independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Lance Armstrong
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 07/04/05 5:51pm

PurpleThunder

avatar

senik said:

CoJones said:


Instead of just giving your opinions, why can't you state a fact in regards to Mr. Armstrong. Like the fact that he's the most tested individual in cycling. Also that he's physiologicially more adept for cycling than most, the 33% larger heart provides this advantage. Has he ever tested positive for any banned substance? No!



Lance Armstrong is an amazing athlete! Not only is his heart 1/3 larger than the ave. male (as you've mentioned) but his lung capacity is almost TWICE the volume of the ave. male with similar physical dimensions.

Mentally tough too, not only because of his fight against the disease that spread from his testes, up through to his chest and into his brain, but the fella went through a hard divorce during all this too AND (like Reincarnate said) set up and awareness centre for people who are battling the same killer.

\

He's an inspiration to many. LIVESTRONG




thumbs up!

Ive been looking for these all over the city and no one has any sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 07/04/05 6:04pm

TheCrucialExpe
rience

avatar

senik said:

TheCrucialExperience said:


Exactly. So you can't be too sure either way yet you're doing just that in favor of him. Intersting.



Well you (or anyone else) couldn't be sure if you weren't conceived in a test tube, coz you weren't consciously there to record it in your log book now, were you?

The allegations you make can be more disproved than proved!

wink


No, I was conceived through intercourse and can prove it. However, cyclists have been known to be able to beat drug tests. My research on the sport is more than likely stronger than yours. wink
"But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois --
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 07/06/05 3:48am

senik

avatar

TheCrucialExperience said:

senik said:




Well you (or anyone else) couldn't be sure if you weren't conceived in a test tube, coz you weren't consciously there to record it in your log book now, were you?

The allegations you make can be more disproved than proved!

wink


No, I was conceived through intercourse and can prove it. However, cyclists have been known to be able to beat drug tests. My research on the sport is more than likely stronger than yours. wink





No, I was conceived through intercourse and can prove it

This is the internet, PROVE IT THEN biggrin

However, cyclists have been known to be able to beat drug tests.

Let's not twat around the bush here, let's talk SPECIFIC CYCLISTS .i.e. Lance Armstrong. Has HE (one of the most singularly tested athletes in sport, nevermind cycling!) been ACTUALLY KNOWN/PROVEN to beat drugs tests by deception? .....Don't answer, baby! wink Coz you know it's rhetorical smile

My research on the sport is more than likely stronger than yours.


It "more likely" maybe, but the day "YOUR OWN RESEARCH" discredits and brings Lance Armstrong himself to an international sports tribunal, that's the day I'll go halves on the lad Joey's "town halls" wink


"..My work is personal, I'm a working person, I put in work, I work with purpose.."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 07/06/05 7:46am

Sowhat

avatar

CoJones said:

TheCrucialExperience said:


Well I guess we see research isn't one of your strengths, because Bonds has NEVER tested positive for any banned substance.

And yes I have a medical background. Do you?

Correct, Bonds has never failed because he fails to test. He hides behind his union. Why doesn't he just test and put criticisms to rest. No medical background , but I do know Lance has never failed and Bonds dances around the subject.


I agree with you on Lance Armstrong but you are again wrong about Barry Bonds. He was tested at least one time last year and he was tested in May this year. And Bonds has never hidden behind his union to avoid testing. Until recently, Baseball did not have testing, so how can you avoid something that does not exist?
"Always blessings, never losses......"

Ya te dije....no manches guey!!!!!

mad I'm a guy!!!!

"....i can open my-eyes "underwater"..there4 i will NOT drown...." - mzkqueen03 eek lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 07/06/05 8:13am

Sowhat

avatar

JoeyMFinCoco said:

CoJones said:


Instead of just giving your opinions, why can't you state a fact in regards to Mr. Armstrong. Like the fact that he's the most tested individual in cycling. Also that he's physiologicially more adept for cycling than most, the 33% larger heart provides this advantage. Has he ever tested positive for any banned substance? No!


So I'm not allowed to give my opinion on things? Interesting...


You can give any opinion you want. But everyone else is just as free to rebut said opinion.

Lance Armstrong is the most tested athlete in the world and has never once tested positive for anything. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Do you have any evidence what-so-ever to even suggest Lance Armstrong has ever cheated in anyway?

I saw a show the other day on the Discovery channel about Lance Armstrong. Not only is his heart 1/3 bigger than the average heart and it pumps 9 gallons of blood per minute compared to 6 gallons a minute for a normal person. Lance’s lungs have more than double the oxygen capacity of the average man and he produces half the level of lactate (what makes your muscles “burn” during heavy exercise) in the blood than a normal person does during exercise.

Lance started competing in triathlons at the age of 14 (pretty sure he wasn’t doping in any way back then) so he has a long history of rigorous training.

Here is a link to an article called “Lance Armstrong's Winning Ways Revealed” that shows A seven-year medical study on the body and athletic performance of Lance Armstrong.:

http://dsc.discovery.com/...lance.html
"Always blessings, never losses......"

Ya te dije....no manches guey!!!!!

mad I'm a guy!!!!

"....i can open my-eyes "underwater"..there4 i will NOT drown...." - mzkqueen03 eek lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 07/06/05 9:56am

TheCrucialExpe
rience

avatar

senik said:[quote]

TheCrucialExperience said:


Let's not twat around the bush here, let's talk SPECIFIC CYCLISTS .i.e. Lance Armstrong. Has HE (one of the most singularly tested athletes in sport, nevermind cycling!) been ACTUALLY KNOWN/PROVEN to beat drugs tests by deception? .....Don't answer, baby! wink Coz you know it's rhetorical smile

My research on the sport is more than likely stronger than yours.


It "more likely" maybe, but the day "YOUR OWN RESEARCH" discredits and brings Lance Armstrong himself to an international sports tribunal, that's the day I'll go halves on the lad Joey's "town halls" wink


LOL! I have NO IDEA what ANYTHING in this posts means! LOL!
"But what of black women? . . . I most sincerely doubt if any other race of women could have brought its fineness up through so devilish a fire." -- W.E.B. Du Bois --
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Lance Armstrong