Yall think haynesworth is worth that 7 year 100 mil. Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: Yall think haynesworth is worth that 7 year 100 mil.
Nope. No defensive player is. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: MuthaFunka said: Kelly Rowland broke him off a piece of that cake and he hasn't been the same since. Hell i would've been sprung too. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: phunkdaddy said: Yall think haynesworth is worth that 7 year 100 mil.
Nope. No defensive player is. Only if you're on LT's level, which Haynesworth is NOT. When will Snyder learn - you don't build a winning NFL franchise this way? Jets are on the verge of trading for Lito Sheppard. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: MuthaFunka said: Nope. No defensive player is. Only if you're on LT's level, which Haynesworth is NOT. When will Snyder learn - you don't build a winning NFL franchise this way? Jets are on the verge of trading for Lito Sheppard. Even LT in his hay-day wasn't worth a ticket. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Matt Cassel and Mike Vrabel to the Chiefs for a 2nd round pick. I don't know what the Pats were thinking. But oh well who gives a fuck? Fuck the Patriots! If you're not doing the fucking, then you're taking one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
weused2luvhim said: Matt Cassel and Mike Vrabel to the Chiefs for a 2nd round pick. I don't know what the Pats were thinking. But oh well who gives a fuck? Fuck the Patriots!
I have a feeling that Cassel was good in the "system" of the Patriots. Outside that system....back 2 scrub status? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: weused2luvhim said: Matt Cassel and Mike Vrabel to the Chiefs for a 2nd round pick. I don't know what the Pats were thinking. But oh well who gives a fuck? Fuck the Patriots!
I have a feeling that Cassel was good in the "system" of the Patriots. Outside that system....back 2 scrub status? Yeah, Cassell has the makings of a Scott Mitchell. Letting him go while you have a 3-time Super Bowl champ coming back = No brainer. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dallas traded CB Anthony Henry to Detroit for QB Jon Kitna. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MajesticOne89 said: the eagles better not lose dawkins
damn.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: Dallas traded CB Anthony Henry to Detroit for QB Jon Kitna.
No fucking way! If you're not doing the fucking, then you're taking one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: weused2luvhim said: Matt Cassel and Mike Vrabel to the Chiefs for a 2nd round pick. I don't know what the Pats were thinking. But oh well who gives a fuck? Fuck the Patriots!
I have a feeling that Cassel was good in the "system" of the Patriots. Outside that system....back 2 scrub status? Yeah i can't understand this. Cassel's only had one season in the nfl and you're banking on this guy leading your team to the post season. He may not be the same in another team's offensive philosophy. The chiefs already have a decent qb in tyler thigpen. Why invest a number 2 pick in Matt Cassel? Has to be a move by their new gm pioli who came over from new england. Here's my WTF moment: WTF the broncos were thinking shopping jay cutler in a 3 team trade. Yeah funka i think Cassel could be more scott mitchell than drew brees. [Edited 2/28/09 22:00pm] Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: Graycap23 said: I have a feeling that Cassel was good in the "system" of the Patriots. Outside that system....back 2 scrub status? Yeah i can't understand this. Cassel's only had one season in the nfl and you're banking on this guy leading your team to the post season. He may not be the same in another team's offensive philosophy. The chiefs already have a decent qb in tyler thigpen. Why invest a number 2 pick in Matt Cassel? Has to be a move by their new gm pioli who came over from new england. Here's my WTF moment: WTF the broncos were thinking shopping jay cutler in a 3 team trade. Yeah funka i think Cassel could be more scott mitchell than drew brees. [Edited 2/28/09 22:00pm] nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: uPtoWnNY said: Kellen Winslow got traded to the Bucs -
Why would they do that? Which team? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
violator said: Graycap23 said: Why would they do that? Which team? Tampa | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: violator said: Which team? Tampa C'mon, dawg. Kellen's better than any TE Tampa has on their roster currently. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: violator said: Which team? Tampa That's who I thought you meant. It's not that I don't think Winslow's worth a 2 and a 5, but that's a steep price to pay for a team in the market for a QB, RB, WR, DT, LB and DE. Those picks could have been better spent. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: Graycap23 said: Tampa C'mon, dawg. Kellen's better than any TE Tampa has on their roster currently. But how much do they use their TE? That's why I couldn't understand it. They did get rid of Dunn for the moment but if Dunn comes back, he'll get the short catches out the backfield over perennial excuse making underachiever Winslow. Last year, Jerramy Stevens had 36 receptions. Winslow had 43 receptions but was definitely targeted more. But his productions suggests he probably should be in Tampa. [Edited 3/1/09 12:12pm] I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: namepeace said: I read on SI's site Dallas is shopping Roy Williams. I know he's a bit of a head case, but I'd keep him over TO. It's Roy Williams the Safety. The Raiders released Gibril Wilson but Roy Williams won't be coming to Oakland. Dallas was so critical of his lack of on field performance, they can't really keep him. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: MuthaFunka said: C'mon, dawg. Kellen's better than any TE Tampa has on their roster currently. But how much do they use their TE? That's why I couldn't understand it. They did get rid of Dunn for the moment but if Dunn comes back, he'll get the short catches out the backfield over perennial excuse making underachiever Winslow. Last year, Jerramy Stevens had 36 receptions. Winslow had 43 receptions but was definitely targeted more. But his productions suggests he probably should be in Tampa. [Edited 3/1/09 12:12pm] They have a new coach, and that usually means a new system. They may incorporate the TE more. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: namepeace said: I know, but that's what I'm saying!!!!! Even for strong safeties, his coverage skills are terrible!!!!! SS's have to stay in position and use their heads. He doesn't do that. Which is why he gets burned so much. Man, y'all tough Roy Williams tackling a TE? LOL that'll be day . . . . I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: MuthaFunka said: Man, y'all tough Roy Williams tackling a TE? LOL that'll be day . . . . Roy can still hit/tackle. Roy can still cover most TEs. Roy can't cover the slot. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: SUPRMAN said: Roy Williams tackling a TE? LOL that'll be day . . . . Roy can still hit/tackle. Roy can still cover most TEs. Roy can't cover the slot. If you're not doing the fucking, then you're taking one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: Graycap23 said: I have a feeling that Cassel was good in the "system" of the Patriots. Outside that system....back 2 scrub status? Yeah i can't understand this. Cassel's only had one season in the nfl and you're banking on this guy leading your team to the post season. He may not be the same in another team's offensive philosophy. The chiefs already have a decent qb in tyler thigpen. Why invest a number 2 pick in Matt Cassel? Has to be a move by their new gm pioli who came over from new england. I don't see what you don't understand. The Chiefs gave up a second round pick for a guy they just watched throw a 3,693/21 line under live NFL fire. How many established, quality vet QB's do you think come available in free agency? Because guys like Peyton Manning and Tom Brady generally aren't exposed to the free agent market, there's almost always going to be some risk involved with this type of acquisition. Or more importantly, if as a GM you've established QB as a high priority pick-up for your team, who are you going to get in the draft with that number 2 selection that fits that descriptive? Unlike any of the QB's who'd be available at #34, Cassel has positive NFL film to justify the deal. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: SUPRMAN said: Roy Williams tackling a TE? LOL that'll be day . . . . Roy can still hit/tackle. Roy can still cover most TEs. Roy can't cover the slot. That was my first mental image of Roy Williams was him getting burnt inside and missing the tackle . . . I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: MuthaFunka said: C'mon, dawg. Kellen's better than any TE Tampa has on their roster currently. But how much do they use their TE? That's why I couldn't understand it. They did get rid of Dunn for the moment but if Dunn comes back, he'll get the short catches out the backfield over perennial excuse making underachiever Winslow. Last year, Jerramy Stevens had 36 receptions. Winslow had 43 receptions but was definitely targeted more. But his productions suggests he probably should be in Tampa. [Edited 3/1/09 12:12pm] The Bucs haven't used their TE's very much in the past, but new OC Jeff Jagodzinski has said this will change. And I don't know. Underachiever might be a bit strong for Winslow. His numbers over the last 3 seasons have been pretty much what you'd expect for a player of his caliber. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
violator said: SUPRMAN said: But how much do they use their TE? That's why I couldn't understand it. They did get rid of Dunn for the moment but if Dunn comes back, he'll get the short catches out the backfield over perennial excuse making underachiever Winslow. Last year, Jerramy Stevens had 36 receptions. Winslow had 43 receptions but was definitely targeted more. But his productions suggests he probably should be in Tampa. [Edited 3/1/09 12:12pm] The Bucs haven't used their TE's very much in the past, but new OC Jeff Jagodzinski has said this will change. And I don't know. Underachiever might be a bit strong for Winslow. His numbers over the last 3 seasons have been pretty much what you'd expect for a player of his caliber. I was expecting Tony Gonzalez's successor or another Shannon but this Winslow won't have a bust in Canton. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SUPRMAN said: violator said: The Bucs haven't used their TE's very much in the past, but new OC Jeff Jagodzinski has said this will change. And I don't know. Underachiever might be a bit strong for Winslow. His numbers over the last 3 seasons have been pretty much what you'd expect for a player of his caliber. I was expecting Tony Gonzalez's successor or another Shannon but this Winslow won't have a bust in Canton. Perhaps not, but that's largely up to him. To put this in perspective, his dad (a HOF) caught 541 passes for 6741 yards and 45 TD's over 9 seasons. Winslow Jr. has 219 receptions for 2,459 yards and 11 TD's over essentially 3 seasons. And he's only 25. But he has to a) cancel the drama he's been a part of from the beginning of his career (maybe the trade was a wake-up call for that). and b) he has to start being an integral part of getting Tampa to the post-season. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
violator said: phunkdaddy said: Yeah i can't understand this. Cassel's only had one season in the nfl and you're banking on this guy leading your team to the post season. He may not be the same in another team's offensive philosophy. The chiefs already have a decent qb in tyler thigpen. Why invest a number 2 pick in Matt Cassel? Has to be a move by their new gm pioli who came over from new england. I don't see what you don't understand. The Chiefs gave up a second round pick for a guy they just watched throw a 3,693/21 line under live NFL fire. How many established, quality vet QB's do you think come available in free agency? Because guys like Peyton Manning and Tom Brady generally aren't exposed to the free agent market, there's almost always going to be some risk involved with this type of acquisition. Or more importantly, if as a GM you've established QB as a high priority pick-up for your team, who are you going to get in the draft with that number 2 selection that fits that descriptive? Unlike any of the QB's who'd be available at #34, Cassel has positive NFL film to justify the deal. Will he have wes welker, randy moss, and those other weapons in KC to support him? I think not. I rest my case. Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: violator said: I don't see what you don't understand. The Chiefs gave up a second round pick for a guy they just watched throw a 3,693/21 line under live NFL fire. How many established, quality vet QB's do you think come available in free agency? Because guys like Peyton Manning and Tom Brady generally aren't exposed to the free agent market, there's almost always going to be some risk involved with this type of acquisition. Or more importantly, if as a GM you've established QB as a high priority pick-up for your team, who are you going to get in the draft with that number 2 selection that fits that descriptive? Unlike any of the QB's who'd be available at #34, Cassel has positive NFL film to justify the deal. Will he have wes welker, randy moss, and those other weapons in KC to support him? I think not. I rest my case. That ain't much of a case. I mean, who knows what he's going to have? The free agency period is in its infancy. Hell, Matt Leinart had Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin in Arizona and he stunk like limburger cheese. So, if there's any case to be made here, it's that great receivers don't insure a quarterback's performance. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |