So, in keeping with the thread topic, my Kobe Bryant trade scenario is:
Trade recipient gets: Kobe Bryant Lakers get: Warm sixpack of beer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RodeoSchro said: Graycap23 said: Now that I think about all of those Bulls scrubs.....neither can I. Just shows how good Mike and Scottie were. Why did Pippen suck so bad when he was a Rocket?!? Scottie has said several times that Barkley was not prepared 2 do what it takes 2 win. Scottie was a one man wrecking crew in Portland. Had they not choked in the last 7 minutes, they beat the Lakers and go 2 the finals a few years ago. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: RodeoSchro said: Why did Pippen suck so bad when he was a Rocket?!? Scottie has said several times that Barkley was not prepared 2 do what it takes 2 win. Scottie was a one man wrecking crew in Portland. Had they not choked in the last 7 minutes, they beat the Lakers and go 2 the finals a few years ago. I know Pippen didn't like Barkley. No one liked Barkley, except for our bountifil strippers. Pippen used to say his biggest problem in Houston was that Rudy T never told him what his job was. That sounded lame to me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RodeoSchro said: Graycap23 said: Scottie has said several times that Barkley was not prepared 2 do what it takes 2 win. Scottie was a one man wrecking crew in Portland. Had they not choked in the last 7 minutes, they beat the Lakers and go 2 the finals a few years ago. I know Pippen didn't like Barkley. No one liked Barkley, except for our bountifil strippers. Pippen used to say his biggest problem in Houston was that Rudy T never told him what his job was. That sounded lame to me. I tended 2 agree with Scottie. Rudy was a roll the ball out on the court type of coach. Scottie was a systematic type of player. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mark Cuban said he would not trade Nowitski for Kobe. Also the Phoenix Suns coach said he wasn't interested in trading for Kobe.
I think Kobe will end up in Chicago. It's rumored that Kobe wants to play with Ben Wallace, so he probably won't be shipped to LA in the deal. I could see him maybe going to Detroit. I remember hearing last year that Rasheed Wallace wants out of detroit. Kobe would be an excellent fit with Yao & McGrady. Maybe he will end up in houston. What about Kobe in Denver with Iverson and Carmelo? That would be a tough team to beat if they could learn to share the ball. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: MuthaFunka said: My bad, playa! ( Now that I think about all of those Bulls scrubs.....neither can I. Just shows how good Mike and Scottie were. AND - How weak the 90s east was. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: Graycap23 said: Now that I think about all of those Bulls scrubs.....neither can I. Just shows how good Mike and Scottie were. AND - How weak the 90s east was. Last I checked.....the Bulls titles were against the Best teams from the West. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RodeoSchro said: MuthaFunka said: I'm gonna side with my Houstonian bro here, GCeezy. MJ was fortunate enough to never have to face a dominant center in the NBA Finals. I think Dream & Co., especially in 95, would have beaten MJ & Pip if they faced off in the Finals. Dream and the Glide v. MJ and Pippen would have been classic. In all honesty, I thought the best team the Rockets ever had was the '97 squad that featured Dream, Drexler and Barkley. They were on a collision course with the Bulls in the Finals until Barkley tore his bicep in the Jazz series. Dream, Drexler, Barkley, Mario Elie, Eddie Johnson, Kevin Willis - wow, they were loaded. They were weak at the point, though. Matt Maloney and Brent Price were not title-quality, and that might've bit 'em in the butt. I was at the final two games of the Utah/Rockets series. In Game 5, with the Rockets facing elimination, Eddie Johnson won the game on a last second shot. Pandemonium. Then, Stockton hit the buzzer-beater/series winner in Game 6, and you could have heard a pin drop. Glide said he wish he had taken it personal like MJ did back when they met in the Finals in 92. He regretted that. So had they met again it would have been a battle like hell between those 2. That 97 team was nice. I remember being in H-Town at the Sky Bar watching that series. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jaimestarr79 said: Mark Cuban said he would not trade Nowitski for Kobe. Also the Phoenix Suns coach said he wasn't interested in trading for Kobe.
I think Kobe will end up in Chicago. It's rumored that Kobe wants to play with Ben Wallace, so he probably won't be shipped to LA in the deal. I could see him maybe going to Detroit. I remember hearing last year that Rasheed Wallace wants out of detroit. Kobe would be an excellent fit with Yao & McGrady. Maybe he will end up in houston. What about Kobe in Denver with Iverson and Carmelo? That would be a tough team to beat if they could learn to share the ball. I've heard Tay and Rich for Kobe. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: MuthaFunka said: AND - How weak the 90s east was. Last I checked.....the Bulls titles were against the Best teams from the West. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: RodeoSchro said: Dream and the Glide v. MJ and Pippen would have been classic. In all honesty, I thought the best team the Rockets ever had was the '97 squad that featured Dream, Drexler and Barkley. They were on a collision course with the Bulls in the Finals until Barkley tore his bicep in the Jazz series. Dream, Drexler, Barkley, Mario Elie, Eddie Johnson, Kevin Willis - wow, they were loaded. They were weak at the point, though. Matt Maloney and Brent Price were not title-quality, and that might've bit 'em in the butt. I was at the final two games of the Utah/Rockets series. In Game 5, with the Rockets facing elimination, Eddie Johnson won the game on a last second shot. Pandemonium. Then, Stockton hit the buzzer-beater/series winner in Game 6, and you could have heard a pin drop. Glide said he wish he had taken it personal like MJ did back when they met in the Finals in 92. He regretted that. So had they met again it would have been a battle like hell between those 2. That 97 team was nice. I remember being in H-Town at the Sky Bar watching that series. I would have paid top dollar 2 see that series. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: Graycap23 said: Last I checked.....the Bulls titles were against the Best teams from the West. ? Isiah and Dumars? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: MuthaFunka said: ? Isiah and Dumars? I forgot they just recently allowed Dumars in but he should have never made the HOF - But yes, the Pistons early 90s team did have 2 HOFers. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: Graycap23 said: ? Isiah and Dumars? I forgot they just recently allowed Dumars in but he should have never made the HOF - But yes, the Pistons early 90s team did have 2 HOFers. U think Rodman should get in? I do. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: MuthaFunka said: I forgot they just recently allowed Dumars in but he should have never made the HOF - But yes, the Pistons early 90s team did have 2 HOFers. U think Rodman should get in? I do. Yep. One of the top 5 greatest rebounders in the modern game. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: It wasn't easy against the Knicks in '92 or '93. They gave the Bulls all they could handle. The Pacers would do the same in the late 90's. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: MuthaFunka said: It wasn't easy against the Knicks in '92 or '93. They gave the Bulls all they could handle. The Pacers would do the same in the late 90's. But MJ still came out of the east damn near every year in the 90s. Then you look at how the east couldn't win a damn thang unless MJ was in the finals, which proves how weak the east was overall. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: uPtoWnNY said: It wasn't easy against the Knicks in '92 or '93. They gave the Bulls all they could handle. The Pacers would do the same in the late 90's. But MJ still came out of the east damn near every year in the 90s. Then you look at how the east couldn't win a damn thang unless MJ was in the finals, which proves how weak the east was overall. Hummmm.....would u say the same thing when the Sixers represented the East damn near every year in the 1980's? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: MuthaFunka said: But MJ still came out of the east damn near every year in the 90s. Then you look at how the east couldn't win a damn thang unless MJ was in the finals, which proves how weak the east was overall. Hummmm.....would u say the same thing when the Sixers represented the East damn near every year in the 1980's? Hell no! You all know the NBA was much tougher during that time, before expansion watered down the league. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Having played sports my entire life until I blew out my achilles.....my persepctive is u play who is on your schedule. Period.
Jordan dispatched all comers.....East and West. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: MuthaFunka said: But MJ still came out of the east damn near every year in the 90s. Then you look at how the east couldn't win a damn thang unless MJ was in the finals, which proves how weak the east was overall. Hummmm.....would u say the same thing when the Sixers represented the East damn near every year in the 1980's? No, because the east was better than the west overall in the 80s, even though there were stacked teams back in the 80s because free agnency hadn't been established until 1988. Teams like the Lakers, Celts, and 6ers had multiple HOFers and the 2 greatest teams of that era had 3 HOFers (Lakers & Celts) which is why they dominated that era. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: Graycap23 said: Hummmm.....would u say the same thing when the Sixers represented the East damn near every year in the 1980's? No, because the east was better than the west overall in the 80s, even though there were stacked teams back in the 80s because free agnency hadn't been established until 1988. Teams like the Lakers, Celts, and 6ers had multiple HOFers and the 2 greatest teams of that era had 3 HOFers (Lakers & Celts) which is why they dominated that era. Also, you had teams on the next level - not as great as the Sixers/Celtics, but still good teams(Nellie's Bucks w/Marques Johnson & Sid Moncrief, Atlanta with a young 'Nique, and an up & coming Detroit team. Even the Knicks took Bird & Co. to seven games in '84). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: Graycap23 said: Hummmm.....would u say the same thing when the Sixers represented the East damn near every year in the 1980's? No, because the east was better than the west overall in the 80s, even though there were stacked teams back in the 80s because free agnency hadn't been established until 1988. Teams like the Lakers, Celts, and 6ers had multiple HOFers and the 2 greatest teams of that era had 3 HOFers (Lakers & Celts) which is why they dominated that era. Interesting. It seems that the Lakers were in the final almost every year but about 3 in the 80's. U could make the same argument about them as u have about the Bulls and Mj. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: MuthaFunka said: No, because the east was better than the west overall in the 80s, even though there were stacked teams back in the 80s because free agnency hadn't been established until 1988. Teams like the Lakers, Celts, and 6ers had multiple HOFers and the 2 greatest teams of that era had 3 HOFers (Lakers & Celts) which is why they dominated that era. Interesting. It seems that the Lakers were in the final almost every year but about 3 in the 80's. U could make the same argument about them as u have about the Bulls and Mj. And I tell Laker fans that shit all the time and some of them don't want to hear "The 80s Lakers were stacked and the west was pretty damn weak sans Houston and then Utah in the latter part of the decade". nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: Interesting. It seems that the Lakers were in the final almost every year but about 3 in the 80's.
That's pretty incredible, considering how long the NBA season is. They missed the finals in '81(lost to Houston), '86(Houston again) and '90(Phoenix). And if it wasn't for injuries, I believe they would have won the '89 Finals and had a three-peat. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: MuthaFunka said: No, because the east was better than the west overall in the 80s, even though there were stacked teams back in the 80s because free agnency hadn't been established until 1988. Teams like the Lakers, Celts, and 6ers had multiple HOFers and the 2 greatest teams of that era had 3 HOFers (Lakers & Celts) which is why they dominated that era. Also, you had teams on the next level - not as great as the Sixers/Celtics, but still good teams(Nellie's Bucks w/Marques Johnson & Sid Moncrief, Atlanta with a young 'Nique, and an up & coming Detroit team. Even the Knicks took Bird & Co. to seven games in '84). And those teams were never truly going to challenge those Celts teams to rep the Finals for the east. Free Agency changed a lot of things in basketball. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: TonyVanDam said: Not true. Shaq has always been a firm believer that every basketball team need to have a one-two punch (Examples: Magic & Kareen, Michael & Scottie, Larry & Kevin). Shaq did everything he could in trying to make Penny & Kobe see this. The only problem with that is when the sport media (provoking controversy along the way) started the "Who's The Next Michael Jordan?" movement by singling out Penny & Kobe, making them get big-headed with their egos, turning into ballhogs in the process. And yes, the media try to do the same thing with Allen, Grant, Tracy, KG, and LeBon. [Edited 10/21/07 23:35pm] Dude, you're talking to a Laker fan since 1979. Shaq has a HUGE ego. And yeah, Shaq believed in the 1-2 punch - as long as HE was the "1". Shaq didn't like it when Penny started blowing up, especially off his "Lil Penny" commercials. Shaq loves the spotlight and he hates to share it. Shaq is a big kid which is why he's so lovable and playful, which also explains his need to have ALL of the attention. It's all about egos with these guys and neither Kobe nor Shaq could set theirs aside to keep the run going. 1. I'm was a Chicago Bills fan during the Jordan-era (72-10 for life!). I'm very happy that Michael & Scottie never had problems sharing the spotlight. 2. If Shaq hates sharing the spotlight so much, then why he isn't feuding with Dwayne Wade?!? It seem to me that Dwayne loves to have Shaq as a teammate better than Kobe ever did. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: MuthaFunka said: Dude, you're talking to a Laker fan since 1979. Shaq has a HUGE ego. And yeah, Shaq believed in the 1-2 punch - as long as HE was the "1". Shaq didn't like it when Penny started blowing up, especially off his "Lil Penny" commercials. Shaq loves the spotlight and he hates to share it. Shaq is a big kid which is why he's so lovable and playful, which also explains his need to have ALL of the attention. It's all about egos with these guys and neither Kobe nor Shaq could set theirs aside to keep the run going. 1. I'm was a Chicago Bills fan during the Jordan-era (72-10 for life!). I'm very happy that Michael & Scottie never had problems sharing the spotlight. 2. If Shaq hates sharing the spotlight so much, then why he isn't feuding with Dwayne Wade?!? It seem to me that Dwayne loves to have Shaq as a teammate better than Kobe ever did. That's easy: The 2 reasons he's not feuding with Wade is: 1 - He's long in the tooth and TRULY realizes he's no "The man" anymore. 2 - There's no way he can get into it with Wade or else people would then be saying "Wow, so it REALLY is Shaq" and Shaq can't take that type of criticism after Penny and Kobe fallouts. He can't handle looking like the bad guy. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: MuthaFunka said: Dude, you're talking to a Laker fan since 1979. Shaq has a HUGE ego. And yeah, Shaq believed in the 1-2 punch - as long as HE was the "1". Shaq didn't like it when Penny started blowing up, especially off his "Lil Penny" commercials. Shaq loves the spotlight and he hates to share it. Shaq is a big kid which is why he's so lovable and playful, which also explains his need to have ALL of the attention. It's all about egos with these guys and neither Kobe nor Shaq could set theirs aside to keep the run going.
People forget Shaq was no angel during that whole fiasco. Now Magic & Kareem/Bird & McHale didn't see eye-to-eye either. But they understood the big picture. Only 2 things Shaq had done wrong during the fallout with Kobe: 1. Not staying in good enough shape. Kobe was right in telling Shaq about the weight problem. 2. Trying too hard to be an big brother figure to Kobe, especially if Kobe never ask for it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: uPtoWnNY said: Also, you had teams on the next level - not as great as the Sixers/Celtics, but still good teams(Nellie's Bucks w/Marques Johnson & Sid Moncrief, Atlanta with a young 'Nique, and an up & coming Detroit team. Even the Knicks took Bird & Co. to seven games in '84). And those teams were never truly going to challenge those Celts teams to rep the Finals for the east. Free Agency changed a lot of things in basketball. But Milwaukee did beat Boston in '83, eventually losing to Philly. They were the best team that never made the Finals, IMO(Moncreif, Marques, Brian Winters, Bob Lanier - team was solid). But Boston & Philly were on another level. [Edited 10/22/07 15:56pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |