VenusBlingBling said:

Because she is completely non threatening, a nice girl who wouldnt dare steal your boyfriend.

VenusBlingBling said:

stereotypes for what?

indeed there most certainly is a type for a Bond girl.

there would be no such thing as style or styling if there were no 'types' of anything.

jennifer aniston, a bond girl?

GOLD bond medicated powder, maybe.

Anxiety said:

I love you, man! You're fucking funny!

She is so average that they should call her the letter "C".

Anxiety said:

Never.

Cuddles said:

Of course there is a stereotype for how the Bond girl should be and she doesn't fit in there plus she's not that great of an actress either.

My comments had nothing to do with her wanting to become a Bond girl but with how you guys were talking about her. You were talking abot how mannish she behaves and that there's nothing feminine about her and even that men who are attracted to her must be gay or bisexual (which is the silliest thing ever). It's that usual "women must behave and look like this to be women and men must act and look like this to be men"- thinking.

VenusBlingBling said:

Well, to many people she has zero sex appeal. There is nothing wrong with thinking that about her. I don't see that as it being about how men or women should act.

JustErin said:

I totally understand if people don't find her to have any sex appeal, but not having sex appeal doesn't equal being like a man which is how most here talk about her.

VenusBlingBling said:

But that was my point.

She has no sex appeal and she just happens to have dude-ish features to many. Of course, the two are not exclusive, but with her she just happens to have both.

VenusBlingBling said:

Some women, like Grace Jones and Annie Lennox, have masculine qualities BUT they are interesting people. Jennifer Aniston isn't, so we are left with just the manly look/mannerisms and no substance or charisma. IMO.

VenusBlingBling said:

well it is kind of a man thing about how each sex should behave and look

and as i said, it nothing bad, but every guy and girl has the opposite sex look alike. guys and girls are not much different from each other IMO
she does look like a stereotypical guy, for a guy who thinks that being a man is fucking women, yet being attracted to women who look like an average joe, well i would question his sexual nature or his idea of what the typical stereo type is for what he ideals being a man is, who is attracted to women.

LleeLlee said:

yet they know how to appear feminine.

maybe its jens hair, but shes always looks like she is slouching,
like a boy in a dress

even the pic with her in a swim suit, she is straight as a board like a guy, no curves.

Also, I cant think much of someone who cried because they found their first grey hair at 40 There are more important things to worry about at 40, especially cosidering the woman is desperate to have kids, then I could understand the tears and worry or whatever, but over a grey hair?

ps, yes Anjie is a bitch, Brad is not blamelss etc.
[Edited 3/3/09 8:14am]

Cuddles said:

I ithink she tries to make th most of herself, I think it is unfair to compare her to Angelina Jolie, because the latter is stand out beautiful. But I know what you mean, there is something of the boy scout about her. She could easily play Peter Pan.

Exhibit A


[Edited 3/3/09 8:21am]
[Edited 3/3/09 8:23am]

Cuddles said:

For sure, and both have real sex appeal too.

Well, I get your points people and can agree with some, although I don't approve of the way you put it sometimes and think the discussion is a bit childish. But that's the org...

Btw, how doesn't she have any curves in the swim suit photo, "straight as a board like a guy"?? I don't kow any men that look like that
I kinda have that body minus the boobs. Oh, I don't wanna know what you curvacious amazons have to say about me

Bonnie Hunt has more sex appeal.
[Edited 3/3/09 9:47am]

Mysterioso said:

Next thing you'll be saying is that Monique has better legs.

PaisleyPark5083 said:

Oh, and that, too. Good job. Chewbacca could get it before Jennifer Aniston. Want me to go any further or should I just quit while I'm ahead?

Mysterioso said:

for you.

She played Rachel in everything I saw.

She can play dark in a whiny-neurotic-suburban-slice-of-life kind of way very well...

...but she doesn't susppend my disbelief enough to give me "over the top Bond Girl" icon: hell, I can't even see her next to Drew Barrymore in a Charlie's Angels sequel, bless her heart

LleeLlee said:

I vote Yay, 'cause she's got a kick-ass bod.

Of course, I'd rather pluck my testicles than watch a James Bond movie.

ThreadBare said:

she's too casual.

uPtoWnNY said:

Without the hair...not attractive whatsoever. Not enough of anything to be a Bond girl.

noimageatall said:

I actually think she looks more attractive in that photo then she usually does with hair. She looks more feminine or something without hair. Her face isnt so harsh. She kind of looks like that picture of Ashley Olsen without hair, except with the creepy Mary-Kate smile
[Edited 3/13/09 4:00am]

I don't think Jennifer Aniston is sexy enough to be a bond girl, even when she tries to look sexy she's still squeaky clean. Now her rival ANGELINA can do it!!


[Edited 3/13/09 5:55am]