Mysterious G-spot just a myth - study

A SEXUAL quest that has for years baffled millions of women, and men, may have been in vain.

http://www.news.com.au/we...5815737655

O RLY.

sammij said:

It's all in your head.

SUPRMAN said:

Or in my vag.

sammij said:

gets Sherlock Holmes hat and magnifying glass

I should investigate this

bboy87 said:

It's no myth

Vagina makes absolutely no sense to me

InsatiableCream said:

I think its a myth. I think its a job for Mythbusters! Or is that Muffbusters?

Does anyone else see a clear problem with the argumentation in the article itself? I'm not claiming that the "g-spot" would necessarily exist, although I do think it's quite obvious that certain spots located around the erogenous zones are bound to be more sensive than others, also implying that there probably also exists the most sensitive spot that many individuals quite likely share. Nevertheless, employing the twin studies method in this instance seems to be pretty shady.



Of course it's "subjective" - the premise for the study was that some individuals have reportedly "found it", whereas the rest haven't, so stating that the study "suggests" it's a "subjective opinion" seems pretty worthless and overly cautious when compared to the title of the article itself. Everything that I can read from the piece itself about this so-called "study" would seem to indicate to me that the people responsible for it were simply interested in debunking a "myth" - as they call it - with very modest methods. How about, I don't know, studying the human organism instead of handing out questionnaires?

being a gay man who's never seen a woman naked it is just as real to me as the garden of eden

sammij said:

they did a study and still can't find the g-spot?

do I need to tattoo the bitch and put up a sign with an arrow and buy a GPS (a GspotPS!)

I remember once this gyno tried to tell me severe cramps were all in the head too.... 15 years, cramps and bleeding, huge fibroids diagnosis, and a hysterectomy suggest otherwise

NOT a myth.
trust me.

novabrkr said:

But there is no physical location for any such "G-spot."
It's not as if there is a physical location in women for the elusive "G-spot."
You can't look at a woman's anatomy or a depiction of a woman's anatomy and say, this here is the "G-spot."
If it's existence isn't physical, then it's worth exploring if it is in a woman's head.

ButterscotchPimp said:

Because a woman can't fake an orgasm?

Are there any women who are gonna stop having sex because there is no G-spot?

it's not in our head...

men need to give head...

then they would find it!

it's not the Holy Grail, dang.

SUPRMAN said:

Yes, there is. From wikipedia: "It is typically located one to three inches up the front (anterior) vaginal wall between the vagina opening and the urethra."

It's not some mystical thing, it's just difficult to stimulate in some women because of where it's located. And some women may feel the effects of it more than others. Just cause one woman hasn't "found" hers, doesn't mean it doesn't exist on the next woman.

all i know is when i'm hungry like that i gotta eat, whether it's at g's spot v's spot or whatever else spot on your kat. i'm feasting until i'm full. and then i ask for seconds and leftovers. there's a place out i'll dine for lifem even if they don't mown the lawn constantly. or is that moan.

CarrieMpls said:

Although research on the G-Spot has taken place since 1981, arguments over its existence, the actual definition of the term, and its location continue in the medical field and in studies of sexuality.[3] 3.^ a b Hines, Terence M. (August 2001). "The G-Spot: A modern gynecologic myth." (abstract). Clinical Opinion: American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 185(2). pp. pages 359–362. http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt...9!8091!-1. Retrieved 6 November 2008.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-spot

G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods: for instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples.[12]

Scientific examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings.[12] A recent study of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density.[14]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-spot

Looks like there isn't conclusive evidence, just anecdotal.

A divorced, or virgin, man wrote that article.

SUPRMAN said:

Sure a woman can.
So can a man.

But certain physical responses due to g-spot stimulation, can't be faked.

ButterscotchPimp said:

[Edited 1/4/10 9:57am]

SUPRMAN said:

You're really just upset because you haven't had good enough sex to find it.

Right?

SUPRMAN said:

Well, what exactly are you attempting to refute with that comment? My second sentence up there already stated that the most sensitive area varies from individual to individual, even though it is also reasonable assume that there exists a zone in the genital area that most people (women) would find the most sensitive. If in common parlance this is considered to be the "g-spot", what exactly is the problem? It's hardly a matter of existence per se, but rather of personal interpretation of sentiments - the article at the very least fails to make that distinction sufficiently. Since there were no uniform answers provided, the highly questionable conclusion in it is that "it's a myth". Attempting to debunk something that's not inserted properly into the scientific vocabulary, or is more a matter of common parlance, is a pretty typical of today's science. A lot of individuals in the academia seem to take a whole lot of delight into getting to say "there doesn't exist a [x]", where the "[x]" is usually some rather abstract thought. It's comparable to asking the individuals taking a questionnaire whether they have a "soul" or not.

The study also seems to make a far too strong assumptions as far as genetic factors go - the twin study -method employed in this instance seems quite arbitrary. I don't have the paper in front of me, but the only thing that the study would seem to "prove" is that twin sisters are also very likely to relate differently to the stimulation of erogonous zones and how they apply cultural concepts on it. That in itself could be a study matter of its own, but it in itself doesn't cancel out the existence of a uniform "g-spot". It does corroborate it somewhat admittedly, but doesn't prove it in itself as a "myth" alone. The claims made at least in this article based on the study are quite unjustifiable. If the subject would be considered worthy of further study, entirely different means would have to be employed as well.

gawd is this another one of those articles written by folks who can't fuck?

DesireeNevermind said:

sammij said:

I don't think SUPRMAN is very interested in finding anything that resides in a vagina.