heybaby said: Can anybody solve this and explain? 66 and 2/3%-45=
My son is struggling with this and I can't explain it because I don't understand it either. It looks like you're just subtracting 45 from 66 and 2/3%. Ignore the percent sign and . . .do the math. You get 21 and 2/3%. The percent sign is the percent of 100. (Unless you are using a base system other than ten, which means you would have a different answer.) 66 and 2/3 is also 66 and 2/3 of 100. [Edited 7/20/09 20:54pm] I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
coolcat said: Vendetta1 said: Yeah, I'm trying to figure out how I need to go about trying to explain the answer.
I get the feeling that there should be a multiply there: (66 and 2/3 %) x (-45) ie: what is 66 and 2/3 % of -45... if that's the case then: (66 2/3)% x (-45) = (200/3)% x (-45) = (200/300) x (-45) = (2/3) x (-45) = -30 But that's only if there's that multiply there... That's one way to look at it. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: Vendetta1 said: Hi Marquis.
Do you know how to convert fractions to decimals? Does the book provide an example? Can you type one here? Maybe I'll be better able to explain it if I know what the book is saying. the examples were: Percent of Decrease: original price minus new price divided by original. perc. of increase: new price minus original price divided by original. Where's the division part of the equation? It does sound like the equation should be treated as a multiplication problem. They just left off the parentheses. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: That's one way to look at it. Suprman, check out replies #17 and #18. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
coolcat said: heybaby said: What is 66 and 2/3% less than 45? Ah.... so the question is asking... take 45... subtract 66 2/3% of it... what is the result... so what you want to do is: 45 - (66 2/3 %)x45 = 45 - (200/3 %)x45 = 45 - (200/300)x45 = 45 - (2/3)x45 = 45 -30 = 15 Hope that helps. Now you can check your answer, to make sure. Use the definition of percentage decrease... see if you get back 66 2/3 %... There we go! I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Vendetta1 said: thekidsgirl said: that is beautiful....I love math check out the big brain on Ivy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IAintTheOne said: Vendetta1 said: So do I.
check out the big brain on Ivy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: IAintTheOne said: check out the big brain on Ivy you know she's gonna fuck my ass up right? LOL | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IAintTheOne said: heybaby said: you know she's gonna fuck my ass up right? LOL Be a man. Suck it up | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: IAintTheOne said: you know she's gonna fuck my ass up right? LOL Be a man. Suck it up hahahahahahahaha | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just want to say thank you. This thread helped him a lot with the other problems he had to solve. He has also been tutored by his teacher for an hour every day. He has went from getting over half wrong out of 30 to only 6 out of 30 wrong on his most recent test. I am very happy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: I just want to say thank you. This thread helped him a lot with the other problems he had to solve. He has also been tutored by his teacher for an hour every day. He has went from getting over half wrong out of 30 to only 6 out of 30 wrong on his most recent test. I am very happy
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlexdeParis said: Fractions are your friends! The question basically asked what is 2/3 off of 45. Yes, the answer is 15.
When you put it that way, seems simple. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: heybaby said: Can anybody solve this and explain? 66 and 2/3%-45=
My son is struggling with this and I can't explain it because I don't understand it either. It looks like you're just subtracting 45 from 66 and 2/3%. Ignore the percent sign and . . .do the math. You get 21 and 2/3%. The percent sign is the percent of 100. (Unless you are using a base system other than ten, which means you would have a different answer.) 66 and 2/3 is also 66 and 2/3 of 100. [Edited 7/20/09 20:54pm] yeah unless I'm reading it wrong it's really simple, basically 66-45 (with 2/3 tacked on) My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RodeoSchro said: Since there is no trailing decimal after the "45", think of it as 66.667 - 45.000.
66.667- 45.000 ----- 21.667 All you have to do is subtract 45 from 66. The .6667 is subtracting 0.000, so it just carries down. right that's how I'm reading it, it's like subtracting one from two and a half My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nevermind I read it wrong! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: did he hand it in and you found out the real answer yet? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZombieKitten said: heybaby said: did he hand it in and you found out the real answer yet? I got an orgnote indicating that I should read the entire thread before offering to ruin kids's math careers. The answer is on the first page. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this thread just totally ruined the org for me.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: ZombieKitten said: did he hand it in and you found out the real answer yet? I got an orgnote indicating that I should read the entire thread before offering to ruin kids's math careers. The answer is on the first page. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just signed another test for him. He got 3 wrong outta 30 on this one.
did he hand it in and you found out the real answer yet?
Coolcat's answer was correct but the math teacher found an even simpler way for him to do it...what that is I don't know clarify edit [Edited 7/23/09 18:13pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You can set up a ratio
66.666667/100 = X/45 and subtract x from 45 My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: You can set up a ratio
66.666667/100 = X/45 and subtract x from 45 I will take your word for it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
heybaby said: NDRU said: You can set up a ratio
66.666667/100 = X/45 and subtract x from 45 I will take your word for it Actually ratios are one of the few things I learned in math that I use in life. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
66-2/3% of $1 is somewhere between $.66 and $.67 (2/3 of $1) pick one .66 x $45 = 29.70 .67 x $45 = 30.15 either one rounded to the nearest $1 is $30 so 66-2/3% of $45 is $30 66-2/3% - $45 would be $30 - $45 = $15 off the original price. [Edited 7/24/09 13:02pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: You can set up a ratio
66.666667/100 = X/45 and subtract x from 45 But again, you can do that in your head if you recognize 66-2/3% is equal to 2/3. "Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The media often relies on calculations with percentages to make an impact these days. You see headlines like "Left hand index finger cancer has increased by 200% in the last year!" and people think "Oh no, left hand index finger cancer is getting out of control! I'd better have a checkup!" but the crucial information of how many cases there are has been left out. It could be 1 case worldwide that increased to 3 cases for all we know, in which case there surely is no need to worry. So I think it can be quite misleading.
Counting with percentages can be confusing in other cases too. Say that you have something that loses 90% of its value. How much, in per cent, would the value need to increase by from there to regain its original value? 90%? Nope, try 900%... So these days when they say that stocks have gained more than 40% (or whatever) in the last few months that sounds great, but it's from such low levels comparatively speaking that the valuations still aren't that impressive. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh shit, my hat done fell off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |