when folks do come out like that, it's cool but I guess I don't see how that can ever further the progress that community especially with those who were already "out" from the get. All I'm saying is it takes more than some famous celebrity to give about change in the homosexual (and bisexual and asexual) communities.

[Edited 6/9/12 16:52pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 06/09/12 11:49pm

PurpleRighteou
s1

avatar

dJJ said:



Timmy84 said:




PurpleRighteous1 said:



The problem with that statement is announcing their sexuality creates a media circus that wasn't there before. And that circus will cause all kinds of issues in that celebrity's life whether they participate further or not. When you don't give them a story they make one (or more) up.



This. It's like damn if you do and damn if you don't.





Nothing is going to change when everybody stays in the closet.



Societal norms change when individuals stretch majorities' norm.



I want to be clear, that I don't judge anybody for choosing their own direction. May it be silent or open about being gay. I just want to challenge the people who choose the easy way out; every decision and behavior by a media person reinforces the norm. Not that I like that. It's just how it is.



I don't think start have to expose their private life to the public. However, when somebody is gay and doesn't out that (bring partner to red carpet, shows or mention it in interviews) , that person silently reinforces the heteroseksual standard.



It's not important if anybody is gay or straight, however it's also not something to hide or be ashamed about.





They're not in the closet. I'm sure the people who know them know the truth about their sexuality. Just because famous people decide not to tell the public about it doesn't mean they are in the closet. To my knowledge, none of the ppl mentioned have lied about it. They just told ppl to mind their own damn business and left it at that. Just because ppl want celebs to use their fame to bring awareness doesn't mean they have to. There are other ways and if particular celebs don't want to help in that way, there are plenty of other celebrities who will do it instead. You seem to think that if someone doesn't tell the world, then they are in the closet and that's not true.
I graduated bitches!!! 12-19-09 woot! dancing jig
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 06/10/12 7:12am

Ottensen

PurpleRighteous1 said:

dJJ said:

Nothing is going to change when everybody stays in the closet.

Societal norms change when individuals stretch majorities' norm.

I want to be clear, that I don't judge anybody for choosing their own direction. May it be silent or open about being gay. I just want to challenge the people who choose the easy way out; every decision and behavior by a media person reinforces the norm. Not that I like that. It's just how it is.

I don't think start have to expose their private life to the public. However, when somebody is gay and doesn't out that (bring partner to red carpet, shows or mention it in interviews) , that person silently reinforces the heteroseksual standard.

It's not important if anybody is gay or straight, however it's also not something to hide or be ashamed about.

They're not in the closet. I'm sure the people who know them know the truth about their sexuality. Just because famous people decide not to tell the public about it doesn't mean they are in the closet. To my knowledge, none of the ppl mentioned have lied about it. They just told ppl to mind their own damn business and left it at that. Just because ppl want celebs to use their fame to bring awareness doesn't mean they have to. There are other ways and if particular celebs don't want to help in that way, there are plenty of other celebrities who will do it instead. You seem to think that if someone doesn't tell the world, then they are in the closet and that's not true.

Precisely this.

It's really not that hard to understand bananadance

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 06/10/12 8:05am

Asymphony5

avatar

I believe that everyone has the right to come out once they are ready to do so. I am not going to suspect, belittle and force people to come out of the closet if they are not ready to do it.

~Time Spent Learning is a Time Never Wasted~

~They say the skies the limit And to me that's really true But my friend you have seen nothing Just wait till I get through~
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 06/10/12 8:11am

musicjunky318

avatar

What difference does it make? Are they hurting anybody? If they are they are if they aren't they aren't. So what? This is part of the reason why the suicide rate among LGBT youth are so high. Can't even fucking be themselves without someone having a problem.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 06/10/12 2:03pm

PurpleRighteou
s1

avatar

Asymphony5 said:

I believe that everyone has the right to come out once they are ready to do so. I am not going to suspect, belittle and force people to come out of the closet if they are not ready to do it.

nod

I graduated bitches!!! 12-19-09 woot! dancing jig
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 06/10/12 2:13pm

dJJ

Ottensen said:

PurpleRighteous1 said:

dJJ said: They're not in the closet. I'm sure the people who know them know the truth about their sexuality. Just because famous people decide not to tell the public about it doesn't mean they are in the closet. To my knowledge, none of the ppl mentioned have lied about it. They just told ppl to mind their own damn business and left it at that. Just because ppl want celebs to use their fame to bring awareness doesn't mean they have to. There are other ways and if particular celebs don't want to help in that way, there are plenty of other celebrities who will do it instead. You seem to think that if someone doesn't tell the world, then they are in the closet and that's not true.

Precisely this.

It's really not that hard to understand bananadance

@Ottensen rolleyes It's jsut a discussion, food for tought. Not a pissing contest. It's not about me 'not understanding'you. I'm tempted to think you don't understand what I'm conveying. Maybe it's not black/white simplistic enough for you?

99% of my posts are ironic. Maybe this post sides with the other 1%.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 06/10/12 2:18pm

prodigalfan

avatar

ScarletScandal said:

Gunsnhalen said:

Raven? i must have missed this one.

Really? She's giving all kinds of dyke vibes off with that picture up there

True. But I never saw that picture before.

"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 06/10/12 2:38pm

Ottensen

dJJ said:

Ottensen said:

Precisely this.

It's really not that hard to understand bananadance

@Ottensen rolleyes It's jsut a discussion, food for tought. Not a pissing contest. It's not about me 'not understanding'you. I'm tempted to think you don't understand what I'm conveying. Maybe it's not black/white simplistic enough for you?

I never implied it was a pissing contest, dear. Those are your words, not mine. For the record, I'm not interested in that sort of thing. I understand it's a discussion, just one where I feel one way about the topic, and you clearly feel another. So be it.

As for not understanding me or me not understanding you, I highly doubt that on either side of the coin actually. I do however see that there is a contingent in society that refuses to accept that people have the right to private lives without carrying a banner announcing who they sleep with for public consumption, and this is what I took from your post however it was intended. I fully support anyone who doesn't feel that they have to make a public declaration about their sexuality one way or the other, period, and that's not going to change. thumbs up!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 06/10/12 5:09pm

smoothcriminal
12

KCOOLMUZIQ said:

rolleyes

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 06/10/12 5:44pm

free2bfreeda

a large majority of people in this society still stigmatize LGBT community or people there of. imo baiting someone or prying into their personal lives to expose a very private part of the human psyche, is more like an insult.

i stretch my opinion by adding a sidebar:

LGBT jokes are very offensive, and equally offensive are the people that ask, inquire, gossip and waste time with what they feel is a "need to know."

wake up!

q.is it really anyone's business. what you/i do behind your/my closed doors, or who you/i hug and smile at in public?

a. no. is not your/my business or anyone else's, unless you/i voluntarily want or wish for you/me to know.

perhaps these three people discuss nosy people with their peers. maybe the say:

"GTFOH, and stay the FO my personal business!"

"i'm generation Y, as in Y don't y'all get in some time for your own lives!"

Freddie J...

"i've paid my dues, my personal business is not built around you!" "myob pls."

“Transracial is a term that has long since been defined as the adoption of a child that is of a different race than the adoptive parents,” : https://thinkprogress.org...fb6e18544a
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 06/10/12 7:05pm

Ottensen

We need more visual aids up in this joint deal

Raven's recent appearance on Wendy:

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 06/10/12 7:20pm

dJJ

I hear you guys. And maybe I'm viewing it to much from a Dutch perspective. To me one can come forward as gay or straight, without having your privat life or partner discussed in the tabloids.

I understand why the rich & famous protect their privacy.

However, not being upfront about it implies that it should be kept secret because it's not okay.

Well, judgement is in the eye of the beholder. And I know it's easy to vent an opinion then actually have to live up to one. lol

99% of my posts are ironic. Maybe this post sides with the other 1%.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 06/10/12 7:33pm

free2bfreeda

ottensen said:

wow, Ms Symone has reached adulthood in a beautificant way. imo, she's intelligent, poised, real and wonderfully beautiful, which equals awesome qualifications in today's woman. more power to her.

i liked the way she skated over her "out and about at the greenhouse" statement. i mean it's like raven had a 50/50% control over the interview.

she seems so cool

thx 4 posting interview.

[Edited 6/10/12 12:41pm]

“Transracial is a term that has long since been defined as the adoption of a child that is of a different race than the adoptive parents,” : https://thinkprogress.org...fb6e18544a
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 06/10/12 7:56pm

free2bfreeda

smoothcriminal12 said:

KCOOLMUZIQ said:

rolleyes

Mr. Broadus, Jr's expression here is priceless.

“Transracial is a term that has long since been defined as the adoption of a child that is of a different race than the adoptive parents,” : https://thinkprogress.org...fb6e18544a
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 06/10/12 8:47pm

Ottensen

Queen La on Wendy:

As usual she is engaging. She's grown into quite a powerful Hollywood player through the years, but always come off as funny and down to earth. I met her at the Delano Hotel once in the 90's (pre-Jeanette Jenkins). She had great hair without her pieces in, and was much smaller in person. Basically just "big-boned-ed", but not as plus sized as you would think from the way she photographs. Kinda the same like Jill Scott, and both very attractive women, with a strong yet humble presence when you talk to them one on one :

[Edited 6/10/12 13:48pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 06/10/12 9:25pm

Ottensen

dJJ said:

I hear you guys. And maybe I'm viewing it to much from a Dutch perspective. To me one can come forward as gay or straight, without having your privat life or partner discussed in the tabloids.

I understand why the rich & famous protect their privacy.

However, not being upfront about it implies that it should be kept secret because it's not okay.

Well, judgement is in the eye of the beholder. And I know it's easy to vent an opinion then actually have to live up to one. lol

Well for all these years, Queen looks to me like she's as upfront as she needs to be and regardless of whether anyone else is okay with her publicly coming forward, she looks like she's okey-dope like soap on a rope regardless, and that's what matters most.

jeanette-jenkins-queen-latifah

Post image for Queen Latifah And Jeanette Jenkins Join Alicia Keys on Her Honeymoon

As for not having your private life discussed in tabloids whether you're gay or straight, apparently you don't know American tabloids, and especially how brutal the urban tabloid market can be. Given the time, perhaps I'll throw one or two headline samples into the thread tomorrow. martini

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 06/11/12 2:11am

KCOOLMUZIQ

free2bfreeda said:

ottensen said:

wow, Ms Symone has reached adulthood in a beautificant way. imo, she's intelligent, poised, real and wonderfully beautiful, which equals awesome qualifications in today's woman. more power to her.

i liked the way she skated over her "out and about at the greenhouse" statement. i mean it's like raven had a 50/50% control over the interview.

she seems so cool

thx 4 posting interview.

[Edited 6/10/12 12:41pm]

hmmm

[Edited 6/12/12 14:22pm]

eye will ALWAYS think of prince like a "ACT OF GOD"! N another realm. eye mean of all people who might of been aliens or angels.if found out that prince wasn't of this earth, eye would not have been that surprised. R.I.P. prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 06/11/12 12:27pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

prodigalfan said:

ScarletScandal said:

Really? She's giving all kinds of dyke vibes off with that picture up there

True. But I never saw that picture before.

For Ravens images that's just edgy not lesbionic

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 06/11/12 12:28pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

PurpleRighteous1 said:

dJJ said:

Nothing is going to change when everybody stays in the closet.

Societal norms change when individuals stretch majorities' norm.

I want to be clear, that I don't judge anybody for choosing their own direction. May it be silent or open about being gay. I just want to challenge the people who choose the easy way out; every decision and behavior by a media person reinforces the norm. Not that I like that. It's just how it is.

I don't think start have to expose their private life to the public. However, when somebody is gay and doesn't out that (bring partner to red carpet, shows or mention it in interviews) , that person silently reinforces the heteroseksual standard.

It's not important if anybody is gay or straight, however it's also not something to hide or be ashamed about.

They're not in the closet. I'm sure the people who know them know the truth about their sexuality. Just because famous people decide not to tell the public about it doesn't mean they are in the closet. To my knowledge, none of the ppl mentioned have lied about it. They just told ppl to mind their own damn business and left it at that. Just because ppl want celebs to use their fame to bring awareness doesn't mean they have to. There are other ways and if particular celebs don't want to help in that way, there are plenty of other celebrities who will do it instead. You seem to think that if someone doesn't tell the world, then they are in the closet and that's not true.

True, and there are alot of 'str8' celebs that don't let you into their personal/love lives as far as publicity is concerned

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 06/11/12 11:49pm

kitbradley

avatar

Really sad that black entertainers are still kind of forced in the closet not to risk their careers. It seems like it's more acceptable for white entertainers. they are usually patted on the back for doing it.

Neal Patrick Harris is gay. Yet, I very seldom hear anyone mention it. He has the starring role on a hit TV show. I don't see the paparazzi following him, gossiping about him or making up stories about him.

Then there is Ellen, Elton and Melisa Ethridge. After Ellen came out, she got her own talk show and became the spokesperson for Revlon or whatever makeup company that is.

Mellisa is considered a Rock icon. When I've seen stories about her in the past, her lesbianism was never the main topic of discussion.

Elton is musical royalty. We don't even have to go into that.

But, the only publically out mainstream gay entertainers that I can think of are Tracey Chapman, Mishell N'Degeochello and Rupaul. eek All the rest have chosen to remain silent. So do you think if a black entertainer officially comes out that they are more likely to be denied a lot of opportunities and be relegated to a gay-only audience?

I think its important for black people to continue to come out in order to break all of the sterotypes that are out there.

[Edited 6/11/12 16:56pm]

"It's not nice to fuck with K.B.! All you haters will see!" - Kitbradley
"The only true wisdom is knowing you know nothing." - Socrates
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 06/12/12 8:17am

Ottensen

KCOOLMUZIQ said:

free2bfreeda said:

ottensen said:

wow, Ms Symone has reached adulthood in a beautificant way. imo, she's intelligent, poised, real and wonderfully beautiful, which equals awesome qualifications in today's woman. more power to her.

i liked the way she skated over her "out and about at the greenhouse" statement. i mean it's like raven had a 50/50% control over the interview.

she seems so cool

thx 4 posting interview.

[Edited 6/10/12 12:41pm]

hmmm Wonder why she never discusses when she was close room mates with L-----y Loha-

No big mystery there. She's discussed that plenty of times. When asked, she she discusses that time in her life at length. Besides, when most people ask her about this in interviews they draw paralells between the two young women and try to figure out how Lohan became such a public wild child in comparison to Raven, who has spent her young adulthood working consistently and staying out of trouble.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #174 posted 06/12/12 7:22pm

HotGritz

avatar

Raven Simone aint gay....she like the dick. Peeps call her gay because she prefer white men over black men and some black men are non-pleased. Allegedly. Plus she's a boss business woman and if she were gay she would be gay. Its not like coming out would hurt her career; shit it might bring her more fans and more money.

Queen is gay we all know it and the pics are out there but I think she has family issues that prevent her from coming out. Also, she doesn't appear to like the press all up in her business and I can't say I blame her.

Freddie come from church folk and I bet he will go to the grave with that secret if you can call it a secret.

Maybe....just maybe....they aren't necessarily in denial but just biding their time to when they can feel comfortable talking about it. OR maybe....just maybe....they are bisexual and therefore don't consider themselves gay and obligated to announce themselves as such. shrug

I'M NOT SAYING YOU'RE UGLY. YOU JUST HAVE BAD LUCK WHEN IT COMES TO MIRRORS AND SUNLIGHT!
RIP Dick Clark, Whitney Houston, Don Cornelius, Heavy D, and Donna Summer. rose
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #175 posted 06/12/12 8:49pm

free2bfreeda

i luv this emoticon, i also used it in another thread.

Image Detail

like i'm choosing to make it do the eye-rolling in response to all this controversy over:

"am i, (he, or she) straight or gay!"

controversy

controversy

controversy

controversy

controversy

controversy

prince sang those "words," not me.

however, all pov-s in this thread are worth reading and listening to imo.

i remember when another orger posted this quote.

“I am not in this world to live up to other people's expectations, nor do I feel that the world must live up to mine.”

Fritz Perle

i really try to live up to this quote.

“Transracial is a term that has long since been defined as the adoption of a child that is of a different race than the adoptive parents,” : https://thinkprogress.org...fb6e18544a
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #176 posted 06/12/12 8:50pm

Timmy84

free2bfreeda said:

i luv this emoticon, i also used it in another thread.

Image Detail

like i'm choosing to make it do the eye-rolling in response to all this controversy over:

"am i, (he, or she) straight or gay!"

controversy

controversy

controversy

controversy

controversy

controversy

prince sang those "words," not me.

however, all pov-s in this thread are worth reading and listening to imo.

i remember when another orger posted this quote.

“I am not in this world to live up to other people's expectations, nor do I feel that the world must live up to mine.”

Fritz Perle

i really try to live up to this quote.

I'm stealing this lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Why are Freedie Jackson, Queen Latifah, & (most recently) Raven Symone are still in denial about being non-straight?!?l