NDRU said:

Then why even add it?

NDRU said:

I wish that I could have articulated that myself so eloquently. my whole point with posing the question was, are we technically advanced to a point where we are making ourselves obsolete. ATMS replace bank tellers. Supermarkets have self check out registers now. Gas stations have self serve pumps. Our advancements are replacing the things that people used to do. Include video games in that. People "ski" on a Wii, instead of going out to the ski slopes.
Instead of developing a relationship with other people, men can have their sex dolls, and women can have their dildoes, if they so desire.

CarrieMpls said:

I have no idea, it sounds like something that would be amusing for a second, then annoying.

Actually that's probably the reason. It's an amusing feature to show your friends "look, she even talks about beer & football!!"

That is, unless men are really more twisted than I realize. Of course, seriously, who's going to spend this kind of money on something like this? Maybe they do want to talk to her, in which case you're right, it IS different than a vibrator.

BlackAdder7 said:

But all these "advances" are not necessarily better. People are becoming obsolete in terms of the bottom line, because having automated phone systems are cheaper than having operators. But talking to a computer is maybe the most annoying thing on the planet.

So we may get replaced, but I don't think we're obsolete. Even sex might work alone, but sex (in my opinion) is always better with a partner, even if a sex toy is involved.

a woman talking to a vibrator must be like me talking to a woman... i know she is saying something but all i hear is a buzzzzz

OnlyNDaUsa said:

oh, snap!

CarrieMpls said:

co-

noimageatall said:

who? me?

More disturbing HAHA here...

http://gawker.com/5445184...oplay=true

the vid is kind of a must watch... (SNSFW)


[Edited 1/11/10 12:34pm]

CarrieMpls said:

That particular aspect of it may seem insulting to women, yes, but the physical shape of it really just amounts to a sex toy IMO

Maybe women just need the stimulation coupled with fantasy and that's why a simple dildoe works for them, but men like all the physical trappings of women. We're more about visual & physical stimulation (ie touching with our hands & moving our bodies).

I mean, we literally can look at mountains and see boobs. So a female shaped sex toy is simply more stimulating than a "dildoe for men" without hips & boobs.

This particular sex toy is a bit over the top, though. I think it's not just a supplement, but meant to be a substitute for some guys who can't handle real relationships.
[Edited 1/11/10 14:18pm]

The frigid personality mode will also say apparently "Please don't touch me there" and "That's not nice". They've really thought this one through!

Do you think it will help with societies problems in keeping all the weirdoes home, I mean they'll be occupied for some time.

And Yes I also thought it looked like Chrissie Hynde.

chocolatehandles said:

It will increase the social problems that all ready exist IMHO.

This is just a blow up doll for suckers with money. No robot can ever replace a real woman.

Tremolina said:

yeah it is just really over priced masturbation.

Tremolina said:

Except Cherry 2000!







Oh yeah, there was also Blade Runner as well. :shrig:

"shrig"?

PunkMistress said:

Agreed.

lmao @ "true companion"

novabrkr said:

chocolatehandles said:

Yeah, if only these dolls would be the solution to sex trafficking, then I'd be all for it. Alas, a real human girl is very cheap.

noimageatall said:

I think these dolls are for people who can't handle real people, unfortunately.

BlackAdder7 said:

interesting point, but I think they are used because they feel good, not because a man is needed necessarily, lesbians also use them remember
I like to use them while fantasising about girl on girl men are furthest thing from my mind sometimes!

NDRU said:

ZombieKitten said:

yes I think doll-girls and dildoes are both used for what they feel like. Dildoes just provide feeling to a much more limited area

actually you help to illustrate my point above that fantasy is a much bigger part of a woman's sexuality, where men like the actual physicality, hence a big doll w/curves.

I believe the curves by themselves are attractive to a man, even separate from the woman, though based on a woman's curves.

NDRU said:

An inanimate object that looks and feels remotely like a real woman that they can throw around that can't object represents a woman though, right? Men simulate actual sex with one!

vibes and dildoes don't look or feel like a real man and can be used in ways that don't resemble sex

All is lost when you have to clean out the jizz!! She's not self cleaning.

ZombieKitten said:

yes, perhaps a dildoe doesn't specifically represent men and a doll w/ boobs does specifically represent a woman.

I'm only saying they're the same in that they are objects that provide what men & women desire, respectively--for men it's the physicality, for women it's pure stimulation with nothing to distract from the fantasy.

ZombieKitten said:

this part is a little unfair, though, why does it have to be something violent?

And who knows what twisted fantasies are going through your head with your toy?