- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Go 'head MY COUSIN WORKS IN A PHARMACY AND SHE SAID THEY ENEMA'D PRANCE INTO OBLIVION WITH FENTONILS!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
luv4u said: meow85 said: Not clear on the law in AB or in Edmonton, but in Vancouver female toplessness actually is legal. Nobody seems to have the bravery to do it though. Not here in the city..... Women should be able to go topless. We have bigger tittayys than men I'm trying to work up the courage to go around topless come warm weather, actually. I can't be arrested for it, I'm just not sure if I could handle the attention doing it out on the street. I'll probably just end up going to the nude beach where everyone's in the altogether themselves so nobody stares at me. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WaterInYourBath said: For women: Yes. In public, breasts should be covered. What also should be illegal is too much/lewd cleavage shown on public TV, like during award shows, reality shows, Wendy Williams' show, etc.
For men: Nope. But honestly, the only bare chests I wanna see are those that look like Van Damme's or Michael Jai White's. Why do you feel this way? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: Joyinrepatition said: agreed!..but there lies a line, im not gonna get shocked im just saying...feckin why you header
Listen, someone said post a nude picture, and I did. My FACE isn't even showing, much less an ass or my wonderful penis. If folks are all bent out of shape over THAT picture - they have more issues than I thought. I am not ashamed of who I am. Life is too farkin' short to walk around w/ your head pointed down, being embarrassed by something like a belly. If people want to view nothing but what society thinks are pretty people, then go elsewhere. The rest of us live in reality....and it's fucking awesome. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IAintTheOne said: People should not be ashamed of the human body regardless of how it looks. or if being shirtless should be illegal. Just another case of the shallow finger pointing world we live in.
I could not agree more! If the person removing their shirt is not uncomfortable then no one else should be. Don't like it? Don't look. Hell, I think you should be able to be naked(as long as there is no lewd public behavior) if you're comfortable, regardless of what kind of shape you're in. It's your body, not mine. I always hear about people being disappointed when they go to nude beaches and expect to find fitness models walking around. Like mothers in their mid 40's and middle aged men are supposed to look like Greek statues. Meanwhile, the people criticizing ... they don't look too hot either. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
At least Ernest had the Cajones to post where y'all at... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tinaz said: It has always pissed me off that men can run around with no shirt on but girls cant.. Who makes these rules and why are my titties illegal but mens arent? Boobs are boobs, just the size is different....right?
Well, size and function... Unless mine are broken. blah blah blah | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: WaterInYourBath said: For women: Yes. In public, breasts should be covered. What also should be illegal is too much/lewd cleavage shown on public TV, like during award shows, reality shows, Wendy Williams' show, etc.
For men: Nope. But honestly, the only bare chests I wanna see are those that look like Van Damme's or Michael Jai White's. Why do you feel this way? I feel that way because it's indecent (at least in industrialized countries), and I don't want to see all of that. Breasts to me are just like genitals: They are involved with reproduction, and therefore shouldn't be shown nude in public. Besides, I can't stand vulgar cleavage that some women show with their clothes, so I certainly wouldn't appreciate seeing bare breasts everywhere. "You put water into a cup, it becomes the cup...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend." - Bruce Lee
"Water can nourish me, but water can also carry me. Water has magic laws." - JCVD | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tinaz said: It has always pissed me off that men can run around with no shirt on but girls cant.. Who makes these rules and why are my titties illegal but mens arent? Boobs are boobs, just the size is different....right?
Not here. It's legal for both men and women to go topless in this province. It should be legal everywhere. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: tinaz said: It has always pissed me off that men can run around with no shirt on but girls cant.. Who makes these rules and why are my titties illegal but mens arent? Boobs are boobs, just the size is different....right?
Not here. It's legal for both men and women to go topless in this province. It should be legal everywhere. Like, anywhere?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter. haha well if I had one, you could. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JerseyKRS said: JustErin said: Not here. It's legal for both men and women to go topless in this province. It should be legal everywhere. Like, anywhere?? Sure. If a business doesn't want shirtless people in it, they just put up one of those, "no shoes, no shirt, no business" type signs. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WaterInYourBath said: meow85 said: Why do you feel this way? I feel that way because it's indecent (at least in industrialized countries), and I don't want to see all of that. Breasts to me are just like genitals: They are involved with reproduction, and therefore shouldn't be shown nude in public. Besides, I can't stand vulgar cleavage that some women show with their clothes, so I certainly wouldn't appreciate seeing bare breasts everywhere. maybe it's because i am gay, and just have no idea, but... how in the world are breasts involved in reproduction? [Edited 3/22/10 7:01am] Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WaterInYourBath said: Breasts to me are just like genitals: They are involved with reproduction, and therefore shouldn't be shown nude in public.
That's about as wrong as you can get. Since when does a titty fuck get a girl knocked up? Nipples on me and women are make of erectile tissue - the same tissue that the penis is formed with. So if women's ta ta's are sexual organs, then so are men's pectorals. Your logic is flawed, and uneducated. If you view breasts the same as you do your own dick (or vag), then you still have a lot to learn about anatomy in general, not to mention sexuality. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: Nick000024 said: ernest post some nude pics
It ain't my bedroom, so don't ask about the shiz in the background. Is your hair photoshoped? There's repeating patterns of pixesl. Not making fun or anything, but is it photoshoped? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheVoid said: Is your hair photoshoped?
There's repeating patterns of pixesl. Not making fun or anything, but is it photoshoped? Yeah, the guy who took the pictures did it for some reason. I never think about it when I post the picture. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Um...I've always thought it a double standard that men can be shirtless and not women. In my opinion, both should be legal. I don't see why the human body naked is such a big deal...if nudity bothers you so much, then cloister yourself.
=0P Brace yourself
The best is yet to come | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | cborgman said: WaterInYourBath said: I feel that way because it's indecent (at least in industrialized countries), and I don't want to see all of that. Breasts to me are just like genitals: They are involved with reproduction, and therefore shouldn't be shown nude in public. Besides, I can't stand vulgar cleavage that some women show with their clothes, so I certainly wouldn't appreciate seeing bare breasts everywhere. maybe it's because i am gay, and just have no idea, but... how in the world are breasts involved in reproduction? [Edited 3/22/10 7:01am] They aren’t. Our society has sexualized breasts though, like it or not, and that’s the reality. And I think there should be something mysterious and taboo about sex and such. We wrap presents for a reason. A strip tease is WAY sexier than a naked woman just sitting there hanging out. I have no problem with mothers breast-feeding discreetly in public places (it’s natural) and I have no problem with topless beaches (time and place) but I don’t want to see boobs when I’m walkin’ down the street any more than I think a guy should walk into a store without a shirt on. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: cborgman said: maybe it's because i am gay, and just have no idea, but... how in the world are breasts involved in reproduction? [Edited 3/22/10 7:01am] They aren’t. Our society has sexualized breasts though, like it or not, and that’s the reality. And I think there should be something mysterious and taboo about sex and such. We wrap presents for a reason. A strip tease is WAY sexier than a naked woman just sitting there hanging out. I have no problem with mothers breast-feeding discreetly in public places (it’s natural) and I have no problem with topless beaches (time and place) but I don’t want to see boobs when I’m walkin’ down the street any more than I think a guy should walk into a store without a shirt on. i mostly agree. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: TheVoid said: Is your hair photoshoped?
There's repeating patterns of pixesl. Not making fun or anything, but is it photoshoped? Yeah, the guy who took the pictures did it for some reason. I never think about it when I post the picture. OK. Well, it's not that I was nit picking or anything. I actually have this mild but weird OCD thing where I notice patterns and grids and I sometime get fixated on them. I can't walk a checkered floor or else I end up stepping only on one of the colors on the floor. Yes, I know...I ain't right. Anyways, orgnoted you.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: cborgman said: maybe it's because i am gay, and just have no idea, but... how in the world are breasts involved in reproduction? [Edited 3/22/10 7:01am] They aren’t. Our society has sexualized breasts though, like it or not, and that’s the reality. And I think there should be something mysterious and taboo about sex and such. We wrap presents for a reason. A strip tease is WAY sexier than a naked woman just sitting there hanging out. I have no problem with mothers breast-feeding discreetly in public places (it’s natural) and I have no problem with topless beaches (time and place) but I don’t want to see boobs when I’m walkin’ down the street any more than I think a guy should walk into a store without a shirt on. Co-sign. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: WaterInYourBath said: Breasts to me are just like genitals: They are involved with reproduction, and therefore shouldn't be shown nude in public.
That's about as wrong as you can get. Since when does a titty fuck get a girl knocked up? Nipples on me and women are make of erectile tissue - the same tissue that the penis is formed with. So if women's ta ta's are sexual organs, then so are men's pectorals. Your logic is flawed, and uneducated. If you view breasts the same as you do your own dick (or vag), then you still have a lot to learn about anatomy in general, not to mention sexuality. No one is talking about perverted crap like that. What are you talking about? So breasts are not involved with reproduction? They are not changed/used in any way during and after parturition? So that means they do not lactate and are never needed for feeding an infant, unlike a man's pectoral muscles? Umm, no. You've got some nerve calling me uneducated. You have no idea....Your vulgarity is what is ignorant. "You put water into a cup, it becomes the cup...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend." - Bruce Lee
"Water can nourish me, but water can also carry me. Water has magic laws." - JCVD | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WaterInYourBath said: No one is talking about perverted crap like that. What are you talking about? So breasts are not involved with reproduction? They are not changed/used in any way during and after parturition? So that means they do not lactate and are never needed for feeding an infant, unlike a man's pectoral muscles?
Umm, no. You've got some nerve calling me uneducated. You have no idea. Your vulgarity is what is ignorant. You are being uneducated in your response. Let me clear that up for you. Open your mind. You have two ears, and one mouth for a reason. 1) Titty fucks aren't perverted. Perhaps a bit boring for women, but not perverted, regardless. 2) Breasts are not involved in the process of implanting sperm in a woman's egg (ie: Not sexual organs). Women get pregnant all the time with the blouses and bras ON. Hmmm, curious that. 3) They are not used or relevant when a woman is pushing out a newborn and bringing life into the world, no more than she's having an orgasm from her vagina being stretched out, or her clitoris possibly being rubbed during the process (ie: Not sexual organs) 4) Breasts lactating isn't a sexual activity. The mother isn't feeding the baby vaginal secretions. It's not like a penis creating precum or a vagina secreting during sexual arousal. If breasts are sexual organs, and babies are breast fed, isn't that a bit perverted thinking on your part? Is the mother abusing the child because she's sticking her breasts up to the baby's mouth? Of course not. I hope your see your flawed logic. 5) Lactation is a natural state of a woman after birth to feed her child. Way before we had formula, we had breast milk. Eve fed Cain and Able with breast milk. Wasn't anything sexual about that. None of that is sexual, nor is it a sexual act (breast feeding a child). You are very confused about what is sexual and what is not. CarrieMPLS stated flat out that breasts are not sexual organs. You know, my ears are hot spot erogenous zones. Someone chews or nibbles on my ears, and I get hard in a hot second. Does that make my ears a sexual organ, the same as a penis or a vagina? That's the same logic you put into saying breasts are sexual organs. You also said you "viewed them the same". Your view isn't correct, nor is it based in the facts of human anatomy. You can have your view, and you're entitled to be wrong. But when the facts are put to you, don't deny them just for the sake of being right. Learn from it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: WaterInYourBath said: No one is talking about perverted crap like that. What are you talking about? So breasts are not involved with reproduction? They are not changed/used in any way during and after parturition? So that means they do not lactate and are never needed for feeding an infant, unlike a man's pectoral muscles?
Umm, no. You've got some nerve calling me uneducated. You have no idea. Your vulgarity is what is ignorant. You are being uneducated in your response. Let me clear that up for you. Open your mind. You have two ears, and one mouth for a reason. 1) Titty fucks aren't perverted. Perhaps a bit boring for women, but not perverted, regardless. 2) Breasts are not involved in the process of implanting sperm in a woman's egg (ie: Not sexual organs). Women get pregnant all the time with the blouses and bras ON. Hmmm, curious that. 3) They are not used or relevant when a woman is pushing out a newborn and bringing life into the world, no more than she's having an orgasm from her vagina being stretched out, or her clitoris possibly being rubbed during the process (ie: Not sexual organs) 4) Breasts lactating isn't a sexual activity. The mother isn't feeding the baby vaginal secretions. It's not like a penis creating precum or a vagina secreting during sexual arousal. If breasts are sexual organs, and babies are breast fed, isn't that a bit perverted thinking on your part? Is the mother abusing the child because she's sticking her breasts up to the baby's mouth? Of course not. I hope your see your flawed logic. 5) Lactation is a natural state of a woman after birth to feed her child. Way before we had formula, we had breast milk. Eve fed Cain and Able with breast milk. Wasn't anything sexual about that. None of that is sexual, nor is it a sexual act (breast feeding a child). You are very confused about what is sexual and what is not. CarrieMPLS stated flat out that breasts are not sexual organs. You know, my ears are hot spot erogenous zones. Someone chews or nibbles on my ears, and I get hard in a hot second. Does that make my ears a sexual organ, the same as a penis or a vagina? That's the same logic you put into saying breasts are sexual organs. You also said you "viewed them the same". Your view isn't correct, nor is it based in the facts of human anatomy. You can have your view, and you're entitled to be wrong. But when the facts are put to you, don't deny them just for the sake of being right. Learn from it. Did I say anything about breasts being "sexual?" Yes, they are certainly related to sexual imagery/activity, but did I mention that? Did I say anything about them being actual sex organs, required to conceive a child? No I did not. I'm so tired of debating with people who don't read and comprehend what I post on here. I said they are "like genitals," and are "involved" with reproductive processes because of their growth and required use after childbirth, which is the truth, regardless of whatever you think. Plus, breasts temporarily increase in size during pre-menstruation, and "like genitals," they swell when aroused. Stop trying to tell me about human physiology when I already know what I'm talking about. And also, no one asked for information about your erogenous zones. That has nothing to do with anything in this thread. "You put water into a cup, it becomes the cup...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend." - Bruce Lee
"Water can nourish me, but water can also carry me. Water has magic laws." - JCVD | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WaterInYourBath said: Did I say anything about ...
Now I know what the Vulcan's felt like when they made first contact with humans. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: WaterInYourBath said: Did I say anything about ...
Now I know what the Vulcan's felt like when they made first contact with humans. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ernestsewell said: WaterInYourBath said: No one is talking about perverted crap like that. What are you talking about? So breasts are not involved with reproduction? They are not changed/used in any way during and after parturition? So that means they do not lactate and are never needed for feeding an infant, unlike a man's pectoral muscles?
Umm, no. You've got some nerve calling me uneducated. You have no idea. Your vulgarity is what is ignorant. You are being uneducated in your response. Let me clear that up for you. Open your mind. You have two ears, and one mouth for a reason. 1) Titty fucks aren't perverted. Perhaps a bit boring for women, but not perverted, regardless. 2) Breasts are not involved in the process of implanting sperm in a woman's egg (ie: Not sexual organs). Women get pregnant all the time with the blouses and bras ON. Hmmm, curious that. 3) They are not used or relevant when a woman is pushing out a newborn and bringing life into the world, no more than she's having an orgasm from her vagina being stretched out, or her clitoris possibly being rubbed during the process (ie: Not sexual organs) 4) Breasts lactating isn't a sexual activity. The mother isn't feeding the baby vaginal secretions. It's not like a penis creating precum or a vagina secreting during sexual arousal. If breasts are sexual organs, and babies are breast fed, isn't that a bit perverted thinking on your part? Is the mother abusing the child because she's sticking her breasts up to the baby's mouth? Of course not. I hope your see your flawed logic. 5) Lactation is a natural state of a woman after birth to feed her child. Way before we had formula, we had breast milk. Eve fed Cain and Able with breast milk. Wasn't anything sexual about that. None of that is sexual, nor is it a sexual act (breast feeding a child). You are very confused about what is sexual and what is not. CarrieMPLS stated flat out that breasts are not sexual organs. You know, my ears are hot spot erogenous zones. Someone chews or nibbles on my ears, and I get hard in a hot second. Does that make my ears a sexual organ, the same as a penis or a vagina? That's the same logic you put into saying breasts are sexual organs. You also said you "viewed them the same". Your view isn't correct, nor is it based in the facts of human anatomy. You can have your view, and you're entitled to be wrong. But when the facts are put to you, don't deny them just for the sake of being right. Learn from it. How long can sig files be? Ernest, happy birthday, I love you. I've not laughed so much at a post for years. Thank you blah blah blah | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: cborgman said: maybe it's because i am gay, and just have no idea, but... how in the world are breasts involved in reproduction? [Edited 3/22/10 7:01am] They aren’t. Our society has sexualized breasts though, like it or not, and that’s the reality. And I think there should be something mysterious and taboo about sex and such. We wrap presents for a reason. A strip tease is WAY sexier than a naked woman just sitting there hanging out. I have no problem with mothers breast-feeding discreetly in public places (it’s natural) and I have no problem with topless beaches (time and place) but I don’t want to see boobs when I’m walkin’ down the street any more than I think a guy should walk into a store without a shirt on. But do you want to legislate your taste, and make everyone else follow? To me pick up trucks are incredibly offensive to look at, but I wouldn't enforce my thinking on everyone else (well trucks maybe....especially when shirtless guys are driving them) Now I'm older than movies, Now I'm wiser than dreams, And I know who's there
When silhouettes fall | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CarrieMpls said: cborgman said: maybe it's because i am gay, and just have no idea, but... how in the world are breasts involved in reproduction? [Edited 3/22/10 7:01am] They aren’t. Our society has sexualized breasts though, like it or not, and that’s the reality. And I think there should be something mysterious and taboo about sex and such. We wrap presents for a reason. A strip tease is WAY sexier than a naked woman just sitting there hanging out. I have no problem with mothers breast-feeding discreetly in public places (it’s natural) and I have no problem with topless beaches (time and place) but I don’t want to see boobs when I’m walkin’ down the street any more than I think a guy should walk into a store without a shirt on. exactly, after spending some time with nudists I am so happy humans adopted clothing. Keeping a barrier between us makes life better IMO, not only for visual senses, but for our sense of smell too!! Time and place, as you say. I don't want to be working with shirtless people, male or female, or in close proximity with some sweaty guy, but when they're on the beach then have at it. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |