Don't get me fucking started on this subject.

lilmissmissy said:

oh dear!

Number23 said:

Can i be ur disciple?

marrying for money seems a much better approach and much more widely accepted practice

AnckSuNamun said:

Well, think this way. Leonardo Da Vinci (ugh, I know) pencilled drawings of sperm with fully formed babies inside the wee tadpole heads. And UNDOUBTEDLY - he still wanked. He wanked with the belief, the cocksure (sorry) solid affirmation that he was condeming millions of microscopic babies to fifteen seconds of life outside of his ballsack onto a duvet cover or inside some twelve-year-old boy's bum (yes, he did). Probably at least three or four times a day too, due to his almost supernatural creative energy and clockwork lightning mind. Now, that seemingly silly belief was held up until very recently in our present timeframe - say 250 years ago. Still men wanked, seemingly burdened by the notion that they were spunking away millions of tiny children brethern for five minutes spacejoy.
Now, what this says about the nature of man is...well, frightening. But fuck that. What I'm saying is, wash your socks. That's your genetic heritage you've just wiped away. That's your immortality, your magic. Have some fucking respect your yourself, you monkeys.
And no, I never wank. I'm like the Pope, bouncing around the vatican with two spacehoppers between my legs.

SpisaRibb said:

My mother always told me to marry for money. 'Beauty fades and love dies,' she said, 'so you may as well be comfortable.'

MikeMatronik said:

No, because that suggests hierarcy which suggests fascism which is a perception in direct conflict with my theory of multiversal convergence, where all living things are fragmented, flesh isolated slices of a singular metaphysical oneness of pure energy. You can watch me masturbate, though.

AnckSuNamun said:

i keep telling him we have another 80 years of bliss ahead of us. he just rolls his eyes at that prospect...

AnckSuNamun said:

Well, think this way. Leonardo Da Vinci (ugh, I know) pencilled drawings of sperm with fully formed babies inside the wee tadpole heads. And UNDOUBTEDLY - he still wanked. He wanked with the belief, the cocksure (sorry) solid affirmation that he was condeming millions of microscopic babies to fifteen seconds of life outside of his ballsack onto a duvet cover or inside some twelve-year-old boy's bum (yes, he did). Probably at least three or four times a day too, due to his almost supernatural creative energy and clockwork lightning mind. Now, that seemingly silly belief was held up until very recently in our present timeframe - say 250 years ago. Still men wanked, seemingly burdened by the notion that they were spunking away millions of tiny children brethern for five minutes spacejoy.
Now, what this says about the nature of man is...well, frightening. But fuck that. What I'm saying is, wash your socks. That's your genetic heritage you've just wiped away. That's your immortality, your magic. Have some fucking respect your yourself, you monkeys.
And no, I never wank. I'm like the Pope, bouncing around the vatican with two spacehoppers between my legs.

SameB1tchDifferentDay said:

You're lucky to have found your life partner/soul mate. Lots of people go through life never finding that.

AnckSuNamun said:

thanks - i do believe i'm very lucky. but i kissed a lot of frogs in the process, too...

I think it has to be a balance. If a person had the best personality in the world and i had no physical attraction to her, what would be the incentive in procreation. Absolutely none. I think you have to be attracted to a person enough physically also, but personality makes the difference later on in life,, like when gravity starts taking effect and stuff starts falling. so it has to be a perfect blend of physical and mental attraction if I am going to marry.

A kind soul always ends up looking super sexy anyways...a rotton evil person always ends up looking really ugly and their flaws magnified to me. Who wants to spend the rest of their life with an asshole? Not me!

karmatornado said:

I think there has to be a slight physical attraction too. I can build close emotional relationships with all sorts of people, but I feel like a significant other should have some indication that that person is the one you make love to. If that wasn't the case, then I might as well be intimate with a best friend. That's just how I feel about the topic personally.

Krystal666 said:

That's bull. There are millions of kind souls who are butt face ugly. And they can be the nicest person in the world and it isn't gonna change that.There are not people lining up to nail them.

PurplePassion65 said:

People die of heart attacks everyday.

I would rather be with someone who was hot looking for a bunch of years than someone who was ugly their whole life.

A true heart does not make you pop a boner.

Spats said:

People like you are the reason the divorce rate is high.

TMPletz said:

If there were more people like me then a lot of people would not waste their time and money and dignity on getting married and then divorcing. Which is what happens most of the time now.

AnckSuNamun said:

"Slight" physical attraction??? If you are gonna nail someone then there should a lot of physical attraction or it's gonna be rotten sacktime.

TMPletz said:

If there were more people like me then a lot of people would not waste their time and money and dignity on getting married and then divorcing. Which is what happens most of the time now.

Spats said:

the word "rotten sacktime" sounds disturbing

Spats said:

the word "rotten sacktime" sounds disturbing

Spats said:

If everyone did that, we'd be living in a modern day Sodom or Gommorah, and someone would make us all pay.

TMPletz said:

Marriage is not something that is needed in society. Things won't crumble to the ground without it.

Spats said:

If everyone did that, we'd be living in a modern day Sodom or Gommorah, and someone would make us all pay.