Garcelle, husband and kids










aren't they cute

she, to me, is a strange star like how is she famous? But yes, very

hate to say it- but if this was mj those "white" kids would not possibly be hers

Evvy said:

at least one of them has a damn tan!

Evvy said:

I knew someone would bring that up, and I bet that's exactly what the thread starter meant for

Arnotts said:

yeah well- there u have it...

they are beautiful children

Oh please. Ya'll kill me. Those kids look half negro. Mj's don't cause they're not

I always thought she was finer than a mickey fickey on the Jamie Foxx Show back in the day.

And by the looks of things, she's still got that SEXY, curvacious body.

LiquidGold said:

you a lie- one of her babies hasa slight tan the other is white

Garcelle's been keeping it tight for awhile and the babies are adorable. I've seen plenty of pics of them and they both usually look tan altho one slightly more than the other.

cdcgold said:

Wow, she's really beautiful.

LiquidGold said:

my my my the hypocrisy


Those babies look like any other white babies, i could post some pictures of other white celeb babies that could be their full siblings if you want

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Paris is tan ( even though i don't think she looks like michael)






Blanket is tan




so your argument is hypocritical

Arnotts said:

actually i just posted them cause i saw them on black celebrity kids and thought they were adorable.(the one that garcelle is holding in the two pictures reminds be of ben savage from boy meets world) But since people want to put mj down i going to respond
[Edited 2/5/09 13:07pm]

another picture

LiquidGold said:

i see no negro

wow, it's everywhere

cdcgold said:

Neither do I.
It's like that JET cover with Donna Summer and that little white baby on it.
And that's her husband? Wow.

can i ask exactly what the issue here is?

sammij said:

she got white babies. Not that I care though
[Edited 2/5/09 13:25pm]

So what are u saying? Those are not her kids?

ScarletScandal said:

so what's the issue then?

sammij said:

sammij said:

I'd like 2 know as well.....what is the issue.
The father has the dominate gene, so what.

Graycap23 said:

nope. didn't say that.

Graycap23 said:

well that's the conclusion i came too, from looking at the photos...


it was obviously called to attention for a reason
(i'm doing research on this kind of discourse)
so i'd like to know what REALLY is on the minds of those who felt the need to point that out...
...what good is it?
[Edited 2/5/09 13:28pm]

ScarletScandal said:

I con-fuse-ter-rated.....

sammij said:

there was no issue at first, until people said that mj's kids couldn't be his, but then claimed to see "negro" in these 100% white looking biracial babies.


I sorry i'm not saying these are not garcelles kids , because i know their hers and i know biracial kids can be white. but there is a double standard going on here. tan or not they look white. period



the one with the curly hair looks no different from fred savages baby











[Edited 2/5/09 13:30pm]

cdcgold said:

Seems 2 be wishful thinking on your part.
Everyone knows that those are not Mj's biological kids.