New topic
PrintableRodeoSchro said: So some of you want to assign dollar amounts, rather than percentages. You think an arbitrary amount should be enough to raise a kid. Therefore, you are the judge and jury based upon what someone makes.
Some asshole that makes $20K a year fucks around on his wife and three kids? Hell, it takes more than $20K a year to raise the kids, so the wife gets everything, right? But some rich asshole fucks around on his wife and three kids, and since it should take no more than some set amount, then he gets to keep the rest? Even if he retains 90% of his incredible net worth? Hypocrites. I've once knew of someone in NY who has married three times with kids. The city takes money out of his check to support three women with children that he's no longer with. The man barely have enough to live on. Was it right to clean him out like that? No, and I understand that he brought it on himself. To my understanding, Tiger has a prenup with his wife. He did not leave her out to dry, despite his philandering ways. Out of spite and greed, she supposedly request $750 million dollars, as opposed to the agreement. Any judge and jury can see right through that, but see how this plays out. In both case scenarios, I do not think you should take almost all of anyone's hard earned money, especially if you didn't work for it, and he's a sleaze. Both of them should chalk this up to an experience. Both of them should learn to keep it in their pants, but Tiger should marry Oprah next time. She's loaded. Just using her for an example. As for the women, these women should learn that if he cheats on his woman with you, what makes you think he wouldn't do the same to you. I'm learning tonight that Tiger had an ex-girlfriend, and he cheated on her with Elin. True or false? I dunno  | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I'm with the men on this. Even if she hada tw*t of pure gold, she don't deservce 750 mil!  That's OK. 
That's just it, Ms. Wood's is never going to get 750 million, but she will get what she's entitled too. This has nothing to do with what her "tw*t" is lined with, if I recall it was Wood's and his dick that started this. As I said in my previous post IF they are divorcing - under these circumstances - Mr. Wood's will probably give her more than what was initially agreed upon in their prenup. For all the talk of money, they do have children very young children who will now know their father on a limited bases. If Mr. Woods has seriously taken into account his choices as he claims he has, he knows he's lost something that money can't replace, being a fully involved presense in his children's lives. It's called consequences..... ----- [Edited 5/24/10 22:10pm] Please, If he's not involved in his children's lives it's because she prevents it or he chooses not to be involved. Divorce doesn't mean he doesn't get to have a relationship with his children. They don't have to known their father on a limited basis but probably will because she will still be on a personal revenge kick rather than putting her children first. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: angel345 said: I called Tiger out, too. My point, though I'd admit it was harsh is what has she done to claim almost all of his earnings, but gave him sex and babies. Give me $750 million then, because I've been through the ringer with men in my lifetime, though I have never married. You cannot pay for pain and suffering because the feeling is still there. Can't prove it, but I heard that it was a business arrangement. If it was, then I see it as having sex for money. It's only a matter of time if this article is true or false. entitlement. IT all comes down to that. people want to assassinate me for even suggesting that women in America feel they deserve something for nothing but this is a great example  Let's see how this entitlement goes. I'll bet the judge is laughing in his chamber. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
angel345 said: I've once knew of someone in NY who has married three times with kids. The city takes money out of his check to support three women with children that he's no longer with. The man barely have enough to live on. Was it right to clean him out like that? No, and I understand that he brought it on himself. To my understanding, Tiger has a prenup with his wife. He did not leave her out to dry, despite his philandering ways. Out of spite and greed, she supposedly request $750 million dollars, as opposed to the agreement. Any judge and jury can see right through that, but see how this plays out. In both case scenarios, I do not think you should take almost all of anyone's hard earned money, especially if you didn't work for it, and he's a sleaze. Both of them should chalk this up to an experience. Both of them should learn to keep it in their pants, but Tiger should marry Oprah next time. She's loaded. Just using her for an example. As for the women, these women should learn that if he cheats on his woman with you, what makes you think he wouldn't do the same to you. I'm learning tonight that Tiger had an ex-girlfriend, and he cheated on her with Elin. True or false? I dunno Um, that money is to raise the children he made. Children are expensive to raise and fathers that live and raise their children give ALL their money AND time. This is not about the women or the ex's. This is about child support, and he got cleaned out because he spread his seed all over town. Why do you think its OK for fathers to walk away from their responsibilities as fathers just because they ain't fucking the baby mommas? 
I would never respect a man like that, much less date him. Men like that don't respect women and have no business having children. It is disgraceful that any man should complain about supporting his own children. That situation is completely different to Tiger Wood's wife asking for a large proportion of her husband's worth for alimony. Two different situations that should NOT be compared. Your boyfriend is scum, and any woman that thinks a mother left to raise a child on her own should not get support she needs to raise a child is just wrong on many levels. You have to be so very selfish and self absorbed to be OK with a man being able to buy you a fancy dinner while his children are left to be cared for solely by the mothers. WOW. That's some trifling shit. If a man can pull his dick out and make babies, then that man should work two, three fucking four jobs happily to make sure his kids are taken well care of. Otherwise he needs to abstain or protect himself. Don't like it? Then don't date a man with kids he doesn't want to take care of. DAMN. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: TD3 said: That's OK.
That's just it, Ms. Wood's is never going to get 750 million, but she will get what she's entitled too. This has nothing to do with what her "tw*t" is lined with, if I recall it was Wood's and his dick that started this. As I said in my previous post IF they are divorcing - under these circumstances - Mr. Wood's will probably give her more than what was initially agreed upon in their prenup. For all the talk of money, they do have children very young children who will now know their father on a limited bases. If Mr. Woods has seriously taken into account his choices as he claims he has, he knows he's lost something that money can't replace, being a fully involved presense in his children's lives. It's called consequences..... ----- [Edited 5/24/10 22:10pm] Please, If he's not involved in his children's lives it's because she prevents it or he chooses not to be involved. Divorce doesn't mean he doesn't get to have a relationship with his children. They don't have to known their father on a limited basis but probably will because she will still be on a personal revenge kick rather than putting her children first. Please what?!! Don't start with me Sup cuz I will beat you down.
The very nature of his job will limit his contact and as my husband says if your aren't the custodial parent, all you are is a glorified babysitter. I agree with that assessment. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm not even going to read any responses. Just give some thoughts, both legal and personal.
Legally, what she can get depends on state law. There are a ton of laws that could come into affect, the most important being that her "reward" will be based only on monies earned since they've been together. Tiger may be worth $1 billion, a he worked up to that over many years before he'd ever met her. Also, prenuptuals, anyone? Did Tiger REALLY not request a prenupt? Regardless, even if there are no laws to protect him in the state where they were married, there is no prenupt and they go before a female judge, you can still cut that figure in half, at least. But hey, $375,000,000 ain't bad!
Personally, fuck that bullshit! Reason number 758 to never get married. He should be required to set up large funds to guarantee his kids will be cared for in high style for the rest of their lives. Should his wife get something? Alimony? I guess. But I tell you what, if I were Tiger and she had asked for $750,000,000 in my divorce, I would hire ever well known lawyer on Earth and fight that mess for as long as possible. What Tiger did WAS wrong and HE is dealing the results of decisions on a daily basis. Chances are quite good that he'll be dealing with them for the rest of his life and that he'll never be looked at the same way. Who the hell is she? As soon as they're divorced and she's moved back to wherever the hell she's from nobody will ever see her again. Just, ridiculous. [Edited 5/24/10 22:31pm] [Edited 5/24/10 22:33pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: SUPRMAN said: Please, If he's not involved in his children's lives it's because she prevents it or he chooses not to be involved. Divorce doesn't mean he doesn't get to have a relationship with his children. They don't have to known their father on a limited basis but probably will because she will still be on a personal revenge kick rather than putting her children first. Please what?!! Don't start with me Sup cuz I will beat you down.
The very nature of his job will limit his contact and as my husband says if your aren't the custodial parent, all you are is a glorified babysitter. I agree with that assessment. co-sign. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: TD3 said: Please what?!! Don't start with me Sup cuz I will beat you down.
The very nature of his job will limit his contact and as my husband says if your aren't the custodial parent, all you are is a glorified babysitter. I agree with that assessment. co-sign. Bullshit. Both parents are as involved and important in a divorced family as they choose to be. Ask how many people here grew up in that situation (on both the good and bad side of it) if you have any doubts. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cerebus said: paintedlady said: co-sign. Bullshit. Both parents are as involved and important in a divorced family as they choose to be. Ask how many people here grew up in that situation (on both the good and bad side of it) if you have any doubts. Bullshit, I am raising my children right now by myself, and dad behaves like he is not a dad anymore. I know a father is important, but his attitude is one like a babysitter would have. He sees them twice a year.  And he is OK with that. He lives 30 minutes away also.
That's a glorified baby sitter to me. It makes me feel good that you think differently, I was beginning to lose hope in divorced fathers. Children NEED their dads. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
It just amazes me the hate this woman is getting. Granted its not shocking, this site has a long history of women bashing in general. He is getting what he deserves to get, he played this game knowing full well the shit that was going to hit the fan sooner or later, he took advantage and abused, yes abused, a woman he supposibly loved and his children. You think those children aren't going to be picked on by fellow classmates for being offspring of Ho tiger? God thats a bully's easy ticket.
N no matter where Elin goes and lives, she will get the side eye from people and the media for the rest of her days and either be treated like the idiot wife, the gold digger, the Ho, and not having a twat made of gold. How anyone can sit and try to justify that Tiger is the victim in this is delusional. He fucked up and he deserves to pay the price. It maybe a god awful amount of money, but welcome to the legal system. Elin has every right to be the vindictive, pissed off, wrath has no fury like a woman scorned, why should she take the high moral road when Tiger sure the hell didn't. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: SUPRMAN said: Please, If he's not involved in his children's lives it's because she prevents it or he chooses not to be involved. Divorce doesn't mean he doesn't get to have a relationship with his children. They don't have to known their father on a limited basis but probably will because she will still be on a personal revenge kick rather than putting her children first. Please what?!! Don't start with me Sup cuz I will beat you down.
The very nature of his job will limit his contact and as my husband says if your aren't the custodial parent, all you are is a glorified babysitter. I agree with that assessment. So the nature of his job means he's not in his children's life now? So he should give up his career to be present in his children's lives? Then he's a deadbeat because he won't make any money to give to Elin . . . . I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cerebus said: paintedlady said: co-sign. Bullshit. Both parents are as involved and important in a divorced family as they choose to be. Ask how many people here grew up in that situation (on both the good and bad side of it) if you have any doubts. It would be a little different if Mr. Woods children were a little bit older but they aren't, there's a lot his going to miss out on.. the good and frustration. I don't have any doubts, my mother divorced my beloved father when my siblings and I were good and grown. As he said ever so often.... I didn't count on losing time with my children. He did miss out on a lot because our time as adults of course wasn't the same as it had been as children. Push came to shove we all saw more of our mother more because she had been the nurturer the builder/keeper of family. Mr. Wood's is going to lose time; his children are so young they won't know any different but he will. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lazycrockett said: It just amazes me the hate this woman is getting. Granted its not shocking, this site has a long history of women bashing in general. He is getting what he deserves to get, he played this game knowing full well the shit that was going to hit the fan sooner or later, he took advantage and abused, yes abused, a woman he supposibly loved and his children. You think those children aren't going to be picked on by fellow classmates for being offspring of Ho tiger? God thats a bully's easy ticket.
N no matter where Elin goes and lives, she will get the side eye from people and the media for the rest of her days and either be treated like the idiot wife, the gold digger, the Ho, and not having a twat made of gold. How anyone can sit and try to justify that Tiger is the victim in this is delusional. He fucked up and he deserves to pay the price. It maybe a god awful amount of money, but welcome to the legal system. Elin has every right to be the vindictive, pissed off, wrath has no fury like a woman scorned, why should she take the high moral road when Tiger sure the hell didn't. Do you believe that? That because the next person can't behave better, I am under no religious, moral or ethical obligation to behave any better than they do? Anyone should strive to be the better person in any situation. It's rarely going to feel good at the time but by your reasoning that she doesn't have to behave any better than he does, she should be out fucking - she's got some catching up to do in that department if she's not trying to be any better than he is. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: Cerebus said: Bullshit. Both parents are as involved and important in a divorced family as they choose to be. Ask how many people here grew up in that situation (on both the good and bad side of it) if you have any doubts. It would be a little different if Mr. Woods children were a little bit older but they aren't, there's a lot his going to miss out on.. the good and frustration. I don't have any doubts, my mother divorced my beloved father when my siblings and I were good and grown. As he said ever so often.... I didn't count on losing time with my children. He did miss out on a lot because our time as adults of course wasn't the same as it had been as children. Push came to shove we all saw more of our mother more because she had been the nurturer the builder/keeper of family. Mr. Wood's is going to lose time; his children are so young they won't know any different but he will. You don't know that. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Listen people, or read... whatever. ANY PARENT CAN BE AS INVOLVED AS THEY CHOOSE TO BE! It has nothing to do with Tiger's schedule. What, you think the kids go to public school or something? If Tiger wants the kids and the tutor along he can obviously afford it. And I'm not commenting on how any of us were raised individually (my father sucked more ass than most and I haven't spoken more than ten words to him in 24 years, seriously). Or on any of the circumstances anybody is currently going through. I'm simply saying there is no black or white. It's a giant gray area. ANY parent can be as involved, or not, in their kids lives as they choose to be. That includes people who are still married. It's as simple as that. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Unless of course you're a complete psycho and have been ordered to stay away. But that's something different. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: TD3 said: Please what?!! Don't start with me Sup cuz I will beat you down.
The very nature of his job will limit his contact and as my husband says if your aren't the custodial parent, all you are is a glorified babysitter. I agree with that assessment. So the nature of his job means he's not in his children's life now? So he should give up his career to be present in his children's lives? Then he's a deadbeat because he won't make any money to give to Elin . . . . I didn't say anything about him being a deadbeat did I? I spoke of time that will be lost, especially with them having very young children.
If you are seeing them everyother weekend, holiday.... and in Mr. Woods case a man who spends a lot of time on the road. Yeah miss time.... ===== ===== [Edited 5/25/10 6:14am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: Cerebus said: Bullshit. Both parents are as involved and important in a divorced family as they choose to be. Ask how many people here grew up in that situation (on both the good and bad side of it) if you have any doubts. Bullshit, I am raising my children right now by myself, and dad behaves like he is not a dad anymore. I know a father is important, but his attitude is one like a babysitter would have. He sees them twice a year. And he is OK with that. He lives 30 minutes away also.
That's a glorified baby sitter to me. It makes me feel good that you think differently, I was beginning to lose hope in divorced fathers. Children NEED their dads. Damn that's the exact phrase I used to describe my ex with. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: Please what?!! Don't start with me Sup cuz I will beat you down.
The very nature of his job will limit his contact and as my husband says if your aren't the custodial parent, all you are is a glorified babysitter. I agree with that assessment. As a non-custodial parent that does FAR more for his child than the custodial parent, I have to say that your statement is ridiculous. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
FauxReal said: TD3 said: Please what?!! Don't start with me Sup cuz I will beat you down.
The very nature of his job will limit his contact and as my husband says if your aren't the custodial parent, all you are is a glorified babysitter. I agree with that assessment. As a non-custodial parent that does FAR more for his child than the custodial parent, I have to say that your statement is ridiculous. and thats you. not elin. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
once again, and still true...cheaper to keep her! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This stinks, this thread stinks...  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cerebus said: Unless of course you're a complete psycho and have been ordered to stay away.
But that's something different. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: angel345 said: I've once knew of someone in NY who has married three times with kids. The city takes money out of his check to support three women with children that he's no longer with. The man barely have enough to live on. Was it right to clean him out like that? No, and I understand that he brought it on himself. To my understanding, Tiger has a prenup with his wife. He did not leave her out to dry, despite his philandering ways. Out of spite and greed, she supposedly request $750 million dollars, as opposed to the agreement. Any judge and jury can see right through that, but see how this plays out. In both case scenarios, I do not think you should take almost all of anyone's hard earned money, especially if you didn't work for it, and he's a sleaze. Both of them should chalk this up to an experience. Both of them should learn to keep it in their pants, but Tiger should marry Oprah next time. She's loaded. Just using her for an example. As for the women, these women should learn that if he cheats on his woman with you, what makes you think he wouldn't do the same to you. I'm learning tonight that Tiger had an ex-girlfriend, and he cheated on her with Elin. True or false? I dunno Um, that money is to raise the children he made. Children are expensive to raise and fathers that live and raise their children give ALL their money AND time. This is not about the women or the ex's. This is about child support, and he got cleaned out because he spread his seed all over town. Why do you think its OK for fathers to walk away from their responsibilities as fathers just because they ain't fucking the baby mommas?
I would never respect a man like that, much less date him. Men like that don't respect women and have no business having children. It is disgraceful that any man should complain about supporting his own children. That situation is completely different to Tiger Wood's wife asking for a large proportion of her husband's worth for alimony. Two different situations that should NOT be compared. Your boyfriend is scum, and any woman that thinks a mother left to raise a child on her own should not get support she needs to raise a child is just wrong on many levels. You have to be so very selfish and self absorbed to be OK with a man being able to buy you a fancy dinner while his children are left to be cared for solely by the mothers. WOW. That's some trifling shit. If a man can pull his dick out and make babies, then that man should work two, three fucking four jobs happily to make sure his kids are taken well care of. Otherwise he needs to abstain or protect himself. Don't like it? Then don't date a man with kids he doesn't want to take care of. DAMN. I have stated that there were lessons to be learned on account of the ladies and men, did I state that? Another thing, in both scenarios, all the children are provided for, so therefore these men are not deadbeats. They've made bad choices, but never the less. If these women are not satisfied with the amount their exes are giving them, Elin can take that money, and start a business. Start a clothing line or something. She's set for life. I don't feel sorry for her. As far as the broke baby's mommas, Walmart is hiring. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BklynBabe said: once again, and still true...cheaper to keep her!
Absolutely | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
angel345 said: paintedlady said: Um, that money is to raise the children he made. Children are expensive to raise and fathers that live and raise their children give ALL their money AND time. This is not about the women or the ex's. This is about child support, and he got cleaned out because he spread his seed all over town. Why do you think its OK for fathers to walk away from their responsibilities as fathers just because they ain't fucking the baby mommas?
I would never respect a man like that, much less date him. Men like that don't respect women and have no business having children. It is disgraceful that any man should complain about supporting his own children. That situation is completely different to Tiger Wood's wife asking for a large proportion of her husband's worth for alimony. Two different situations that should NOT be compared. Your boyfriend is scum, and any woman that thinks a mother left to raise a child on her own should not get support she needs to raise a child is just wrong on many levels. You have to be so very selfish and self absorbed to be OK with a man being able to buy you a fancy dinner while his children are left to be cared for solely by the mothers. WOW. That's some trifling shit. If a man can pull his dick out and make babies, then that man should work two, three fucking four jobs happily to make sure his kids are taken well care of. Otherwise he needs to abstain or protect himself. Don't like it? Then don't date a man with kids he doesn't want to take care of. DAMN. I have stated that there were lessons to be learned on account of the ladies and men, did I state that? Another thing, in both scenarios, all the children are provided for, so therefore these men are not deadbeats. They've made bad choices, but never the less. If these women are not satisfied with the amount their exes are giving them, Elin can take that money, and start a business. Start a clothing line or something. She's set for life. I don't feel sorry for her. As far as the broke baby's mommas, Walmart is hiring. I think Elin would have preferred to have a husband that was loyal to her. I will not speculate how she'll do in the future, but I do know that when Tiger met her she was no slouch. And as far as your last comment, its not the babymommas that would need that work at Walmart, it would be the babydaddy crying about how much money he doesn't have to live on because he's bitching about the child support.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
angel345 said: paintedlady said: Um, that money is to raise the children he made. Children are expensive to raise and fathers that live and raise their children give ALL their money AND time. This is not about the women or the ex's. This is about child support, and he got cleaned out because he spread his seed all over town. Why do you think its OK for fathers to walk away from their responsibilities as fathers just because they ain't fucking the baby mommas?
I would never respect a man like that, much less date him. Men like that don't respect women and have no business having children. It is disgraceful that any man should complain about supporting his own children. That situation is completely different to Tiger Wood's wife asking for a large proportion of her husband's worth for alimony. Two different situations that should NOT be compared. Your boyfriend is scum, and any woman that thinks a mother left to raise a child on her own should not get support she needs to raise a child is just wrong on many levels. You have to be so very selfish and self absorbed to be OK with a man being able to buy you a fancy dinner while his children are left to be cared for solely by the mothers. WOW. That's some trifling shit. If a man can pull his dick out and make babies, then that man should work two, three fucking four jobs happily to make sure his kids are taken well care of. Otherwise he needs to abstain or protect himself. Don't like it? Then don't date a man with kids he doesn't want to take care of. DAMN. I have stated that there were lessons to be learned on account of the ladies and men, did I state that? Another thing, in both scenarios, all the children are provided for, so therefore these men are not deadbeats. They've made bad choices, but never the less. If these women are not satisfied with the amount their exes are giving them, Elin can take that money, and start a business. Start a clothing line or something. She's set for life. I don't feel sorry for her. As far as the broke baby's mommas, Walmart is hiring. To add, God forbid Tiger croaks, his children gets his fortune. God forbid the other guy croaks, his children gets his pension, and other possible benefits. Are there any winners or losers in this? It's called the game of life. A cold statement, but true. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: angel345 said: I have stated that there were lessons to be learned on account of the ladies and men, did I state that? Another thing, in both scenarios, all the children are provided for, so therefore these men are not deadbeats. They've made bad choices, but never the less. If these women are not satisfied with the amount their exes are giving them, Elin can take that money, and start a business. Start a clothing line or something. She's set for life. I don't feel sorry for her. As far as the broke baby's mommas, Walmart is hiring. I think Elin would have preferred to have a husband that was loyal to her. I will not speculate how she'll do in the future, but I do know that when Tiger met her she was no slouch. And as far as your last comment, its not the babymommas that would need that work at Walmart, it would be the babydaddy crying about how much money he doesn't have to live on because he's bitching about the child support. I'm sure that man is moonlighting | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: RodeoSchro said: Ivy, you are 1,000,000% right. As usual! What I don't get is these dudes hung up on the money. Hey dudes, think of it in percentages. If she's asking for 33% - 50% of his net worth (as has been estimated), he's getting a good deal. She deserves 3% if that. As a divorcee who personally knows the the sting of being emotionally, physically, financially, and socially ripped to shreds by anothers infidelity and the collateral damaged it caused to my life, being shattered in my very being to the core, after being what I thought was a good, loyal ,devoted partner to someone I would have taken a literal bullet for, I'm really disappointed to hear you feel this way.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cerebus said: Personally, fuck that bullshit! Reason number 758 to never get married. He should be required to set up large funds to guarantee his kids will be cared for in high style for the rest of their lives. Should his wife get something? Alimony? I guess. But I tell you what, if I were Tiger and she had asked for $750,000,000 in my divorce, I would hire ever well known lawyer on Earth and fight that mess for as long as possible. What Tiger did WAS wrong and HE is dealing the results of decisions on a daily basis. Chances are quite good that he'll be dealing with them for the rest of his life and that he'll never be looked at the same way. Who the hell is she? As soon as they're divorced and she's moved back to wherever the hell she's from nobody will ever see her again. Just, ridiculous.
co-sign x 750,000,000 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |