lazycrockett said: ^Cause any woman who steps up and challenges her man is obviously a ho.
No, she challenged him apparently that night they fought and all this came to light. That doesn't make her a ho. Being all about the benjamins does. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: SUPRMAN said: Fact are never needed to bash men in the Org. They are presumed to be whatever the accusation is. What exact bashing has gone on here about the men of the org? About the men of the org? I dunno. About men period? Lots. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: uPtoWnNY said: I just hate the idea of the primary earner always having to pony up in a divorce. Laws are fucked up. That's because the primary breadwinner always acts like they own everything and they are owed and own their partner. Even men that earn less money than their wives complain of being treated unfairly or belittled when disagreements happen. This is why my sister's husband divorced her, she maid more money than him, and reminded him of that everyday. I earned more money than my guy and he couldn't tell me shit either. So we don't know how Mrs. Woods was treated behind the scenes. Ya know? That money may be retribution money to heal her damaged sense of self-respect. You start of saying "the primary breadwinner always . . . ." You end saying that you don't know. Did you ever see her with a black eye? Any domestic violence calls? No credit cards to go shopping with? Boo-hoo. And if her self-esteem and/ or self-respect is somehow inexplicably damaged, no amount of money is going to fix it. Therapy can help but it's the individual who has to change their self-image. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: But the bank account treats him better than she has/is . . . . How do you know this? Well we do know the bank account didn't go after him with a golf club . . . . I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Plain and simple.... she wants him to hurt as much as he hurt and humiliated her... What better way to "make him pay" than by going for BIG money, she also knows it will be in the press again and what better way to keep throwing his piggish behaviour in his face than to start this drama... ~~~~~ Oh that voice...incredible....there should be a musical instrument called George Michael... ~~~~~ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tinaz said: Plain and simple.... she wants him to hurt as much as he hurt and humiliated her... What better way to "make him pay" than by going for BIG money, she also knows it will be in the press again and what better way to keep throwing his piggish behaviour in his face than to start this drama...
I can get with this. This seems a lot more honest than saying she deserves it because he earned it. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: tinaz said: Plain and simple.... she wants him to hurt as much as he hurt and humiliated her... What better way to "make him pay" than by going for BIG money, she also knows it will be in the press again and what better way to keep throwing his piggish behaviour in his face than to start this drama...
I can get with this. This seems a lot more honest than saying she deserves it because he earned it. I dont play that game... shes a grown ass woman who can get a job and support herself.... BUT he does need to help support those babies... ~~~~~ Oh that voice...incredible....there should be a musical instrument called George Michael... ~~~~~ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: paintedlady said: That's because the primary breadwinner always acts like they own everything and they are owed and own their partner. Even men that earn less money than their wives complain of being treated unfairly or belittled when disagreements happen. This is why my sister's husband divorced her, she maid more money than him, and reminded him of that everyday. I earned more money than my guy and he couldn't tell me shit either. So we don't know how Mrs. Woods was treated behind the scenes. Ya know? That money may be retribution money to heal her damaged sense of self-respect. You start of saying "the primary breadwinner always . . . ." You end saying that you don't know. Did you ever see her with a black eye? Any domestic violence calls? No credit cards to go shopping with? Boo-hoo. And if her self-esteem and/ or self-respect is somehow inexplicably damaged, no amount of money is going to fix it. Therapy can help but it's the individual who has to change their self-image. Let me be clear... I know in my circumstance and with those around me how primary breadwinners can behave. Not all do, but it can happen. That being said, hurt can come in many forms. Emotional abuse is one of them. Neglect is another. Spousal abuse is not just a black eye. One thing for sure is, an abuser will make restitution for his bad deeds done to his/her victim by buying their apology. So handing her a credit card as you say may be a way of showing his affection or an apology. Also, what makes you think she's not in therapy? He sure is, for spin control. Oh and BTW, cheating on a spouse is considered a form of abuse. So call her a ho all you want to, no one deserves to be treated like that by someone who claims to love them. Shit, and just like YOU said... Tiger made that money, its only money, he'll make more. So why not hand it over to ease her suffering? Nothing but a thang for good ol' Tiger! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: Vendetta1 said: As soon as I saw your name, I knew exactly what your response would be.
So exactly how is she a ho? As I knew you would. Didn't wanna disappoint. Well now that it's done, she just wants her money off the nightstand. and can you tell us why she is a ho? we know that Tiger is but how is she? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: You start of saying "the primary breadwinner always . . . ." You end saying that you don't know. Did you ever see her with a black eye? Any domestic violence calls? No credit cards to go shopping with? Boo-hoo. And if her self-esteem and/ or self-respect is somehow inexplicably damaged, no amount of money is going to fix it. Therapy can help but it's the individual who has to change their self-image. Let me be clear... I know in my circumstance and with those around me how primary breadwinners can behave. Not all do, but it can happen. That being said, hurt can come in many forms. Emotional abuse is one of them. Neglect is another. Spousal abuse is not just a black eye. One thing for sure is, an abuser will make restitution for his bad deeds done to his/her victim by buying their apology. So handing her a credit card as you say may be a way of showing his affection or an apology. Also, what makes you think she's not in therapy? He sure is, for spin control. Oh and BTW, cheating on a spouse is considered a form of abuse. So call her a ho all you want to, no one deserves to be treated like that by someone who claims to love them. Shit, and just like YOU said... Tiger made that money, its only money, he'll make more. So why not hand it over to ease her suffering? Nothing but a thang for good ol' Tiger! I love you! "Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noimageatall said: paintedlady said: Let me be clear... I know in my circumstance and with those around me how primary breadwinners can behave. Not all do, but it can happen. That being said, hurt can come in many forms. Emotional abuse is one of them. Neglect is another. Spousal abuse is not just a black eye. One thing for sure is, an abuser will make restitution for his bad deeds done to his/her victim by buying their apology. So handing her a credit card as you say may be a way of showing his affection or an apology. Also, what makes you think she's not in therapy? He sure is, for spin control. Oh and BTW, cheating on a spouse is considered a form of abuse. So call her a ho all you want to, no one deserves to be treated like that by someone who claims to love them. Shit, and just like YOU said... Tiger made that money, its only money, he'll make more. So why not hand it over to ease her suffering? Nothing but a thang for good ol' Tiger! I love you! Right back at cha beautiful! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tinaz said: Plain and simple.... she wants him to hurt as much as he hurt and humiliated her... What better way to "make him pay" than by going for BIG money, she also knows it will be in the press again and what better way to keep throwing his piggish behaviour in his face than to start this drama...
Great point | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: Vendetta1 said: As soon as I saw your name, I knew exactly what your response would be.
So exactly how is she a ho? As I knew you would. Didn't wanna disappoint. Well now that it's done, she just wants her money off the nightstand. And so she shall get it! Or did he do that all by himself? Chalk it up as a lesson learned and pay up, foo'...I'm not seeing Tiger playing the sympathy card and winning.... Tiger, blubbering like a true bitch "don't give her all mah money just because mah dick tripped and fell in pussy over and over again" Judge...."bitch, please" if he didn't want to pay a "bitch" he should have married Anna Nicole..... [Edited 5/23/10 20:18pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: noimageatall said: I love you! Right back at cha beautiful! "Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BklynBabe said: SUPRMAN said: As I knew you would. Didn't wanna disappoint. Well now that it's done, she just wants her money off the nightstand. And so she shall get it! Or did he do that all by himself? Chalk it up as a lesson learned and pay up, foo'...I'm not seeing Tiger playing the sympathy card and winning.... Tiger, blubbering like a true bitch "don't give her all mah money just because mah dick tripped and fell in pussy over and over again" Judge...."bitch, please" if he didn't want to pay a "bitch" he should have married Anna Nicole..... [Edited 5/23/10 20:18pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tinaz said: SUPRMAN said: I can get with this. This seems a lot more honest than saying she deserves it because he earned it. I dont play that game... shes a grown ass woman who can get a job and support herself.... BUT he does need to help support those babies... Agreed. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: You start of saying "the primary breadwinner always . . . ." You end saying that you don't know. Did you ever see her with a black eye? Any domestic violence calls? No credit cards to go shopping with? Boo-hoo. And if her self-esteem and/ or self-respect is somehow inexplicably damaged, no amount of money is going to fix it. Therapy can help but it's the individual who has to change their self-image. Let me be clear... I know in my circumstance and with those around me how primary breadwinners can behave. Not all do, but it can happen. That being said, hurt can come in many forms. Emotional abuse is one of them. Neglect is another. Spousal abuse is not just a black eye. One thing for sure is, an abuser will make restitution for his bad deeds done to his/her victim by buying their apology. So handing her a credit card as you say may be a way of showing his affection or an apology. Also, what makes you think she's not in therapy? He sure is, for spin control. Oh and BTW, cheating on a spouse is considered a form of abuse. So call her a ho all you want to, no one deserves to be treated like that by someone who claims to love them. Shit, and just like YOU said... Tiger made that money, its only money, he'll make more. So why not hand it over to ease her suffering? Nothing but a thang for good ol' Tiger! Do you think handing over money will ease her suffering?!!! My experience says it won't. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: DesireeNevermind said: Why you painin' over that fool's money?
I just hate the idea of the primary earner always having to pony up in a divorce. Laws are fucked up. Grow up. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: DesireeNevermind said: Why you painin' over that fool's money?
I just hate the idea of the primary earner always having to pony up in a divorce. Laws are fucked up. Even if the primary breadwinner is a female? "Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: paintedlady said: Let me be clear... I know in my circumstance and with those around me how primary breadwinners can behave. Not all do, but it can happen. That being said, hurt can come in many forms. Emotional abuse is one of them. Neglect is another. Spousal abuse is not just a black eye. One thing for sure is, an abuser will make restitution for his bad deeds done to his/her victim by buying their apology. So handing her a credit card as you say may be a way of showing his affection or an apology. Also, what makes you think she's not in therapy? He sure is, for spin control. Oh and BTW, cheating on a spouse is considered a form of abuse. So call her a ho all you want to, no one deserves to be treated like that by someone who claims to love them. Shit, and just like YOU said... Tiger made that money, its only money, he'll make more. So why not hand it over to ease her suffering? Nothing but a thang for good ol' Tiger! Do you think handing over money will ease her suffering?!!! My experience says it won't. People everyday every where win cash settlements in courts to ease their suffering. How is this any different? That's why we have lawyers. If your child got lead poisoning or cerebral palsy, you would sue.. to get a cash settlement. It wouldn't make things "better" just easier. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: Do you think handing over money will ease her suffering?!!! My experience says it won't. People everyday every where win cash settlements in courts to ease their suffering. How is this any different? That's why we have lawyers. If your child got lead poisoning or cerebral palsy, you would sue.. to get a cash settlement. It wouldn't make things "better" just easier. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: paintedlady said: People everyday every where win cash settlements in courts to ease their suffering. How is this any different? That's why we have lawyers. If your child got lead poisoning or cerebral palsy, you would sue.. to get a cash settlement. It wouldn't make things "better" just easier. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: Do you think handing over money will ease her suffering?!!! My experience says it won't. People everyday every where win cash settlements in courts to ease their suffering. How is this any different? That's why we have lawyers. If your child got lead poisoning or cerebral palsy, you would sue.. to get a cash settlement. It wouldn't make things "better" just easier. It is not awarded to ease their suffering. It is awarded because they suffered. The law doesn't pretend that restitution eases suffering. But some compensation is better than none. I have no problem with her getting some money, but it's the amount that I feel is undeserved. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: paintedlady said: People everyday every where win cash settlements in courts to ease their suffering. How is this any different? That's why we have lawyers. If your child got lead poisoning or cerebral palsy, you would sue.. to get a cash settlement. It wouldn't make things "better" just easier. It is not awarded to ease their suffering. It is awarded because they suffered. The law doesn't pretend that restitution eases suffering. But some compensation is better than none. I have no problem with her getting some money, but it's the amount that I feel is undeserved. I don't think any woman should take ALL of any man's money, but it should be a percentage. The same way child support is measured. If he is rich, she should get a percentage... now what percentage should that be? In this case I'd say 50%. Some may say 20%, 10%, 75%. Its all opinion. I think she'll fight for half though. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: paintedlady said: People everyday every where win cash settlements in courts to ease their suffering. How is this any different? That's why we have lawyers. If your child got lead poisoning or cerebral palsy, you would sue.. to get a cash settlement. It wouldn't make things "better" just easier. It is not awarded to ease their suffering. It is awarded because they suffered. The law doesn't pretend that restitution eases suffering. But some compensation is better than none. I have no problem with her getting some money, but it's the amount that I feel is undeserved. Well, what do you think the compensation would be for A. Potentially contacting AIDS or several other incurable STD's. B. Constant public humiliation for her and her children. C. A broken heart. I'm sure I could think of D, E, F, G, etc. But I'm vey tired and about to crash. "Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: It is not awarded to ease their suffering. It is awarded because they suffered. The law doesn't pretend that restitution eases suffering. But some compensation is better than none. I have no problem with her getting some money, but it's the amount that I feel is undeserved. I don't think any woman should take ALL of any man's money, but it should be a percentage. The same way child support is measured. If he is rich, she should get a percentage... now what percentage should that be? In this case I'd say 50%. Some may say 20%, 10%, 75%. Its all opinion. I think she'll fight for half though. But why should she get half or more? He had already made that money before They were even married? And she came into the marriage with nothing! Why does she deserve even CLOSE to half? ~~~~~ Oh that voice...incredible....there should be a musical instrument called George Michael... ~~~~~ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tinaz said: paintedlady said: I don't think any woman should take ALL of any man's money, but it should be a percentage. The same way child support is measured. If he is rich, she should get a percentage... now what percentage should that be? In this case I'd say 50%. Some may say 20%, 10%, 75%. Its all opinion. I think she'll fight for half though. But why should she get half or more? He had already made that money before They were even married? And she came into the marriage with nothing! Why does she deserve even CLOSE to half? Noimmy said it here: "Well, what do you think the compensation would be for A. Potentially contacting AIDS or several other incurable STD's. B. Constant public humiliation for her and her children. C. A broken heart. " Standard alimony for a man who cheated on his wife. She can raise the kids on that and be just fine, and then some. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: SUPRMAN said: It is not awarded to ease their suffering. It is awarded because they suffered. The law doesn't pretend that restitution eases suffering. But some compensation is better than none. I have no problem with her getting some money, but it's the amount that I feel is undeserved. I don't think any woman should take ALL of any man's money, but it should be a percentage. The same way child support is measured. If he is rich, she should get a percentage... now what percentage should that be? In this case I'd say 50%. Some may say 20%, 10%, 75%. Its all opinion. I think she'll fight for half though. I think half is well south of $750 million. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paintedlady said: tinaz said: But why should she get half or more? He had already made that money before They were even married? And she came into the marriage with nothing! Why does she deserve even CLOSE to half? Noimmy said it here: "Well, what do you think the compensation would be for A. Potentially contacting AIDS or several other incurable STD's. B. Constant public humiliation for her and her children. C. A broken heart. " Standard alimony for a man who cheated on his wife. She can raise the kids on that and be just fine, and then some. Ok, so what if they got divorced because they just came to the realization they didnt love each other and split on friendly terms... ~~~~~ Oh that voice...incredible....there should be a musical instrument called George Michael... ~~~~~ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noimageatall said: SUPRMAN said: It is not awarded to ease their suffering. It is awarded because they suffered. The law doesn't pretend that restitution eases suffering. But some compensation is better than none. I have no problem with her getting some money, but it's the amount that I feel is undeserved. Well, what do you think the compensation would be for A. Potentially contacting AIDS or several other incurable STD's. B. Constant public humiliation for her and her children. C. A broken heart. I'm sure I could think of D, E, F, G, etc. But I'm vey tired and about to crash. Nothing for A. You can't base awards on could of, or potentially. Hypothetically, just about anything can potentially happen. Unless she contracted something, why award her? Could Tiger offer as a defense that she could've potentially cheated on him?! Constant public humiliation? What's public humiliation? Paparazzi? She married into that attention. It was there before she married. It comes with the territory. If she didn't leave him, would it suddenly stop? Either way, the pararazzi and tabloids aren't going away and she knew they were there long before she said I do. A broken heart? What's the value of that in dollars? For everyone? Or because he has more money, her broken heart is worth more than someone else's? [Edited 5/23/10 21:11pm] I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |