Imago said: NDRU said: I think tanning is not just an aesthetic of color, but rather is associated with being outdoorsy, maybe having healthy bloodflow in your cheeks (even though, yes, tans themselves are unhealthy). Your skin becoming lighter (paler) is associated with being sick. So I don't get the aesthetic reasons to lighten your skin when I think people for the most part try to change their appearances to look more young & healthy. [Edited 11/11/09 16:24pm] Certain Asians and Caucasians look beautiful pale. Milky white skin with dark black hair has always been attractive to me. I simply love the way it looks, and don't think it looks sickly on a person who's skin is prone to being pale--even if they 'assist' it a bit cosmetically. But the Thai's that look sickly when the bleach their skin are red, brown, and olive skin thais--folks who look better when their skin is slightly sunkissed. It really depends on the person whether a slight tan looks good, or a slight milky complection looks good. But the homogenous nature of the fashion industry and television tends to make everyone think that they can look a certain way--moreover, that they should look a certain way. It's one thing to want to be in shape and healthy--but something altogether to feel you must have 'good hair' if you're black, or 'pale skin' if you're Asian--it all depends on your base complection what looks best...not what some magazine says. There's Sinead O'conner who looks beautiful pale..... then there's Michael Jackson who looks.....well, just pale. There's also plenty of light-skinned blacks that have beautiful, natural skin tones as well, and look good the way they are. Also, darker-skinned Blacks where many have flawless skin tones. People with olive-skinned tones seem to tan well and look like they have year round tans. There's so many variations of brown to dark-skin it would be impossible to put them in one category. It all depends on what looks good on an individual, but when you try to lighten your skin 5 times lighter than your natural skin tone, it can look a bit odd. [Edited 11/12/09 7:32am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: Imago said: Certain Asians and Caucasians look beautiful pale. Milky white skin with dark black hair has always been attractive to me. I simply love the way it looks, and don't think it looks sickly on a person who's skin is prone to being pale--even if they 'assist' it a bit cosmetically. But the Thai's that look sickly when the bleach their skin are red, brown, and olive skin thais--folks who look better when their skin is slightly sunkissed. It really depends on the person whether a slight tan looks good, or a slight milky complection looks good. But the homogenous nature of the fashion industry and television tends to make everyone think that they can look a certain way--moreover, that they should look a certain way. It's one thing to want to be in shape and healthy--but something altogether to feel you must have 'good hair' if you're black, or 'pale skin' if you're Asian--it all depends on your base complection what looks best...not what some magazine says. There's Sinead O'conner who looks beautiful pale..... then there's Michael Jackson who looks.....well, just pale. There's also plenty of light-skinned blacks that have beautiful, natural skin tones as well, and look good the way they are. Also, darker-skinned Blacks where many have flawless skin tones. There's so many variations of brown to dark-skin it would be impossible to put them in one category. It all depends on what looks good on an individual, but when you try to lighten your skin 5 times lighter than your natural skin tone, it can look a bit odd. lawd, I need to take some snapshots when I'm in dowtown Bangkok and show you some scariness. It's like girls thinking they look good pale, but it looks Skelator from he-man trying to be a Geisha. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: 2elijah said: There's also plenty of light-skinned blacks that have beautiful, natural skin tones as well, and look good the way they are. Also, darker-skinned Blacks where many have flawless skin tones. There's so many variations of brown to dark-skin it would be impossible to put them in one category. It all depends on what looks good on an individual, but when you try to lighten your skin 5 times lighter than your natural skin tone, it can look a bit odd. lawd, I need to take some snapshots when I'm in dowtown Bangkok and show you some scariness. It's like girls thinking they look good pale, but it looks Skelator from he-man trying to be a Geisha. Well, I can't speak for Thais, and have no idea why they would want to change the natural beauty of their skin tone just to be accepted by society, but I guess not everyone is confident and accepting of their natural gifts. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
well I love having melanin in my skin and I feel much pity for people that buy into a mentality that the amount of pigment in your skin cells has anything to do with your intelligence or worth as a human being. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BklynBabe said: well I love having melanin in my skin and I feel much pity for people that buy into a mentality that the amount of pigment in your skin cells has anything to do with your intelligence or worth as a human being.
Exactly. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He's not the first and won't be the last....
And why do I fancy indian food every time I see this thread.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonwalkbjrain said: You would think he was entitled to live as he chooses . . . . Guess not. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: 2elijah said: There is no way in hell you can use a bleacher to soften your skin. He is lying his ass off and is embarassed to say that he tried to bleach the black out of his skin. What an ass. And what manly man admits to wanting "soft" skin. I'ma go on and say it: "Nucca puhlease!" (See, 2E, there's no other phrase that adequately addresses this BS. ) "To each his(her) own?" I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: paintedlady said: I hope his skin heals 4x's darker than what it was originally. He doesn't look good in mustard yellow. He looks awful. Not to mention what kind of poisoning that could have on his blood and organs. He used way too much. He needs to just embrace the beauty of his skin and be done with it, and if someone has an issue with the hue of his skin....then F*ck them. [Edited 11/11/09 8:22am] If we don't know what he's using, how can we know if and how toxic it may be? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: SCNDLS said: And what manly man admits to wanting "soft" skin. I'ma go on and say it: "Nucca puhlease!" (See, 2E, there's no other phrase that adequately addresses this BS. ) I hear you. How did he think he could get away with that, without people questioning what the hell he is doing. It appears he was ashamed of who he is, as if his skin tone was a curse. It's all that colonial/plantation mentality. How stupid can he be to do that to himself just to be "accepted" by others? I have no sympathy for jackasses. What he did was lack of self-love and respect for himself. And why is that a problem for the rest of us? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Here it comes..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: Moonwalkbjrain said: You would think he was entitled to live as he chooses . . . . Guess not. He can do whatever he wants. The public has the right to comment on it, positive or negative. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: ufoclub said: bleaching creams really do that much!? I had a scar mark on my arm I tried to use bleaching cream for, but it didn't some to work at all. Maybe you have to use it for years.
Yes. if he used it every night, and who knows how long, then it doesn't surprise me that his skin lightened like that. I think he may have used another type of procedure, but probably won't admit it. As far as your scar, you probably could have used natural cocoa butter. The one that is sold in solid, stick form, because it works faster. You can also use the one from a company named "Palmer's" cocoa butter that is sold in the jar. I had burnt my arm while taking something out of the oven and it left me with a bad scar. But I used natural cocoa butter, and also opened up some Vitamin E gel capsules and poured the oil from the capsule on the scar. It took a long time to see any difference, almost 8 months to a year, but now, you could see it just a little, as before it was really showing, and I had to hide it with bracelets. OR you could open an aloe vera leaf and rub the contents of it on the scar. It takes a long time to work, but it is natural and good for healing scars and getting the scar back to its natural color, depending on the severity of the burn or scar. This is something my mother who is from the Caribbean told us about years ago, that they used to grow aloe vera in her mother's yard, and that people in the Caribbean used the contents of the aloe vera leaf, as a lotion for their skin. They also used it for scars to get the scar back to their natural skin color or close to it. [Edited 11/11/09 8:59am] So a scar is ok, but where's the line? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rushing07 said: I think the most interesting part of the story is that he is actually admitting to doing this. I am sure there might be a whole racial theory written about cases like that(and have, Frantz Fanon's "Black Skins White Masks" for one) but it is intriguing that he treats skin bleaching as a purely aesthetic procedure, or so he claims. Let's face it, bleach creams are out there so they are used by somebody.
It makes me wonder whether there will be a time when stuff like that will be treated with such lightness as spray on tan or hair removal. [Edited 11/11/09 9:26am] Co-sign I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SCNDLS said: rushing07 said: I think the most interesting part of the story is that he is actually admitting to doing this. I am sure there might be a whole racial theory written about cases like that(and have, Frantz Fanon's "Black Skins White Masks" for one) but it is intriguing that he treats skin bleaching as a purely aesthetic procedure, or so he claims. Let's face it, bleach creams are out there so they are used by somebody.
It makes me wonder whether there will be a time when stuff like that will be treated with such lightness as spray on tan or hair removal. [Edited 11/11/09 9:26am] Not for people of color who do this because they think being lighter is closer to being white which equals "better" in their twisted minds. Do we KNOW that that is his state of mind, or is that an inference? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: SCNDLS said: Not for people of color who do this because they think being lighter is closer to being white which equals "better" in their twisted minds. Exactly, and how very sad to believe that. Now whether it is his freedom of choice to erase his skin tone then that's on him, but at the same time, the general public also has the freedom of opinion to comment and inquire about it, whether they agree with what Sammy did or not, [Edited 11/11/09 12:07pm] 'Comment and inquire' or judge? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: KidaDynamite said: Temporary...and no you don't! I also don't think it has the same implications Why can't I make the same accusations that someone white hates their skin color? They are choosing to change it after all. Self hate is self hate right? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonwalkbjrain said: 2elijah said: Exactly, this issue is deeper than "skin deep" for some folks who actually are harboring self-hatred, and not happy with their dark skin. Especially with all the false BS about "white or light skin being better", So many men and women are taking drastic measures, globally and causing harm to their skin with bleach creams. I just think it sends the wrong message, and it's already becoming more of a global situation, in which some people are so desperate, they don't care about the consequences of the health issues that may follow. There's a lot of bleach creams not approved by the FDA, and making their way on beauty supply shops. I remember they reported this on a local news station, about bleach creams that are harmful, and not approved by the FDA, but are being sold in beauty supply shops. [Edited 11/11/09 13:01pm] YES! CO SIGN! it really saddens me that there are whole sectiosn of beauty supply stores devoted to this shit. like literally shelves upon shelves right next to the shampoo and moisturizer theres skin bleachers wtf? and wat makes it even worse is that idk...most beauty supply stores *in my area* are asian owned and they stock there shelves with this i really want them to stop perpetuating this shit in my community idk if they really understand the deepness of it all but idk...i had never even HEARD of skin bleachers til i saw them in a store when iwas younger, so i can just imagine how often this happens with others. the same with drug stores If it weren't selling they would probably use the shelf space for something that did. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: Moonwalkbjrain said: YES! CO SIGN! it really saddens me that there are whole sectiosn of beauty supply stores devoted to this shit. like literally shelves upon shelves right next to the shampoo and moisturizer theres skin bleachers wtf? and wat makes it even worse is that idk...most beauty supply stores *in my area* are asian owned and they stock there shelves with this i really want them to stop perpetuating this shit in my community idk if they really understand the deepness of it all but idk...i had never even HEARD of skin bleachers til i saw them in a store when iwas younger, so i can just imagine how often this happens with others. the same with drug stores Agree about these creams being sold mostly in beauty supply shops owned by Asians. Many that are not legal or approved by the FDA. They make a killing off of Black Americans. I almost wonder if many of these shop owners take a special course in all the products many Black Americans use,(Africans and Black Americans 101 ) as it seems to carry just about many of the products they use from haircare, weaved hair, body lotions, creams, natural products, etc., and even the products that's the subject of this thread. Scary as hell. On top of that, many of the fruit and vegetable stores owned by Asians, also carry many of the Caribbean products that Blacks from the Caribbean use, that you will not find in a regular grocery store. Everything from the fruits to Bay Rum...go figure. Bottom line, Sammy is sending the wrong message. Makes you wonder how he feels about people his original skin tone. I swear somebody should send his ass a big box of dark chocolate congratulating him on his "new look". [Edited 11/11/09 13:25pm] What message should he be sending? That he can't be himself? That he shouldn't be true to himself? That he should care more about what other people might think, say or print first? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: Moonwalkbjrain said: i really want them to stop perpetuating this shit in my community
They can perpetuate all they want....doesn't mean people of color have to fall for the bs. EXACTLY! I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: PanthaGirl said: [/b]
I had no problem if he wanted to do it. The problem is he lied about it.He looks unnatural being that light with his features, he looked fine beforehand but in saying that, it was his choice and if he doesn't have a problem with it then no one else should either. So where are all the threads devoted to each and every liar? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: SUPRMAN said: You would think he was entitled to live as he chooses . . . . Guess not. He can do whatever he wants. The public has the right to comment on it, positive or negative. Absolutely. It makes me laugh when people will jump on a thread without reading it fully just to go after specific posters just to stop them from expressing their right to their opinions, yet no one put a bullet to the complainers' heads and forced them to read it. That kind of bullying tactic throws the thread of course, and the reason it ends up getting deleted or locked. Same poster does the same sh*t in P&R. I just ignore him. As long as everyone stays within the rules of the forum, then no one shuld be telling us that we can't express our opinion on the topic. On top of that, not one single poster on this thread said Sammy couldn't do what he wanted with his skin. [Edited 11/12/09 8:41am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: Imago said: But at any rate, I've always wondered if some darker skin folks look at skin bleaching the same way white folks look at tanning--an aesthetic decision with no racial overtones.
Imago, I remember working with an Italian co-worker who had a Japanese friend, and she told me and the other co-workers that her Japanese friend did not like going to the beach or staying in the sun, because she feared become dark-complected. I was pretty shocked when she was tell us this, but apparently it was a true story. As far as in the black community, and I am only speaking from my own experience not for any other person of African/African-American descent. Anyway, some use it because they scar from acne, and will put it on the scars to bring the area back to their complexion, but often times, it will leave discolored patches, and makes the complexion uneven. Then you have some that use it temporarily to have an "even" complexion, but then you have those that are actually trying to "lighten" their skin, because they want to be "lighter", due to how beauty is perceived in society and various industries, (i.e. advertisers/cosmetic industry, fashion industry, etc.), that promote the "fair or lighter skin". Since this Sammy Sosa situation, I'm basically now finding out it affects more communities than I originally knew about. The light vs dark complected has been a problem within the black community for years. More than likely developed during the slave era, and passed down into this generation, as the light-skinned and mixed slaves were allowed to be in the slave owner's house, and many were treated better by the slave owners, while the darker-skinned slaves were forced to work in the fields and treated more harshly. This light vs dark skin, is a situation that has plagued the black community for years, and it's been discussed in the P&R forum before, but it is something many of us have been trying to clean up by educating those within our families, friends, associates, and where discussions of this situation has been taken place, etc. It's done a lot of damage within the black comunity over the years unfortunately, which is why some of us feel the way we do about what Sammy did. [Edited 11/11/09 16:19pm] I think it's older than that. But different cultures develop different definitions of beauty and attractiveness. The current difference is being able to actually do something about it. 'The Bluest Eye' by Toni Morrison has a character who wants to be somthing/someone other than who she is. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: Why can't I make the same accusations that someone white hates their skin color?
They are choosing to change it after all. Self hate is self hate right? Dude, come on, you're really reaching with that. Look at history - when has white skin been considered negative like dark skin? Yes, some white folks tan, but that's not the same as permanently altering your features to look 'more African'(like Downey's character in Tropic Thunder). How many would do that? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonwalkbjrain said: uPtoWnNY said: They can perpetuate all they want....doesn't mean people of color have to fall for the bs. it's not about falling for it. if it's something that is SO engrained within you how are you supposed to react? me personally i never dealt with it externally, i never had relatives that said don't stay in the sun cuz you'll get too dark, i never grew up with the good hair/ bad hair mentality, i never had relatives tht favored my lighter skinned relatives over me. but i know of people that did and for them it isn't about falling for it - it's about having it so engrained within you that you believe the hype. i feel that if these creams were not made so available then people wouldnt be so able to experiment. yes you would have the feelings of negativity toward your dark skin, but without knowing that these things existed that you could possbily use then maybe that would be a step in the right direction of getting over those negative feelings. So ingrained? By what? Do you really get that attached to everything you are told? Does anyone? Do you think merely removing the means would make people stop wanting and dreaming? Not being able to get to the moon didn't stop people from wanting to. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: Imago said: lawd, I need to take some snapshots when I'm in dowtown Bangkok and show you some scariness. It's like girls thinking they look good pale, but it looks Skelator from he-man trying to be a Geisha. Well, I can't speak for Thais, and have no idea why they would want to change the natural beauty of their skin tone just to be accepted by society, but I guess not everyone is confident and accepting of their natural gifts. Same reasons given here for black folks? I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: I think it's older than that.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I judge on Sammy, the same way I judge on Pamela Anderson with her fake ole titties, and Michael Jackson when his nose looked like it was about to fall off, and that Joyce Wildenstein lady who fucked up her whole face and tries to pretend it's because she wants to look like a lion or some shit and the lady with over 1000 facial piercings.
suckas! some people just take it too far. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: uPtoWnNY said: He can do whatever he wants. The public has the right to comment on it, positive or negative. Absolutely. It makes me laugh when people will jump on a thread without reading it fully just to go after specific posters just to stop them from expressing their right to their opinions, yet no one put a bullet to the complainers' heads and forced them to read it. That kind of bullying tactic throws the thread of course, and the reason it ends up getting deleted or locked. Same poster does the same sh*t in P&R. I just ignore him. As long as everyone stays within the rules of the forum, then no one shuld be telling us that we can't express our opinion on the topic. On top of that, not one single poster on this thread said Sammy couldn't do what he wanted with his skin. [Edited 11/12/09 8:41am] Let's start by you proving I haven't completely read the thread shall we? What bullying? Never said you couldn't express your opinion(s). I'm just expressing my disagreement. Is that allowed? Does someone have to literally say what is being implied? My response is MY response. Feel free not to read them. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: SUPRMAN said: Why can't I make the same accusations that someone white hates their skin color?
They are choosing to change it after all. Self hate is self hate right? Dude, come on, you're really reaching with that. Look at history - when has white skin been considered negative like dark skin? Yes, some white folks tan, but that's not the same as permanently altering your features to look 'more African'(like Downey's character in Tropic Thunder). How many would do that? It's the same act with different implication being attached based not on knowledge of the individual and their personal reasons but bringing personal assumptions to the actions of others. Yes, that's natural, but you are arguing that no white person tans because they hate the color of their skin. That I doubt, but none of us here knows that, we just give them a pass and persecute someone darker for making basically the same decision. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |