Spats said: Fauxie said: Oh Well, the ... was there in your mind (and mine) anyway. It was where that sentence should've led even if spats didn't think so. I honestly feel sorry for him as I see no way out of his sacktimeless life: You won't accept less than a hot woman Your method does not attract hot women All the hot women are taken anyway You don't have a hot woman You don't have a woman You don't get sacktime You won't change your method Where can you go from there??? You won't accept less than a hot woman - I hope you are not saying i should settle. That's a sure fire way to be unhappy Your method does not attract hot women- It has in the past. All my girlfriends were really pretty. All the hot women are taken anyway- Yes. 8 out 10 usually are. You don't have a hot woman- The babe is pretty but we are not really a couple anymore. You don't have a woman- No. You don't get sacktime- Not right now. You won't change your method- I don't see any other method that will improve my love life. I'm not saying you should settle for someone you don't find attractive. For myself, I found a woman I find attractive by my method (being honest and sincere) and I never felt I compromised my integrity (how could I if I was always being myself? Who would I answer to but myself in that respect?) I don't really know what to say. If you won't change your ways, that's fine of course since it's up to you, and if you really do think you're happy to wait until it works for you (which I hope it does) then cool, but you remind me of a captain choosing to go down with his ship. I don't think the problem is you wanting a real top-notch attractive woman (who wouldn't?) but rather what actions you consider compromise your integrity. I just don't agree that the things you say you stay away from really do that. It's all down to your values though, I guess. I just can't say I can empathise with you in any way whatsoever. Thankfully there's no great need for me to do so, happy as I am in my sacktime abundant life. But seriously, are you so sure this integrity and the things you consider go towards making it, are right for you or the best for your love life? Can you change? Are you flexible enough for this world and for love and relationships? Maybe it'll never work. ... [Edited 11/13/06 22:51pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Spats said: I agree it's hard for that to happen because for the most part women don't make the first move. Or lower their standards. No, women do lower their standards.lol Millions and millions of women are currently dating jerks/bad boys. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: JustErin said: Or lower their standards. No, women do lower their standards.lol Millions and millions of women are currently dating jerks/bad boys. But obviously, unfortunately for you, they are not lowering them enough to give you that sacktime. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Spats said: No, women do lower their standards.lol Millions and millions of women are currently dating jerks/bad boys. But obviously, unfortunately for you, they are not lowering them enough to give you that sacktime. Why would giving me sacktime be lowering their standards?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: JustErin said: But obviously, unfortunately for you, they are not lowering them enough to give you that sacktime. Why would giving me sacktime be lowering their standards?? Why are you not getting sacktime from women you think are hot? That's the question. How can you change the way things are going? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: JustErin said: But obviously, unfortunately for you, they are not lowering them enough to give you that sacktime. Why would giving me sacktime be lowering their standards?? Fauxie said: So approaching this from a purely superficial angle, a hot woman is supposed to see a guy who admits himself is not hot looks-wise, and without being wowed by his charm, wit, or intelligence owing to the fact he will not make the move, she's expected to approach and set in motion a chain of events that will lead to beautiful sacktime (though sans oral).
To which you responded: I agree it's hard for that to happen because for the most part women don't make the first move.
A women would be lowering her standards so incredibly low to actually date a guy like the one Fauxie mentioned (and you pretty much agreed to being). No one does that. And you're not getting sacktime. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The evolution of this thread is disturbing. It went from dissing us classless Americans to a Brit in Thailand and a Hot Canadian woman giving love advice to a social misfit? ONly on the org! Carpenters bend wood, fletchers bend arrows, wise men fashion themselves.
Don't Talk About It, Be About It! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said:[quote] Spats said: To which you responded: I agree it's hard for that to happen because for the most part women don't make the first move.
A women would be lowering her standards so incredibly low to actually date a guy like the one Fauxie mentioned (and you pretty much agreed to being). No one does that. And you're not getting sacktime. Why is that lowering their standards? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: Spats said: Why would giving me sacktime be lowering their standards?? Why are you not getting sacktime from women you think are hot? That's the question. How can you change the way things are going? I could have and could possibly still be having sacktime with the babe. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: JustErin said: A women would be lowering her standards so incredibly low to actually date a guy like the one Fauxie mentioned (and you pretty much agreed to being). No one does that. And you're not getting sacktime. Why is that lowering their standards? Wait a sec. Where is the highlighted part of Fauxie's post? It is there where you will find the answers you seek. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Spats said: Why is that lowering their standards? Wait a sec. Where is the highlighted part of Fauxie's post? It is there where you will find the answers you seek. No, because it's just his opinion that those are negative qualities. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: JustErin said: Wait a sec. Where is the highlighted part of Fauxie's post? It is there where you will find the answers you seek. No, because it's just his opinion that those are negative qualities. Seriously, here's a newsflash for you. Woman like looks in a guy. If there is no great looks, humour and wit are a turn on, if there is none of that, intelligence can be really attractive, if there is none of that, I guess money might entice some....but going by how you present yourself on here and the things you have admitted to....you have none of these qualities. That my friend, would be the ultimate lowering of one's standards. The best you can do is hope that you meet someone that is also lacking in all these qualities so you can get your sacktime. And even then, the odds of keeping a girl that will tolerate your admittedly vanilla, dull ways in bed are pretty slim. But good luck! It's been fun playing. I need some sleep. Now, back to Americans vs Japanese. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Spats said: JustErin said: Wait a sec. Where is the highlighted part of Fauxie's post? It is there where you will find the answers you seek. No, because it's just his opinion that those are negative qualities. What are negative qualities? Wit, charm and intelligence? On the contrary, they're positive attributes. If we simplify this, much as I loathe to, but I think it's probably necessary here, we could say those 3 qualities plus looks go a fair way to determine how much a girl might be attracted to a guy. Your method of not approaching a woman pretty much takes away the potential for the hot woman to be attracted to the first three qualities and leaves only looks. You yourself have admitted you're not a really hot guy, but rather average or a little above average, so what exactly are you expecting the hot girl to be attracted to and make her want to make the first move? It's inherently flawed, borne out by your lack of success in regards to 'sacktime'. I'm not sure there's anything more to say. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JustErin said: Spats said: No, because it's just his opinion that those are negative qualities. Seriously, here's a newsflash for you. Woman like looks in a guy. If there is no great looks, humour and wit are a turn on, if there is none of that, intelligence can be really attractive, if there is none of that, I guess money might entice some....but going by how you present yourself on here and the things you have admitted to....you have none of these qualities. That my friend, would be the ultimate lowering of one's standards. The best you can do is hope that you meet someone that is also lacking in all these qualities so you can get your sacktime. And even then, the odds of keeping a girl that will tolerate your admittedly vanilla, dull ways in bed are pretty slim. But good luck! It's been fun playing. I need some sleep. Now, back to Americans vs Japanese. My ex girlfriends told me they thought i was good looking. One of the reasons they hooked up with me. I think i am humurous and have wit. And i have never been accused of being stupid other than by people here that don't like me. I am not rich by any means but i am not poor either. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
karmatornado said: The evolution of this thread is disturbing. It went from dissing us classless Americans to a Brit in Thailand and a Hot Canadian woman giving love advice to a social misfit? ONly on the org!
It seems like every thread on which Spats posts turns into this. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: Spats said: No, because it's just his opinion that those are negative qualities. What are negative qualities? Wit, charm and intelligence? On the contrary, they're positive attributes. If we simplify this, much as I loathe to, but I think it's probably necessary here, we could say those 3 qualities plus looks go a fair way to determine how much a girl might be attracted to a guy. Your method of not approaching a woman pretty much takes away the potential for the hot woman to be attracted to the first three qualities and leaves only looks. You yourself have admitted you're not a really hot guy, but rather average or a little above average, so what exactly are you expecting the hot girl to be attracted to and make her want to make the first move? It's inherently flawed, borne out by your lack of success in regards to 'sacktime'. I'm not sure there's anything more to say. I think i am average looking. My ex girlfriends said i am good looking. That's why they said they approached me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
All I can say is, I've spent a month in California, and went to NY a couple of times, and New York was a much more enjoyable experience overall. I couldn't cope with the fakeness in California, and was always doubting what people really felt. In NY, what you see is what you get in my experience. Most people were pretty polite, some where not and some where complete ass holes. Most simply minded their own business, what is still the most polite thing to do where I live. "It's better 2 B hated 4 what U R than 2 B loved 4 what U R not."
My IQ is 139, what's yours? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fauxie said: Spats said: You won't accept less than a hot woman - I hope you are not saying i should settle. That's a sure fire way to be unhappy Your method does not attract hot women- It has in the past. All my girlfriends were really pretty. All the hot women are taken anyway- Yes. 8 out 10 usually are. You don't have a hot woman- The babe is pretty but we are not really a couple anymore. You don't have a woman- No. You don't get sacktime- Not right now. You won't change your method- I don't see any other method that will improve my love life. I'm not saying you should settle for someone you don't find attractive. For myself, I found a woman I find attractive by my method (being honest and sincere) and I never felt I compromised my integrity (how could I if I was always being myself? Who would I answer to but myself in that respect?) I don't really know what to say. If you won't change your ways, that's fine of course since it's up to you, and if you really do think you're happy to wait until it works for you (which I hope it does) then cool, but you remind me of a captain choosing to go down with his ship. I don't think the problem is you wanting a real top-notch attractive woman (who wouldn't?) but rather what actions you consider compromise your integrity. I just don't agree that the things you say you stay away from really do that. It's all down to your values though, I guess. I just can't say I can empathise with you in any way whatsoever. Thankfully there's no great need for me to do so, happy as I am in my sacktime abundant life. But seriously, are you so sure this integrity and the things you consider go towards making it, are right for you or the best for your love life? Can you change? Are you flexible enough for this world and for love and relationships? Maybe it'll never work. ... [Edited 11/13/06 22:51pm] I am not a romantic person. At all. So doing romantic sissy boy things is compromising my integrity. A person cannot be what they are not. If i do that it will be a total act. I can pretend i am enjoying it i guess, i have done it before but it's not fun. If i thought the honest and sincere approach worked with women i would do it. But i don't think it does. As much as they say they want that approach from men, the evidence says otherwise. What does the honest and sincere approach get me me from people here? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |